So which band was the beatles of their generation
Weezer
>>130345989Radiohead if they broke up around Kid A.
>>130345989>>130346034Beatles weren't one-hit-wonders, so it's none of these.
>>130346121millennial opinion
>>130345989Oasis = The Beatles of the 90sRadiohead = Pink Floyd of the 90s
>>130346206Weird because no opinion was posted
>>130346227kys unc
>>130346223Who are the beach boys? pumpkins?
>>130346249The High Lamas were the creative era Beach Boys
>>130345989The Beatles of their generation never got a record contract, so nobody knows them.
Blur
>>130346223Pretty accurate. Both Radiohead and Pink Floyd are the best cure to insomnia. But the people in the 70s actually listened to Pink Floyd. Nobody listened to Radiohead after 1995 until r*dditors dug their shit up.
Ween
>>130346121>>130346223>>1303459892010s Beatles: One Direction
>130348137Dudes continues to be a one trick pony after 5 years, rage baiting for (you)s
>>130345989Radiohead and it's not even closeWho did Oasis even influence?Coldplay are arguably still the biggest band in the world and they're a Radiohead ripoff
>>130348198Agree
>>130348198>Who did Oasis even influence?>if I misread the question I'm right kys moron
>>130345989Soundgarden was the Led Zeppelin of their generation
>>130345989It is blatantly NirvanaOasis was Beatles in UK onlyRadiohead never performed that well commercially
>>130345989Take That or INXS
>>130346249Primus
>>130347391no one in the 70s listened to pink floyd, only the weirdest of the weirdos were into them. No one today listens to them, they just know the name Pink Floyd.
>>130352170Wrong on so many levels
>>130348198radiohead has shitty depressing songs, the only good songs they have are the ones where they add a bigger punch on the guitars and the ones with a more positive vibe like High and Dry, for example.
>>130352176explain what's wrong? PinkFloyd is the worst band of the 70s.
>>130352176you're supposed to take confidently wrong statements at face value that's how it works
>>130345989new edition... started out as a boy band then the numerous members went out and did successful solo projects
>>130352197I’m not debating someone whose goal is to troll
Only aging British millennials like Waysis, Radiohead is appreciated by younger generations.
>>130345989None of them had any revolutionary impact like Nirvana or the actual Beatles.Sabbath was more influential than both of them, for example, and it didn't spawn a cultural revolution either.
The answer is The Smashing Pumpkins. Corgan was the Lennon of the 90's. Corgan is better than everyone in that era. I'm not Billy Corgan btw.
>>130353527yup. nirvana had 190x the impact.oasis survives on zoomer internet memes. nirvana had real world relevance back before corporate times.
oasis are huge plebsradiohead i don't like but at least they make music that sounds like they've heard a non top-40 artist in their lives
>>130345989A garbage pop rock band? I'd say Oasis
>>130353300>>130353550>>130353637>shitcunt >shit opinionpikk both yeh
>>130348137based
>>130345989Both. Because all three bands suck.
>>130353546Does Billy beat his wife?
>>130345989
Which band was the Gen X's Charlie Chaplin? Which britpop group was the Drake of the British Invasion? Who was the Barbra Streisand of Grunge?
>>130353527>None of them had any revolutionary impact like Nirvana
