[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_7732.jpg (1011 KB, 1161x817)
1011 KB
1011 KB JPG
Why don’t we fly DC-10’s anymore?
>>
the Douglas DeCompression-10 was a mistake
>>
File: vc10-dc10s.jpg (160 KB, 1566x1000)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
ETOPS.
>>
File: IMG_6108.jpg (136 KB, 1600x1055)
136 KB
136 KB JPG
Anything with more than two engines is haram
>>
>>2051321
We've become too good at building engines, it would've been cool to see modern trijets, but we're doomed to see twinjets for the rest of time, at least until someone manages to cheat physics/engineering/economics.
>>
>>2051315
Death Cruiser 10, followed by More Death II
>>
>>2051317
This. As impressive as the death cruisers and tristars were close up in the hangar, or lined up together waiting to go on stand, they were always on a countdown.
I suppose they're like looking at photos of those old steam ships that also had full canvas rigging, in a way. Not as obviously technologically transitional, but definitely of a particular timeframe.
>>
>>2051367
Love this livery. I think the first flight I took was Airtours Airbus of some type (although the internet doesn't seem to think they had Airbuses in the 90s) to Spain. Think I was 5 or 6.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (92 KB, 1280x720)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
I wish we had gone with the original Trijet 777 design.
>>
>>2051378
They did very late 90s, partly courtesy of spotters sites and also because I started there around 2000 and there were some early msn A320's and 21's there already (looking at some of those registrations is a trip down memory lane) to say nothing of the lower-deck-lav A330s (who were global fleet FH leaders up to TCX going bang; the old girls were still trucking away happily)
An anecdote in the spirit of the thread. Pull up a toolbox, lad.
The 3 DC10s were all due to go out of service on the same day. One last set of flights, and then adios. BYDA, TDTW (aka Tinky Winky) and DPSP (Dipsy) had other ideas. They effectively downed tools that day. "Get rid of us, will you? Right. Sod you.". All three went tech before their early morning flights, had maintrol and flight ops both tearing their hair out as they tried to sort out the consequences of three sulking widebodies all day, and they didn't move till I saw them taxi out as I pulled out the car park myself to go home late afternoon. Full day of delays. Ouch. Fortunately I don't THINK we had EU261 at the time. Now in fairness, the reliability of those old jets was partly the reason they were getting offloaded, but I did find it darkly amusing they'd gone for collective action.
>>
Is it less fuel efficient?
>>
>>2051326
I want to see a unijet with an extra-wide-bypass turbofan the diameter of the fuselage, feeding from ducts to the top/side and discharging from the rear + limited thrust vectoring
>>
>>2051525
and I want every plane in passenger service to continue to have minimum two engines.
>>
>>2051314
tri engines are dangerous as fuck
>>
>>2051314
The youngest one(s) are 36 years old. The company that made them went tits up. There were a couple of high-profile vehicle failures that led to a massive loss of orders and payouts to the estates of lives lost. I'm not even a pilot or aviation enthusiast and I know this. Let someone who can tell you how shitty they were give a more detailed explanation.
>>
>>2051367
so many memories of being delayed for hours and hours with these glorious bastards
>>
File: upship.jpg (80 KB, 1169x936)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>2051525
NIMBYs always whine when new aircraft types appear.
>>
>>2051741

Would the rotodyne have been successful if it had the main rotor driven by another set of turboshafts instead of tip jets?
>>
>>2051801
Probably not because someone from Lockheed would have bribed people to buy their sh1t instead.
>>
>>2051741
I like this thing because it looks so spiteful towards nature and the laws of physics. It's lifting straight up with that rotor because fuck gravity and fuck being a plane, and it's going straight forwards with those propellers because fuck being a helicopter.
>>
>>2051525
ducts won't do on a modern high bypass engine, it needs that big cavernous intake to have efficiency
>>
File: av-breaktrough.jpg (78 KB, 700x467)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
>>2051895
file fell off
>>
>>2051314

You only need two engines to fly over the ocean now.

(Despite the early problems, the DC-10 is rock solid. They're still flying for FedEx.)
>>
>>2052023
Inverted occasionally with a madman loose in the cockpit.
Take care airplane dudes.
>>
>>2051314
no concordes left to kill
>>
File: grok_image_ipba63.jpg (89 KB, 720x960)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
>>2051314
Humans cannot compete with AI when it comes to engine placement design. You only need 1 engine.
>>
File: juan èngine.png (1.15 MB, 1024x1024)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB PNG
>>2051326
you one need 1 engine
>>
>>2052023
FDX retired their DC-10 fleet (converted to MD-10s) in December 2022
>>
File: antonov225faci1.jpg (66 KB, 1063x558)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>2052220
Nyet, comrade. More engines better.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.