[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3281.jpg (305 KB, 1290x1544)
305 KB
305 KB JPG
That cozy, old school cabin photo of a Delta Air Lines L1011 TriStar from the 1980s is getting people talking for one simple reason: it looks roomy. Wider looking aisles, big overhead bins, and that warm lighting that makes the whole cabin feel like a different era of flying.

Delta's own history of the L1011 explains why it felt that way. The airline called it "high, wide and handsome," noting a cabin about 8 feet high and 19 feet wide, plus wider aisles and large entry doors designed to make boarding and deplaning easier.
Delta's first revenue L1011 flight was on Dec. 15, 1973 from Atlanta to Philadelphia, and the airline ultimately flew 70 of the type, the largest L1011 fleet in the industry.

Delta retired the L1011 in 2001, after decades of domestic and international flying, including transatlantic and transpacific routes. And over time, the industry shifted hard toward efficiency and packing more people into each flight, especially after U.S. airline deregulation in 1978 changed how airlines competed. Looking at this cabin, you can see why so many travelers say, "Yeah... they really don't make it like that anymore."
>>
because the average american wasn't 250 pounds back then. so packing the pax in like anchovies was more tolerable, and bags didn't cost $75 extra, they were included, so the cabin wasn't overstuffed with carry on bags, so the bins didn't have to be as bulky. also, most jumbo jets have higher ceilings, that's how circles work.

t. been on those old planes, back in the "good old days"
>>
>>2062036
Airlines hadn't started charging extra for checked baggage yet, flights often weren't completely full, so less overhead bin space was needed. A modern widebody can be ordered the same way (without middle overhead storage), but the demand for that space is so great now that no airline would.

The warm lighting is probably because the film/photo was old and the photographer didn't have a filter for fluorescent lighting. They were bright white inside, at least while on the ground.

The service was better then, unquestionably. Seat width and pitch was better in economy too. It took quite a while for the full effects of deregulation to manifest, the 80s were holdover regulated years where change was slow to happen because low cost carrier service was still limited compared to the majors.
>>
>>2062039
People probably took less stuff too as rolling cases hadn't been invented
>>
>>2062036
Don’t post this AI rubbish here, please.
>>
File: file.png (58 KB, 865x395)
58 KB
58 KB PNG
>Why was flying back then more upscale and classier?
Because it cost a lot more, retard
>>
>>2062055
It's basically this. Air travel used to be a more luxury experience because it was very expensive. Significantly cheaper to drive, bus, or train. As a result, the people who flew had money, and the airlines catered to the audience they had who expected a nice experience for their pricey ticket.

Now the cost to operate domestically is a lot cheaper in comparison to purchasing power. That opens up air travel to a significantly larger audience, but that consumer group is far more cost conscience. They are willing to be less comfortable to save money, they are willing to adjust their schedules around the cheapest flights. So its less that airlines made it a cheaper experience out of the blue, the consumers buying the tickets WANT a cheaper experience.

The money is still there. There are still luxury lounges, better seating, better service, and all sorts of amenities for the people who want them. But they occupy a portion of the air travel experience relative to the amount of people who want it. If an airline thought they could fill a flight with nothing but first class they would offer it. But they don't. They have instead have a small portion of the interior for people willing to pay for more and then 30+ rows of economy.
>>
There is a famous economic answer for this:

1) Government dictated pricing, all prices were set so high that it was "rent" making (above average returns), and airlines only competed on service

2) When airlines were deregulated, prices fell rapidly such that flying became common place and affordable for everyone. For a country as large and spread out as the US, this was the desired social outcome as the government promoted transportation as a public good

3) With prices competitive, planes were "right-sized", firms merged until it reached a natural monopoly number, and features priced accordingly

4) The ultimate proof in the pudding is empirical evidence over the past 40 years that shows air transportation becoming extremely affordable (compared to historical prices), almost everyone can afford to fly, and flying is no longer a luxury or once-in-a-lifetime experience.

If you don't like the race to the bottom, simply pay for premium cabin. Premium cabin prices today mirror what similar service cost way back when, regardless of name.
>>
>be a clown who picks some budget airline for being 25 $ cheaper
>wonder why flying was different in the past
>>
>>2062055
>300 for NY to LA
Christ thats cheaper than taking a bus
>>
File: 6364363.png (57 KB, 693x640)
57 KB
57 KB PNG
>>2062434
Yeah, and it's actually a bit conservative. You can go from NYC to LA for significantly less if you don't care about the actual airport you go out of. There's a reason Greyhound is dying.
>>
>>2062036
absolute kino interior



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.