[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1704826355747296__01.jpg (731 KB, 1111x1123)
731 KB
731 KB JPG
radical edition

Resources:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/repair-help
https://www.youtube.com/@RJTheBikeGuy/videos
Neutral Support News on Youtube

previous thread: >>2064027
>>
>>2064038
how do I get a different Q factor?
like, do I have to look up every crank's specs individually or does, say, Shimano list all their cranks by q factor?
or are they all the same and you can only change it outward with spacers? I'm trying to go narrower than my old Sora.
>>
>>2064040
You just get different pedal axles and adjust your cleats, do people actually adjust q factor with the cranks? That doesn't make much sense to me.
>>
>>2064044
well, to go any narrower it would have to be from the crank arms or the bottom bracket. my crank arms are something like a cm away from the chainstays. if the arms were angled less, my feet could be closer together. I have flat pedals so I just ride with my shoes touching the crankarm. my pedal bolts have extra space but I already cover it with my feet to be as close to the crank as possible, different pedals won't change this
>>
why do bike clothes look so faggy
>>
File: Grant_Petersen-8405.jpg (1.03 MB, 1732x2500)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB JPG
>>2064100
you can always join us
>>
File: 1759862104352470.jpg (112 KB, 607x910)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>>2064100
they're overpriced and low quality too
i go british warm weather mtp field pants for $20, top features for biking. also have domestic mid height safety work shoes rather than chinkshit biking ones. flat & stiff ass soles, toe protectors, quick laces and everything.
>>
Has anyone blown a tube, tried to replace it and never been able to get the tire back on?

I’m not talking about it being tough to get back on (I understand that) I’m talking spending hours trying to get the tire back on, and then taking it to a bike shop and them not being able to get the tire back on either. Somehow the manufacturer got the tires on before I bought the bike so it’s possible but not sure if they have some sort of special method they use in the factory?

Any tips or should I just get new tires?
>>
Do not respond
>>
File: IMG_7744.jpg (954 KB, 1254x1869)
954 KB
954 KB JPG
>>2064118
I would assume they put the tires on with a machine you can buy soigrip type tire bead tools that give you more mechanical leverage
>>
>>2064119
?
>>
>>2064040
>>2064049

Q factor is mostly a matter of bottom-bracket spindle length. going wider is easy. going narrower may or may not be possible with your frame and even if possible, may or may not require significant changes to the drivetrain.

you're better off just getting a different bike
>>
>>2064118
there's a thing called a bead jack you can try. but maybe the shop already tried it?
>>
>>2064129
sure, I'll just throw my favorite bike in the trash
>>
>>2064118
It happened to me once but I was a kid and I forced a 622 tire onto a 630 wheel. I managed to get the tire on but when I pumped it up it exploded and made my ears ring
>>
>>2064136
in lieu of a new bike you're probably not going to see major Q factor improvements. depending on drivetrain you might be able to use a track or timetrial crankset which might be designed with a narrower Q factor but I wouldn't bet on eking out more than a couple of millimeters that way, assuming it can even be made to work.
>>
>>2064157
I hear you. well, I guess that answers my question, anyway.
it's not awkward or anything, I was just hoping I could make it narrower via crankarm but I'm not going to find a TT/track crank with a compact or subcompact BCD so that settles that, even if a couple mm would be worth shelling out for a new crank in the first place. the gap between the end of the crankarm and my chainstay measures 1.5cm, so...
>>
>>2064158
I'm not the last word on this. there's probably some way to make the crankset you want, I just don't know about it.
>>
File: 1v58nwq76v8f1.jpg (700 KB, 3072x4080)
700 KB
700 KB JPG
hey guys, i got a new bike with a spacer stack that looks pretty much exactly like this(not my pic). i suppose that's because the frame was designed for fully integrated headset cables but still has the old frame-only cables, thank god. can i replace the bottom spacers with flanged ones so it looks less fugly? or would that fuck up the headset somehow?
>>
What is up with /n/ hating bicycle helmets?
>>
>>2064236
I heard it's because helmets expire
>>
Can someone help me identify this bike?
>>
>>2064242
Surly Ogre
>>
>>2064243
Surly Karate Monkey
>>
>>2064236
Nobody here rides a bicycle
>>
>>2064236
kys
>>
>>2064242
this is like the whitest you could ever possibly be in america
>>
>>2064242
Reaching bike
>>
File: IMG_7785.jpg (40 KB, 537x293)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
We all agree this is best right?
>>
>>2064308
ebin trole
>>
>>2064268
>that nose
>those ears
>white



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.