[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Instead of HSR, why doesn't California build a high speed ferry between LA and San Francisco?
>>
>>2069658
ferries have high but very obvious upfront costs centered around specific properties, so they're easier to point at and basedface about how expensive it is. meanwhile, HSR is priced per mile so you can pretend like it's not as expensive upfront because most americans can't do math.
>>
If we use the Catalina Flyer that takes people from mainland California to Catalina Island as our base line, that has a top speed of about 30mph. Do you have any fucking idea how long it would take a Ferry like that to go between San Fransisco and LA? Nobody wants to actually spend that long on a boat rocking about on the ocean surrounded by randos unless it's a massive cruise ship. Plus that's just the top speed, depending on tide and weather conditions it's going to be way slower
>>
File: 20091105-TurboJET_Urzela.jpg (378 KB, 1600x1200)
378 KB JPG
>>2069670
A hydrofoil would work great though, also why are anti-transportation people so worked up about "spending time with randos", people take trains and it's a lot more cramped than a boat
>>
>>2069658
It could be done, but it would be difficult to make it cost effective. A basic itinerary would be San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Monterey, Morro Bay, Santa Barbara, Ventura, and Santa Monica Los Angeles. The total distance traveled would be something like 440 miles. At 20 mph (about the average speed of the San Francisco Golden Gate ferries) that works out to 22 hours of travel, not counting docking, loading and unloading. Morro Bay would probably be a crucial logistical stop point because it's about halfway between San Francisco and Los Angeles.

The other challenge would be Honda Point, Point Arguello, and Point Conception. This area of the California coast can become extremely treacherous in fog, even with experienced captains.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTveGOZo1_g
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Point_disaster
>>
>>2069658
>>2069685
Honestly it would be better to just improve ferry service in the Bay, add more stops/lines and connect them better to public transit.
>>
What if we just made the ferries go so fast they could lift off the ground with a wing? And what if we put wheels on it so they could take off and land on the ground instead of the water?
>>
File: bay_ferries.png (442 KB, 2048x2048)
442 KB PNG
>>2069688
Ferry service in San Francisco Bay is limited because of competition with the Bay Bridge, BART/Caltrain and land constraints in the South Bay. Historically there were about 12 ferry companies ferrying people between San Francisco and Oakland every 30 minutes before the bridge was built. Supposedly there will be a ferry from SF to Berkeley because traffic is high enough to warrant it.

The South Bay land issues are another matter. The problem there is that the bay is very shallow and there is a large area of former salt ponds that are now wetlands. One could probably get a ferry as far as the center channel of the Dumbarton bridge safely every time but after that one would be limited by high tide.
>>
File: IMG_8669.jpg (3.41 MB, 3541x2447)
3.41 MB JPG
It's crazy that by the time we're done bombing Iran China will have built a new airport yet if you were to propose something like that on US soil it would unanimously dismissed as a waste of money
>>
File: 18652_6.png (1.27 MB, 6082x3691)
1.27 MB PNG
It's also one of the reasons why the historical Sonoma Creek ferry to Wingo was abandoned. There would need to be a dredging operation and that just isn't cost effective based on who would use the ferry.

In the case of the Petaluma River there is already regular dredging for free by the US Army Corps of Engineers because its a river used by the Coast Guard to patrol San Pablo Bay. And there were plans for a ferry to Port Sonoma, but those fell apart. The bridge is for cars only. The issue there is that the port facilities are on the east side of the river at Port Sonoma, but the people are on the west side of the river at Black Point-Green Point. There is a direct rail link from Black Point-Green Point to Novato owned by SMART. And SMART has stated (this was about a decade after the Port Sonoma ferry plan fell apart) that they would build their own bridge for rail and pedestrian traffic if someone else were to put in the funding. Because it's to Marin/Sonoma it would fall under the Golden Gate Transit ferry system and I don't think capacity has been reached at Larkspur Landing such that it would warrant the creation of a new terminal. There will eventually be a pedestrian path for the San Francisco Bay trail.
https://mtc.ca.gov/operations/regional-trails-parks/san-francisco-bay-trail
And the general area is considered to be part of the San Francisco Bay water trail for kayakers.
https://sfbaywatertrail.org/
>>
File: _ags_18651-1.jpg (471 KB, 2500x1880)
471 KB JPG
Here's the depth map for the South Bay
>>
>>2069702
Where did you get these maps?
>>
>>2069703
If you image search NOAA and the location you are looking for you can find them. But it also helps to know the chart number to find the best resolution. The San Pablo bay one is from here:
https://geographic.org/nautical_charts/14_san_francisco_to_cape_flattery/18652_6_san_francisco_bay_to_san_pablo_bay.html
>>
>>2069696
China has never and will never send humans to the moon. I hear there's plenty of airports in Africa too anon.
>>
>>2069703
nautical charts are literally free in the US
>>
>>2069706
Who the fuck cares about weird "feats of strength" like sending people to the moon? I want public services I can use, not international dick-measuring.
>>
>>2069696
>>2069708
This brainrot is the result of watching too many soijaking b-roll of Chinese construction projects played to trashy third world phonk music on social media. There's many improvements America can make to public transportation but we don't need more airports. But if building new airports is what tickles your autism for some reason, there is a new commercial airport that was just approved and funded for construction in Southern Nevada but it isn't expected to be completed for another decade, hopefully your doomer ass would've committed suicide by then. One can only hope
>>
>>2069706
How does that improve my quality of life and that of my fellow citizens?
>>
>>2069709
JFK should be razed to the ground and rebuilt.
>>
>>2069709
>it isn't expected to be completed for another decade
see, this is the problem. chinks can get shit done. america is too up the ass of career bureaucrats that make money on every single delay to even approve construction. publically execute all bureaucrats and politicians.
>>
my city just started a water taxi and the only people using it are tourists. faster to just take the bus for anyone commuting.
>>
File: _GL_sosnitskii.jpg (414 KB, 1600x1067)
414 KB JPG
>>2069789
my city started water buses a couple years ago. mostly for their winter icebreaker duty, but they keep running in the summer because why not. a bunch of tourists, of course, but i've also seen people on dates and highschool kids with tutors.
>>
>>2069796
that's pretty neat it breaks up the ice and doubles as public transport?
>>
>>2069796
>highschool kids are dating their tutors
>>
File: ekranoplan-km.jpg (71 KB, 990x453)
71 KB JPG
>>2069658
not as fast nor efficient, don't carry as much people
now a ground effect vehicle might cut it
>>
>>2069696
>if you were to propose something like that on US soil it would unanimously dismissed as a waste of money
everything in america is a waste of money
>>
>>2070384
im convinced that everyone in america does shit wrong on purpose to "prove" that shit other than bubble economy infinite money glitches is not worth doing

even if you look at basic blue collar or min wage mcjob work it's a constant cycle of crying that wypipo dont wanna work, importing mexicans and such to do it, complaining that THEY dont wanna work, trying to automate is much as possible, crying that automated service sucks, so then they have to get wypipo to do it properly, who dont wanna work and have to be replaced by jeets who have to be replaced by machines, and at no point can someone just get a fucking burger without waiting nine hours for it and having to pay 17.99+tax+tip+fee+klarna+bnpl+ewa+tax+tip
>>
>>2069658
Fun idea, but no. If the HSR program had been redirected to improving Amtrack with something like picrel and building high efficiency on/off stations to reduce commuter traffic it might have actually been useful. People that commute daily would probably love the ability to eat breakfast and catch up on emails for 30-40 minutes instead of fighting traffic for an hour and a half both ways if they're lucky. Get your car checked for fit, pay the "autotram" pass fee, make your reservation window online and, show up 10-15 minutes before. departure. Fucking easy, reliable and, functional. And that's why they'll never fucking do it.
>>
>>2069658
who the fuck lives in LA who needs to go to SF or vice-versa who can't do that shit over Teams
>>
>>2072118
Tons of people. I used to do the LA-SF drive almost monthly, because there were events up there I wanted to attend, I had friends and family up there, etc. There are also a shitload of tourists who want to visit both cities on their vacation.
>>
>>2072105
>point to point
Obsolete
>but there are multiple points
Transfers destroy usability and still have the last mile and centralization problems. The number one thing that fights against traffic congestion is remote work for those jobs that don't have a physical component. The existing roadway capacity is vastly overbuilt already for the needs of a society where white collar work is primarily conducted in or near the worker's residence.
>>
>>2069796
>>2069807
>that's pretty neat it breaks up the ice and doubles as public transport?

I wouldn't think they'd let passengers on it during the winter due to the possibility of getting stuck in the ice but it's Russia, so...
>>
>>2072158
>tourism is the only reason for good public transit
this is why public transit in the US is a failure, you are all niggas with nowhere to be consistently



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.