[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 3Z.png (141 KB, 644x618)
141 KB
141 KB PNG
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/08/16/us/politics/texas-california-redistricting-republicans-democrats.html

The aggressive push by President Trump and Republicans in Texas to flip as many as five congressional seats by drawing new maps ahead of the midterm elections threatens to set off a nationwide redistricting arms race. But it is Republicans who have a clear advantage over Democrats in the total number of states that could redraw their maps.

The process of drawing new legislative maps — which is typically done at the beginning of every decade, after the census — varies from state to state. And not every state has the right conditions to participate in the emerging redistricting battle.

Redrawing a map in the middle of the decade without a court order is likely a highly partisan affair, requiring one party to control both the governor’s mansion and the statehouse. The state must have seats that could be drawn into a partisan advantage without running afoul of Voting Rights Act protections for communities of color. And it must also be one where the legislature holds the power to draw the maps.

Here’s how the list of states that could consider redistricting gets narrowed down.
>>
As the country has become more polarized, trifectas — when one party has control over the governor’s office and both chambers of the legislature — have become more common. Republicans currently hold 23 trifectas, while Democrats hold 15.

In rare cases, control of the legislature alone can give a party complete control over the redistricting process, either through specific state laws or through a supermajority, which enables the legislature to override a governor’s veto.

For example, in Kentucky, which has a Democratic governor, the Republican supermajority functions largely as a trifecta because it needs only a simple majority to override the governor’s veto.

In North Carolina, Republicans are a few votes shy of a supermajority in one chamber but still control the redistricting process because the state’s congressional maps are not subject to veto and therefore can be passed by a simple majority in the legislature.

While some highly polarized states are willing to join the redistricting fray, many are limited by simple math: They need a seat held by the opposing party that could be flipped through redistricting.

States with just one congressional seat — Alaska, Delaware, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming — have no way to change the map; it’s just the state’s borders.

In other states, one party controls all the congressional seats, leaving no room to maneuver. This is true of Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico and Rhode Island, which have all-Democratic delegations, and Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia, which have all-Republican delegations. (Although New Hampshire has an all-Democratic delegation, Republicans currently control its state government.)
>>
Even where it looks as if a seat could be flipped, there are restrictions on how maps may be drawn. The federal Voting Rights Act requires states to preserve the rights of minority communities, effectively limiting the legislature’s ability to gerrymander. And in many states, there are simply too many voters from the opposing party to completely eliminate their representation in Congress, no matter how ruthlessly the lines are drawn.

So let’s focus on states where one party has complete control of government but the opposing party holds some congressional seats. Can they start drawing new maps?
Not exactly.

In some states, an independent commission, rather than the legislature, draws the legislative map. These commissions were created, in many cases by referendum, to reduce the role of partisan politics from the redistricting process — essentially, to prevent the kind of gerrymandering that both parties are now considering.
Nine states have some form of redistricting commission: five Democratic trifecta states, two states with divided government, and two Republican trifecta states.

In response, some Democratic states have embarked on efforts to work around their commissions.

In California, where voters approved an independent commission in 2010, Democratic leaders are moving to amend the State Constitution to empower the legislature to redraw the maps to head off Texas’ redistricting threat. That amendment process, if successful, could conclude in time for new maps to be installed before the 2026 midterms.

Democrats in New York have also threatened to change the state’s Constitution to disband its independent commission, in place since 2014. But because of a different state law, that change would not take effect until after the midterms.
The other Democratic trifecta states with a commission, Colorado, New Jersey and Washington, have not moved or pledged to return the redistricting power to the legislature.
>>
>>1427038
I'm not surprised. They've been setting this up for a long, long time. Notice how the right has this narrative of insidious leftist tentacles quietly pushing their agenda and taking over society? That's because that's exactly what they're doing themselves.
>>
>>1427094
>insidious leftist tentacles quietly pushing their agenda
They pretended milquetoast corporate centrist Joe Biden was a far left socialist/commie who hates white people and wanted to take your hamburgers and gas-powered cars away if that's what you mean.
>>
>>1427250
Pretty sure the issue with Joe was that he was a corrupt politician when he had his faculties, and that he hasn't had his faculties since around 2016.
Otherwise his political leanings were whichever way the winds blows.
>>
>>1427331
This
>>
>>1427331
Yeah right that's why Comer never proved he did anything illegal after 5 years of useless hearings.
>>1427334
Fuck off redditor.
>>
>>1427360
>Yeah right that's why Comer never proved he did anything illegal after 5 years of useless hearings
Wait are you taking about the time when Biden was interviewed by the FBI and they concluded that he likely committed a crime but was so senile they probably couldn't get a conviction?

Yeah I've heard audio from the FBI interview, they asked Biden about his book deal and he went into 10 minutes of rambling about dates and his dead son
>>
>>1427578
>Wait are you taking about the time when Biden was interviewed by the FBI and they concluded that he likely committed a crime but was so senile they probably couldn't get a conviction?
Yeah mud flinging in the "we couldn't actually find any crimes" admission doesn't count.
>>
>>1427580
Don't let the truth get in front of their narrative.
That they didn't find that Biden committed a crime and didn't find he was senile doesn't matter when it comes to spreading shill lies
>>
>>1427578
Do you think because this board is slow that nobody will notice your lies?
>>
>>1427038
tl;dr dems who were all for packing the supreme court until it wasn't in their best interest, and were all for ending the filibuster until it wasn't in their best interest, are now complaining about gerrymandering - even though they're heavily into it - because right now it's not in their best interest.

Typical "It's only okay when WE do it!" thread.
>>
>>1427585
>That they didn't find that Biden committed a crime
Yeah it's a shame we can't investigate anyone in the Biden family since they've all been given pardons. I would've loved an investigation into Burisma.
>>
>>1427618
>I would've loved an investigation into Burisma.
you're gonna love the fact there were several, then
at least until you conveniently forget they exist, like you do everything that BTFO's you out
>>
>>1427617
The only reason dems wanted to pack the court is because Mitch McConnell rigged it for republicans while Obama was president.
>>
>>1427038
I cannot fucking fathom how either party thinks permanently silencing political disagreement and keeping the opposition view out of office is going to end well for the nation. The Republicans are precipitating a civil war, and I doubt they can actually win it.
>>
>>1427622
McConnell didn't rig anything. Americans wanted this court. Americans want conservatism. They want a strong ethnonat country that takes what it needs. They want to bring the leafs and europoors to heel and expand their living space. They want to cleanse the world of degeneracy. That is why they elected Trump by an overwhelming majority.
>>
>>1427976
Cool headcanon
>>
>>1427976
Cool, hope they enjoy the country getting browner and browner.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.