SSA whistleblower lodges complaint against DOGEhttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/26/us/politics/doge-social-security-data.htmlhttps://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/a9f2afd18a79e330/b181d62a-full.pdfDear All:The Government Accountability Project represents Mr. Chuck Borges, the Chief DataOfficer (CDO) at the Social Security Administration (SSA), and a whistleblower. Mr. Borgespresents the following disclosures to your attention pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 2302 , 5 U.S.C. § 1213and 5 U.S.C § 7211 for your respective offices to take appropriate oversight action.In recent weeks Mr. Borges has become aware through reports to him of serious datasecurity lapses, evidently orchestrated by DOGE officials, currently employed as SSA employees,that risk the security ofover 300 millionAmericans' Social Security data.1 Mr. Borges' disclosuresinvolve wrongdoing including apparent systemic data security violations, uninhibitedadministrative access to highly sensitive production environments,2 and potential violations of internal SSA security protocols and federal privacy laws by DOGE personnel Edward CoristineAram Moghaddassi John Solly and Michael Russo.3 These actions constitute violations of laws, rules and regulations abuse of authority mismanagement and creation of threat to public health and safety. Since February 2025 it has been widely reported that DOGE officials have sought to access the American public's Social Security data purportedly to address claims of fraud. A lawsuit hasbeen filed resulting in temporary restraining order to limit DOGE's access to this sensitivedata What has not been reported are DOGE's actions in violation of SSA protocols and policiesunder the authority of SSA Chief Information Officer (CIO Aram Mogaddassi to create live copy of the country's Social Security information in cloud environment that circumvents oversight.
cloud environment is effectively live copy of the entire country's SocialSecurity information from the Numerical Identification System (NUMIDENT database thatapparently lacks any security oversight from SSA or tracking to determine who is accessing or hasaccessed the copy of this data NUMIDENT contains all data submitted in an application forUnited States Social Security card including the name ofthe applicant place and date ofbirthcitizenship race and ethnicity parents names and social security numbers phone numberaddress and other personal information Should bad actors gain access to this cloud environmentAmericans may be susceptible to widespread identity theft may lose vital healthcare and foodbenefits and the government may be responsible for re issuing every American new SocialSecurity Number at great costMr. Borges reports supported by documentary evidence reveal disturbing pattern ofquestionable and risky security access and administrative misconduct that implicates some ofthepublic's most sensitive data Mr. Borges has raised concerns internally with various authorities inthe Chief Information Officer's (CIO office and to date has not been made aware of any remedialaction He therefore elevates his concerns out of sense of urgency and duty to the AmericanpublicSince February several members of Congress have written letters and investigations to demand greater oversight over DOGE's access to SSA data. We urge allmembers ofCongress committed to the safety oftheir constituents' data along with the U.S. Officeof Special Counsel to investigate the disclosures presented in this letter.
>>1429918Already a thread on this >>1429886
>>1429925Yeah we all are well aware someone posted Rachel Maddow blogshit.Personally, I'd like to keep the quality of threads on this board high.Historically Rachel Maddow threads have been deleted.For fucks sake, "maddowblog" is literally in the url of that thread
>>1429931do you think anyone is moderating this glorified shitslinging board right now? there's a thread up right now where the only link is "cia.gov"
>>1429931Rachel Maddow isn't wrong though
>>1429933>>1429932Don't care.I'm posting the original source because I care about the quality of the threads on this board, and posting threads citing "maddowblog" is clearly against rule 1: Blog and editorial articles are not acceptable.
>>1429936Where did Rachel Maddow hurt you?
>>1429936>I care about the quality of the threads on this boardthen why did you post this admittedly hilarious shitpost
>>1429931>Personally, I'd like to keep the quality of threads on this board high.>>1429936>I care about the quality of the threads on this boardhilarious
>>1429938They pretend to care about quality, then deliberately refused to post the article text. They're just raging and shilling per usual
>>1429940>deliberately refused to post the article text.I posted both of the original sources, and my text is the text of the whistleblower complaint.It doesn't get any more high quality than that, maddowblog-posterDon't get salty that you post blogs. Instead, try not posting blogs.
>>1429944I like how you bitch and moan about blogs when there's not a single personal opinion part of that article. You're literally seeing red over a part of the URL.
>>1429945Just ignore him, he's trying to deflect from the content of the article.
>>1429944>It doesn't get any more high quality than thatPosting the original text of the news article you're posting is the highest qualityThe board isn't called /sources/, shill
>>1429918No one cares, chud.
>>1429946Yeah why would anyone want to read the whistleblower complaint, that's for Chuds. I read maddows blogs all day every day, that's where us educated folk learn the news at.
>>1429918Post article in OP, faggot
>>1429951Read the whistleblower complaint, butthurt blogfag
Ah, so we're in a shitty shill threadYou can tell by OP being a faggot, not posting the article, and OP hanging around to make fun of people pointing out they didn't post the article.
>>1429920>Since February several members of Congress have written letters and investigations to demand greater oversight over DOGE's access to SSA data. We urge all members ofCongress committed to the safety oftheir constituents' data along with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel to investigate the disclosures presented in this letter.So nothing's going to happen except "strong urging".
>>1429954Dunno.Maybe they should implement the proper auditing procedures on it though. Pretty sure the judicial orders said they could access the data and work with it, but I would presume standard access and data protection guidelines still apply
>>1429947> Why in the world would anyone want to understand the cause of a controversy? I don't have time for that, I want people I've never met before to tell me how I should feel about recent events
>this link is absolutely board relevant, even though it would be deleted if I posted it by itselfPost the article, faggot
>>1429970What's your problem
>>1429937>Where did Rachel Maddow hurt you?He felt a same sex attraction toward Rachel maddow. The Anon is very confused
>>1430016This post makes no sense
Any crying over DOGE is just white noise at this point. Democrats just want their unlimited gibs and corruption
>>1430101if you keep fellating billionaires like this you're going to choke to death
>>1430102>Those damn billionaires spending millions of dollars on gay muppets in the middle east
>>1430105Yeah, we gotta get that money out of there. How else are we going to give it all to billionaires?
>>1429955If it isn't explicitly stated then it didn't happen. Power hungry autists auditing for "their" country...Nice DD's
>>1430102Do you think the billionaires with infinitely better credit than yours are trying to steal your identity?
>>1430189i can't understand you. what does gawk gawk gawk mean
>>1430191It means you think about dicks too much.You know what you are suggesting is retarded.
>>1430192i can barely hear you, but from what i can tell it sounds like a strawman. wipe that drool off your face, you're shameless
>>1430189Rich people are well-known for not wanting more money or power.
