Anonymous 52 shot in Chicago over weeken(...) 09/01/25(Mon)13:24:19 No. 1431398 52 people were shot in Chicago over the weekend as the Governor rejects Trump's offer to help make the city safe. https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-shootings-labor-day-weekend-least-32-shot-3-fatally-gun-violence-city-police-department-says/17701051/ Chicago shootings: At least 52 shot, 7 fatally, in Labor Day weekend gun violence, police say CHICAGO (WLS) -- At least 52 people have been shot, seven fatally, in shootings across Chicago so far this Labor Day weekend, police said. The weekend gun violence comes as the Trump administration prepares to potentially deploy the National Guard to the Chicago area. Summer 2025 violence: Tracking shootings across Chicago | Live updates A woman was shot and killed in a South Shore apartment on Friday night. The shooting happened at about 11:56 p.m. in the 7700-block of S. Essex Avenue, according to police. Police found two women with gunshot wounds inside the apartment. A 25-year-old woman was shot twice to the abdomen, and once to the left leg. Police said she was taken to University of Chicago Hospital where she died. A woman was shot to death in the Altgeld Gardens neighborhood on Saturday evening, police said. The shooting happened at about 7:46 p.m. in the 900-block of E. 131st Street, police said. A 43-year-old woman was approached by five male suspects and they started to shoot at her, police said. She was taken to an area hospital with multiple gunshot wounds, where she died. Nobody is in custody. On Sunday, a 33-year-old man was shot to death during an argument in Englewood, police said. The shooting happened at about 2:52 a.m. in the 6300-block of S. Elizabeth Street. The man was shot in the head and died at the scene, police said. Nobody is in custody. Chicago police are also investigating two separate drive-by shootings. >>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)13:24:53 No. 1431399 In Bronzeville, at least seven people were shot at about 11:10 p.m. on Saturday in the 3500-block of S. State Street, police said. All victims were taken to area hospitals and are expected to be OK. In Humboldt Park, at least four people were shot at about 1:11 a.m. on Sunday in the 2700-block of W. Haddon Avenue, police said. A man was killed in a triple shooting on Sunday, Chicago police said. The shooting happened at about 1:39 a.m. in the 1900 block of W. 17th Street. Police said three men, aged 41, 43 and 46, were outside when a male suspect approached and started shooting. All three were taken to an area hospital. The 46-year-old man was shot multiple times, police said he died at the hospital. The other two were shot in the legs and are expected to be OK. A teenage boy was shot on the city's West Side on Sunday afternoon, Chicago police said. Police said the shooting happened in the Lawndale neighborhood's 1500-block of South Christiana Avenue just after 5 p.m. A 14-year-old boy was near the sidewalk when someone approached him, took out a gun and fired shots, police said. The victim, shot in the arm and hand, went to St. Anthony Hospital in good condition. There is no one in custody, and area detectives are investigating. Police did not immediately provide further information about the shooting. A teenager was critically hurt in a mass shooting during a large gathering on Monday, Chicago police said. The shooting happened at about 1:05 a.m. in the 3600-block of S. Cottage Grove near Ellis Park, Chicago police said. Police said officers were at the scene of a large gathering when they heard gunshots. A total of five people were shot, including a 17-year-old boy, according to police. CPD said officers recovered four firearms. One person of interest was being questioned by police. >>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)13:31:33 No. 1431406 >>1431398 not my problem>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)13:33:47 No. 1431408 >>1431398 >52 >link: 32 So OP lied immediately, what a shocker Apparently the shill is celebrating the holiday by asking to get BTFO all day>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:12:22 No. 1431415 >>1431408 That's really the best you have? Lying on the internet? Lmao>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:12:44 No. 1431416 >>1431408 to be fair the headline on the article really does say 52>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:16:12 No. 1431417 >>1431416 Where is 32 coming from? Did he make it up or is that what the actual totals are if you add up every shooting casualty from the article?>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:20:10 No. 1431418 This doesn't count as mass shootings according to Democrats >>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:20:34 No. 1431419 >>1431417 >>1431416 No, even if you add it up it's still 52 7 fatal + 45 non-fatal = 52 total shot So he did just make it up.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:24:57 No. 1431420 >>1431408 >https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-shootings-labor-day-weekend-least-32-shot-3-fatally-gun-violence-city-police-department-says/17701051/ >Chicago shootings: At least 52 shot, 7 fatally, in Labor Day weekend gun violence, police say Retard.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:26:22 No. 1431421 >>1431417 >>1431419 Its the URL>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:27:22 No. 1431422 >>1431418 This counts as terrorism according to Republicans>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:28:29 No. 1431423 >>1431418 Amazing that it took six posts for the sperglord to start whining about democrats>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:30:23 No. 1431424 >>1431420 Hey, the URL also says you're a faggot so it must be true even though when I click into it the article describes 52 people being shot: https://abc7chicago.com/post/you-are-a-major-faggot/17701051/ >>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:36:09 No. 1431425 >>1431421 >>1431424 Situation resolved. Now please continue with the petty politically partisan bickering.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:36:34 No. 1431426 >>1431420 >>1431424 >lies about content of article >gets called out immediately >spergs out Its another shillish fenty meltie, alright>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:37:18 No. 1431427 >>1431426 Really weird of you to talk about yourself in the third person like that>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:38:59 No. 1431428 >>1431426 >>1431427 Guys the thread exists to blame democrats for population density problems. If you can't do that then go to another thread.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:42:25 No. 1431429 >>1431428 I'm 32% sure you're wrong about that>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:42:46 No. 1431430 >>1431428 According to Wikipedia, Chicago's, only the 80th most dense city in the US, so I don't think population density is really the only thing at play here>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)14:52:01 No. 1431435 >>1431430 It's the third largest city after NYC and LA ya foreign moron>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:36:26 No. 1431440 >>1431435 It seems that you don't know English well enough to understand the difference between the terms "density" and "size". The original post said "population density". Try Google translating it into Punjabi or whatever the fuck your native tounge is and you might understand your mistake>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:39:16 No. 1431441 >>1431440 As a proud American, English is the only language I know, so... You're a complete retard if you think Chicago is evenly distributed over its suburbs.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:40:17 No. 1431442 >>1431429 Ahh so it's actually a racebait thread. Got it. Those are so rare on /news/.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:45:23 No. 1431444 >>1431441 >You're a complete retard if you think Chicago is evenly distributed over its suburbs. I only argued against your demonstrably incorrect statement. Aren't you the retard for saying "population density" instead of "size"? I'm not even sure how you can argue size matters more than population density anyways. Isn't that your whole talking point, that a lot of people packed tightly together are more violent than people stretched over long distances?>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:48:19 No. 1431447 >>1431444 I know you live in Mumbai so I'll clue you in on a thing about Chicago. There are parts that are very dense, where the crimes keep happening, and there are parts that are sprawl, where it is relatively safe.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:50:51 No. 1431448 >>1431435 Houston is actually the 3rd largest. Chicago is 4th, but it used to be 2nd.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:52:37 No. 1431449 >>1431398 Sounds like they’re going to get a visit from Trump’s National Guard…>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:54:07 No. 1431450 >>1431449 They could be 100% crime free and still get a visit from Trump's shock troops. He's sending them to all the cities that voted against him.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:55:42 No. 1431452 >>1431450 Nice try lefto but Trump sent the NG to 19 Red States.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)15:57:43 No. 1431453 >>1431452 get a real job>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)16:21:02 No. 1431469 >>1431450 He's only sent them to DC though. And I guess LA because they were assaulting federal agents>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)16:21:57 No. 1431470 >>1431469 It's just a distraction from the real news anyway.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)16:36:39 No. 1431472 >>1431453 Ahaa! What a 4chan idiot!>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)16:40:23 No. 1431473 >>1431469 >assaulting federal agents they were? I saw a bunch of abuse hurled at anonymous masked retards who never identified themselves Federal agents identify themselves though, so that definitely wasn't them>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)17:21:47 No. 1431481 >>1431473 Are you always this stupid or is it just when you're posting anonymously online?>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)17:23:21 No. 1431482 >>1431481 He has a point you know.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)18:24:49 No. 1431488 >>1431482 I just hope you can continue to hold your viewpoint that " It's okay to assault people wearing masks" It's okay to assault people wearing masks the next time you fags decide to riot, because we all know none of you tards show your faces as your looting and burning structures>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)18:33:51 No. 1431489 >>1431488 so you admit masked ice agents are on the same level as rioters in your book?>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)18:37:09 No. 1431490 >>1431488 oh, and i almost forgot to make fun of you for your terrible knowledge of the english language esl>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)18:52:56 No. 1431497 >>1431489 Why would people in homeland security or ice uniforms and vehicles be on the same level as random nobodies trying to burn shit down and loot buildings? I'm saying that if all it takes is a mask to justify violence, the left-wing rioters would have all been shot long ago>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)18:55:19 No. 1431498 >>1431497 it's funny that nobody believes you're white or american>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)18:56:48 No. 1431499 >gee libs, why can you see a difference between people wearing a mask to prevent a disease and having masked, anonymous cops refusing to identify themselves? >I can't, despite screeching like a retard for my right to infect other people and complaining about masked anonymous feds whenever dems are in charge. >>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)19:09:33 No. 1431501 >>1431489 Fuck you and fuck Democrats. The only purpose of unmasking the agents is so that you shit heads can harass them while they do their job>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)19:10:49 No. 1431503 >>1431501 nobody likes a fascist faggot who plays victim, anon>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)19:14:41 No. 1431504 >>1431488 You people think throwing a sandwich at or filming an agent counts as "assault" so .>as your looting and burning structures Cool strawman, grandpa>>1431499 Even cooler strawman, grandpa>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)19:33:42 No. 1431508 >>1431501 This>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)19:34:59 No. 1431509 >>1431508 that was your post, yes>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)20:33:59 No. 1431518 >>1431398 52 people out of 2721000 people. WOW.>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)20:39:06 No. 1431519 >>1431518 This post goes to the Hall of Shame…>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)20:56:40 No. 1431520 >>1431518 stormfront won btw>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:02:01 No. 1431521 >>1431520 the faggot award?>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:03:15 No. 1431522 >>1431521 its over /pol/ is the most populated board here now you lost>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:04:21 No. 1431523 >>1431522 i could consort with bots and shills but i have integrity>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:04:59 No. 1431524 >>1431523 sad cope>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:07:43 No. 1431525 >>1431524 why don't you go back there faggot, then you can pretend to be popular for the rest of your miserable life>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:08:04 No. 1431526 >>1431525 utterly seething>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:09:41 No. 1431527 >>1431398 I really hope Trump is able to help out those poor people in Chicago>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:10:34 No. 1431528 >>1431526 just telling poltards that they'll die alone, it's a fact (you're seething about)>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:11:28 No. 1431529 >>1431528 you are so mad kek>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:12:06 No. 1431530 >>1431529 have fun never touching the skin of a female faggot. nobody feels bad for you>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:12:48 No. 1431531 >>1431530 bahahahahahahahahahahaha>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:13:28 No. 1431532 >>1431531 i think it's funny too. i'm glad we can both laugh at the fact that you're objectively a loser>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:14:29 No. 1431533 >>1431532 AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:15:37 No. 1431534 >>1431533 isn't it sad that your mom gets laid more than you by default>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:20:50 No. 1431535 esl shill may have choked to death faking laughter >>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:29:55 No. 1431537 >>1431528 Where did this whole meme come from? The science shows that conservatives have sex more often than liberals>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:32:11 No. 1431538 esl shill is larping as a non virgin, LOL >>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:41:15 No. 1431539 >>1431537 you should probably wait until 3 am to post so you can get your shillcraft off, huh>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:54:58 No. 1431540 >>1431537 OH MY SCIENCE THE DATA FROM THIS ONE STUDY SHOWS IT!>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)21:58:21 No. 1431541 >>1431540 imagine posting studies in an attempt to prove you're statistically witnessing bobs and vagene>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)22:22:19 No. 1431546 >>1431537 There's no way that's true. Homo men are sleeping with thousands of other men>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)23:22:40 No. 1431572 >>1431546 >>1431541 >>1431540 >>1431539 >>1431538 >Shills utterly btfo by FACTS and SCIENCE gottem!>>
Anonymous 09/01/25(Mon)23:23:41 No. 1431574 >>1431572 have some attention before i go to sleep. have fun being a shill during bedtime hours faggot>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)01:11:33 No. 1431590 >>1431537 >conservatives have sex more often than liberals >conservatives >what 'GOP' means after the Epstein Scandal exploded But then, liberals aren't pedos. Unlike conservatives.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)02:42:26 No. 1431597 >>1431398 Chicongo votes democrat with that in mind i find it outrageous that not more democrat voters died.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:59:31 No. 1431639 >>1431518 >52 people out of 2721000 people. WOW. The city of Chicago has more murders than the _entire state_ of neighboring Indiana.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)14:06:01 No. 1431642 >>1431639 see >>1431406 fpbp>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)14:10:48 No. 1431644 >>1431639 >The city of Chicago has more murders than the _entire state_ of neighboring Indiana Proof? No way thats possible, Indiana has more permissive gun laws. By definition they have more gun crime>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)14:46:08 No. 1431646 >>1431644 look i see your point but the us has a gun problem in general but i do agree>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)15:20:27 No. 1431649 >>1431646 There’s no gun problem out there that can’t be solved by More Guns!>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)16:07:05 No. 1431657 >>1431408 >it's another "Zoomers don't understand anything about the media or the internet" thread with articles like this, they will update the headline/article as facts change. However, they can't update the URL so that remains what it was when the article was first published. At the time the article was originally written, 32 people had been shot and 3 killed. When OP made this thread, it was 52 shot and 7 dead. And now, it's been updated again to:>Chicago shootings: 58 shot, 8 fatally, in Labor Day weekend gun violence, police say >>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)16:20:47 No. 1431662 >>1431447 >>1431428 >it's just population density! >it has nothing to do with single mothers >or schools/culture teaching kids that they shouldn't face consequences for their decisions and that they should blame everything on racism instead of taking accountability >or a culture that glorifies and defends extreme violence anytime somebody is "disrespected" >or being soft on crime >nope, it's all just population density >also mass immigration doesn't have any effect on population density >also in 1950 the homicide rate was 1/3 of what it is now even though the population density was actually significantly greater hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm>>1431441 you're an American Zoomer though so your generation barely understands English no cap fr fr On God. Which is why you got population size and density confused. >>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)16:24:33 No. 1431664 >>1431662 (boomer moralfag screeching intensifies)>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)16:29:31 No. 1431667 >>1431664 >Democrat shill resorts to shitposting because he knows he got objectively BTFO yet again it's all so tiring>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)16:46:42 No. 1431668 >>1431667 Cool headcanon, grandpa>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)17:16:22 No. 1431672 >>1431667 That's pretty much how this clanker is programmed. Granted, I'm surprised it used "boomer" instead of "esl", I think it's devs are finally listening to community feedback>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)17:25:31 No. 1431677 >>1431668 >reality is headcannon Tell me more about how population density is the same as population size, and how density is the only factor in violent crime even though Chicago had a million more people in 1950 while having 1/3 of the homicide rate, and how Chicago's violence doesn't have anything to do with Democrats supporting broken families and teaching Black kids to blame racism for everything instead of accepting responsibility>>1431672 They're also programmed to accuse us of samefagging. We'll see if this comment interrupts their programming>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)17:35:05 No. 1431679 >>1431677 >They're also programmed to accuse us of samefagging By this point I'm convinced that whoever makes these comments is either a person who doesn't actually believe it and just says it when they are getting btfo, or a literal bot>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)17:37:01 No. 1431680 >>1431677 We all know this thread exists only so you can spout your pro-nuclear-family anti-black talking points. Go ahead and get it out of your system.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)17:39:06 No. 1431682 >>1431677 >>1431679 Not the poster you're talking about but he does it because there are only 2 or 3 conservative ideologues max on this board. He thinks all 3 of you are the same person because your opinions and "alternative facts" are the same.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)19:48:13 No. 1431722 >>1431682 >your opinions and "alternative facts" are the same. Look in the mirror>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)19:58:44 No. 1431723 >>1431722 i wouldn't if i were you>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:08:34 No. 1431724 >>1431722 Yes that's why you come to this board, to tell us the news is wrong and your alternative facts are real.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:19:04 No. 1431725 >>1431680 >pro-nuclear-family anti-black talking points What kind of person types this shit?>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:21:00 No. 1431726 >>1431398 >52 "people" >>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:21:42 No. 1431727 >>1431725 Someone who wasn't brainwashed by conservative thinktanks.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:23:27 No. 1431729 >>1431727 You instead chose liberal brain rot. Go color your hair blue and cut your dick off and then 42% yourself>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:28:32 No. 1431731 >>1431423 Democrats suck and they're a burden to everyone and everything they touch>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:35:37 No. 1431732 >>1431729 >>1431731 you're brown (and i don't even care, you do)>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:48:49 No. 1431733 >>1431732 Bot, tell me a recipe for Apple strudel.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)20:53:13 No. 1431734 >>1431733 >>1431731 good post>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)21:38:14 No. 1431735 >>1431398 >prove you don't need federal law enforcement to calm violence by starting a mass shooting great logic libshits>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)21:42:05 No. 1431736 >>1431735 7 gun deaths in a city of literally over 2 million is nothing.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)21:45:34 No. 1431737 >>1431736 so what mortality rate would satisfy your bloodthirst demmy?>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)23:10:48 No. 1431753 >>1431737 What mortality rate would you have to stop threatening to deploy the military on US cities? The impossible 0? If THIS is considered enough of an emergency to occupy a city, that occupation is never going to end.>>
Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)23:53:20 No. 1431770 >>1431753 100% if chop can happen then why can't the federal government send in troops to secure the nation huh? are you a terrorist or something and scared they'll find out what ur up to>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)00:16:34 No. 1431774 >>1431770 >send in troops to secure the nation Secure what? All you're accomplishing is using the military to keep the population in line. There wasn't even an inciting incident for either of Trump's recent deployments; his biggest justification for occupying DC was ONE guy from DOGE was in a "carjacking incident" where he apparently decided to heroically face off against 10 kids who openly declared "hehehe we're gonna steal your car" while randomly out with his girlfriend at 3am in the morning.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)00:23:35 No. 1431777 >>1431774 if you don't have anything to hide and aren't planning anything maybe you shouldn't be against more law enforcement huh? its not like its more cops these are federal military they're more disciplined. Its almost like you're planning something and are mad trump preemptively put an end to it by putting you on watch.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)00:26:25 No. 1431780 >>1431777 >its not like its more cops these are federal military they're more disciplined Federal military are worse than cops when it comes to discipline in a civic context. There is a very good reason the military and the police are separate things; military are trained for combat, not law enforcement. They are not trained to interact with civilians. They are not trained to enforce laws. They are trained to be deployed against enemies. When you are deploying them on your own cities, you are making your own people the enemy.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)01:07:08 No. 1431803 >>1431780 >They are trained to be deployed against enemies. well seeing as chicago just had another mass shooting clearly that was the right call.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)01:09:29 No. 1431804 >>1431803 Who are those troops going to be interacting with 99% of the time anon? Not this theoretical indefinite mass shooter you seem to think they're being used against.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)01:17:05 No. 1431809 >>1431804 every leftists is a potential mass shooter, every righty is a potential mass shooter. they're all threats>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)09:23:25 No. 1431835 >>1431780 Literally all of the war in Iraq/Afghanistan from the military perspective was about "inspiring hearts and minds" and interacting with people who don't even speak English.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)09:30:06 No. 1431836 >>1431780 A lot of our own people ARE the enemy though.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)10:08:50 No. 1431837 >>1431836 >our Don't make me say it anon>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)13:14:57 No. 1431850 >>1431408 You people are actually retarded.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)15:38:42 No. 1431864 >>1431657 Damn people just keep getting shot and killed in Chicago>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)15:47:08 No. 1431868 >>1431835 Yeah and that worked out SO well.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)15:58:16 No. 1431871 >>1431780 So have they shot anyone? Or you just fear-mongering>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)17:58:23 No. 1431884 >>1431736 ok, then we don't need to ban all the guns. It's fine.>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)21:02:08 No. 1431905 >>1431837 its about time we admit that leftists are anti-american and start revoking their citizenship if they go against the country. citizenship should be a privilage not a right and people like you who support domestic terrorism deserve to no longer have it>>
Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)22:36:09 No. 1431916 >>1431905 we?>>
Anonymous 09/04/25(Thu)00:56:58 No. 1431922 >>1431780 >Federal military are worse than cops when it comes to discipline in a civic context. Thousands of cops are veterans of the War on Terror, which itself was mostly a police action. Just say'n.>>
Anonymous 09/04/25(Thu)06:18:51 No. 1431934 >>1431922 That explains a lot.>>
Anonymous 09/04/25(Thu)11:12:53 No. 1431943 >>1431922 Yeah this isn't the positive points towards either the military or police you think it is.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.