Anonymous Newsome btfo by DHS 09/23/25(Tue)00:29:57 No. 1441139 DHS announces they will not be complying with Newsome's unconditional publicity stunt and tell him to go pound sand, California doesn't control federal policy. https://thehill.com/national-security/5516288-dhs-ice-california-mask-ban/ DHS says ICE won’t comply with California ban on agents wearing masks The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said Monday it would not follow California’s new law banning its agents from covering their faces during enforcement operations. “To be clear: We will NOT comply with [California Gov.] Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” DHS said Monday in a post on the social platform X. DHS suggested the masks provide protection for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, who have seen a sharp rise in attacks in recent months. “At a time that ICE law enforcement faces a 1,000% increase in assaults and their family members are being doxxed and targeted, the sitting Governor of California signed unconstitutional legislation that strips law enforcement of protections in a disgusting, diabolical fundraising and PR stunt,” DHS said in a statement. Newsom, a possible 2028 presidential contender, signed a first-of-its-kind bill on Saturday banning ICE agents from wearing masks while operating in the state. He said ICE agents would no longer be “hidden from accountability,” arguing masks prevent “transparency” for citizens and hinder “oversight.” “That’s Trump’s America, but that’s not the America we’ve grown up in. And so we are pushing back,” the governor said during remarks at a local high school. The Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration has hit California especially hard, where 27 percent of the residents are born outside the country. DHS has said 5,000 immigrants living in the U.S. illegally were arrested in Los Angeles from June to August. Newsom’s office did not respond to an immediate request for comment. >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)00:41:40 No. 1441141 I'd just like to ask what exactly makes the request by Newsome 'unconstitutional'? >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)00:58:45 No. 1441143 >>1441141 That's how you don't have to do anything. It is unconstitutional that I answered you. It's unconstitutional to reply. Just more gayness, from closet fags. Which is also unconstitutional.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:16:45 No. 1441147 >>1441139 So, Newsom's plan was to dox ICE agents, huh? Are all Democrats terrorists?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:25:05 No. 1441149 >>1441147 are you a faggot (rhetorical question)>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:35:07 No. 1441154 >>1441149 I post on 4chan so yes, but I'm not a homosexual faggot that sucks cocks, takes cocks in the ass and sucks cocks. Send me an email and I'll show you my clean HIV test to proven I'm most likely not black, gay or Russian.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:41:09 No. 1441155 >>1441139 i love face diapers now!!!>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:42:38 No. 1441156 esl shill is black gay and russian, apparently >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:46:19 No. 1441157 >>1441156 You know, I think I'm the one who originally called you esl like 2 years ago. I'm glad you've gotten such frequent use bothering people and being a completely retarded shitlord with the term.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:48:11 No. 1441158 >>1441157 you're this upset about it? i'm glad esl shill>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:50:01 No. 1441159 >>1441158 Not upset. I'm just pointing out that you're just annoying and your posts are entirely unproductive. So, when will you be shooting up a school?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)01:52:27 No. 1441160 esl shill is so upset he has delusions >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)02:53:48 No. 1441162 >>1441139 Can't wait until the next Ruby Ridge>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)03:10:28 No. 1441166 >>1441147 Yes. All of them laughing about Charlie Kirk should've made this obvious by now.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)03:23:08 No. 1441167 >>1441139 So, what happens now? Can Californians call their police to protect them from mask wearing ICE? Will Californian police be arresting ICE if they see them masked up? How are local state laws implimented on the ground if federal practices conflict with them?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)03:27:32 No. 1441168 >>1441167 they're probably going to be retroactively dealt with after the fascist in charge is gone>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)03:58:58 No. 1441169 >>1441167 https://statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu/featured/2025/explainer-can-states-prosecute-federal-officials tl;dr it's complicated >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)04:50:32 No. 1441174 >>1441167 Federal supremacy. State law has no effect unless feds specifically assimilate it.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)06:02:46 No. 1441180 >>1441147 Do you know what makes the Secret Police a Secret? They're not invisible. In fact, they're very visible. The secret is WHO IS IN IT. They mask their identities and use that anonymity to enforce the Dear Leader's wishes in quasi-legal ways, with powers that are both sweeping and poorly-defined. ICE certainly fits the bill.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)06:38:58 No. 1441181 >>1441174 Federal courts can decide certain things are outside the scope of supremacy clause immunity. That's why it's more complicated than that.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)07:37:05 No. 1441186 >>1441139 >"We'll keep wearing masks!" >Local law enforcement now ordered to arrest any suspicious figures in masks and unmarked vans as potential terrorists >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)08:40:29 No. 1441187 >>1441186 The new california law doesnt actually say they cant wear masks. You should read it. Newsom just did a big PR stunt for the presidential campaign he is running. Thats it. >>1441180 There is no secret as to who is in ICE. FOIA requests are a thing.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)08:45:47 No. 1441190 >>1441139 Weird how this new "no secret police" law doesn't apply to California's Highway Patrol.>Rules for thee but not for me >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:02:54 No. 1441194 >Party of limited government >Party of states rights >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:04:40 No. 1441195 >>1441194 Yes. There is no contradiction.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:08:32 No. 1441197 >>1441139 OP, which boot tastes the best? Statist coward.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:19:29 No. 1441200 >>1441187 >FOIA requests are a thing. Yeah let's see how long that keeps up.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:23:16 No. 1441202 >>1441200 >b... but the Senate may get enough votes to beat the filibuster and repeal the Freedom of Information Act!!!!!1111 Thats not an argument. This whole thing about "masked" agents is fucking stupid. Newsom wants to be president and is creating "issues" to fight Trump over. Cops are allowed to wear masks because you dont need to see their faces, and you as a random bystander have no right to their information unless they give you a lawful command. As long as they are in unfirm and identify themselves to whomever they detain its fine. This is idiocity tier shit.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:23:16 No. 1441203 >>1441141 Article VI clause 2>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:24:16 No. 1441204 >>1441202 *uniform **Idiocracy as in the movie>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:24:19 No. 1441205 >>1441180 >Do you know what makes the Secret Police a Secret? They're not invisible. In fact, they're very visible. The secret is WHO IS IN IT. So the FBI are secret police then? Or can you point me to a registry of FBI agents?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:33:34 No. 1441209 >>1441187 >The new california law doesnt actually say they cant wear masks. You should read it Excerpts from that ca website Law and immigrant enforcement officers must be identifiable by name or badge number, and exceptions to that must be clearly established — masks are not to be worn except when absolutely necessary. Impersonating a federal agent is a crime. So .. it says masks but be worn, but then backtracks and says you can where then when needed. And somehow they had to define again that impersonating a federal agent is illegal, as if it weren't illegal already but they just enjoy redundancy I guess>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)09:38:23 No. 1441212 >>1441209 Its so fucking dumb.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)10:43:35 No. 1441220 >>1441212 Not really. When masked and unidentifiable ICE officers show up, the cops are going to get called. Cops are going to get ICE officers to identify themselves by name or badge number Then those ICE officers are going to get charged when they arrest legal citizens with ID, or leave someone in a cell with a broken arm for days, because they're not anonymous and can be linked to their crimes. ICE can't hide behind, "well, we don't know which officer is doing it, sorry">>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)11:07:12 No. 1441225 >>1441220 Yeah, whatever. Here's what's really going to happen given that the DHS has taken an official stance on the matter instead of leaving it up to individual agents to decide on their own. 9/10 times or even 95/100 times nothing at all will happen, ice will do their job and no local leo will interfere. As soon they do try to charge someone, it's going to hit a local court, then be raised to a federal court to dispute the merits of it, and they are going to have to decide if state legislation can control the operational policies, uniform and dress of federal employees, and I don't think it will be in Californias favor.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)11:08:11 No. 1441226 >>1441222 >>1441225 NTA but the Supremacy Clause blew Newsome out of the water long ago. All this shit about demasking ICE agents is cope because, assuming he tried to enforce it, he would be in open rebellion against the federal government. The worst thing California can do is not help federal agents (which is what happened during BLM) but Trump still sent in federal agents to black-bag leaders of the mobs.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)11:31:34 No. 1441236 >>1441220 It serves literally no purpose as in all the scenarios you named you can identify the officers.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)11:33:25 No. 1441237 Hang on, I thought masks made it impossible to breathe and were a terrible imposition from an overreaching government. Why are they okay now? >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)11:44:28 No. 1441239 >>1441236 >It serves literally no purpose as in all the scenarios you named you can identify the officers. sure jan thats why all these crimes are being committed by unidentified ICE officers Sorry, no anonymous facist goons for you>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)11:45:38 No. 1441240 >>1441239 >thats why all these crimes are being committed by unidentified ICE officers Link?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)11:55:38 No. 1441242 >>1441237 Hypocrisy. Stop the count! Keep counting the votes!>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)12:29:10 No. 1441246 >Officers demanded that the unidentified persons show official identification and unmask to confirm that their documents were consistent with their claims. The belligerent party became hostile while attempting to move a person into an unmarked vehicle. Officers drew their service weapons and proceeded to stop what they believed to be a potential kidnapping, as officers could not confirm that the other party was a sworn officer of the law. If ICE escalates further after that, no jury is going to convict CA officers on their response.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:20:50 No. 1441265 >>1441180 They wouldn't have to wear masks if the violent Democrats followed the law to begin with. Get fucked>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:22:31 No. 1441266 >>1441265 Stop terrorizing communities and people might not be mad at you.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:27:39 No. 1441269 >>1441266 >Terrorizing communities >By arresting criminals This is why Democrats are sociopaths>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:28:13 No. 1441271 >>1441266 >terrorizing communities By enforcing the law?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:34:26 No. 1441277 >>1441269 >>1441271 Well, by doing shit like holding children hostage and blowing up people's doors to retaliate for bumping into their car.>https://americasvoice.org/press_releases/this-cruel-act-says-it-all-ice-holds-5-year-old-daughter-hostage-to-arrest-father/ >https://www.nbclosangeles.com/video/on-air/video-shows-federal-agents-blast-their-way-into-huntington-park-home/3734157/ >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:37:23 No. 1441283 >>1441277 shills hate accountable law enforcement>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:44:19 No. 1441295 >>1441283 >>1441277 >oh noes they are enforcing the hekkin law! this is TERRORISM >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:45:49 No. 1441298 >>1441295 Law enforcement isn't allowed to do either of these things. An unaccountable arm of it is effectively state sponsored terrorism.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:47:25 No. 1441300 >>1441295 >who cares if cops kill a baby? >maybe it was a terrorist baby >no, you're not allowed to know which officer killed the baby >they'll get to retire early due to PTSD and collect a check for the rest of their lives though Why are chuds like this?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:48:14 No. 1441301 >>1441298 >Law enforcement isn't allowed to do either of these things Law enforcement is allowed to make forced entry into a home. As for your "hostage" argument>“A Guatemalan family from Leominster, Massachusetts, says >says >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:49:15 No. 1441302 >>1441300 Who said anything about killing babies? Dude. Argue the merits. When you do shit like this all you do is undermine your own position.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:51:53 No. 1441305 >>1441302 lmao, the shill is demanding to 'argue the merits' after getting BFTO Maybe you should just keep to greentexting strawman positions, faggot>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:52:53 No. 1441306 >>1441305 >Not an argument. Many such cases.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:53:25 No. 1441307 >>1441302 Maybe try reading the news sometime.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:54:18 No. 1441308 >>1441306 Feel free to scroll up and engage with the actual stories of anonymous ICE faggots breaking the law anytime.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:54:52 No. 1441309 >>1441307 I know what you're talking about. It was an incident where a SWAT team mistakenly threw a flash-bang into a babies crib while making an entry into a home. Yeah dude, we're all in favor of not hurting babies. However, that doesn't have anything to do with >Federal LEO's enforcing Federal Law is TERRORISM! >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:56:09 No. 1441310 >>1441308 I did. Neither of the cited instances is them "breaking the law". And in the instance of the little girl, none of the officers were wearing masks which renders it moot.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:58:06 No. 1441313 >>1441310 I'm pretty sure illegally detaining a 5 year old girl and refusing to return her to her mother is a crime. Maybe its different in your country>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)13:59:30 No. 1441314 >>1441313 You wanting something to be illegal does not mean it is.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:00:55 No. 1441315 >>1441314 You wanting something to be legal doesn't mean it is. The girl and her mother were American citizens, and after the mother showed ID she was entitled to her kid and ICE is entitled to fuck off. Just because ICE is doing shady shit they can't get warrants for doesn't mean they can overstep their bounds>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:01:43 No. 1441316 >>1441313 Dude its so easy to steelman the detention >homg you didnt let a random child enter the scene of an ongoing law enforcement operation? Monsters! >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:03:06 No. 1441317 >>1441315 Stopping a child (or anyone) entering a the scene of a law enforcement operation is not a crime. Get real.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:04:44 No. 1441318 >>1441315 >hey! Do you know what would make this tense standoff better? Let's throw children in the mix!!!! Bruh>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:07:24 No. 1441319 >>1441313 It is called kidnapping.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:08:53 No. 1441320 >>1441319 Call the police and make a report.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:21:16 No. 1441321 >>1441320 Not him but what do you think the press has been reporting on for the last 9 months?>>
read DOG in a mirror 09/23/25(Tue)14:58:10 No. 1441330 >>1441314 >You wanting something to be illegal does not mean it is. Crimes against humanity maybe not written into law, but they are an a front to me. Newscum is the alpha + dog, tRump is the alpha- dog whose day is done>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)14:59:52 No. 1441332 >>1441317 >>1441318 >its not safe for kids to be at this crime scene >so lets detain the kid and not let the mother take the kid away from the crime scene >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:23:54 No. 1441335 >>1441301 It's on video. They held that girl until the actual police showed up and forced them to release her to her family.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:43:19 No. 1441337 >>1441321 And no one called the police?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:46:40 No. 1441341 >>1441337 They did, and the police showed up and made ICE release her. Then ICE left, probably because they didn't have a warrant and couldn't get into the house legally.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:48:20 No. 1441342 >>1441332 The mother is in the house. You're unironically complaining that cops didn't allow a child into a home containing a wanted fugitive with a deportation order due to prior convictions for *checks notes* domestic abuse and strangulation. >do you know what would make this situation better? Give the kid to the wife beating strangulation enjoyer! >>1441335 The "actual" police did not "force" them to return the kid.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:51:18 No. 1441344 >>1441341 The statement was that ICE committed a crime. Weird how they didnt get charged despite police being there. >they didn't go into the house Because deportation orders are administrative orders not criminal warrants.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:54:49 No. 1441346 >>1441342 >>1441344 Yeah, because the system protects its own. Trying to have a standoff using an administrative warrant is already beyond its scope, holding a US citizen hostage because your administrative warrant is too weak is something that should get them thrown in prison. It won't, but it should.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:55:47 No. 1441347 >>1441344 >>1441342 No matter how much you btfo him with facts he isn't going to stop being a retard>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:58:32 No. 1441348 >>1441347 If they were there to get him for domestic violence, they would have an actual warrant that allows them to go arrest him.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)15:59:14 No. 1441349 >>1441346 >preventing a civilian entering the scene of an enforcement action >holding that civilian hostage Bruh. And FYI, ICE ended up with the little girl because her father (wife beater btw) fled a traffic stop, jumped out his car and ran inside his home. Leaving his daughter in the car.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:00:14 No. 1441350 >>1441348 He has priors for that. That's why he has a deportation order. 70% of the people deported thus far have felony convictions.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:26:31 No. 1441351 >>1441349 Weird how its unhelpful to your shill narrative that the childs mother was there and was refused access to the child.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:30:31 No. 1441352 >>1441351 The child's mother who was in the house? With the person they were trying to detain? That mother?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:35:24 No. 1441353 >>1441352 It must be really hard to be a shill. The legal American citizen mother? The one who could tell ICE to fuck off, release her American daughter and go get a warrant if they wanted to get inside the house? Retard shill logic doesn't make sense because we all know your actual goal, deport nonwhites, but you can't do that because its illegal and gets a supermajority of Americans to hate you. So you do this weird backwards logic to try to claim that all these American rights don't matter in this instance, like pretending a man accused of passing off a counterfeit $20 bill should be murdered on the street on tape.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:39:26 No. 1441354 >>1441350 >70% of the people deported thus far have felony convictions Thank you, MR PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump!>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:41:47 No. 1441355 >>1441350 100% have been criminals.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:44:48 No. 1441356 >>1441353 >like pretending a man accused of passing off a counterfeit $20 bill should be murdered on the street on tape. George Floyd deserved to die because he robbed a pregnant woman at gunpoint. Also, harboring illegals is a crime. Cry moar faggot.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)16:59:35 No. 1441359 >>1441320 I would pursue and engage, personally. Cops are more like janitors, cleaning up messes, preventing crime in progress not so much. Better to look out for your own rather than wait for police to even know what is going on. I think cops would tell you the same. Police taking someone into custody as per state orders and following protocol for the situations where a child is left in their custody is a civil matter and not kidnapping. Cops end up with children due to an active incident. Unless it was a conspiracy between officers to kidnap children but I highly doubt that, however I'm sure there have been cades when cops have left the child with a person they shouldn't have. I don't think cops are monsters but mistakes happen. Crime is dynamic and evolves where cops are stuck obeying policy, law, and their own intuition when applicable. I'm going for tldr, because I would rather have discussion rather than trolls. Thanks for your time and I'm still adding words. I'm not a shill, nor do I think what happened is kidnapping, in this instance. I wish 4chan would say how long your post is before you hit the 2000 mark, it would help me right now. I hope you all are having a great day, or happy Rapture or w/e. I am fine just taking it easy. Regardless of how many characters this is now, I think I passed the point of safety. Thanks for your time.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)17:04:24 No. 1441360 The amount of chuds ITT who support mask-wearing, jack-booted government thugs is insane. >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)17:45:54 No. 1441383 >>1441359 Not reading an opinion that looks like AI slop. One sentence in and it's obvious you're full of shit. You can join all the other retards who try to be cops and end up dead or in prison for life. The state created these criminals and the state can deal with them>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)17:48:31 No. 1441385 >>1441383 >an opinion that looks like AI slop The entire article is based on an anonymous tweet from the DHS account. It remains to be seen if the ICE agents on the ground will still wear masks or not.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)17:50:03 No. 1441388 >>1441360 oh don't worry anon, they're not americans. they are convincing your boomer relatives though unfortunately>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:15:23 No. 1441396 >>1441388 Oh good, conspiracy anon is back>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:16:31 No. 1441397 >>1441396 so you don't think shills exist?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:17:13 No. 1441398 >>1441397 Are your boomer relatives browsing a dead board on 4chan, anon?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:17:43 No. 1441399 >>1441398 no but you also notoriously shill on facebook, shill>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:19:06 No. 1441400 >>1441399 >also Bro just take your meds>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:19:48 No. 1441401 >>1441400 yes, also. also, why do you shill here, shill? do you just enjoy being called a faggot? or just following orders>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:34:47 No. 1441405 esl shill is apparently at a loss for words >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:46:06 No. 1441406 >>1441353 You're asking why ICE didnt allow a child to enter the home of a known fugitive while they were trying to apprehend the fugitive?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:47:06 No. 1441407 >>1441360 Oh no, law enforcement enforcing the law. The horror.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:50:16 No. 1441411 >>1441407 When you get Koreshed for "antisemitism" by the same jackbooted thugs I'm going to laugh>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:51:10 No. 1441413 >>1441411 >Koreshed That was ATF not ICE.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:54:55 No. 1441421 >>1441413 ICE doesn't have the manpower so they draw from other agencies like the ATF/IRS/DEA/etc.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:56:28 No. 1441427 >>1441421 Instead of accepting that you fucked up your analogy you're just making shit up to continue it?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)18:58:04 No. 1441428 >>1441427 Do you think I'm lying? Do you think I'm some kind of leftist?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:00:30 No. 1441430 >>1441427 https://www.govexec.com/management/2025/09/report-federal-agencies-have-deployed-nearly-33000-employees-assist-ice/407907/>DEA has assigned nearly 40% of its total employees to ICE, according to Cato’s data, while the ATF has sent nearly 30% and USMS around 20% >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:01:42 No. 1441433 >>1441430 You understand that ICE does immigration enforcement and ATF does firearms, right? ICE has nothing to do with citizens. Hence, your Koresh analogy is fucking retarded.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:02:48 No. 1441435 >>1441433 >ICE has nothing to do with citizens Considering how many actual citizens have found themselves harassed by ICE (aided by Trump's supreme court finding they're literally allowed to racially profile) fucking DOUBT.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:03:03 No. 1441437 >>1441433 Oh so now govexec.com is lying as well? lmaa this is why they call you people a cult.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:03:56 No. 1441439 >>1441435 Thats cute. Problem is that if you're a citizen ICE cant do anything to you. OMG dude take the L>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:05:47 No. 1441441 >>1441437 Do you not understand what ICE does?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:07:15 No. 1441443 >>1441439 >Problem is that if you're a citizen ICE cant do anything to you. You know, except:>Imprison you for a few days >Blow the door off your house >Smash up your home looking for someone who isn't there >Steal your fucking life savings and electronic devices (https://newrepublic.com/post/194557/ice-invades-wrong-home-oklahoma-girls-underwear-life-savings) >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:12:53 No. 1441447 >>1441443 >>Imprison you for a few days Not if you identify yourself as a citizen >>Blow the door off your house >Smash up your home looking for someone who isn't there Yep if they have a warrant >>Steal your fucking life savings and electronic devices Confiscate subject to a warrant.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:14:24 No. 1441448 >>1441441 Do you not understand ICE doesn't have the manpower on its own to do what Stephen Miller told them to?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:14:59 No. 1441449 >>1441443 >U.S. marshals, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and FBI agents So this was a wanted federal fugitive they were pursuing, given that the marshals and FBI were also involved. That's quite a bit more than a simple immigration raid, but you people love to misrepresent the truth. I'm pretty used to it by now>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:15:30 No. 1441450 >>1441448 I'm not disputing that they pull agents. However, what your peabrain is failing to understand is that agents working for ICE cant do anything to non-citizens because they have no lawful mandate. Thats why we have specific agencies for drugs, guns etc.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:26:33 No. 1441451 >>1441447 >nah guys it's fine they just need a warrant >a warrant they can now get for reasons like "looks kinda illegal" >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:30:17 No. 1441453 >>1441449 Yeah no. It was ICE. US Marshalls confirmed none of their guys were there.>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/us-citizen-family-traumatized-ice-raid-rcna203700 I'll give the benefit of the doubt and say the family got them mixed up instead of them lying about credentials. This doesn't change the fact they still confiscated all their belongings over people who hadn't lived in the house in months.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:32:03 No. 1441454 >>1441451 No. They can only enter a home with a criminal warrant which requires probable cause and is issued by a judge. They can detain you for deportation with a removal order, which is again, issued by a judge - but they cant enter your home. They can racially profile to stop you on the street an ask if you're a citizen because the standard in that scenario is reasonable suspicion. I dont understand why you care so much about this you will argue with me for hours, but you dont care enough to do some basic research on the topic.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:33:04 No. 1441455 >>1441453 >This doesn't change the fact they still confiscated all their belongings over people who hadn't lived in the house in months. Yes. Because they had a warrant. Once you figure out that you got the wrong people you give their stuff back. Things take time.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:37:00 No. 1441456 >>1441455 >Guys it's fine >They got permission to confiscate all this family's electronics and money and keep them for weeks >It's not their fault no one could be fucked to make sure the person they were looking for actually lived there On a technical level, the warrant wasn't valid, because the person it was directed towards didn't own that house anymore.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:37:42 No. 1441457 >>1441455 >the police can come into your house and steal all your stuff >why are you complaining? you'll probably get it all back in a few months what a faggot>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)19:38:25 No. 1441458 >>1441454 Uh, yes they can. If they can use it as reasonable suspicion to stop and detain you in the road, they can use it as reasonable suspicion to search your house.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)21:04:06 No. 1441470 >>1441457 With civil asset forfeiture, you're not getting it back unless you sue them using a lawyer that costs more than whatever you'll recover.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)21:34:01 No. 1441474 End qualified immunity! >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)21:56:21 No. 1441478 >>1441168 >they're probably going to be retroactively dealt with after the fascist in charge is gone They should watch old newsreel footage of what happened to collaborators in France not long after D-Day. This means you too, MAGAtards. This legislation being enacted against those not exactly like you. What's to stop the next Democrat administration - presumably Newsom - from using the same against you? Why let those laws Trump made go to waste? Can't take a little 'Fashing Up', you don't have the right to dish it out. Pushback. And what French people did to those who collaborated with those who didn't have the right to be there. Each & every French town & city welcomed those American liberators who drove out those who didn't have the right to be there. Certain so-called 'French' shit themselves at the sight of those Sherman tanks & Jeeps with GIs on them.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)21:59:33 No. 1441479 >>1441478 This rhetoric and retardation is what causes people to become delusional when they're in power. Trump hasn't done any dictator shit besides throwing a wrecking ball approach at illegal immigration and you're already talking about killing and imprisoning everyone on the right. I wish Trump was just 10% as much of a fascist as you retards make him out to be.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:06:16 No. 1441482 The collaborator that is >>1441479 is already shitting itself or wouldn't have said what it just did. Just as those who collaborated with fascists shit themselves seeing those Sheman tanks & jeeps approaching 80 or so years ago. Pushback. >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:08:13 No. 1441484 >>1441479 >Trump hasn't done any dictator shit the sheer denial>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:08:21 No. 1441485 >>1441479 Well, what's stopping you from not being a rightard and condemning what Trump's doing?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:10:09 No. 1441487 Banality of evil holds no weigh in this court. All the guilty will be rounded up and exterminated. Better fight tough because cowards get it worse. Chump up motherfucker, you about to be a bitch. >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:12:33 No. 1441488 >>1441487 bet you'll be crying like a bitch when all the illegals are back in the country and paid millions in reparations with Elon's money>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:14:55 No. 1441489 >>1441485 >Well, what's stopping you from not being a rightard and condemning what Trump's doing? You're asking him (Republicans generally) to condemn law enforcement enforcing the law?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:16:26 No. 1441490 >>1441489 >You're asking him (Republicans generally) to condemn law enforcement enforcing the law? NTA, but they still whine all the time about Babbit getting shot.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:17:40 No. 1441492 >>1441490 >but they still whine all the time about Babbit getting shot. I dont understand why you think a whataboutism from outta nowhere would be an appropriate response.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:23:13 No. 1441495 >>1441492 Its okay, I understand why you need to be purposefully ignorant of a direct example of when Republicans condemned law enforcement enforcing the law.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:26:00 No. 1441496 >>1441495 >talking about ICE deportations >BUT WHATABOUT You're an idiot.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:34:41 No. 1441504 >>1441489 >>1441479 has no excuses when ICE larpers are dealt with so he should be praying it's purely actual law enforcers who deal with such >>1441479 should remember what >>1441168 says. Where will the power of all those Cartman-esque 'ICE' be after that which gave them their 'authoritah' that had to be 'respected' after their Fuhrer... I mean president is gone? The protection provided by fascists immediately ceased to exist for those collaborators once those GIs were seen in the distance. Very powerful were those binoculars with lenses by Carl Zeiss used by those collaborators' protectors. Gave them time enough to GTFO there, and fuck those who collaborated with them, leave them to their own resources and the tender mercies of those celebrating their protectors suddenly ceasing to exist there: and thus their authority. 20th January 2029. Or sooner, with the midterms. Think about the future, certain 'people': yours.>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:47:47 No. 1441508 >>1441496 >you gotta give an example of Republicans condemning law enforcement enforcing the law >no no, not like that, it has to be an ICE deportation specifically >>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)22:48:36 No. 1441509 >>1441508 >>you gotta give an example of Republicans condemning law enforcement enforcing the law Who are you quoting?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)23:01:47 No. 1441518 >>1441509 You watching Kimmel, bro?>>
Anonymous 09/23/25(Tue)23:10:24 No. 1441527 >>1441518 No. Barely anyone does.>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)00:44:57 No. 1441583 >>1441527 You must not have heard, after the FCC backed off on their threat ABC immediately reinstated him. Retards are still coping and pretending he wasn't incredibly profitable>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)02:16:42 No. 1441606 >>1441202 They don't need to repeal the act, just ignore it. That's how Trump's been rolling all year. So, so many of his executive orders are either outside of his purview or outright illegal, and they just go through with them without real pushback.>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)02:17:51 No. 1441607 >>1441583 From what I hear he still won't be aired by may affiliate stations. BIG WIN!>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)08:43:46 No. 1441624 >>1441583 >Retards are still coping and pretending he wasn't incredibly profitable He gets 1.1 million views. As I said, barely anyone watches him.>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)09:36:27 No. 1441625 ICE "agents" are all coward cucks larping as specops KEKW >>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)09:45:59 No. 1441626 >>1441625 Daily reminder that Antifags at CHAZ/CHOP were larping as NKVD Border Security and executed two black teenagers.>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)09:54:43 No. 1441627 >>1441139 If he took those masks off, would they die?>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)10:07:38 No. 1441631 >>1441627 It would be extremely painful... for you>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)11:00:58 No. 1441648 >>1441624 You misspelled 7 million, cuck>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)11:02:19 No. 1441649 >>1441203 Which federal law requires agents to wear masks?>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)11:07:25 No. 1441650 >>1441488 Probably not. But if that's how you cope you can think I'll be crying. I'll laugh knowing they have more money individually in a year than you'll have in your lifetime. B-b-but Elon, where is my money? I said you were cool once, just ignore the fact I called you a traitor and made threats against your children... cope, magat. You are done. You're just an annoying joke, the hilarity is gone because it has been told so many times already.>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)11:08:28 No. 1441651 >>1441631 Lol. This is cope in online form, folks.>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)11:15:40 No. 1441654 >>1441651 Someone get this hothead outta here!>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)12:13:14 No. 1441674 >>1441651 Its a reference from movie you fucking autist.>>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)12:27:32 No. 1441680 I hope Cali splits away from the us with those earthquakes soon >>
Anonymous 09/24/25(Wed)22:37:20 No. 1441970 >>1441651 You just blow in from stupid town?>>
Anonymous 09/25/25(Thu)10:11:20 No. 1442111 >>1441139 The party of "muh state's rights" everyone
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.