New York police arrested Brianna J. Rivers, 30, in April on one count of second-degree assault after she sucker punched activist Savannah Craven Antao during a street interview on abortion. The attack was caught on camera as Craven Antao asked Rivers questions about abortion on behalf of the pro-life organization Live Action.

But now, attorneys with the Thomas More Society say they plan to file a civil suit and seek damages on Craven Antao’s behalf after Bragg’s office declined to prosecute the felony assault charge.


Bragg’s office first downgraded the charge to a misdemeanor before ultimately dismissing the charge altogether, they said.

“District Attorney Bragg’s shocking refusal to uphold justice only works to undermine confidence in the system, especially when our political climate has become as fraught as it is now,” Thomas More Society senior counsel Christopher Ferrera said in a statement. “Failing to prosecute these clear-cut charges sets a dangerous standard for how our society responds to violence against those engaging in democratic dialogue.”

“This blatant example of selective prosecution shows a troubling disregard for equal protection, leaving peaceful pro-life advocacy exposed to intimidation and violence. Savannah’s assailant may have been spared criminal consequences by the Manhattan DA’s failure, but we will see to it that she faces accountability. We will seek justice for Savannah, including punitive damages, as a lesson to those who think they can respond to pro-life speech with violence,” Ferrara added.

Craven Antao noted “millions of people saw my attack, an unprovoked assault, captured on camera while I was peacefully sharing my pro-life views and engaging in respectful dialogue.”

“Even with indisputable evidence, District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office quietly let the charges fade away, as if protecting people from violence was negotiable,” she added. “Political violence should never be tolerated or given a free pass. When those in power refuse to hold accountable those who respond to free speech with violence, it threatens the very fabric of our civil society. I will not be intimidated or silenced when it comes to speaking up for the unborn, and with the support of Thomas More Society, I will keep pushing for accountability.”

Craven Antao was transported by police to a local hospital. She reportedly suffered two cuts that required several stitches.

Craven Antao’s husband, Henry Antao, told Live Action at the time, “The woman became aggressive and violent upon learning Savannah’s pro-life stance. I intervened to protect my wife and we immediately called 911. The police arrived, and we provided them with the assailant’s photo and description. We hope justice will be served soon.”

Rivers, earlier this year, claimed she was provoked by Craven Antao.

“To Savannah, I sincerely apologize, but cannot sit around and allow you to continue pushing this one sided narrative. I understand hands being put on someone is never the answer, but throwing rocks and hiding hands is worse,” Rivers wrote on Facebook.

“She knows the truth and she needs to release the footage in its entirety. Savannah is a professional antagonist not a ‘reporter’ and the truth will be told,” she added.

Craven Antao did in fact post the entire video online immediately after the incident.

>>1442608
This isn't the first time. They refused to prosecute Matthew Dolloff after he shot a man in the chest in retaliation for getting bitch-slapped. Not enough evidence they said - in a crowd full of people, in broad daylight, with cameras, 20 feet away from a line of police officer.

But they demanded a trial for Rittenhouse.

>>1442608
I'M OUTRAGED!!1 THEY OUGHT TO APOLOGIZE!!11

Simple. Keep your hands to yourself, naughty little pedophiles. Secretly touching kids thinking you can treat an adult that way? Nope. FAFO.

Arg, you make me so mad, embarrassed me on front of my friends. I'll show you!
Blam, blam, blam.
What were you gonna show me, sir?

>>1442610
>Savannah is a professional antagonist not a ‘reporter’ and the truth will be told
True.

>>1442608
Bro what the fuck that was clearly assault. Like literally peaceful conversation and then the lady on the left just straight up swung on her twice. What the fuck is wrong with NYC DA?

>>1442654
Lady has a history of antagonizing people. Likely realized any jury would get bombarded with evidence her being a general bad faith shithead to farm clips and decide "yeah, she was provoking". The price you pay for being an annoying influencer is that people don't have much sympathy for you.

>>1442655
God this position of yours is retarded as fuck. Someone else willingly interviewing with you on the street to discuss a political topic is not antagonizing. You would lose your shit if people were punching leftists for interviewing them about issues important to left wing causes.

>>1442656
Bad faith "debate me" interviews are antagonizing; they're literally designed to just piss people off. You don't see this happening much with leftists because they never had some influencer like Kirk popularizing them in their influencer spheres; hell the right having done them so much kinda turned the left off from them entirely.

>>1442654
>What the fuck is wrong with NYC DA?
It's not just the NYC DA Anon. The entire left unironically thinks they're morally correct to punch people that disagree with them, like >>1442655 and >>1442657
Those aren't troll posts. They seriously believe this shit.

>>1442658
Don't know why you don't want to accept that juries don't have sympathy for people who make their entire careers around pissing people off to clip farm getting punched for doing just that, but alright.

>>1442659
I mean if you really want to set the standard that New Yorkers find it acceptable to attack people like that, don't complain when we return the favor and hold off charging anyone knocking out leftists.

Most Americans don't actually sound like the comments... occasionally, one that spends too much time arguing with Russian shills might. Just reminding everyone that the person arguing you incoherently is a foreign shill instigating civil unrest. Let it be a sign that Russia is desperate.

UPDATE:
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/alvin-braggs-office-admits-botching-123119652.html?guccounter=1
DA is claiming that they wanted to prosecute but the DA just made a mistake so now they can't prosecute her anymore.
So this isn't a case of Democrat-run cities supporting political violence, it's just a case of Democrat-run cities being so corrupt and incompetent that they fuck up the simplest tasks. DEI strikes again.

>>1442633
>>1442655
>>1442657
>ummm actually you annoyed me me so I'm allowed to sucker-punch you in the face and send you to the hospital
idk maybe this type of thinking, and not muh heckin racism, is the actual reason why Black people go to prison more and why their neighborhoods and schools suck.

>>1442660
Anon I hate to break this to you, but most of the time when an influencer gets punched trying to clip farm, political or not, the case is usually dropped. It's a combination of how the defense can usually just bring up how they were intentionally trying to get an overreaction of some kind as the whole point of the video (which saps the sympathy of the jury for the victim), and how it's so brief and typically a relatively minor injury that juries don't feel it's worth convicting on an assault charge the same way they would on a sustained beatdown or a major injury. It's literally just not worth it to drag it all the way to court, and this isn't something exclusive to blue states either.

>>1442668
>Deliberately antagonize people so you can get an overreaction for youtube views
>Gets punched as that overreaction
>"how could this happen. they're so heckin violent..."
No one cares when the guy intentionally trying to piss people off pisses the wrong person off lol.

I might care about the right wing chuddie whining about how any leftists doing the same thing deserved to get punched too if I could think of any leftists who did the same thing
Go ahead and find the 15 view militant vegan influencer doing dishonest interviews and hit her, whatever

>>1442660
Lol. New Yorkers in Moscow, now?
Plus 10 more points.

>>1442670
1) [citation needed]
2) That doesn't justify attacking her.
3) Don't complain when leftists start getting knocked the fuck out. You set this standard. Next time some lefty gets their ass beat and /news/ starts crying about it, I'll be here to remind you fags.

>>1442668
Honestly this is literally just another instance of the lengthy list of recent examples of the left not acknowledging political violence originating from their side.

It's obvious af to anyone watching the video that the entire proceeding was a peaceful interview until the lady on the left (both physically and metaphorically) flew off the handle and assaulted the other lady.

Just imagine if charges had been pressed, the prevailing narrative from the left would have been that the lady was secretly a conservative Republican Groyper

>>1442676
>>1442677
lmao why are conservashills such pussies
right wing outrage farmers are getting censored, deal with it
we'll trade you all the (nonexistant) left wing outrage farmers in exchange, lmao

>>1442674
>>1442678
>of COURSE punching somebody so severely that they need stitches is justified if that person is being mildly annoying
yeah you're right nobody on the left has ever been mildly annoying so this can't possibly backfire.

No actual grown adult in a civilized society acts like this or approves of this. In any normal jurisdiction a jury would easily convict here. If your argument is that an NYC jury would not convict then that just means New Yorkers are violent lawless savages

>>1442678
It seems like you are so utterly ass blasted by facts all you have left is insulting and assaulting people.
Typical for the tiny mind of the leftist.
Come back to me when you are ready to acknowledge violence from all sides, not just your political enemies

>>1442614
>someone gets punched
>”This is just like that time someone got murdered!”
You people are fucking unbelievable.

>>1442660
Start shit, get shit.
>I mean if you really want to set the standard-
Yup.

>>1442680
>No actual grown adult in a civilized society acts like this or approves of this. In any normal jurisdiction a jury would easily convict here
1 million percent this

>>1442681
>left is insulting and assaulting people.
yawn, the boi is crying wolf again

>>1442681
>Come back to me when you are ready to acknowledge violence from all sides, not just your political enemies
Hey so where was this mindset when Trump pardoned a bunch of cop beaters from 1/6? If you wanna look to anything normalizing violence, that's a pretty big one.

>>1442680
>>1442683
Literally look it up. A guy got acquitted for literally shooting an influencer who refused to stop bothering him. I legitimately couldn't find an example of someone who punched a ragebait "interviewer" who actually got convicted.

>>1442684
Is this being covered in actual news sites, or just conservative propaganda rags like the national review?
If its the latter they probably deserved to get hit, maybe curbstomped
No, I didn't read the article

>>1442686
Are you talking about this case?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jury-acquits-delivery-driver-main-charge-shooting-youtuber-rcna118007

that's a completely different situation. This woman was doing nothing but debating and the other woman was free to leave at any time. Nowhere except uncivilized lawless crime-ridden Democrat-run cities thinks it's acceptable to punch somebody in the face for that.

>>1442687
there's literally a video, you can watch for yourself and form your own opinion
>but I'm a leftist and therefore not capable of forming my own opinion
>No, I didn't read the article (or watch the video) because being informed is against my ideology

>>1442688
Find a conviction in similar circumstances. I doubt this is the first time a street interviewer got sucker punched.

>>1442690
Show me one time in a non-shithole jurisdiction where somebody was caught on camera punching somebody in the face hard enough to require stitches and they were let off because they were being annoying and mean.

>>1442691
So, you can't.

>>1442689
>shill lies about leftists committing crimes constantly
>No, this time I'm telling the truth, for reals
you can't do this in public because people would rightfully beat the shit out of you
then supposedly the FBI would cornhole you for the rest of the life in club fed, lmao

>>1442682
>You people are fucking unbelievable.
Coming from the side that finds this acceptable? Okay anon. The point, which went above your simple head, is that this is not a one-off event. You dems have a pattern of not prosecuting people who commit crimes against conservatives. You sure you want to keep playing this game?
>Yup.
Alright then.

>>1442694
I'm sorry, which side literally pardoned over a hundred people convicted of assaulting police?

>>1442694
>people who commit crimes against conservatives
big if true, you got a source?

>>1442695
Don't want to hear it after all the blanket pardons Biden gave, including to people who weren't charged with anything. Especially don't want to hear it from some fake faggot pretending to give a shit about assaulting police after 2020.

>>1442696
>big if true, you got a source?
I already named two.

>>1442697
>I already named two.
but do you have valid sources
all you seem to have are right wing propaganda pieces and stories about youtube shitheads getting shot in self defense after stalking and harrassing someone

>>1442698
>but do you have valid sources
>just ignores the OP

>>1442699
>>right wing propaganda pieces
>just ignores the OP
nah, i covered it

>>1442690
>Find a conviction in similar circumstances. I doubt this is the first time a street interviewer got sucker punched
Holy fuck are you serious? You are doubting that harmless street interviewers being "sucker punched" for political reasons is a convictable crime?
What the fuck is wrong with you people

>>1442690
Unfortunately for you, assaulting independent journalists or interviewers is still a crime, even if you don't like the political persuasion of the person who gets punched
https://newstalkkit.com/ixp/1130/p/seattle-journalist-assault-case/

You people are literally some of the most uncivilized, privileged brats who think It's okay to attack someone because they have a different opinion than you do

>>1442702
>please, you gotta hate leftists
>leftists are the real baddies
>stop hating orange man waaaaaahh
cope from conservashills this week has been delicious

>>1442703
Honestly you acting like that after getting repeatedly btfo only makes you look worse.
Cheers.

>>1442704
nah, everyone still thinks you're a faggot
maybe lie less and cry wolf less often
>but think of the influencers chasing you down and harassing you in public to the point multiple people think the shooting was justified!
lmao, no one likes you people

>>1442702
1. Not a conviction retard.
2. Wasn't the same context, the guy wasn't debating, he just got attacked from behind. THAT is a different story.
3. Ironically, looking up this guy, he's also another glorified conservative influencer instead of a journalist
4. "You people are literally some of the most uncivilized, privileged brats who think It's okay to attack someone because they have a different opinion than you do" is a rich take from the same group that got pardoned for breaking into the capitol and assaulting police because they wanted to overturn an election.

>>1442697
>Don't want to hear it after all the blanket pardons Biden gave, including to people who weren't charged with anything. Especially don't want to hear it from some fake faggot pretending to give a shit about assaulting police after 2020.
Were anyone to people who were on video smashing in officers' heads with flagpoles? No? Hmmmmmmm...

Well it's not like Trump has repeatedly gone on record stating he'll go after political enemies, both before and after Biden's pardons. Oh wait.

>>1442701
Find an example retard. Provoking someone for a clip only to result in provoking them into punching you isn't usually something a jury is too sympathetic for.

>>1442709
>Were anyone to people who were on video smashing in officers' heads with flagpoles?
I'm sorry, I don't understand ESL retards.

>>1442711
Answer the question retard. How many people on video assaulting police did Biden pardon?

>>1442711
>BTFO this hard
you make too many of your own spelling mistakes to hide behind this shit, faggot
answer the man

>>1442712
None. His crackhead son wasn't there.

>>1442713
>haha u can't understand chinese bot durr btfo

>>1442708
>he's also another glorified conservative influencer instead of a journalist
its because the only source they could provide is a shitty AM station in rural washington instead of an actual news source
all their programming is either right wing shills or paid advertising/ufo kooks: https://newstalkkit.com/shows/wednesday/

>>1442714
Wow. So it looks like the only party that literally pardoned and legitimized political violence done in their name are... Republicans! Amazing how they suddenly have a problem with the mere idea of that when they already went one step further and already did it.

>>1442717
You'd have a point except for the part where the left didn't get absolutely fucking hammered by the FBI like the right did - even when they attempted their own little insurrection by trying to break into the White House to kill Trump on May 30th 2020. And unlike the Jan 6th crowd they actually threw molotovs and burned down a building.

Care to guess how many people were charged with a crime? I'll tell you ... One. For destruction of government property.

So in a way Trump's pardons made things even.

>>1442718
>So in a way Trump's pardons made things even.
no, because Jan 6th was a crime.
Trump had two barriers of fences and was hiding in a bunker, no one was trying to kill him. They were content to let him hide like a bitch while they yelled 'mean things' at him from the sidewalk.
The rest is mostly your fentanyl fuelled delusions, aside from the one rightful arrest that you're conspiracy theorizing over.

>>1442718
>Uh but what about when we protested outside the white house and didn't beat cops with flagpoles, break in, and force security into a last stand barricade?
If you think these things are even, you're either retarded or a paid shill.

Trump pardoned people who were convicted of violence in his name, solely because they did it in his name. He legitimized political violence more than any other president, republican or dem.

>>1442708
>Not a conviction retard.
He's still being prosecuted. Turns out he violated probation for a previous criminal charge in 2019 and they handled that first.
Dude is still locked up in jail.

>>1442719
>no, because Jan 6th was a crime.
So was May 30th you fucking retard. Even more so than Jan 6th. We just don't call it an insurrection because the left did it.
>Trump had two barriers of fences and was hiding in a bunker, no one was trying to kill him.
Why was he in a bunker if nobody was trying to kill him?
>They were content to let him hide like a bitch while they yelled 'mean things' at him from the sidewalk.
Oh so that's why they injured 60+ Secret Service and burned down a guard station?
>The rest is mostly your fentanyl fuelled delusions,
Mhm. Sure thing leftist. At this point I really don't give a fuck about your excuses. I'm so fed up with the shit you've pulled over the last 10 years that I WISH Trump was half the dictator you've made him out to be.

>>1442716
>I don't like the url!
What type of retarded cope is this you people have it's very real
https://komonews.com/news/local/jeremy-lawson-33-years-old-anti-ice-rally-cam-higby-assault-concussion-head-trauma-second-king-county-deputy-prosecuting-attorney-criminal-trespass-2019#

>>1442720
>>Uh but what about when we protested outside the white house and didn't beat cops with flagpoles
>Pay no attention to the burned cops and buildings!

>>1442721
Which is not a conviction, and, again, is a vastly different situation because the guy jumped him from behind instead of being in the middle of a "debate"/argument.

So again, you can't actually find a conviction of the sort, proving exactly why they didn't even bother filing charges.

>>1442722
1 million percent accurate

>>1442724
Did Biden pardon any of the people convicted of doing that?

>>1442727
How could he when the FBI only convicted one person?

>>1442722
>So was May 30th you fucking retard. Even more so than Jan 6th.
>Guys a protest turned riot is basically the same as breaking into the capitol building to overturn an election
People were convicted for 1/6 and Trump pardoned them. They were found guilty of committing violence in his name, and he pardoned them. Fucking cope.

>>1442725
>It doesn't count because they weren't talking to each other
Bro you are weaseling this down to the point that it's going to be impossible to actually find this shit using google searches because you are making the situation so niche

What's the burden of proof you are demanding so far?
You want: 1) and independent no-name journalist with conservative viewpoints 2) interviewing people about their political views 3) having a peaceful conversation 4) unprovoked attack from a leftist 5) incident must have occurred in America 6) charges were filed 7) these charges ended in a conviction

This shit is so un-newsworthy and specific it's nearly impossible to find examples of it happening at all, even ignoring the final criminal ruling

This shit is insane. You are insane. Assault is assault, and it is generally always prosecuted as such, unfortunately unless if politics come into play. This should be obvious to literally anyone living in a first world country

>>1442729
>When we try to kill the president it's a protest that turned into a riot.
>When you break into the Capitol and do nothing it's an attempted coup of the entire country!

>>1442725
I just found a conviction for a Republican from Minnesota who had a progressive news reporter from the guardian enter his personal office without permission and refused to leave after being asked to several times. The Republican pushed him to the ground and punched him a single time. The Republican was charged (and convicted) of assault.

But go ahead and tell me how that doesn't apply or isn't analogous, because to me sounds like double standards, lmao.

>>1442732
>I found it
>But I won't actually post it
>Bro trust me it happened tho

>>1442731
Yeah Trump hiding in a bunker doesn't make it an assassination attempt. Bro is so paranoid he regarded a fucking elevator stopping as an attempt to kill him and his wife at the UN.

>>1442734
When the Secret Service relocates Trump and his family into a secure bunker because there's an angry mob of leftists shouting how they want to kill him, and over 60 Secret Service agents are injured keeping them out, it's very clear that the mob of firebending leftists wants him dead. But go on coping and making excuses like you leftists do all the time for your behavior. Just like the OP topic we drifted away from where you feel justified attacking people for asking you questions. I really don't give a fuck at this point. I've got left fatigue.

>>1442733
Here faggot: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/24/greg-gianforte-bodyslams-reporter-ben-jacobs-montana

>>1442735
You seem to keep misremembering what happened, probably because you're a sleezy propagandist
But here's the news from that day. Feel free to seethe and claim its fake after finding out your delusions aren't real.
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/protesters-gather-in-dc-for-2nd-day-in-response-to-george-floyds-death/2317512/

>>1442732
>>1442736
Ok so:
>Didn't break into his office (contradicted by audio)
>Wasn't recording a video either until Gianforte assaulted him
>Literally was in the middle of asking a question when Gianforte body slammed him
>Gianforte hit him repeatedly on the ground as well
>Got a slap on the wrist misdemeanor charge
>Pled guilty while admitting he started the confrontation

Oh, and Trump also literally celebrated him doing it, which kinda puts a dent into your "look at how the left celebrates violence!" side point.

>>1442737
LMAO real cute. But let me do you one even better.
https://www.doioig.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/2021-09/SpecialReview_USPPActionsAtLafayettePark_FOIAReadingRoom.pdf

>>1442739
...proof that Trump was a whiny bitch and all your hallucinations about them rushing the white house and trying to kill trump are in fact fentanyl fuelled delusions?
I'm guessing at the fentanyl part, but this is just another count of you posting shit that doesn't back up any of your arguments again.
Sorry you self-BFTO again, try not to whine about it

>>1442738
>Didn't break into his office (contradicted by audio)
No, it's not. Can you even read?
I didn't even use the term "break into" I said "without permission"

>>1442738
Regardless of any of your cope, this fits the bill. The reporter entered his private office and in your own term "antagonized" the person.

He was punched a single time, and got charged.

Your entire argument about it being ok to punch out journalists during peaceful conversation because you dislike someone else's political views has been btfo and you are tacitly admitting it while trying to remain defensive and petty.

>>1442741
Its cargo cult arguing.
They've seen someone slap a pdf about an incident before with citations to disprove them, and think all they need is the pdf to disprove you
It doesn't matter that they can't cite anything in it to back them up. You lost because pdf.

>professional troll is subjected to karmic retribution
Good. If anything, she both needs, and deserves to be institutionalized for being a sadistic, narcissistic, machiavellian psychopath.

>>1442742
>>1442743
1. Didn't antagonize him at all, he literally just asked him a question about his campaign and was promptly body slammed.
2. He was in the office with permission as he was a press member there with other reporters. Gianforte later admitted in his guilty plea that he'd falsified details when he initially talked to authorities.
3. The retard in the OP isn't a journalist, just an influencer giving herself a title

>>1442746
Oh, and 4. The reporter wasn't clip farming. In fact the incident wasn't caught on video at all because he wasn't a fucking influencer, he was an actual member of the press with other members of the press as eyewitnesses.

>>1442746
1. The lady in the op just asked a question about abortion to somebody that wanted to be interviewed about it
2. They were all standing on a public sidewalk
3. So what, she can't ask people questions without getting punched? Fuck off you retard.

This would be a whole lot easier if you just admitted that this was clearly assault in the video. Even the da said it was assault, they just screwed up being able to charge her for it. Why won't you admit this trivial fact? Does your political beliefs prevent you from doing this?

>>1442747
Yeah okay, I get it. You apparently believe that if you're not employed as a journalist, you can't ask people questions on the street and other people have the right to punch you if you do ask a question they don't like

You fucking uncivilized gorilla.

>>1442748
>>1442749
>Guys let me just antagonize people on the sidewalk until they overreact
Yeah this is why the closest thing you can find to a conviction with similar circumstances involves a guy literally assaulting a reporter on sight purely because he didn't like his company. Oh, and for added irony, a case where Trump actively celebrated and congratulated the guy.

>>1442748
>This would be a whole lot easier if you just admitted that this was clearly assault in the video. Even the da said it was assault, they just screwed up being able to charge her for it. Why won't you admit this trivial fact? Does your political beliefs prevent you from doing this?
If you wanna argue it was assault fine, the problem is you seem to have forgotten the original topic was that they didn't prosecute because juries aren't sympathetic to influencers who intentionally egg people on for content because they literally make their living antagonizing people until they provoke a reaction. It's the same way how giving someone laxatives by slipping them in your lunch they keep stealing is technically poisoning but will never result in a conviction because the jury will have no fucking sympathy for the victim: there's no point in bringing charges in that scenario.

Now, if you wanna change to topic to "da violent left hates free speech!" let's talk about how your boy got congratulated by donald trump for doing that.

>>1442750
its literal braindamage.
their brains are terminally misfiring trying to reconcile reality with all the shillslop they've slurped up over the years
this is just the digital corner they're squatting on as they slide into self imposed dementia

>>1442741
Yeah I was really hallucinating that building you animals set on fire, right? The one showing pictures in the .pdf with flames shooting out the windows? lol

>>1442657
Do you punch annoying people trying to get you to buy their mixtape? It's less hassle to avoid some conservative trying to interview people on the street. Do you punch people handing out pamphlets?

>>1442674
Leftists are children or stupid college students who act like toddlers. That's why it happens more.

>>1442657
Civilized people would just walk away instead of committing a crime

>>1442750
>involves a guy literally assaulting a reporter on sight
You are just lying now or you didn't read the article. The article literally states that the reporter asked him questions and he responded to a few of them and got upset at the reporter for being in his office

>>1442751
>the problem is you seem to have forgotten the original topic was that they didn't prosecute because juries aren't sympathetic to influencers
No, the original argument I was replying to was that it was justified. Here is that argument: >>1442655 >>1442657

>>1442753
I can barely see the goalposts after you've moved them that far
lmao

>>1442751
>that they didn't prosecute because juries aren't sympathetic to influencers
You literally made this up. They didn't prosecute because they missed a filing deadline.
ffs, source or gtfo.

More woke right grievance culture please. Can't get enough of chuds whining and feeling personally attacked.

>>1442764
>physically attacked

>>1442655
of course democrats aren't violent thugs they're just "emotionally charged" censorship doesn't exist it's just "problematic" crime is down since we just reclassified all violence crimes to minor misdemeanors or outright dismiss them.

If you're so unhinged you'll openly punch someone in public for asking you for an interview which we all know what was said fyi, maybe you shouldn't be allowed to have kids or be out in public.
my god leftists are all such terrorists.
>>1442657
some are but that's because leftists are cry babies who refuse to go out of their echochambers.
>never had some influencer like Kirk popularizing them in their influencer spheres
ok you're just an out of touch retard, just ignore the most popular twitch influencer why don't you.

>>1442678
leftists can't debate they just project and ignore reality like you.
>we'll trade you all the (nonexistant) left wing outrage farmers in exchange
hasan is literally on record telling for people to die if they voted red and wanting another 9/11.
Since you're such an illiterate moron you now deserve to die for being an ignorant bigot.

>>1442771
don't you have a school to shoot up faggot

>>1442773
I was waiting for you to shoot up a gay nightclub and a synagogue first

>>1442773
I'm not a leftists nor trans so no.

>>1442693
>it's yet another thread where NPC leftists deny objective evidence despite being given the link to the video

>>1442710
>>1442670
>>1442751
>the jury won't convict
>the jury won't care
>you can't convince the jury that this was wrong
Anon does not know what a jury even is kek.
Anon, a jury is just people. Show that video to any actual civilized human and 100% of them will tell you she's guilty. You want proof? Go talk to a civilized human. Look at how civilized humans are reacting to this. Her lack of remorse after the fact adds to that.
The only jury that wouldn't convict would be a jury of lawless subhuman piece of shit savages like you. Which, since this is NYC, might be the case.

But in case you missed it, the DA is not saying that they are dropping charges because NYC is a lawless shithole full of violent savages not fit for civilized society. Instead they are claiming that they accidentally missed a deadline or something and now they legally cannot prosecute her. If the DA is telling the truth then you are BTFO. If the DA is lying about why they dropped the charges then it is because they know that most people are not pieces of shit like you and most people would be upset with the charges being dropped. So you are still BTFO.

>>1442768
Add it to your ever expanding list of grievances. It's going to be a long festivus this year.

>>1442778
>Anon, a jury is just people. Show that video to any actual civilized human and 100% of them will tell you she's guilty. You want proof? Go talk to a civilized human
Absolutely this

>>1442710
assault is assault retard, also gotta love how you want to say they were provoked when the whole interview is on display you fucking imbred.
gotta love the left justifying violence yet again, your face is provoking me better get to punching soyboy nepobabies like you then

>>1442778
>The only jury that wouldn't convict would be a jury of lawless subhuman piece of shit savages like you
I'd like to point out that it's really not hard to get 12 of those together in NY. It's the reason Trump refused to have those kangaroo court trials. Your chances of winning in NY is basically zero, even with a jury trial

>>1442782
>also gotta love how you want to say they were provoked
Remember you're talking to the same people who think Rittenhouse "provoked" the people who tried to murder him because he had a fire extinguisher. Leftist standards for provocation are different

>>1442784
agreed they're such utter and vile hypocrites,
since by their logic
>ask interview and the interviee gets mad for being a hypocrite = justified assault
>get chased down by a mob of violent domestic terrorists and sex offenders = how dare he defend himself he deserves the death penalty.

they're never consistent the feds should just round them up and throw them into a furnace already.since according to them violent rhetoric justifies murder.

esl shill sure is doing a lot of performative outrage in here

>>1442786
Its the libs fault
they need to commit as much crime in real life as they do in the shills dreams and propaganda
its unfair that they don't.

>>1442786
terrorists are bad
wow what an unreasonable and unhinged take

>>1442788
i'm so glad you come when called esl shill, does this mean you've finally accepted the fact that we all know you're not american?

>>1442785
>they're never consistent the feds should just round them up and throw them into a furnace already
While I strongly agree with the second half of your statement, you are at least completely accurate in the first half of it

>>1442791
Shut up retard

esl shill sure has original comebacks doesn't he. zing!

>>1442779
>It's going to be a long festivus this year.
Oh indeed it is. Trump just declared Antifa a terrorist organization and is sending troops to Portland.

>>1442797
trump admitted he's a fascist? oh, we already knew that anon

>>1442798
so you're a terrorist supporter?
boy I hope you enjoy being in prison.

>>1442800
does it souund like i support trump? and why do you even care esl shill, you're literally not american

>>1442801
defaming the election representative of the people is terrorist behavior, you deserve to go to a gulag

>>1442795
Fuck off faggot

>>1442608
You ever heard of the term "Fighting words"? It's a legal defence in that something some idiot said was so blatantly insulting that a swift punch in the mouth is an excusable action.

>>1442808
So can I punch you for calling me a Nazi?

>>1442809
if you'd like to lose a fight, sure

>>1442810
lol

>>1442797
Troops are to defend against Russia when we nuke them next week since they can't learn to stay the fuck off Alaska.
Kaboom!

>>1442812
Troops are also used to combat terrorism. Something we've been doing for almost 25 years actively.

>>1442817
>we

>>1442778
>>1442781
Show them the video and they'll think that. Show them a history of the same woman doing the exact same thing to farm clips (which the defense WILL do if it goes to trial) and they'll realize "oh, she went around hoping for people to blow up on her". Pattern of behavior goes a long way to fuck you over in these kind of trials, as shown by how you STILL cannot produce a similar verdict when it comes to people punching influencers.

>>1442758
>me when I cannot read

>>1442809
Well that depends, are you currently exhibiting nazi behaviours? Because I distinctly recall seeing some cunt get floored while wearing a swastika arm band.

>>1442757
No, I'm going off of reports on the incident from beyond when it initially happened. The guy was in the middle of a press meeting with multiple other reporters present; he then got pissed at the guy for asking questions while being from a paper he hated and attacked him. He literally admitted to this in his guilty plea.

>https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-69013312
>Texas Governor Greg Abbott has pardoned a man convicted of killing a Black Lives Matter protester in 2020.

>>1442825
>IB4: But he was surrounded in traffic!
He literally had multiple texts saying he wanted to just go over and give himself a legal excuse to kill one of them. It was such a premeditated "wait for someone to get close then blast them" situation he got convicted in fucking texas.

>>1442817
Wild card

>>1442817
>Troops are also used to combat terrorism
Speaking of which, that appears to be exactly what Trump is going to be using to combat the terrorism in Portland Oregon

If you bait someone into hitting you, clearly you requested it. It's easy in the cases of influencers baiting, since the video and precursor video tells a lot. Harder is the instances without video confession.

>>1442831
Securing the western backside. Gonna pop off soon and I don't mean civil unrest. Watch my hands, watch my hands, oh stuck a megaton up yo ass.

>>1442819
doesn't matter a rational person can't assault someone just because they're annoyed in an interview. or i'm just going to punch you for offending me.

>>1442826
>Garrett Foster, one of the protesters, approached the vehicle carrying a rifle.
if leftists are justifying punching and assaulting people then i guess the same goes both ways.
blue states won't charge them and red states will pardon the convicted, alls fair in the end right?

>>1442838
Again anon, a history of challenging people to bad faith arguments so you can get click bait is gonna bias the jury against you. Influencers in general don't get a lot of jury sympathy in low-stakes cases like this because they're fucking annoying and most jurors will regard them as dipshits, hence why, again, you can't produce a conviction for similar circumstances.

>>1442826
>"Texas has one of the strongest 'Stand Your Ground' laws of self-defence that cannot be nullified by a jury or a progressive District Attorney," Governor Abbott said in a statement, referring to Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, a Democrat.

stand your ground law ftw, better not touch any property or vehicles in texas, you terrorist

>>1442841
Punching someone, shooting someone, same thing really.

>>1442842
>>a jury of terrorists are going to convict one of their own
ya we should definitely care about nyc jurors huh.
they've failed the jury instructions to begin with you know the part where you're suppose to be fair impartial and make your judgement solely based off the evidence provided at trial? but thats impossible for terrorists

>>1442841
You're literally comparing getting punched to getting shot to death. I'd say the guy who was literally convicted of murder and got pardoned solely because the victim was BLM is actually several times worse than anything else posted in this thread.

Shit was literally premeditated. He intentionally drove into a BLM crowd, waited for one of their armed members to come into view, and shot him to death. This isn't even subjective because again, he got fucking convicted.

>>1442846
There's no jury that was involved in any of this though, you are literally just injecting your own biases into the conversation and trying to retcon it as fact

>>1442844
This is pure cope. He got convicted even with that law in mind. Abbott is literally just saying "yeah as long as I say it was justified it doesn't matter what a jury trial says".

>>1442846
Imagine saying shit like this and thinking anyone is going to take you seriously. I would love to see you in court, anon. It'd be hilarious.

>>1442845
tell that after you've seen the leftist property damage
>>1442848
stand your ground is a right seeing as your type likes to justify violence over rethoric
>the victim was BLM is actually several times worse than anything else posted in this thread.
Oh but saying someone who goes around interviewing people deserves to be shot or assaulted is fine huh.
it doesn't work that way buddy,
>he got fucking convicted.
and pardoned so cry me a river, if people are going to justify violence then why not take it a step further, that BLM "protester" tried to invade his car he deserved it, that BLM protester tried to damage his car they deserved it, that BLM "protester" said violent things they deserved it
funny how the left are so used to it only applying one sidedly.

>>1442844
Except in texas, you're cattle. They don't care if the cattle fight a bit. However, you dare challenge a boss or company, you're done. They don't tolerate you sticking up for yourself there. Most will miss the point like the dumb culls you are.

>>1442852
>funny how the left are so used to it only applying one sidedly.
no, you're just unable to tell the difference between the situations due to your mental problems.
try to have a trusted grown up explain it to you

>>1442851
>>1442849
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/27/grand-jury-refuses-charges-sean-charles-dunn/85849774007/
but throwing stuff at law enforcement is fine
>>1442853
its fine as long as the bad people are gone
>>1442854
>trusted grown up
I hope you arent talking about yourself cause i'd trust epstein with kids before i'd trust a terrorist like you.
Also yes violent rhetoric justifies violence as said by leftists like you, you didn't attack the people celebrating it so you're complicit. That makes you a valid target, don't feel too bad when someone decides to elevate it from a punch to something more.

>>1442848
>victim was BLM is actually several times worse than anything else posted in this thread.
member of a terrorist movement that preaches to assault and kill people who oppose them
>gets shot
but the left told me it was a good thing when supposed hypocrites get their comeuppance.
they even nitpicked what they said intentionally made a bad faith argument.
Its only fair that if ur a BLM member who calls for violence it comes back to you why would anyone be against it.
凸(⊙⊙ )

>>1442855
I'll definately be suprised, because most right wing chuds are timid pussies.
Its why they tend to shoot children

>>1442856
Good post

>>1442857
>children
so perfect for handling you

>>1442852
Property damage, murder, same thing really.

>>1442855
You know, I opened that link thinking that there was no way it was the guy who threw a sandwich.
There's no way you'd cite that farce for this, that'd be too stupid. Even for /news/, even for you, that'd be just too stupid.
I'm sorry I gave you even a little credit, anon.

>>1442855
The bad people are in charge.

>>1442855
The United States was founded by terrorists, murdered/slaughtered natives, then hired nazi scientists to mass control a bunch of mindless cattle to slaughter for Mammon. There are two Factions, not left and right, it is you vs. them(vampires)

B-b-but terrorism is bad.

When all is won and lost, the spoils of war are yours to keep. Just change the history book so it sounds nicer. I didn't massacre dozens of women and children, I was outnumbered by their fiercest warriors and killed every one of them.

Some motherfucking mouth-breathers still don't understand. Wait. You will. Too late to change your fate, but your mind.

You like living?
Don't get used to it. Your death is more valuable to some rich old blood. You will die and they will profit. Always.

>>1442860
a sandwich today is a brick tomorow but i guess you're too stupid to have any common sense. I hope you stop breeding cause clearly your family tree is just producing retards

>>1442872
>chuds want precrime to be real now
Minority report wasn't supposed to be a documentary.

>>1442873
its reality now leftists are all terrorists, its like with babies you scold and punish them when they do something small so they don't grow up into being pampered nepobabies that grow up commiting horrible things. clearly leftists have failed and now should be euthenized

>>1442875
Seek help for your severe case of red pill syndrome.

>>1442876
teach euthenization to held rid the world of your failed parenting

>>1442877
Reality doesn't resemble the weird strawmen you make up.

>>1442878
look up the people freaking out over losing their thousands a month food stamps because they refuse to work part-time to maintain them.
they're of the same breed as you, entitled narcissistic pampered nepobabies.

>>1442879
The problem is you looked it up on questionable sources and became radicalized by the cherry picked examples.

>>1442872
A sandwich, a brick, same thing really.

>>1442875
>>1442878
>leftists are terrorists
>we should kill them all
Man, it's not even fun to poke at your insane projection anymore.

>>1442881
an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
>>1442880
buddy your whole cherrypicking bullshit doesn't work all you need is 1 example. its hilarious seeing leftists still use the "its just 1 person they don't represent the group" after using the stupid bad apple analogy.
all it takes is 1 example and that's too many now please die.

>>1442841
>Garrett Foster, one of the protesters, approached the vehicle carrying a rifle.
Legally open carrying.

>>1442882
sandwiches aren't gateway projectiles

>>1442883
just like rittenhouse

>>1442884
a poisoned half eaten sandwitch with his spit on it.
first its a sandwitch, next its a rock, then its used cum napkins before they move on to using explosives.
If you don't teach a kid when they're young what's right and wrong they'll just escalate.

>>1442882
>buddy your whole cherrypicking bullshit doesn't work all you need is 1 example.
for you
>its hilarious seeing leftists still use the "its just 1 person they don't represent the group"
I'm not a leftist
>after using the stupid bad apple analogy.
You seem to think every poster you argue with is a samefag
>all it takes is 1 example and that's too many now please die.
You have a mental illness but also you've been indoctrinated.

>>1442885
Yeah, I don't think rittenhouse deserved to go to be attacked because he was open carrying. Nor do I think he was because of that. Did you have a point or were you just agreeing with me that Texas pardoned a murderer for purely political reasons?

>>1442821
Let's say for the sake of argument I am. I'll steelman your position. I'm wearing full regalia: the boots, the armband, the fucking mustache. You come up and yell nazi. By your logic those are fighting words and I can turn around and knock you the fuck out.

>>1442826
>he got convicted in fucking Austin
Fixed that for you.

>>1442889
>Yeah, I don't think rittenhouse deserved to go to be attacked because he was open carrying.
Nor was he. He was initially ambushed by Rosenbaum, Ziminski and Ziminski's literal whore of a wife in retaliation for Kyle extinguishing the dumpster they set on fire earlier.

>>1442848
>He intentionally drove into a BLM crowd
Stop saying this. It gets more and more ridiculous every single time you say it. He did not DRIVE into a BLM crowd. Stop.

>>1442655
>Lady has a history of antagonizing people
But enough about the escalating Karen that is Trump

If I just saw some massive hamplanet assault my wife I would have beat the dog shit out of that giant Amazonian bitch. What a weak man.

It's too bad trump normalized deplorability

>>1442902
From the people who've been rioting ever since Trump won his first presidency.

>>1442904
don't shit on the floor ok insurrectionist (i know you're not even american, it was a rhetorical insult)

>>1442842
>>1442819
>muh history
legally irrelevant and therefore legally inadmissible.
>Pattern of behavior goes a long way to fuck you over in these kind of trials,
no it doesn't because it's not relevant.
>as shown by how you STILL cannot produce a similar verdict when it comes to people punching influencers.
numerous examples of people being convicted of unprovoked assault have been given. Here are some more:
https://apnews.com/general-news-01b7d24e0915ff867e2ed916f799b382
https://www.dw.com/en/irish-fighter-mcgregor-fined-for-punching-man-who-refused-whiskey/a-51086432
https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/man-convicted-of-punching-kicking-stranger-unprovoked-in-san-francisco/
https://globalnews.ca/news/11254877/sucker-punch-sentencing-hearing/
https://nypost.com/2023/04/20/youth-wrestler-who-sucker-punched-opponent-cited-for-assault/

>inb4 "but those cases aren't EXACTLY like this one!!!!"
yes, anon, because we live in reality and no two cases are ever exactly the same. Every single case above was a unique case too yet also resulted in conviction. Since you are the one saying that normal civilized humans would let this woman off, you provide a case with the following elements:
1) The entire encounter, including 20 minutes leading up to it, is caught on video
2) Absolutely nothing that any reasonable civilized human would consider provocation (being annoying doesn't count)
3) Victim was injured (here requiring stiches at the hospital)
4) Attacker showed zero remorse

This case is a prosecutor's wet dream. DA's salivate at cases like this because of how much of an easy slam dunk it is. The NYC DA says you're wrong btw, see >>1442668
The DA says that they still intended to prosecute but they made a procedural error in handling the case so now they can't.

This is assuming the jury is human though. If your argument is that NYC is a lawless shithole full of subhuman savages, then I will agree.

>>1442906
Anon you retard, literally all of these cases involve someone getting smacked from behind, and again, lack the context of being a bad faith "debate me" influencer who literally clip farms to see people get annoyed. These are a dime a dozen and yet you still can't find a comparable case.

>>1442898
This day and age it is proper etiquette to do nothing except record with your phone that's already in your hand. So don't lie, anon. 1) beating someone up 2) you having a girlfriend 3) doing stuff besides dark lurk

>>1442907
Anon you retard, nothing you said is relevant at all and you failed to address the other points repeatedly. Since it has now been conclusively proven that civilized humans will convict somebody in an unprovoked assault caught on camera that results in injury (as can be seen by the reactions of 100% of civilized humans to this very case) I don't really have any choice except to accept your concession.

Well, well, well... you're both wrong. Now shut up and hold hands.

>>1442918
How am I (>>1442917 and >>1442906) wrong? Which point is wrong? Even the NYC DA agrees with me which is why they say that the only reason they dropped charges was because they made a procedural error so now they aren't allowed to prosecute. Nothing to do with not being able to convince a jury of a case that's 100% guaranteed win if it goes in front of 12 humans in a civilized society.

>>1442919
You're wrong because of pride. Attitude.

>>1442919
>Nothing to do with not being able to convince a jury
That was literally made up by the resident lyin' leftist, the DA never used the Biden Excuse to justify why they didn't charge her

>>1442887
you are a leftist terrorist, gotta love the leftists trying to pretend they aren't one of the terrorists when people are eyeing them. fuck off and die you offend people with your violent rhetoric you deserve to be punched.

1442977
>terrorist
Was Timothy McVeigh a leftist?
By destroying the anti-leftist Joseph McCarthy via just giving him enough political rope to hang himselfL certainly by doing nothing to him, was president Eisenhower a leftist?
Murdering 167 people - including 19 innocent children - by not using a gun, letting an anti-leftist kill himself with alcohol. Same thing, really.

this thread has really opened my eyes to left wing terrorism
I'm ready to support our President and his war against antifa now
its just... are you guys right wing shills?
I've heard right wing shills lie constantly on the internet, and it'd be a shame if I supported a facist over a bunch of unsubstantiated lies
I saw the link about a assaulting a police officer with a deadly weapon, and it turned out to just be a sandwich. There's definitely some right wing liars in this thread.
How do I figure it out?

>>1442995
Well, you are a liar, It should be easy for you to pick out your own kind

>>1442995
watch the video in the OP. Then read this thread and the comments from leftists on YouTube to see how many lefties support terrorism.

>>1443001
No one is buying your bullshit, Ivan.

>>1442995
Just read the post of 1443001 the projecting terrorist hypocrite shill that is /news/' resident lolcow, and for good reason, then be the diametric opposite to all rightards, as they never had the right to be listened to in the first place, as they're nothing more than hypocritical terrorists and pedo supporters, the latter factor making them worse than terrorists.

If you support pedophilia you deserve to be terrorized and then brutally murdered, should also take out any contacts, family, and pets lest the disease spreads.

>>1443011
>If you support pedophilia you deserve to be terrorized and then brutally murdered, should also take out any contacts, family, and pets lest the disease spreads
>those that support the Republican party that refuses to make child marriages illegal in certain states, thus the GOP: Gang Of Pedophiles. Pedophilia = worse than terrorists.
Rightards are pedo supporting projecting terrorist hypocrites. And hypocrites don't have the right to have opinions, certainly about those not exactly like them. But who would want to be exactly like rightards: pedos.

>>1443012
I would say it applies to all, conservatives tend to have more in the pedo dept though, but it isn't exclusive.

>>1443026
>>1443012

The pedos who do this aren't left or right. They play left or right roles for public purposes, but they're all the same oligarch class. They have a big fight in public to rile up the proles and then they get together behind closed doors to snort coke off the chests of 12 year olds.

Coke and Pepsi are the exact same thing, but they spend billions convincing you there's a difference and your choice means something

>>1442608
Based

>>1442700
>anything I don't like is a propaganda piece
retarded

>>1443039
Is it shame or retardation that forces you retards to say both sides are bad when republicunts are in charge and sucking?

>>1443079
you must be a new hire

>>1443039
>a difference
I say throw Bill Clinton under the bus. That's the difference.
A leftist didn't murder a white woman at Charlottesville. That's the difference.
It wasn't a Democrat president who said there were 'Very fine people on both sides'. That's the difference.
There's you. And there are those who aren't: not only Republicans Against Trump, but even those MAGAts with 'Buyer's Regret', certainly since 20th January 2025. They're going to have Voter's Vengeance' next year: why did so many ensure Starmer was given on a platinum platter a 400+ seat majority on 4th July last year? Voting in revenge against 14 years of Conservatism. They'd had enough of so-called 'Populism', especially against the Trump-esque 'Bozo the Clown' Johnson? The same mainly white party that previously had he of Indian ancestry chose a black woman to lead them since. And, when exit polls said they'd have 13 seats, the rightard Nigey FaRAGE & his (Un)Reform(ed) only got five? UK voters had enough. Those voters purged 'Populism' in politics. They wanted the diametric opposite: Make Politics Boring Again'. It can't happen in the US? Why did Starmer win in UK? Why did Obama win in US? Because all rightards' opinions are more than wrong, and rightards never had the right to be listened to in the first place: least of all cryptically-speaking retards. Why only five seats when those polls said you'd get 13, FaRAGE? Because most of the electorate don't like the vile thoughtcrime you allow to exist in your single brain cell. Perhaps you'd be in 10 Downing Street right now if you weren't a vile rightard. I won't regard you as human until you stop speaking, acting & thinking the way you do. Even US troops said 'The Only Good Nazi Is A Dead Nazi'. Rightard opinions never had the right to be listened to in the first place. The only way I'll listen to you is when your mindset is exactly like mine
More people aren't you. That's the difference.
tl;dr: When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you.

>>1443080
These vermin are incapable of shame.

>>1443111
Literally mentally ill post. Here's some attention for (You)

>1) here's 1443115 wanting attention or wouldn't post in /news/
>2) will be proving it wants attention if it replies to this or any other post it doesn't like
>3) what is 'Hide Post' or ignoring certain posts
Only the mentally ill can't do as '3' suggests

>>1442891
I wouldn't yell nazi, I would come up behind you and give a swift kick in the balls. Or should I say ball, singular?

>>1443125
>nazi, I would come up behind you and give a swift kick in the balls. Or should I say ball, singular
I see or Nazi what you did there
At least a Nazi had the ball_ to kill a Nazi when in soon to be Soviet Berlin, triggered was him.

>>1443125
>I would just attack this guy out of nowhere without being provoked
I mean that does seem to be the left's playbook these days, plus acting like the victim afterwards.

>attack out of nowhere without being provoked
That was the Nazis' playbook in WWII, then rightards play the victim way afterwards

>>1443141
another chud projection post

>>1443144
Nazis were left wing. They used the same tactics leftwingers today use.

>>1443174
Objectively false. Fascism is an inherently right wing ideology.

>>1443141
Nazis are inherently provocative by nature.

>>1443174
>racist: or Shitler would have been anti-'Aryan'
>misogynist: 'Kinder, Kuche, Kirche', as opposed to Rosie the Riveter. Even the Soviets had women in T-34 tanks
>homophobic: or Shitler would have promoted Ernst Rohm into the SS instead of murdering him
>anti-left wing: or Shitler wouldn't have been rabidly anti-Bolshevik
That pesky thing called Reality just keeps on proving your retarded opinions wrong.

>>1443186
Siezing private property for pseudo public benefit is classic left wing.

>>1443189
>a certain scheme that was part of their 'Kraft durch Freude' movement
>Paying five Reichmarks per week via stamps in a book: to the end of receiving a certain thing Shitler ordered Ferdinand Porsche to make
>but if so much as one payment was missed, the whole thing was null & void, with no refunds. All money going into Reich coffers
>not one person receinved their KdF-wagen: or Shitler would have ensured those responsible for such would pay with their lives
>Shitler ultimately paid for not doing so, with his own life: at least Russians were able to obtain Ladas, East Germans were able to obtain Trabants & Wartburgs
Scamming people is classic right wing. Just ask your orange Fuhrer.

>>1443176
>>1443186
>state controlling the economy
>pro-gun control / confiscations / bans
>censorship
>seizure of personal property for state
>National """Socialist""""
Hmmm dems have more in common than I thought.

>>1443192
I literally can't understand your mix of English and muttspeak, schizo.

>>1443199
>I literally can't understand
Rightards cornered by historical facts they can't counter nor dispute thus proving their opinions wrong are reduced to this excuse.
>>1443189
>Siezing
No wonder the rightard schizo can't understand English when it can't spell English words, thus proving its not only a foreigner, but is educationally inferior. But then, being inferior is classic right wing.

>>1443195
Hmmm, revisionism because rightists today = rightists between 1933-1945
>racism
>misogyny
>homophobia
>anti-left wing
Rightists expose their own hypocrisy