View Announcement
Anonymous White House freezes funds for (...) 10/01/25(Wed)22:02:05 No. 1443978 https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-government-begins-shut-down-most-operations-after-congress-fails-advance-2025-10-01/ WASHINGTON, Oct 1 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday froze $26 billion for Democratic-leaning states, following through on a threat to use the government shutdown to target Democratic priorities. The targeted programs included $18 billion for transit projects in New York, home to Congress's top two Democrats, and $8 billion for green-energy projects in 16 Democratic-run states, including California and Illinois. Vice President JD Vance, meanwhile, warned that the administration might extend its purge of federal workers if the shutdown lasts more than a few days. The moves made clear that Trump would carry out his threat to take advantage of the shutdown to punish his political opponents and extend his control over the $7 trillion federal budget, established by the U.S. Constitution as the domain of Congress. The government shutdown, the 15th since 1981, suspended scientific research, financial oversight, environmental cleanup efforts and a wide range of other activities. Some 750,000 federal workers were ordered not to work, while others, such as troops and Border Patrol agents, began to work without pay. The Department of Veterans Affairs said it would provide burials at national cemeteries, but would not erect headstones or mow the grass. Vance said at a White House briefing that the administration would be forced to resort to layoffs if the shutdown lasts more than a few days, adding to the 300,000 who will be pushed out by December. Previous shutdowns have not resulted in permanent layoffs. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said it would lay off 1% of its 14,000 employees, according to an internal letter seen by Reuters >>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:02:45 No. 1443979 SCHUMER ALLEGES SHUTDOWN 'BLACKMAIL' Hakeem Jeffries, the top Democrat in the House of Representatives, said the funding freeze for subway and harbor projects in his home of New York would throw thousands out of work. Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer, also from New York, said Trump was targeting regular Americans for partisan aims. "He is using the American people as pawns, threatening pain on the country as blackmail," Schumer said. Republican Senator Thom Tillis said he was concerned that the freezing of infrastructure funds for New York could make it harder for Congress to exit the shutdown. "They need to be really careful with that, because they can create a toxic environment here," Tillis said. "So hopefully they're working with the leader, and the leader with them, on not creating more work to get us out of this posture." Republican Senate Leader John Thune dismissed concerns that the spending freeze amounted to hostage-taking. "Well, vote to open up the government and that issue goes away, right? I mean, it's pretty straightforward," he said at a press conference. >>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:04:03 No. 1443980 Jeffries said he had not had any contact with the White House since a meeting with Trump earlier in the week. "We haven't heard from the White House since the White House meeting on Monday," he said in an CNN interview. "Clearly, they wanted to shut the government down." DIFFERENT DAY, DIFFERENT VOTE, SAME RESULTS Meanwhile, the Senate again rejected efforts to keep the government functioning as both a Republican proposal that would fund the government through November 21 and a Democratic vote that would pair funding with additional health benefits failed in floor votes. Trump's Republicans hold a 53-47 Senate majority, but they need the support of at least seven of Schumer's Democrats to meet the chamber's 60-vote threshold for spending bills. At issue on the government funding front is $1.7 trillion for agency operations, which amounts to roughly one-quarter of annual spending. Much of the remainder goes to health and retirement programs and interest payments on the growing $37.5 trillion debt. A bipartisan group of senators huddled on the floor during the vote, trying to find a path forward. "I want to see that a deal is a deal, and I would like to see the Republicans make a commitment to work with us on health care," said Senator Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat who represents many federal workers near the nation's capital. "But I've never said that has to be all I's dotted and T's crossed because that could be complicated." Democrats are also seeking guarantees that Trump will not be able to ignore spending bills he signs into law, as he has repeatedly done since returning to office. Both sides sought to pin the blame on the other, looking for advantage ahead of the 2026 midterm elections that will determine control of Congress. Democrats said Republicans were responsible for the disruption, as they control the levers of power in Washington. >>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:05:04 No. 1443981 Republicans said Democrats were surrendering to partisan pressures to oppose Trump, even though they have routinely backed spending bills in the past. They also repeated a false claim that the Democratic proposal would extend health coverage to people who are in the country illegally. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the Democratic plan would only restore coverage to certain categories of immigrants who are in the country legally, such as asylum seekers and people on work visas. Several government agencies posted notices on their websites blaming the "radical left" for the shutdown - a possible violation of a law known as the Hatch Act meant to insulate nuts-and-bolts government services from partisan politics. The longest U.S. government shutdown, which stretched over 35 days in 2018-2019 during Trump's first term, ended in part after flight delays caused by air traffic controllers calling in sick. ___ >>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:08:49 No. 1443982 >>1443978 Maybe they’ll think twice for being Gay…?>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:11:19 No. 1443983 >>1443978 Hey remember when even fucking Biden didn't pull this shit on red states? Yeah, Trump isn't making it past 2026 without getting impeached. Even Republicans are starting to realize he's giving Dems way too much ability to swing the pendulum back next election. That's not even getting into the utter disaster for red states should the blue states he's fucking over decide "hm, I think I'm not gonna put in more to the fed than I get out of it anymore".>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:40:49 No. 1443987 >>1443978 >Republicans shut down government >Trump punishes Democrats for it Yeah, that sounds about right.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:46:06 No. 1443988 >>1443978 >S. President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday froze $26 billion for Democratic-leaning states Maybe they shouldn't fucking shut down the government>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:51:05 No. 1443992 >>1443988 >Remember, vote for dear leader's policies or your entire state suffers Thanks for admitting we're in a dictatorship.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:52:07 No. 1443993 >>1443992 >we're in a dictatorship. The President exercising his lawful authority is a dictatorship?>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:52:59 No. 1443994 >>1443993 Only if you're an anarchist, evidently.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:54:19 No. 1443996 >>1443992 Relax, comrade. There was only a single budget proposed in the Senate that had majority of senators agreeing to it, with even several Democrats on board, as soon as the remaining Democrats decide to stop filibustering the entire fucking US government I'm sure they'll get their funding back, It is only frozen after all>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:54:43 No. 1443997 >>1443993 His lawful authority to punish states for voting against him?>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:55:11 No. 1443998 >>1443997 Yes.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:56:00 No. 1443999 >>1443993 The President does not have the authority to overrule Congress by neglecting to execute the laws they have passed, including laws allocate funding for projects in one or more states.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:57:26 No. 1444001 >>1443999 Okay, sue him.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:58:37 No. 1444002 >>1443999 >The President does not have the authority to overrule Congress by neglecting to execute the laws they have passed ..you mean like the presidential veto?>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)22:58:57 No. 1444003 >>1444001 No need. It's in the democrat spending bill.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)23:05:27 No. 1444011 >>1444002 A veto is a specific power to reject a law that is sent to the president for signature. That's not the same as failing to execute a law already passed by Congress and signed by the President or where a veto is overridden by Congress. >>1444001 I shouldn't have to sue the President for him to follow the constitutional separation of powers. He's there to execute Congress' laws (or delegate the execution of those laws to his cabinet and/or other officials in the executive), to serve as commander in chief of the armed forces, and to conduct foreign policy. He's not the arbiter of what laws ought to be.>>
Teflon don coated tin frying p(...) 10/01/25(Wed)23:12:56 No. 1444015 Schoolyard bully Trump steals wimps Schumer and Jeffrey's lunch money again. Respected teacher AOC Will give the bully a good dressing down in 2028 >>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)23:19:34 No. 1444019 >>1444011 President has the authority to withhold funds. If you think he doesnt, sue. Otherwise: cope, seethe and mald>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)23:49:55 No. 1444026 >>1444011 >That's not the same as failing to execute a law already passed by Congress and signed by the President or where a veto is overridden by Congress. This is happening in blue states as we speak, both in regards to immigration and combating antifa.>>
Anonymous 10/01/25(Wed)23:52:29 No. 1444027 >>1444019 Yeah, not how it works.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Train_v._City_of_New_York >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_and_Impoundment_Control_Act_of_1974 >Trump literally trying to do this earlier this year and failed I wouldn't play these games by the way. Blue states can weather some fuckery; if Dems decide to treat red states the same way most of them will become like third world countries in a month.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:13:39 No. 1444031 >>1443997 Yes. In fact, blue states shouldn't be getting anything. Take everything from them and give them nothing. This will be retribution for 170 years of injustice against Dixie.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:18:52 No. 1444032 >>1444031 >In fact, blue states shouldn't be getting anything They give more than they get lol. If anything blue states are the only reason Dixie hasn't become a barren wasteland.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:19:16 No. 1444033 >>1443999 "Faithfully execute" has more wiggle room than one would expect.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:23:30 No. 1444034 >>1444031 I like how conservatives are still butthurt over Lincoln and Sherman even two centuries later.>>
Anonmous 10/02/25(Thu)00:36:02 No. 1444035 >>1443983 > Hey remember when even fucking Biden didn't pull this shit on red states? yeah I do remember. fuck biden. democrats are limp wristed do nothings.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:44:43 No. 1444036 >>1444034 Who are the conservatives?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:45:13 No. 1444037 >>1444035 You retards are like toddlers. You throw a hissy fit over every last fucking thing, but if the rest of the country left you for a day we'd come back to a corpse.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:45:42 No. 1444038 If Democrat senators are voting not to fund the government and are making it shut down, why should they not have their funding frozen until they start doing their fucking job and stop doing everything in their power to keep the government shut down They again voted today to block a spending bill from Congress that would reopen the government >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:46:09 No. 1444039 >>1444037 Nah>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:49:43 No. 1444040 >>1444038 Their job is to represent their voters, not give in to Republican demands. Their voters don't want their healthcare to triple in price, and if Republicans don't want to negotiate, then the government shuts down to encourage them to do so.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:53:16 No. 1444041 >>1444040 >Their voters don't want their healthcare to triple in price, Yet they supported ACA. Odd. And additionally, if it's going to triple in price due to CONVID era additional subsidies, well, perhaps someone should look into fraud or money laundering by the healthcare industry to figure out why the cost of healthcare has tripled in the past 5 years.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)00:58:19 No. 1444042 >>1444036 Anyone to the right of Bernie.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)01:19:32 No. 1444043 >>1444041 >Yet they supported ACA. Odd. Not really, since its not related>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)01:51:42 No. 1444044 >>1444043 It's entirely related to the inflated price of healthcare.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)01:52:25 No. 1444045 >>1444044 Nah, its mostly republicunt enabled corporate greed but I'm sure you have a bunch of ignorant lies and shill slop points that say otherwise>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)02:11:44 No. 1444047 There is nothing outlandish about senators voting against a bill they disagree with. There IS something outlandish about one side of congress outright refusing to negotiate with the other, because negotiation and compromise is how congress fucking works. And it's fucking outrageous for the president to actively punish states for that. That's fucking insane, completely out of line, and demonstrates perfectly the authoritarian takeover we're experiencing. If you go against Trump, he will hurt you and the people you represent. >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)03:30:29 No. 1444049 >>1444045 >Republican enabled >Demodumps shut down the government to retain healthcare subsidies Well, you're retarded. How do you deal with your cognitive dissonance?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)03:46:10 No. 1444051 >>1444047 Not when "negotiation and compromise" means giving illegals free healthcare using American taxdollars.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)04:05:36 No. 1444052 >>1444051 That's not a thing.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)04:13:15 No. 1444053 >>1444052 >But Democrats are holding out for a deal that would restore $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts passed into law this summer on top of a permanent extension of the Obamacare subsidies set to expire at the end of the year, saving health insurance for 3.8 million people at a cost of $350 billion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/congressional-leaders-continue-blame-game-clock-ticks-shutdown/story?id=126083610 >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)04:31:06 No. 1444054 >>1444053 ...okay? That doesn't say they want to give illegals free healthcare. It does say this, though.>Meanwhile, Trump appeared to waver Tuesday on whether there would be a shutdown while continuing to push false claims about what Democrats want in the funding bill. >"Nothing is inevitable, but I would say it's probably likely, because they want to give health care to illegal immigrants, which will destroy health care for everybody else in our country. And I didn't see them bend even a little bit when I said, we can't do that," Trump said in the Oval Office. So that's nice. Thank you for showing you're just repeating the bullshit party line, anon.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)05:57:17 No. 1444057 >>1443983 Hey remember when Biden let in several million illegals and then sent the feds down to the border to tear up the barriers the state of Texas was putting up to curb the flow - dare I say tidal wave - of illegals? >Yeah, Trump isn't making it past 2026 without getting impeached. lmao sure. You've tried every possible type of lawfare against this guy and even tried killing him - but no, THIS TIME you'll get him.... mhm.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)05:58:57 No. 1444059 >>1444037 >but if the rest of the country left you for a day Oh no, what would we do without rioting democrats? Have low crime? Anything but that!>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:02:32 No. 1444060 >>1443983 Biden's infrastructure bills and Covid spendings actually did more to help Red States than they did Blue States. Because Joe was President for everybody, not just whoever supports his shitcoin.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:09:07 No. 1444061 >>1444060 >censors conservatives >raises gas prices >gets soldiers killed in Afghanistan >floods red states with illegals >turbocharges inflation >strengthens red flag laws >fires people for refusing the jab, including military >... but trust me, he's actually helping you more than us! kek>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:18:49 No. 1444062 >>1444061 ESL>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:21:44 No. 1444063 >>1444062 Translation: I can't refute shit.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:25:17 No. 1444064 >>1444063 Nah, it just triggers you like it did now>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:28:38 No. 1444065 >>1444064 >y-you're mad! lol>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:33:31 No. 1444066 Esl shill is trying to play his anger off >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)06:36:26 No. 1444067 >>1444061 None of those are Biden's infrastructure bills and Covid spendings.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)08:48:02 No. 1444077 >>1444061 Hey, retard, we're talking about actual funding, not your bullshit. Biden actually said outright he's giving more funds to red states, even though they hate him, because they needed them more.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)08:49:03 No. 1444078 >>1444059 You spend more federal funding than you take in, dumbass.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)08:50:04 No. 1444079 >>1444053 Wow, so that literally says nothing about what you said, and instead points out how Dems are actively protecting millions of americans, both dems and repubs, from increased healthcare prices?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)08:53:56 No. 1444082 >>1444061 And that's where he touched me...>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)08:55:16 No. 1444083 Government is closed? Woo-hoo! >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)09:13:11 No. 1444086 That fucking homo Trump is also making petty threats against Bad Bunny. How very Umbridge of Trump. Trump is the angry geezer altering out. Get off my lawn! Reality though he is deranged and losing it faster. Just hope some good soldier or WH aid knows when it is just humane to put the old dog down. >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)09:15:24 No. 1444087 >>1444079 Trump and Republicans think that helping Americans is socialism or communism. Instead they wish to embezzle those tax dollars to their 'friends'. That's capitalism.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:07:17 No. 1444088 >>1444087 >Trump and Republicans think that helping Americans is socialism or communism. Yes. You taking my money and giving it to someone else is is socialism.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:10:35 No. 1444089 >>1444088 >people getting paid for their jobs is socialism The absolute state of the right.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:11:58 No. 1444090 >>1444089 >taking my money to pay for someone else's healthcare >getting paid for a job ???????>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:16:09 No. 1444092 >>1444067 >>1444077 Well retards even if you wanted to stick to infrastructure bill funding you'd still be wrong because California is the highest recipient of that. But please keep telling me how Biden was doing more to support red states than he was blue states - even as he's fucking red states in the ways I listed.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:20:04 No. 1444093 >>1444078 Thanks to blacks sucking down welfare, SNAP, housing, etc. in states like Mississippi, Alabama, etc. So go ahead, do me a favor and stop providing those federal funds - oh wait, you can't because those voters are your only shot at one day flipping those states in an election.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:37:59 No. 1444098 >>1444093 nice try, but stay on topic shill, make your own thread if you want to cry about black people>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:40:01 No. 1444099 >>1444090 Hey anon, I don't know how to break this to you, but when you pay someone for something, the money can go to a different person's paycheck for a different job at the same place.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:41:01 No. 1444100 >Trump acts like an elderly child and makes the average citizen pay for his stupidity >gets praised >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)10:47:57 No. 1444101 >>1444100 >dems play chicken with Trump by threatening the economy unless they get what they want >Trump responds by cutting funding to dem states >dems whine and cry that they got outskilled >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:22:21 No. 1444104 >>1444101 >trump is a pants-shitting pedophile traitor pushing his country over the edge of civil war >somehow this is a good thing >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:30:36 No. 1444106 >>1444099 What?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:33:02 No. 1444108 >>1444104 >dems shut down the government because they won't pass a clean CR, like they did a couple of months ago >this is Trumps fault Good luck with that.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:36:23 No. 1444109 >>1443978 Time for all the Blue states to stop paying in, and start working together.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:55:25 No. 1444110 >>1444104 >Trump is pushing the country towards civil war >coming from the people who keep sniping political figures from rooftops and rioting all the goddamn time lol>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:58:20 No. 1444111 >>1443982 People aren't born gay.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:59:40 No. 1444112 >>1444108 Maybe try making a deal with the other half of the country, "Art of the Deal">>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:00:44 No. 1444115 >shill is fuming because their shillbux aren't coming in because of the shutdown >keeps trying to pretend democrats are responsible lmao, keep crying chuddie>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:15:48 No. 1444118 >>1444112 There is no deal to be made. Its a clean CR.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:18:05 No. 1444120 >>1444112 you mean less than half of the country less than half or we would have the retard who got there by sucking dick, imagine telling your daughter they too can be president if they fuck the right guy... so powerful no money for non americans, its basic and should be for all countries why should we give them a damn thing when we have our own people homeless, starving, mental health issues, drug issues... places like NY said fuck them and found money to house people just not them...>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:24:19 No. 1444125 >democrat states: we're footing the bill for red states >non-partisan president: *withdraws subsidy to democrat states* >democrat states: nooooo lol>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:27:44 No. 1444127 >>1444125 Yeah don't punch someone who can cripple you back. Blue states stop paying for red states' shit, they're the ones who are gonna suffer first.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:29:02 No. 1444128 >>1444120 >you mean less than half of the country lmao Trump couldn't even clear flat 50%. And since the election he's lost so many supporters he'd lose.>why should we give them a damn thing when we have our own people homeless, starving, mental health issues, drug issues.. I love how you say this when the issue is tax credits for medicaid ending, which will cause all of those to increase across the fucking country.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:34:22 No. 1444133 >>1444110 but you don't dispute the pants-shitting pedophile part, i see>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:37:09 No. 1444136 >>1444127 >reading comprehension >what is it? >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:37:27 No. 1444137 >>1444128 >I love how you say this when the issue is tax credits for medicaid ending Dems voted on them to end.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:54:57 No. 1444156 >>1444137 Not enough of them lmao. Start compromising maybe.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:56:01 No. 1444157 >>1444156 >Start compromising maybe. Compromise on what? Its a clean CR. Dems voted for them to be temporary COVID-19 relief. They voted on them to expire. R's are asking for nothing and cutting nothing. There is no compromise to be made.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:00:45 No. 1444160 >>1444157 Renew the credits retard. Literally just do that and everything goes back to normal.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:01:26 No. 1444162 >>1444160 >give us this thing we voted for to be temporary >in return you get nothing Yeah, no.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:02:38 No. 1444163 >>1444160 >Renew the credits Renew? You mean make permanent, that's what they are holding the government hostage over, to make the temporary COVID emergency credits become permanent>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:04:52 No. 1444164 >>1444162 In return, you get a functional government.>>1444163 Maybe should've thought about that before you cut medicaid via the BBB, meaning those credits are now all that stands between americans and doubling/tripling of insurance rates.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:06:18 No. 1444165 >>1444164 >In return, you get a functional government. Okay, have fun with that.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:08:52 No. 1444166 >>1444165 The ball is literally in the republican court; Dems are hardline on this issue, literally all they have to do is be like "ok, we've gotten all this other stuff through, we can let them have their tax credits". But no; they're incapable of compromise and negotiation, and thus the government shuts the fuck down.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:09:53 No. 1444167 >>1444166 >and thus the government shuts the fuck down. Best of luck with that.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:10:53 No. 1444168 >>1444166 >ok, we've gotten all this other stuff through, we can let them have their tax credits". Its a clean CR. Republicans aren't getting anything through.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:18:14 No. 1444169 >>1444166 Yeah, you need to understand the clean CR came from nothing. Sprung forth naturally from the deep state with no congressional input. its non-partisan, pure, holy.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:20:09 No. 1444170 >>1444169 The CR is bipartisan.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:27:45 No. 1444171 >>1444170 nah>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:28:29 No. 1444172 >>1444171 Dem senators voted with R's to pass it. That makes it bipartisan.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:29:12 No. 1444173 >>1444172 nah>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:38:53 No. 1444177 >>1443983 If Biden pulled that kind of shit he would've been impeached and for damned good reason.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:40:42 No. 1444178 >>1444177 >impeached for exercising lawful authority >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:50:06 No. 1444180 >>1444178 Impeached for making financial decisions without congress and using his office to enact political retribution on entire states.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:51:19 No. 1444182 >>1444019 you just proved me the US is not a serious country>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:54:43 No. 1444184 >>1444180 The executive can definitely cancel projects.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)13:55:44 No. 1444185 >>1444182 You're foreign, I don't give a shit what you think>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:07:09 No. 1444186 >>1444026 states don't enforce immigration law and political association is protected by the constitution foreign shill>>1444184 the supreme court disagreed in cases such as train v. New York and INS v. Chada. if congress passes a law or allocates funds the executive cannot unilaterally rescind those funds or edit the law. we briefly tried to have a line item veto but that was also held unconstitutional in Clinton v. City of New York>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:10:40 No. 1444187 >>1444186 Yeah dude. The President cannot impound funds. He can however decide who he awards contracts to. He's well within his authority.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:11:44 No. 1444188 >>1444187 You don't want a president you want a king.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:13:10 No. 1444189 >>1444188 It's settled law and has been since 1993. See Lincoln v. Vigil.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:19:31 No. 1444191 >>1444187 >deciding who to award contracts to is the same as withholding funding that has already been allocated to ongoing projects with specific intent to punish political opponents I don't know why I try to have a rational discussion with bad faith posters.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:21:58 No. 1444192 >>1444191 See >>1444189 >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:41:14 No. 1444198 >>1444192 in Lincoln, funding to an agency with no specificity to how it must be used didn't require the agency to use those funds for a project it had previously used them for. Here, multiple bills passed years ago budgeted specific money for this specific project. the cases are not factually similar enough for the holding in Lincoln to control. the president does not have the authority to ignore congress' specific appropriations.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:42:15 No. 1444199 Related news>White House cancels nearly $8B in clean energy projects in blue states https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/white-house-cancels-nearly-8b-in-clean-energy-projects-in-blue-states >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:42:35 No. 1444200 >>1444198 >the president does not have the authority to ignore congress' specific appropriations And Congress does not have the authority to direct the Executive how, specifically, to spend the money. That's the holding. Cope, seethe, mald, its not up for debate.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:44:11 No. 1444202 >>1444200 That is literally their job you fucking retard. The republican interpretation of separation of powers amounts to "The president can do whatever he want. Congress is free to either agree or get overruled by him">>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:45:58 No. 1444205 >>1444202 >>1444200 #>That is literally their job you fucking retard Its not their job to run the executive.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:47:41 No. 1444208 >>1444205 Power of the purse you fucking retard. You know, that thing the President does not have.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:49:43 No. 1444210 >>1444208 This is not an impoundment issue you fucking retard. They haven't said they won't spend the money.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:51:27 No. 1444212 >>1444200 congress explicitly has the authority to allocate money for specific purposes that the executive must follow. Lincoln does not overturn that well established precept. I have read the entire case - have you? please cite to me where Lincoln holds that a president or executive agency can disregard specific directives from congress as to how funding is allocated. because I believe it states the exact opposite:>Of course, an agency is not free simply to disregard statutory responsibilities: Congress may always circumscribe agency discretion to allocate resources by putting restrictions in the operative statutes (though not, as we have seen, just in the legislative history). [Citation] And, of course, we hardly need to note that an agency's decision to ignore congressional expectations may expose it to grave political consequences. Lincoln v. Vigil 508 U.S. 182 at 193 (1993)>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:53:02 No. 1444215 >>1444212 >authority to allocate money for specific purposes Yes. Never said otherwise. What congress does not have the authority to do is tell the executive who it must contract with and under what conditions.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:54:14 No. 1444218 >>1444215 >Guys congress can say what purposes the money are for and where the money goes >But there ain't no rule saying we have to actually send it to those places! Yes there is, you're contradicting yourself.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:55:43 No. 1444220 >>1444218 No one said the money would not be spent.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:56:14 No. 1444221 >>1444220 Is it going to where it was directed to go to? No? Then you're violating the law.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)14:56:57 No. 1444222 >>1444221 Okay. Sue.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)15:02:28 No. 1444227 >>1444215 >What congress does not have the authority to do is tell the executive who it must contract with and under what conditions. I believe that congress explicitly does have that power, actually. the congress makes the decisions. If congress said, other laws related to procurement or contracting notwithstanding, that the executive must provide funding to a specific company to build a specific factory, then the executive would have no choice but to do so. similarly, if congress allocates money for a multistate infrastructure project and specifically notes some of the partners and where the money should go, then the executive's only function is to do that. go read the infrastructure bill from four years ago or some of the more recent funding bills and tell me they do or they don't but at this point you've demonstrated a pretty severe lack of understanding of how the constitution lays out powers in our government so parsing a bill might also be a bit difficult for you.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)15:05:58 No. 1444231 >>1444222 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500 Hey I saw your girlfriend enter here with a box of condoms you might want to look into it>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)15:28:27 No. 1444244 >>1444222 Or Republicans could pass the Democrat bill which takes care of it without suing anyone.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)15:42:17 No. 1444252 >>1444244 No.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)15:56:13 No. 1444258 >>1444252 That's why the government shut down.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:05:23 No. 1444260 >>1444258 No shit.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:10:07 No. 1444262 >>1444244 The Democrat bill doesn't actually have enough votes to stand on its own 2 feet, it has 45 votes. The Republican proposal to continue the budget as is has 55 votes which is enough to pass, as it has several Democrats supporting it as well Here's a question: why won't Democrats agree to every offer theyve had to negotiate the issue during FQ4 without shutting down the government?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:24:48 No. 1444268 >>1444244 >Or Republicans could pass the Democrat bill No way fag.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:27:19 No. 1444269 >>1444262 >30% blame the crisis on congressional Democrats You're a minority, shill>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:28:17 No. 1444270 >>1444269 >muh polls taken before 90% of people even knew there was a shutdown >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:30:10 No. 1444273 >>1444270 >In a survey conducted by the Washington Post on Oct. 1 – the first day of the shutdown – 47% said they blamed Trump and Republicans in Congress for the ongoing impasse that has left thousands of federal workers without pay and halted various government activities. turbo cope continues>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:32:48 No. 1444276 >>1444273 Get back to us in a week.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:34:32 No. 1444278 >>1444276 >t-t-t-they'll blame dems in a week >yeah, definitely in a week cope is still intensifying somehow>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:34:50 No. 1444279 >>1444054 >That doesn't say they want to give illegals free healthcare. The federal government gives money to the States to reimburse healthcare costs like California which actively provides healthcare to illegals. This was a part of the BBB bill debate a few months ago.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:36:34 No. 1444282 >>1444278 Yes. This your first shutdown or something?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:38:54 No. 1444287 >>1444279 So basically, everyone's healthcare has to be more expensive, because theoretically some of it might go to an illegal? There's a reason why they just say "They're giving illegals healthcare!" instead of explaining why/how; because every explanation makes them look terrible and willing to fuck over millions of americans to potentially avoid benefiting a few illegals.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:39:26 No. 1444288 >>1444279 nah https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Medical_Treatment_and_Active_Labor_Act>It requires hospital emergency departments that accept payments from Medicare to provide an appropriate medical screening examination (MSE) for anyone seeking treatment for a medical condition regardless of citizenship, legal status, or ability to pay. If you walk into a hospital injured with no ID, they're not allowed to let you die while figuring out who you are and how to get money from you. The funds are to compensate hospitals if they can't get paid for that treatment. >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:42:57 No. 1444293 >>1444287 >So basically, everyone's healthcare has to be more expensive, because theoretically some of it might go to an illegal No, it only applies to people who are insured through the ACA market place. Most people's rates will be unchanged. It will affect 22 mil or so MAX.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:43:23 No. 1444294 >>1444288 Hey weren't Repubs the same ones who said without this kind of idea, there'd be "death panels" that just decide if people get medical treatment or not?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:44:23 No. 1444296 >>1444293 >It will affect 22 mil or so MAX. >Don't worry guys, this'll only affect like 22 million people. They're basically all fringe cases >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:45:51 No. 1444298 >>1444294 no, death panels were if the US was actually running healthcare and possibly denying treatment. Republicunts freaked out about it despite private insurance having literal death panels, and eventually offloading that to AI programmed to simulate death panels. Probably because they love giving away money to billionaires so they can fuck their children>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:47:24 No. 1444300 >>1444294 Indeed. And this is what Democrats are fighting to stop. Imagine hospitals just having to eat shit and treat someone instead of charging a million dollars to see some Indian faggot claiming to be a doctor when injured or sick.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:48:10 No. 1444301 We would prefer to work out the details before 3/4 of a trillion dollars on something in a fucking CR. >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:51:52 No. 1444304 >>1444288 >The funds are to compensate hospitals if they can't get paid for that treatment. And that treatment still needs to be paid with tax dollars. Do you understand how stupid it is for Americans to be subsidizing the welfare of invaders?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)16:55:53 No. 1444306 >>1444304 >Do you understand how stupid it is for Americans to be subsidizing the welfare of invaders? That is a really stupid sentence, and you should feel dumb for typing it out. Most Americans think it would be even dumber if American citizens die because they have a medical emergency when they don't have ID for some reason>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:01:03 No. 1444311 >>1444304 >invaders It's like you get all your rhetoric from Stephen Miller's playbook.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:01:38 No. 1444312 >>1444306 >for some reason >I'm having a medical emergency and I managed to arrive at a hospital but I don't have an id.. >for >some >reason >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:02:49 No. 1444314 >50 million visa applicants and 20+ million illegals enter the country, soak up public resources >democrats don't understand why healthcare is getting expensive We really are becoming like the UK>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:03:21 No. 1444315 >>1443978 More money to send to Argentina!>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:03:51 No. 1444317 >>1444311 He's absolutely right.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:06:14 No. 1444319 >>1444312 >kid has an accident at school when their parents are at work? Sorry, he has to die because we can't prove he's American >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:07:06 No. 1444320 >>1444319 Or you could just treat him and then send the bill to his parents after? Lmao wtf is this argument.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:07:31 No. 1444321 >>1444312 >Only illegal immigrants don't have their papers on them all the time >>1444314 >Immigrants are the cause of health insurance cartels colluding with for-profit hospitals and for-profit drugmakers >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:08:47 No. 1444323 >>1444319 >lefties think the world is going to turn into DMV waiting lines because we can't give illegals free healthcare >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:14:04 No. 1444326 >>1444321 Have you ever been to an ER? Illegals use them to get non-emergency medical care because they know they can't get turned away. Hospitals don't care because they know they can bill the government (At emergency rates which are higher than normal rates) for it. If you turn off the money, hospitals will turn away illegals for non-emergencies.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:15:24 No. 1444327 >>1444321 >illegal walks into hospital, gets free healthcare (paid by medicare), leaves >no bills paid, no mailing address for debt collection >repeat 20 million times >tax burdens and economical entanglements start fucking up the middle class >retards can't figure out why healthcare is becoming more expensive, chalk it up to corporate greed and keep kvetching that illegals are being deported >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:15:36 No. 1444328 >>1444326 >If you turn off the money, hospitals will turn away illegals for non-emergencies. No, they're still required by law to treat them. It'll just force the hospitals that can't cover the cost to shut down>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:23:43 No. 1444330 >>1444317 No he isn't. >>1444326 >>1444327 >muh "illegals" How did you people get like this?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:24:13 No. 1444331 >>1444327 >Ah yes, my finest fictional scenario to justify tripling health insurance costs please >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:24:45 No. 1444332 >>1444326 No they won't. They don't turn away Lashawndra when she comes in for the eight unpaid time this month because little Jamquesha got the sniffles and they don't turn away José. They're not allowed to even when the money doesn't come in. They send the bill a couple weeks later, let it sit for a while, drop their credit score from 300 to 285, then ask the government to cover this so they don't have to eat the cost. Finding out who can't/won't pay is something that happens long after treatment is over.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:26:20 No. 1444333 >>1444330 mmm yeah he is. >muh illegals aren't illegals How did you subhumans get like this?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:26:49 No. 1444334 >>1444331 >>Ah yes, my finest fictional scenario to justify tripling health insurance costs please You just gotta ignore that Obamacare mandated that 80% of insurance costs had to go to actual insurance instead of padding leech pockets, and Republicunts decided to allow the loophole where they could triple prices to get the old profit margins back.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:26:56 No. 1444335 >>1444328 Yeah anon, illegals still have credit cards, bank accounts, and/or billing addresses. Hospitals can and do still send them bills they have to pay; you literally cannot force a hospital to refuse treating someone who needs help and is consenting to treatment. It violates the hypocritic oath all doctors have to take.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:26:59 No. 1444336 >>1444332 It's like you get your racist strawmen from Rush Limbaugh's radio show in 1996.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:28:12 No. 1444337 >>1444333 No he really isn't.>muh subhumans If you really wanted people to believe you then you wouldn't be using literal nazi buzzwords.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:29:10 No. 1444338 >>1444327 Most illegals have mailing addresses. They're the places ICE go to when they're dragging people out of their homes into unmarked vans. You didn't think those were squatters, did you? They pay rent and usually also taxes, because the IRS doesn't care even a little bit about your legal status when they could be wringing tax money out of you>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:29:29 No. 1444339 >>1444335 >illegals Anyone who doesn't pay taxes is an "illegal".>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:30:59 No. 1444340 >>1444336 I know people who work in an ER. The nogs bring their kids in for things a pediatrician wouldn't even bother looking at them for. Common colds, tummy aches, scraped knees, straight to the ER at taxpayer expense. They bill them, the bills go unpaid, the bills go to the government. They don't ask for money up front.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:31:08 No. 1444341 >>1444337 lol I could give a fuck what you believe, leftist. They're in the country illegally, that makes them invaders. They do not belong here and will be removed. Your attempts to keep them here AND give them benefits paid through taxes is being unraveled by Trump. Your tears are delicious.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:31:33 No. 1444342 >>1444340 You don't even live in America.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:32:29 No. 1444343 >>1444342 I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you aren't sheltered and just call you a stupid shill. Put your supervisor on, I have some complaints about the quality of your work.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:32:35 No. 1444344 >>1444341 The funny thing is you don't even have to be a leftist to call out your far right racist bullshit.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:33:38 No. 1444345 >>1444343 Seek help for your bad case of woke right indoctrination>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:33:41 No. 1444346 >>1444338 >Most illegals have mailing addresses. Which they don't leave at the hospital, because that would mean receiving a bill.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:34:51 No. 1444347 >>1444344 I hope we start deporting "Americans" who shill for illegal immigrants.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:34:59 No. 1444348 >>1444346 So what is your solution, kick out anyone who doesn't have an ID? Hospitals don't ask for payment up front for emergency services, because that's some fucking dark comedy shit.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:37:35 No. 1444349 >>1444346 If that worked, nobody who showed up at a hospital would ever give their name or address and they'd all walk out scot free. What actually happens if you refuse to ID at the hospital is they call the police or pass your info off to a collections agency who will try to find you using alternative means. Since most illegals do have an address and had to pass under cameras to arrive at the ER, they're not hard to find.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:40:00 No. 1444350 >>1444344 And yet you are. >in before nuh uh I just want to flood millions of illegals into the country and give them a pathway to citizenship so we never lose another election >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:40:03 No. 1444351 >>1444345 I'll believe the lived experiences of people who work in the ER over you, thanks. I'm sorry the reality of our broken system doesn't vibe with your beliefs.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:44:39 No. 1444353 >>1444349 >they're not hard to find They all look the same and use the same names.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:47:07 No. 1444354 >>1444351 And the more you keep using words like "nog" and "illegal" no one is going to believe you.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:48:40 No. 1444355 >>1444350 Where do you people get this shit from?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:53:12 No. 1444358 >>1444354 >reality is unbelievable because you almost said a naughty no-no word It's worse than I thought. You should get off this site right now before someone actually drops some doubleplus ungood words on you. Did you know we don't even have to engage in zoomer algospeak here? I can say the words suicide, murder, rape, and even those super duper trigger words. I won't out of courtesy, but you've been warned.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:54:25 No. 1444360 >>1444355 Chuck Schumer.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:55:27 No. 1444362 >>1444358 Go outside and stand on a street corner with a giant sign saying "Nogs and illegals clogging hospitals is why you can't have healthcare". I'd be curious to see if you lasted more than an hour before you end up in a hospital yourself.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:56:04 No. 1444363 >>1444339 Lmao then those people you've been deporting aren't illegal>https://itep.org/undocumented-immigrants-taxes-2024/ >Undocumented immigrants paid $96.7 billion in federal, state, and local taxes in 2022. Most of that amount, $59.4 billion, was paid to the federal government while the remaining $37.3 billion was paid to state and local governments. >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:56:09 No. 1444364 >>1444362 Why do you believe the nogs and illegals are violent reactionaries like that?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:56:30 No. 1444365 >>1444360 Wrong>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:57:55 No. 1444368 >>1444363 Go back to your thinktank and mull over it again.>>1444364 Do you honestly think all white americans are as racist as you are?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:59:04 No. 1444369 >>1444368 Sister, you're the one who claimed you wouldn't last an hour with a sign that had the word nog on it. Did someone attack you? It's not racist to report them if they did. I know you think it is, but it's really not.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)17:59:30 No. 1444371 >>1443978 >Meaningless word-slinging and meaningless foot-shuffling to help folks stay riled up about this and that >>ITT elsewhere: meta-progression forces dueling bots, maintenance of some odd parallel of infighting on a board known only for meaningless infighting, on a site known partially for meaningless infighting. Ok, so if anybody's not getting paid to hang out yapping finger-bone-dust about flat distractions, post again. If not, dead thread, seems fine? Since things tend to get muddy when there's all this nonsense flying around, this means that all further posts in this thread are by genuine humans, interacting in a public forum as friends and equals.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:00:33 No. 1444372 >>1444369 No I claimed you wouldn't. You're so out of touch with the average American's viewpoint you think being an edgy racist is acceptable outside of 4chan.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:02:26 No. 1444374 >>1444372 And why wouldn't I? Is it because doing that would be dangerous? Danger from whom, exactly?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:03:08 No. 1444376 >>1444374 White non-racist people (the vast majority of Americans)>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:04:46 No. 1444377 >>1444371 I'm not sure what you were expecting. Rational discourse? That went out the window when the thread devolved into being about racist strawmen visiting hospitals.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:05:07 No. 1444379 >>1444376 So you think white people would jump me, and only white people? What a weird take. Do you suppose the rest of them are too infantile to stand up for something? Or are they inhumanly noble props instead of people?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:05:45 No. 1444380 >>1444372 >>1444374 >>1444376 Acceptance and danger are different things. There are limited populations for each, which tend to self-segregate.>>1444377 There there, calm down little fella.>>1444379 Nobody wants to jump you, and your mother would look askance at your behavior there and here, unless she's just fine with that kind of thing. Maybe everyone you know is. That's not a very universal experience.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:06:01 No. 1444381 >>1444374 People who think racists can eat shit. I'd love to see you ruin your own life anon.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:06:26 No. 1444382 >>1444379 I'm white and I would definitely jump you>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:07:03 No. 1444383 >>1444380 >Nobody wants to jump you Then why would I end up in the hospital within an hour? Is this some religious thing? God hasn't smote anyone that openly in centuries.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:07:12 No. 1444384 >>1444381 >>1444382 It's unfortunate, but there are a lot of racists in this country. There are many places they could get by just fine, albeit without much respect outside of the community.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:08:08 No. 1444385 >>1444382 Okay, but do you see the brown hordes as noble Others of an inhuman nature, or just props used for good boy points? Because it sure doesn't sound like any of you see them as people.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:08:43 No. 1444387 >>1444384 There aren't that many racists in this country, but the few there are like to inflate their numbers to self-rationalize their irrational worldviews.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:09:27 No. 1444388 >>1444383 Not them, and you won't wind up in any hospital.>>1444385 This is starting to sniff like some paid content, there.>>1444387 Just enough.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:10:00 No. 1444389 >>1444385 I know it's hard for a racist like you to not automatically divide every group of people by race but consider that the "brown hordes" are more American than you are.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:10:36 No. 1444390 >>1444389 Likewise, paid content odor.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:13:43 No. 1444394 >>1444389 Well, I know it's hard for you to be introspective, but I do want you to realize that infantilization is also racism. When you insist that no such people could ever abuse the system because that race is all so great, that is racist. It's not even some dumb shit like inverted racism against white people, it's racist against the ones you are praising. You are reducing them to props. You're so blinded by this that you didn't even get the point of the original post that illegals aren't the ones eating up all the ER money for lack of payment and so this demand for Medicaid isn't for them.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:14:17 No. 1444395 >>1444390 No not likewise. You have a flawed worldview that belongs in the 1920s, not the 2020s. Everyone else laughs at you or threatens you.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:15:31 No. 1444397 >>1444394 This post is just coping.>>1444395 applies to you as well.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:17:13 No. 1444401 >>1444395 You may have misidentified me: I have no such worldviews.>>1444397 At this point, it's difficult to imagine that you're not a paid actor or a simple bot. Please accept my regards.>>1444394 If you're very invested, consider talking with yourself in the bathroom mirror for gaining confidence and a sense of self-worth.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:19:24 No. 1444404 >>1444401 Why are you in this thread at all if you (incorrectly) think it's bots?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:20:40 No. 1444405 >>1444365 >"The only way we’re going to have a great future is if we welcome immigrants get a path to citizenship for all 11 million illegal immigrants.” lol>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:23:50 No. 1444408 >>1444404 Its cope. Desperate cope, because they're so fucking dumb they can't even consider other posters are dumber, so they have to pretend they're AI>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:27:16 No. 1444410 >>1444405 >path to citizenship So not illegal then. Got it.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:28:34 No. 1444411 >>1444410 >for all 11 million illegal immigrants Reading is hard.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:30:58 No. 1444413 >>1444411 Technically all that means is that none are excluded from the possibility, not that it's free or easy. Which I don't agree with, if they commit felonies they should never be eligible for citizenship, at a minimum.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:31:52 No. 1444414 >>1444368 >Go back to your thinktank and mull over it again. What is there to mull? It's an objective, proven facts that there are illegals who pay taxes. All of them? Almost definitely not, but at the same time enough of them do that it contributed billions to our total taxes.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:34:32 No. 1444416 >>1444413 Technically what it means is that he - and all democrats - want to make the 11 million illegals Biden let into the country into voting citizens... i.e. what I just said earlier, despite the "nuh uhs" from gaslighting leftists ITT.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:36:18 No. 1444419 >>1444414 >What is there to mull? The meaning of the word compromise and how Republicans will need to give up something if they want to pass the CR.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:37:24 No. 1444421 >>1444416 >repeating the debunked GOP talking points again Shouldn't you be shitposting on twitter instead of 4chan, Mr. Miller?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:37:47 No. 1444423 >>1444363 >>1444414 The study you're quoting is an estimate, a complete and total hypothetical.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:38:48 No. 1444424 >>1444419 >give us what we want or no one gets to have a government "No">>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:41:09 No. 1444425 >>1444395 >Everyone else laughs at you or threatens you. Because white people being aligned on a racial basis scares the hell out of people like you.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:44:20 No. 1444426 >>1444423 Anon I don't know how to break it to you, but taxes come on literally everything. For no illegals to have ever paid taxes, they would've had to never use or never have:>Electricity >Water >Housing >Food >Gas >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:45:55 No. 1444427 >>1444426 >hypothetically they pay taxes >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:46:40 No. 1444428 >>1444421 >We're not trying to make illegals citizens! >Here's a dem that said he wants to make illegals citizens. >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:47:10 No. 1444429 >>1444425 You have mistaken mocking and ostracizing you for being scared, a common mistake backwards racists make.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:47:16 No. 1444430 >>1444426 Don't forget the sales tax on absolutely everything. Massachusetts has a tax free weekend once a year, I guess you could stock up on an entire year's worth of beans and rice if you were really determined to never pay a single tax. But the rest of the year you better be living under a bush or something.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:48:26 No. 1444431 >>1444424 The compromise is going to happen eventually. >>1444428 They are not illegal if they're on a path to citizenship.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:49:58 No. 1444432 >>1444431 >The compromise is going to happen eventually. Lol, that's where you're wrong bucko.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:50:52 No. 1444433 >>1444432 But I'm not wrong though. They need democrats to pass the CR and the democrats aren't going to vote for the CR in its current form.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:52:07 No. 1444434 >>1444429 >commie instinctually seethes at whites many such cases>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:52:14 No. 1444435 >>1444057 a non issue>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:52:45 No. 1444436 >>1444433 Aw sweet, babies first shutdown.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)18:58:05 No. 1444437 >>1444431 >They are not illegal if they're on a path to citizenship. They came here illegally. That makes them illegals, regardless of your attempts to make voters out of criminals.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:00:02 No. 1444438 >>1444437 Actually that's just a misdemeanor. On a technical level they aren't even criminals.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:01:30 No. 1444439 >>1444438 >misdemeanors aren't crimes Democrats are fucking retarded>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:02:14 No. 1444440 >>1444438 >A misdemeanor isn't a crime Well if we're going to play these games, Supreme Court has already ruled that deportation isn't a punishment.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:02:43 No. 1444441 >>1444438 >that's just a misdemeanor. On a technical level they aren't even criminals. You obviously aren't even American>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:08:42 No. 1444445 >>1444438 https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/criminal-defense/what-is-a-misdemeanor/ >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:15:29 No. 1444446 >>1444438 >misdemeanor >they aren't even criminals. brooooooo>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:31:08 No. 1444447 >>1444438 Misdemeanors are crimes. The better argument is that immigration actions are civil and not criminal proceedings. On that level, illegal immigration is on the same level as things like parking tickets, which are ultimately not impactful to anyone's rights no matter how many they rack up.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:34:05 No. 1444448 >>1444446 remind us what trump is>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:39:06 No. 1444449 >>1443978 good good fuck new yorkers>>1444112 what part of don't negotiate with terrorists do you not get?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:40:08 No. 1444450 >>1444128 https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/trackers/the-republican-party-favorability https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/trackers/the-democratic-party-favorability republicans are leading by 9% anon your narrative doesn't match reality. >>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:43:54 No. 1444451 >>1444450 >your narrative doesn't match reality. Doesn't seem to stop you from lying on this board constantly Tell me again about a clean CR>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:49:10 No. 1444452 >>1444450 >https://www.gelliottmorris.com/p/democrat-flips-trump-11-seat-in-iowa Oops.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:49:41 No. 1444454 >>1444451 >Tell me again about a clean CR Nta, but you mean the continuing resolution that proposed no changes to the existing budget which would allow the health care issue to be negotiated before end of year, preventing a government shutdown? That cr, which several Democrats refused to accept and decided instead they would rather shutdown the government? What about that cr?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:51:34 No. 1444455 >>1444454 >which would allow the health care issue to be negotiated before end of year ...and thus leaving it the problem for Americans until god knows when? You recognize it was running out NOW right?>>
God 10/02/25(Thu)19:55:06 No. 1444456 >>1444455 >..and thus leaving it the problem for Americans until god knows when You don't have to be God to know that the tax credits expire in 3 months and regardless of the government shutdown happening right now, there is 3 months to negotiate it. Avoiding the government shutdown would have just, you know avoided the government shutdown>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:56:12 No. 1444457 >>1444452 wow that's so going to help you right lmao>>1444451 I don't lie I'm not a leftist terrorist>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:56:14 No. 1444458 >>1444456 If they won't negotiate it now, why would they negotiate it then? They've refused to negotiate at every turn in spite of the issue, thus forcing a shutdown because they won't even listen to the other side long enough to address their issues.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)19:56:49 No. 1444459 >>1444457 your job is to lie and we all know you're literally not american>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)20:12:35 No. 1444465 >>1444093 >Thanks to blacks sucking down welfare, SNAP, housing, etc. in states like Mississippi, Alabama, etc. False.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)20:26:11 No. 1444471 >>1444458 They've offered to address the issue raised by Democrats by paying for the medical credits by cutting spending elsewhere. Have Democrats even responded to that or did they just stamp their feet and shut down the government?>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)20:50:29 No. 1444475 >>1444128 >Trump couldn't even clear flat 50%. And since the election he's lost so many supporters he'd lose. Wrong. The number of Trump's supporters are growing everyday and even more so when you have the richest man in the world on your side. I'd say it's an easy win for Republicans next election>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)20:54:06 No. 1444476 >>1444475 you do know golden shower is a euphemism right billionaire slurper>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)21:03:17 No. 1444477 >>1444471 >by cutting spending elsewhere. By using the same "waste and fraud" bullshit that caused DOGE to waste billions of dollars. Come in with a good faith discussion instead of buzzwords and maybe you'll get somewhere. To use some language dear leaders have; the Repubs have no cards. Dems have all the cards. Give them what they want and end the shutdown without trying to attach strings.>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)21:16:41 No. 1444479 >>1444477 >the Repubs have no cards. Dems have all the cards. KEK>>
Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)21:27:32 No. 1444484 >>1444475 >A number of Trump's supporters are growing everyday fixed it for you rural hospitals shutting down is going to be real hard on MAGA fatties and grammas we're trying to save you faggots from yourselves>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)07:13:40 No. 1444542 >>1443978 killing all democrats and democrat voters would literally solve all our countries problems, i dont understand what we are waiting for>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)07:33:59 No. 1444543 >>1444542 >we Don't you have to get on a scooter and invade Ukraine, shill>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)08:26:27 No. 1444546 >>1444330 Let me bring in ol' Lyndon B. Johnson to explain their mindset.>“If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.” It's that simple. Held up for decades.>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)10:06:03 No. 1444550 >>1444546 LBJ was talking about far right republicans.>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)10:59:20 No. 1444551 I‘m really shocked that Trump alone has so much power as President, it seems he can do whatever he wants. Why this was never possible before with other US Presidents? I remember that Republicans always had an easy way to block everything that a Democratic President and Party did or wanted to do. I somehow don‘t hear much from the Democrats recently, except maybe from Bernie Sanders and this guy is not even a member of the Democratic Party. Seriously, what‘s going on there in the USA and why does it look as if the whole country is in coma instead of giving Trump a hard Opposition. >>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)11:01:38 No. 1444552 >>1444551 Any other president would've been impeached or shot down by the supreme court. But Trump has corrupted all the checks to his power... and it's backfiring horrifically as he's leading us to shit.>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)11:06:01 No. 1444553 >>1444551 millions of people are protesting every week, but if the media shows that instead of trump's golf victory they'll be sued out of existence>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)12:40:50 No. 1444556 >>1444552 you do realize one of the cases he had that reached the supreme court literally had the justice asking why wasn't it a crime in the past for a former president to do this but it is now for trump and the democrat attack dogs tried to argue oh times have changed. leftists are so out of touch with reality.>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)12:43:04 No. 1444557 >>1444556 please study english instead of posting>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)12:45:26 No. 1444558 >>1444557 learn to read run on sentences or just hurry and kys>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)13:11:54 No. 1444559 >>1444558 it's not learning to try and decipher your babble. are you 18?>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)13:27:23 No. 1444562 >>1444559 so the uneducated retard cant read run on sentences and has a freak out why karen why are you still allowed to breed.>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)13:36:26 No. 1444563 i didn't know esl shill was underage too. go figure >>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)13:44:45 No. 1444564 >>1444563 you need to click on their No. to reply to someone dipshit, you're welcome stop being a techlet. stop being a terrorist>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)13:56:20 No. 1444568 >>1444558 >learn to read run on sentences no thanks>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)15:43:27 No. 1444595 >>1443983 >>1444060 >>1444177 Go back>>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)15:49:05 No. 1444596 esl shill is begging for his safe space >>
Anonymous 10/03/25(Fri)22:42:19 No. 1444650 >>1443993 >Only Democrats live in Blue states, Only Republicans live in Red states >>
Anonymous 10/07/25(Tue)20:12:40 No. 1445718 >>1443992 There's only one country here, Juan, not the Democratic States and the Republican States. We already settled the issue of what happens to people who secede from the Union, they get killed for treason.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.