Anonymous State Department says it has r(...) 10/15/25(Wed)12:53:42 No. 1447963 https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/14/politics/state-department-revoke-visas-charlie-kirk-murder The US State Department said it has revoked visas from at least six individuals who allegedly “celebrated” Charlie Kirk’s murder. In a post on X Tuesday – which would have been Kirk’s birthday – the agency cataloged “just a few examples” of people who had their visas revoked for comments about the conservative figure following his death. The State Department also said it “continues to identify visa holders who celebrated the heinous assassination of Charlie Kirk.” The Department’s moves to revoke and deny visas to people for their comments about Kirk have raised questions about their legality under the First Amendment. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said last month that the agency had “most certainly been denying visas” to people “celebrating” Kirk’s murder. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said he had instructed consular officials to monitor the comments on social media claiming to identify individuals “praising, rationalizing, or making light of” Kirk’s death. It is unclear how many people have been assigned to do the social media vetting or if the revocations cited Tuesday represent all of those who have had their visas revoked. CNN has asked the State Department for further details about the revocations. Among the examples cited Tuesday are a post said to be from an Argentine national who said that Kirk “‘devoted his entire life spreading racist, xenophobic, misogynistic rhetoric’ and deserves to burn in hell”; another said to be from a South African national who “mocked Americans grieving the loss of Kirk, saying ‘they’re hurt that the racist rally ended in attempted martyrdom’ and alleging ‘he was used to astroturf a movement of white nationalist trailer trash’”; and a Paraguayan national who allegedly said, “Charlie Kirk was a son of a b**** and he died by his own rules.” >>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)13:03:20 No. 1447970 >>1447963 >Mfw they're taking away free speech because of some masterdebater, who promoted free speech >>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)13:06:56 No. 1447973 >celebrate the death of someone who change people's minds in the spirit of free debate >wowwww why are you taking away my free speech? this is fascism though? lol lmao>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)13:30:58 No. 1447980 It sounds like the ACLU will be suing the government again soon. >>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)13:34:21 No. 1447981 >>1447973 Free speech doesn't end when you call someone out for being a piece of shit post-mortem.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)13:34:51 No. 1447982 >>1447963 >devoted his entire life spreading racist, xenophobic, misogynistic rhetoric’ and deserves to burn in hell >he was used to astroturf a movement of white nationalist trailer trash >Charlie Kirk was a son of a b**** and he died by his own rules Three objectively correct statements, why are they getting punished for using their right to free speech to speak the truth? Ah, right, Republicunts hate it when you contradict their propaganda...>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)14:16:40 No. 1447992 >>1447981 >>1447982 None of that is true and he didn't deserve to get JFK'd for believing in the 2nd amendment or that the civil rights act was a scam. Also not everyone cares about milque toast right wing pundits debating college kids so quit obsessing over him>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)14:24:05 No. 1447993 >>1447981 Visa holders don't have free speech. Part of the application process is denouncing totalitarian bullshit. If you're simping for the guy who killed charlie kirk, then that's visa fraud.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)16:44:39 No. 1448036 >>1447992 he deserved it for being a soulless government shill.>>
Scrub 10/15/25(Wed)17:03:50 No. 1448039 Only American citizens have the right to free speech. >>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)17:53:21 No. 1448055 >>1447982 Show me one racist thing he said. Transphobia isn't a real thing, do no need for that>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:04:05 No. 1448056 >>1448055 Look at ur face.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:06:09 No. 1448057 >>1448055 Do need for that. Yes. Now tongue punch that fart box.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:06:48 No. 1448058 >>1447993 >Visa holders don't have free speech. Yes they do anon. First amendment actually applies regardless of citizenship.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:08:35 No. 1448059 >>1448055 This Anon reminds me of a Lesbian Seagull.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:10:35 No. 1448060 >>1447993 I remember my first beer. Salt water mexican!>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:14:21 No. 1448062 >>1447993 Yes they do.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:16:47 No. 1448063 >>1448062 I don't think he speaks English. I mean he does but too much crack rock.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:30:13 No. 1448075 >>1448058 No, they don't. Because they are subject to the visa contract they signed before entering the United States.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:31:05 No. 1448076 >>1448075 No contract can overwrite constitutional rights.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:35:49 No. 1448079 >>1448076 Told ya bro. This kid lives in Narnia.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)18:40:08 No. 1448081 >>1448076 You're retarded. American citizens willingly give up their rights all the time via contract, like when they join the military or work as public employees. Stop posting anytime.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)20:04:28 No. 1448126 >>1447963 good visa holders/non citizens are guests in a country, if guests come in my home and shit on the floor i want them out as well.>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)20:19:48 No. 1448132 >>1448076 Shall not be infringed>>
Anonymous 10/15/25(Wed)22:27:36 No. 1448170 >>1447973 50% of internet traffic is made up of AI bots that pretend as humans and you are one of them>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)00:01:55 No. 1448194 Inalienable rights means they apply to all, cannot be separated from one group or another. America is a country heading to Hell, it and (You) won't be missed. If I were the Judge, you'd be dead already. >>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)00:04:38 No. 1448198 The party of "kill whitey and take his stuff" is very concerned about the principles and decorum of republican politics right now lol >>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)00:15:45 No. 1448204 >>1448198 Black Panther Lives! V!>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)00:26:09 No. 1448207 >>1447993 >what is Bridges v. Wixon >>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)10:21:10 No. 1448284 >>1448194 you are a guest in the country and guests can be told to fuck off if they mistbehave you fucking retard>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)12:28:43 No. 1448303 >>1448194 Browns need to leave. Simple as. If you're not a white American of European stock this is not your country and you need to get out.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)21:03:17 No. 1448408 >>1448303 Orale this cuntrag things I give a flying fuck what she thinks. Stay in the mid west ya bish.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)21:05:52 No. 1448409 >>1448303 Dudes a Lezzy seagull. Confirmed fart sucker. Tongue punch the fart box!>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)21:09:01 No. 1448413 Charlie Kirk deserved to die and he was killed not for expressing his beliefs but for being a millionaire PAC shill with a direct line to the presidency. The fact his death is being used to justify cracking down on speech is laughable but its fitting with how rapidly this administration is spiraling right and doing every unpopular. >>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)21:58:57 No. 1448426 >>1447993 Fuck you retard, the American constitution's rights apply to EVERYBODY within its borders, citizen or otherwise.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)22:05:12 No. 1448428 >>1448055 >"If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?" (Janurary 2024) >"If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified." (January 2024) >"Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more." (May 2023) >"We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s." (December 2023) >>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)22:15:47 No. 1448432 >>1448428 i'm currently pre-laughing at his delusional excuses for these quotes, as well as his inevitable whataboutism>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)22:17:31 No. 1448434 >>1448426 >sign your rights away at the border >WOWWWW THERE WAS NOTHING I COULD'VE DONE kek That's nice hun.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)22:50:37 No. 1448441 >>1448426 No they don't. The Constitution is for actual citizens, we are in no way obligated to defend subhumans illegally existing within our borders.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:00:37 No. 1448445 >>1447982 maybe you shouldn't of tried to kill people for saying the trans movement is based on mental illness. Body dysmorphic disorder is literally classed as a mental disorder. so all's fair game when you're literally lying and grave dancing.>>1448036 you sound like an idf secret agent>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:01:38 No. 1448446 >>1448413 did you say the same about the billionaire pacs funding the floyd riots? oh right rules for thee but not for me.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:05:02 No. 1448447 >>1448303 white freaks just need to be made into soylent green and fed to india, I hate leftists but the righties are obnoxious nepobabies too why won't you all just get rounded up and processed into food to save india.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:31:56 No. 1448453 >>1448447 >Muh both sides!!! Have you ever considered you may need to be made into soylent green? Leftists think you're a right wing fascist and will probably shoot you too.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:33:13 No. 1448454 >>1448447 I'm sorry we cancelled your H1B visa and FHA loan, pajeet.>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:49:04 No. 1448457 Why the fuck would you even want to come here? >>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:57:11 No. 1448460 >>1448453 ok? i don't discriminate leftists are mostly white nepobaby trash soylent green them too>>1448454 imagine thinking people want to live in america atm.... lol>>
Anonymous 10/16/25(Thu)23:58:47 No. 1448461 >>1448447 Buy food, not drugs.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)00:40:57 No. 1448466 >>1448058 >First Amendment >Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. >Congress shall make no law >Congress >>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)00:43:37 No. 1448468 >>1448466 I don't understand what point you think you're making.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)00:53:36 No. 1448472 > State Department says it has revoked visas from people who ‘celebrated’ Charlie Kirk’s murder Good. If you're going to talk shit about America, do it in your own country.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)00:56:47 No. 1448473 >>1448460 >Confags sanctifying Charlie while throwing away any of his principles >Soylent Schizo saying everyone should die A beautiful evening faggots. Never change.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)01:06:18 No. 1448476 >>1448468 If you don't understand the point, don't be so quick to assume I merely "think" I have one. That's a tell that you're seething. The First Amendment applies to laws passed by Congress. What branch is Congress part of? What branch is the State Department part of?>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)01:28:25 No. 1448481 >>1448468 Congress doesn't enforce immigration law, the White House and its associated departments do.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)02:08:14 No. 1448483 >>1448481 NTA, and I hate illegals, but just for argumentation, seeing as the executive cannot make laws but exists to enforce laws, does this violate any laws that congress has created? And if so, can we just tell leftists illegal immigrants and H1-b visa holders are right wing fascists so they'll snipe them crossing the border?>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)02:26:50 No. 1448485 >>1448483 >does this violate any laws that congress has created? The Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits anybody who rhetorically supports terrorism from acquiring a visa. >can we just tell leftists illegal immigrants and H1-b visa holders are right wing fascists so they'll snipe them crossing the border? Leftists are NPCs. They only care about "norms" and the first amendment because they think parroting conservative principles will hinder their removal from the country. But conservatism died in Utah.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)03:00:57 No. 1448490 >>1448485 >But conservatism died in Utah. Almost a good thing. I'm personally not a fan of stock conservativism. I'm more of a liberal pseudo-anarchist nationalist or something odd like that. I'm not a huge fan of Rush Limbaugh calling leftists asshats liberals and having it define the political zeitgeist for decades. Democrats and leftists are not liberal.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)07:10:25 No. 1448515 >>1448441 That's not how it fucking works you imbecile.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)07:23:52 No. 1448516 >>1448485 >The Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits anybody who rhetorically No. It doesn't.>But conservatism died in Utah. Conservatism died in 2007.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)10:37:41 No. 1448531 Let's celebrate in their absence Charlie was an astroturf. Now he's just turf. >>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)10:40:35 No. 1448532 >>1448490 And here we have one of the most retarded people in politics. The "X isn't Y, even though they vote for the same person".>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)11:05:20 No. 1448540 >>1448516 >No. It doesn't. The government disagrees with you.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)12:15:30 No. 1448569 >>1448532 To be fair, I hate terrorists. There's no reason I'd ever vote for a Democrat.>>
Anonymous 10/17/25(Fri)15:04:54 No. 1448615 >>1448515 >Implying it works at all >>
Anonymous 10/18/25(Sat)11:07:46 No. 1448911 >>1448615 Touche.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.