[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (53 KB, 678x452)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/14/politics/state-department-revoke-visas-charlie-kirk-murder
The US State Department said it has revoked visas from at least six individuals who allegedly “celebrated” Charlie Kirk’s murder.

In a post on X Tuesday – which would have been Kirk’s birthday – the agency cataloged “just a few examples” of people who had their visas revoked for comments about the conservative figure following his death. The State Department also said it “continues to identify visa holders who celebrated the heinous assassination of Charlie Kirk.”

The Department’s moves to revoke and deny visas to people for their comments about Kirk have raised questions about their legality under the First Amendment.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said last month that the agency had “most certainly been denying visas” to people “celebrating” Kirk’s murder.

Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said he had instructed consular officials to monitor the comments on social media claiming to identify individuals “praising, rationalizing, or making light of” Kirk’s death.

It is unclear how many people have been assigned to do the social media vetting or if the revocations cited Tuesday represent all of those who have had their visas revoked.

CNN has asked the State Department for further details about the revocations.

Among the examples cited Tuesday are a post said to be from an Argentine national who said that Kirk “‘devoted his entire life spreading racist, xenophobic, misogynistic rhetoric’ and deserves to burn in hell”; another said to be from a South African national who “mocked Americans grieving the loss of Kirk, saying ‘they’re hurt that the racist rally ended in attempted martyrdom’ and alleging ‘he was used to astroturf a movement of white nationalist trailer trash’”; and a Paraguayan national who allegedly said, “Charlie Kirk was a son of a b**** and he died by his own rules.”
>>
>>1447963
>Mfw they're taking away free speech because of some masterdebater, who promoted free speech
>>
>celebrate the death of someone who change people's minds in the spirit of free debate
>wowwww why are you taking away my free speech? this is fascism though?
lol
lmao
>>
It sounds like the ACLU will be suing the government again soon.
>>
>>1447973
Free speech doesn't end when you call someone out for being a piece of shit post-mortem.
>>
>>1447963
>devoted his entire life spreading racist, xenophobic, misogynistic rhetoric’ and deserves to burn in hell
>he was used to astroturf a movement of white nationalist trailer trash
>Charlie Kirk was a son of a b**** and he died by his own rules
Three objectively correct statements, why are they getting punished for using their right to free speech to speak the truth?
Ah, right, Republicunts hate it when you contradict their propaganda...
>>
>>1447981
>>1447982
None of that is true and he didn't deserve to get JFK'd for believing in the 2nd amendment or that the civil rights act was a scam. Also not everyone cares about milque toast right wing pundits debating college kids so quit obsessing over him
>>
>>1447981
Visa holders don't have free speech.
Part of the application process is denouncing totalitarian bullshit. If you're simping for the guy who killed charlie kirk, then that's visa fraud.
>>
>>1447992
he deserved it for being a soulless government shill.
>>
Only American citizens have the right to free speech.
>>
>>1447982
Show me one racist thing he said. Transphobia isn't a real thing, do no need for that
>>
>>1448055
Look at ur face.
>>
>>1448055
Do need for that. Yes. Now tongue punch that fart box.
>>
>>1447993
>Visa holders don't have free speech.
Yes they do anon. First amendment actually applies regardless of citizenship.
>>
>>1448055
This Anon reminds me of a Lesbian Seagull.
>>
>>1447993
I remember my first beer. Salt water mexican!
>>
>>1447993
Yes they do.
>>
>>1448062
I don't think he speaks English. I mean he does but too much crack rock.
>>
>>1448058
No, they don't. Because they are subject to the visa contract they signed before entering the United States.
>>
>>1448075
No contract can overwrite constitutional rights.
>>
>>1448076
Told ya bro. This kid lives in Narnia.
>>
>>1448076
You're retarded. American citizens willingly give up their rights all the time via contract, like when they join the military or work as public employees.
Stop posting anytime.
>>
>>1447963
good visa holders/non citizens are guests in a country, if guests come in my home and shit on the floor i want them out as well.
>>
>>1448076
Shall not be infringed
>>
>>1447973
50% of internet traffic is made up of AI bots that pretend as humans and you are one of them
>>
Inalienable rights means they apply to all, cannot be separated from one group or another. America is a country heading to Hell, it and (You) won't be missed. If I were the Judge, you'd be dead already.
>>
The party of "kill whitey and take his stuff" is very concerned about the principles and decorum of republican politics right now lol
>>
>>1448198
Black Panther Lives! V!
>>
>>1447993
>what is Bridges v. Wixon
>>
>>1448194
you are a guest in the country and guests can be told to fuck off if they mistbehave you fucking retard
>>
>>1448194
Browns need to leave. Simple as. If you're not a white American of European stock this is not your country and you need to get out.
>>
>>1448303
Orale this cuntrag things I give a flying fuck what she thinks. Stay in the mid west ya bish.
>>
>>1448303
Dudes a Lezzy seagull. Confirmed fart sucker. Tongue punch the fart box!
>>
Charlie Kirk deserved to die and he was killed not for expressing his beliefs but for being a millionaire PAC shill with a direct line to the presidency.

The fact his death is being used to justify cracking down on speech is laughable but its fitting with how rapidly this administration is spiraling right and doing every unpopular.
>>
>>1447993
Fuck you retard, the American constitution's rights apply to EVERYBODY within its borders, citizen or otherwise.
>>
>>1448055
>"If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?" (Janurary 2024)
>"If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified." (January 2024)
>"Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more." (May 2023)
>"We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s." (December 2023)
>>
>>1448428
i'm currently pre-laughing at his delusional excuses for these quotes, as well as his inevitable whataboutism
>>
>>1448426
>sign your rights away at the border
>WOWWWW THERE WAS NOTHING I COULD'VE DONE
kek
That's nice hun.
>>
>>1448426
No they don't. The Constitution is for actual citizens, we are in no way obligated to defend subhumans illegally existing within our borders.
>>
>>1447982
maybe you shouldn't of tried to kill people for saying the trans movement is based on mental illness. Body dysmorphic disorder is literally classed as a mental disorder. so all's fair game when you're literally lying and grave dancing.
>>1448036
you sound like an idf secret agent
>>
>>1448413
did you say the same about the billionaire pacs funding the floyd riots?
oh right rules for thee but not for me.
>>
>>1448303
white freaks just need to be made into soylent green and fed to india, I hate leftists but the righties are obnoxious nepobabies too why won't you all just get rounded up and processed into food to save india.
>>
>>1448447
>Muh both sides!!!
Have you ever considered you may need to be made into soylent green?
Leftists think you're a right wing fascist and will probably shoot you too.
>>
>>1448447
I'm sorry we cancelled your H1B visa and FHA loan, pajeet.
>>
Why the fuck would you even want to come here?
>>
>>1448453
ok? i don't discriminate leftists are mostly white nepobaby trash soylent green them too
>>1448454
imagine thinking people want to live in america atm....
lol
>>
>>1448447
Buy food, not drugs.
>>
>>1448058
>First Amendment
>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
>Congress shall make no law
>Congress
>>
>>1448466
I don't understand what point you think you're making.
>>
> State Department says it has revoked visas from people who ‘celebrated’ Charlie Kirk’s murder

Good. If you're going to talk shit about America, do it in your own country.
>>
>>1448460
>Confags sanctifying Charlie while throwing away any of his principles
>Soylent Schizo saying everyone should die
A beautiful evening faggots. Never change.
>>
>>1448468
If you don't understand the point, don't be so quick to assume I merely "think" I have one. That's a tell that you're seething.

The First Amendment applies to laws passed by Congress. What branch is Congress part of? What branch is the State Department part of?
>>
>>1448468
Congress doesn't enforce immigration law, the White House and its associated departments do.
>>
>>1448481
NTA, and I hate illegals, but just for argumentation, seeing as the executive cannot make laws but exists to enforce laws, does this violate any laws that congress has created?
And if so, can we just tell leftists illegal immigrants and H1-b visa holders are right wing fascists so they'll snipe them crossing the border?
>>
>>1448483
>does this violate any laws that congress has created?
The Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits anybody who rhetorically supports terrorism from acquiring a visa.
>can we just tell leftists illegal immigrants and H1-b visa holders are right wing fascists so they'll snipe them crossing the border?
Leftists are NPCs. They only care about "norms" and the first amendment because they think parroting conservative principles will hinder their removal from the country. But conservatism died in Utah.
>>
>>1448485
>But conservatism died in Utah.
Almost a good thing. I'm personally not a fan of stock conservativism.
I'm more of a liberal pseudo-anarchist nationalist or something odd like that.
I'm not a huge fan of Rush Limbaugh calling leftists asshats liberals and having it define the political zeitgeist for decades. Democrats and leftists are not liberal.
>>
>>1448441
That's not how it fucking works you imbecile.
>>
>>1448485
>The Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits anybody who rhetorically
No. It doesn't.
>But conservatism died in Utah.
Conservatism died in 2007.
>>
Let's celebrate in their absence

Charlie was an astroturf. Now he's just turf.
>>
>>1448490
And here we have one of the most retarded people in politics. The "X isn't Y, even though they vote for the same person".
>>
>>1448516
>No. It doesn't.
The government disagrees with you.
>>
>>1448532
To be fair, I hate terrorists. There's no reason I'd ever vote for a Democrat.
>>
>>1448515
>Implying it works at all
>>
>>1448615
Touche.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.