“The transcripts of Alex Acosta’s interview confirm what we’ve known all along: he has no remorse for his mishandling of the Epstein case,” Guerrero said in a statement. “Because of the deal Alex Acosta gave Epstein, he was able to continue assaulting and raping young women and girls for another decade. No matter how House Republicans try to spin this, Oversight Democrats will keep pushing for the truth.”

Acosta, in his capacity as U.S. attorney, oversaw the deal between the federal government and Epstein that many have argued allowed the financier to continue to victimize women for years. Acosta resigned from his post as Labor Secretary in the first Trump administration amid renewed scrutiny of the Epstein case. He told Congressional investigators last month that the decision to resign was his choice and not by the urging of the White House.

The panel has been probing the Epstein case for months, after a subcommittee in July compelled the full committee chair, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), to subpoena the Justice Department for documents.

Epstein’s estate has also turned over materials to Congressional investigators, including a so-called birthday book that included a note allegedly written by Trump for Epstein.

Trump has denied his connection to the note and sued the Wall Street Journal, which was the first to report on its existence. Democrats continue to suggest Trump is trying to hide his longtime relationship with Epstein.

The House Oversight Committee also on Friday released a new batch of documents it had previously received from Epstein’s estate, including Epstein’s schedules.

The materials mention a host of powerful men with whom Epstein had dealings, including a proposed 2011 appointment with Tom Pritzker — who appears to be the businessman and executive chairman of Hyatt Hotels — and a planned 2012 dinner with filmmaker Woody Allen and his partner, Soon-Yi Previn.

Among other events mentioned, Epstein also appeared to scheduled a dinner in Feb. 2013 with the former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Barak and Larry Summers, former Treasury Secretary and Harvard University President.

>>1449189
>Oversight Democrats will keep pushing for the truth.
democrats had the option to release the files they didn't they're complicit
Meanwhile if you look at epstein's political contribution it was majority democrat, how does it feel Chuck schumer to know your campaign money is literally sourced from human trafficking

>>1449195
>democrats had the option to release the files they didn't
They were under a court order to not release them.

>>1449206
they ran the country

>>1449195
So you're fine with releasing the files then?

>>1449206
Not only is this probably not true, but even if it were, are you suggesting that court order conveniently dissolved the day Donald Trump was sworn in?

>>1449211
no not only should they seal the files permanently they should exonerate ghislaine maxwell and appoint her as head of the education board

>>1449209
Courts are an entirely different branch of government
>>1449212
It is true but keep coping all you want
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/23/jeffrey-esptein-grand-jury-doj-00471291

>>1449187
Breaking News: Pedophile finds no wrongdoing by another pedophile.
This is news now, Fake News.

>>1449220
justices are appointed

>>1449223
Yes we know which is why Trump keeps appointing unqualified thinktank shills and then rescinding the appointments

>>1449221
>Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee took a victory lap Friday after releasing a transcript of their recent interview with former U.S. attorney Alex Acosta regarding Jeffrey Epstein, saying it provides evidence President Donald Trump was not involved in the case against the late convicted sex offender.
That's the story.

>>1449230
Alex Acosta, the guy who claimed out of nowhere that Epstein belonged to the FBI and needed to be released with a slap on the wrist to keep fucking kids for another decade
Bondi couldn't deny that the FBI had pictures of Trump fucking kids, lmao

>>1449220
>It is true but keep coping all you want
Hold up, anon. Slow your roll with your cognitive dissonance for a moment, You aren't actually addressing the concern whatsoever .

What was claimed was that Democrats did not release these records while Biden was in control because "They were under a court order to not release them". Exact words: >>1449206

What you provided was an article dated this year just a couple months ago.

So we arrive back at the original statement: if what is in them is damaging to Trump, why didn't Democrats release it when they were in power?

>>1449236
Massie is trying to unseal the same court order right now. Look at how much success he's having.

>>1449236
>democrats didn't release the epstein files, so we have to protect global pedophiles
pathetic

>>1449253
>>1449240
So I take it you're admitting that Democrats never even tried to release these files that are super duper damaging to Trump, and now for some reason this is the Republicans fault and some sort of crazy conspiracy and not some sort of dem political ploy

>>1449255
Why will Republicans not release them after pledging to several times? Wouldn't that absolve Trump instantly? But instead they're claiming they don't even exist.

>>1449187
Seventeen years after Acosta let Epstein walk free and covered up his crimes, and eight years after Trump rewarded him for it by making him Secretary of Labor, he's still protecting pedophiles
Truly, a lifetime commitment to covering up sex crimes against children by powerful men

>>1449256
>Why will Republicans not release them after pledging to several times
According to them they have released them though. Maybe the remaining "files" are just political fantasy pushed by Democrats, you ever think of that?

More than likely though they are damaging to Israel's national security

>>1449255
It's really weird that you keep deflecting from the topic of the thread with "but da demcrats!!1".

>>1449263
If shills don't stick to the script, they don't get paid

>>1449260
>Guys they're not real
>Just ignore how we can't say that under oath and unironically tried to say Epstein had no clients, which directly goes against testimony from HIS OWN VICTIMS

>>1449209
>they ran the country
They obey the law

>>1449209
Joe Manchin was never really a democrat

>>1449195
Cool so lets release the files then and put all those Democrats in jail. Or is Trump protecting them out of the kindness of his heart?

>>1449302
<crickets chirping>

>>1449266
>Epstein had no clients
Let's examine this statement for a bit and think about it critically.
You say "clients" implying that Jeffery Epstein was selling them. Do you really think this was happening? The dude was rich as fuck and owned a private goddamn island, he didn't need to sell sex to anyone, he made his money managing rich Jewish peoples financial portfolios.

If you can agree that he wasn't selling rich people sex for financial gain, I'd like you to speculate about what other purpose he may have been trafficking minors for sex. And maybe we can start to understand why additional information isn't being released

>>1449334
>Guys he was already rich and powerful why would he ever want more money and blackmail material

>>1449352
Yeah ok so you can't think critically, you just repeat whatever the social media bots and bobble heads tell you that you should believe.

Got it.

>>1449354
Critically thinking would be "yes, the rich would absolutely love to be richer." My additional sources is every other fucking millionaire or billionaire on the planet. Fucks sake, Trump is literally President RN and he's still occasionally pushing crypto scams and merch for a quick buck.

>>1449355
>yes, the rich would absolutely love to be richer
Putting your own biases aside about how rich people must be evil, please think critically here.
Has anybody involved ever even alleged that these people were paying jeffrey Epstein to fuck them?

>>1449358
>Has anybody involved ever even alleged that these people were paying jeffrey Epstein to fuck them?
Virginia Giuffre for one. And here's a bunch of the living survivors pissed that they denied what happened to them.
>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-epstein-files-victims-anguish-maga-conspiracy-theory-rcna218693

>>1449361
>Virginia Giuffre
I can spot a lying clout chaser from a mile away

>>1449376
>One of Epstein's victims who actually won against him in court
>"lying clout chaser"
C O P E

>>1449358
>Ask question
>>1449361
>Get specific answer
>>1449376
>Dismiss answer out of hand because it hurts your position
The dance of the bad faith pedo shill is a marvel to watch, no matter how many times you see it

>>1449376
faggots like you who make life living hell always get what they deserve in the end

>>1449187
>evidence President Donald Trump was not involved in the case against the late convicted sex offender
>all the pro-orange Pedo-in-Chief supporters
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/all-names
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/black-book-images/80.jpg
Along with not only you being liars, the above evidence is the best worst kept secret

>>1449379
>faggots like you who make life living hell always get what they deserve in the end
I agree
https://i.postimg.cc/bvsXY7Pv/hubris.png
The pushback starts here

>>1449382
The point of the story is Trump's first Labor Secretary did nothing wrong when he was the prosecutor charging Epstein with a slap on the wrist.

>>1449384
Pushback against what?

>and 1449453 hasn't actually read what it says on that pic
If MAGAts can say what they like with impunity and employers wouldn't dare fire Trump voters for fear of repercussions, why was that woman fired? The fact she's now experiencing Hubris and will suffer financial Hell - certainly this Xmas - for the crime of having wrong opinions, then that's proof that the pushback starts here.