Anonymous Trump Said to Demand Justice D(...) 10/22/25(Wed)08:13:58 No. 1450512 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/21/us/politics/trump-justice-department-compensation.html President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit. The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department. Mr. Trump submitted complaints through an administrative claim process that often is the precursor to lawsuits. The first claim, lodged in late 2023, seeks damages for a number of purported violations of his rights, including the F.B.I. and special counsel investigation into Russian election tampering and possible connections to the 2016 Trump campaign, according to people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the claim has not been made public. The second complaint, filed in the summer of 2024, accuses the F.B.I. of violating Mr. Trump’s privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago, his club and residence in Florida, in 2022 for classified documents. It also accuses the Justice Department of malicious prosecution in charging him with mishandling sensitive records after he left office. Lawyers said the nature of the claims posed undeniable ethics challenges. “What a travesty,” said Bennett L. Gershman, an ethics professor at Pace University. “The ethical conflict is just so basic and fundamental, you don’t need a law professor to explain it.” >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)08:15:43 No. 1450514 He added: “And then to have people in the Justice Department decide whether his claim should be successful or not, and these are the people who serve him deciding whether he wins or loses. It’s bizarre and almost too outlandish to believe.” Even the president seemed to acknowledge that point in the Oval Office last week, when he alluded vaguely to the situation while standing next to the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and her deputy, Todd Blanche. According to Justice Department regulations, the deputy attorney general — in this case, Mr. Blanche — is one of two people eligible to sign off on such a settlement. “I have a lawsuit that was doing very well, and when I became president. I said, I’m sort of suing myself. I don’t know, how do you settle the lawsuit, I’ll say give me X dollars, and I don’t know what to do with the lawsuit,” Mr. Trump said, adding: “It sort of looks bad, I’m suing myself, right? So I don’t know. But that was a lawsuit that was very strong, very powerful.” Administrative claims are not technically lawsuits. Such complaints are submitted first to the Justice Department on what is called a Standard Form 95, to see if a settlement can be reached without a lawsuit in federal court. If the department formally rejects such a claim or declines to act on it, a person could then sue in court. Still, that is an unlikely outcome in this instance, given that Mr. Trump is already negotiating, in essence, with his subordinates. Compensation is typically covered by taxpayers. Two people familiar with the president’s legal claims said that he had not been paid by the federal government but that he expected to be. >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)08:16:46 No. 1450516 The second claim accused Merrick B. Garland, then the attorney general, Christopher A. Wray, then the F.B.I. director, and Jack Smith, the special counsel investigating Mr. Trump at the time, of “harassment” intended to sway the electoral outcome. “This malicious prosecution led President Trump to spend tens of millions of dollars defending the case and his reputation,” the claim said. According to the Justice Department manual, settlements of claims against the department for more than $4 million “must be approved by the deputy attorney general or associate attorney general,” meaning the person who runs the agency’s civil division. The current deputy attorney general, Mr. Blanche, served as Mr. Trump’s lead criminal defense lawyer and said at his confirmation hearing in February that his attorney-client relationship with the president continued. The chief of the department’s civil division, Stanley Woodward Jr., represented Mr. Trump’s co-defendant, Walt Nauta, in the classified documents case. Mr. Woodward has also represented a number of other Trump aides, including Mr. Patel, in investigations related to Mr. Trump or the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. A White House spokeswoman referred questions to the Justice Department. Asked if either of those top officials would recuse or have been recused from overseeing the possible settlement with Mr. Trump, a Justice Department spokesman, Chad Gilmartin, said, “In any circumstance, all officials at the Department of Justice follow the guidance of career ethics officials.” In July, Ms. Bondi fired the agency’s top ethics adviser. Mr. Trump famously hates recusals. He complained bitterly after his first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, withdrew from overseeing the Russia investigation that is now the subject of one of his demands for money. >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)08:17:21 No. 1450517 “The attorney general made a terrible mistake when he did this and when he recused himself,” Mr. Trump said in 2018. “He should have certainly let us know if he was going to recuse himself, and we would have used a — put a different attorney general in.” The Justice Department does not specifically require a public announcement of settlements made for administrative claims before they become lawsuits. If or when the Trump administration pays the president what could be hundreds of millions of dollars, there may be no immediate official declaration that it did so, according to current and former department officials. Some former officials have privately expressed misgivings that the department’s leaders did not reject Mr. Trump’s legal claims in the waning days of the Biden administration. It has long been standard practice for civil litigation, including lawsuits against the government, to be paused until any criminal cases around the same facts have been resolved. >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)08:18:37 No. 1450518 >>1450512 He doesn't take a salary>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)08:53:38 No. 1450521 >>1450518 No, he just grifts endless millions from sycophants.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)09:17:20 No. 1450522 >>1450518 He took nuclear secrets.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)09:21:20 No. 1450523 Now, let's compare. At the White House, or what's left of the White House anyway, how much was that new ballroom gonna cost? Would it happen to be covered by this 230 million he just discovered from the taxpayers? >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)09:47:44 No. 1450527 >>1450518 >Guys he doesn't take his 400k salary >All he has is the billions he's made off of using his position for merch and crypto grifts >He's basically homeless! >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)10:42:35 No. 1450535 So Trump filed these lawsuits before he was elected into public office, has anything actually happened with the lawsuits since then? Because this really seems like leftist outrage clickbait, since it doesn't actually seem like the lawsuits are being approved, and despite having the power to do so for nearly a year, no payments have been authorized >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)10:44:49 No. 1450537 >>1450535 >has anything actually happened with the lawsuits since then? Yes; he's still doing them and said he deserves the money. The fact this lines up perfectly with him actually starting construction on that 200 million ballroom isn't a coincidence. If he had any fucking integrity he would've dropped this shit the moment he became president. He is literally asking HIS OWN LAWYER to make a settlement to him.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)10:49:26 No. 1450539 >>1450537 >Trump is a time traveling genius >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)10:49:44 No. 1450540 >>1450537 >The fact this lines up perfectly with him actually starting construction on that 200 million ballroom isn't a coincidence. What the fuck are you talking about the lawsuits are from before when he was elected you filthy clanker.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)10:53:46 No. 1450543 >>1450539 >>1450540 >File lawsuit >Win presidency >Want vanity project >Realize you can get taxpayers to pay for it by just using said lawsuit >Literally now cannot lose said lawsuit because your lawyer now decides if DOJ settles instead of going to court >Profit You don't need to be a time traveler to pull this shit. It's pretty simple; either he loses the election and is probably in prison, or he wins and he can literally use this to order taxpayer dollars to be transferred to his personal account.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)10:55:36 No. 1450544 >>1450543 The improvement is being paid for by private donations. Idk why you need to cook up a huge (and ridiculous) conspiracy about it. All that accomplishes is making you look unhinged.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)10:58:17 No. 1450546 >>1450544 >The improvement is being paid for by private donations Trump literally said he'd do it out of his own pocket. He only switched to saying "private donors (that include myself)" AFTER it became public knowledge he was, COINCIDENTALLY, about to receive even more than the price tag of the ballroom from his own DOJ.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:00:16 No. 1450548 >>1450546 Im not interested in your conspiracy theory. Im just telling you that its a really bad look for (you).>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:03:48 No. 1450550 >>1450548 It's not really a conspiracy theory to point out "Hey Trump said no public money would go to the Ballroom because he'd be paying for it himself, but then it turns out he's paying himself roughly the same amount the ballroom costs". The ballroom is effectively still being paid for by american taxpayers. Trump lied.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:03:52 No. 1450551 >>1450535 So the DoJ are just going to say to Trump '$230 million from us? Go fuck yourself'? Now put yourself in Trump's position: would you just say 'Okay, I don't want that $230 million from you' if the DoJ said that?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:05:25 No. 1450552 >>1450551 Why would they even say that when his own lawyer now runs it?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:15:41 No. 1450553 >>1450552 >Trump will be getting that $230 million from the D0J So that ballroom will be paid for with taxpayers money. Thanks for admitting that, Trump, or you wouldn't be demanding that $230 million from the DoJ>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:28:32 No. 1450559 >>1450539 This is what they believe tho>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:29:14 No. 1450561 >>1450550 >time traveling mastermind theory Never stop.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:31:21 No. 1450563 >>1450551 >>1450553 Its really quite something that youre do mind broken by Trump that you have to cook up all this nonsense to argue that a good thing is in fact not a good thing. And BTW, we know who the donors are as well. https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/administration/5565273-trump-white-house-ballroom-funding-plans/amp/ >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:32:38 No. 1450564 >>1450561 How is it time travel? If he won the election he won the case. If he lost he'd almost certainly be in prison and it wouldn't matter. After the former happened he just figured out how to use it to get tax payers to pay for his vanity project. He saw he had a 230 million payday from tax payers coming up and used it on his own personal ballroom project, then spun it as "The taxpayers aren't paying for it, I am (with the money I got from taxpayers)".>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:33:43 No. 1450565 >>1450563 THE FIRST DONOR LISTED IS TRUMP YOU FUCKING RETARD. LMAOOOOO>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:36:53 No. 1450567 >>1450564 Taxpayers aren't paying for it, we have a list of donors. >>1450565 And? The President using his own money to improve the WH is a bad thing?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:37:43 No. 1450568 >>1450563 >And BTW, we know who the donors are as well. So the only one on that list that's actually got any record of donating on paper is the youtube lawsuit settlement to Trump. The others haven't actually done anything yet, but Trump's amount hasn't been confirmed yet. Hmmmm. How interesting. Youtube is paying 22 million, and Trump just got 230 million. If you add that together you get... the estimated price they said the ballroom will cost.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:38:37 No. 1450570 >>1450563 >Its really quite something that youre do >youre do It's really quite something that you're so illiterate.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:38:43 No. 1450571 >>1450567 >Guys Trump is spending his own money >While also suing the DOJ for roughly the same amount the project needs >Which will be paid for by... taxpayers Oops.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:38:54 No. 1450572 >>1450568 It kills you that he's doing this with private funds. It absolutely grates your soul, doesn't It?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:39:42 No. 1450573 Trump simps on suicidewatch >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:39:46 No. 1450574 >>1450572 If he pays himself the same amount from the DOJ that he needs to spend, he's not doing it with private funds lmao.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:40:25 No. 1450575 >>1450563 >>1450567 Trump doesn't need that $230 million from the DoJ then>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:40:32 No. 1450576 >>1450564 >If he won the election he won the case. He saw he had a 230 million payday from tax payers coming up and used it on his own personal ballroom projec Has he won the case? Or are you just making all of that it up a fit of schizophrenic cognitive dissonance to justify your terminal TDS?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:40:54 No. 1450578 >>1450571 >Time traveling machiavellian genius theory If he is entitled to 230 million fron the Doj and he decides to give that money to the American people, instead of keeping it, that's extra based.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:41:23 No. 1450579 >President could pay all his voters $1,000,000. >or he steals $1,000,000 from taxpayers republicans gargle deez nuts>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:41:55 No. 1450580 >>1450574 If its his money. Its private. LOL. Your conspiracy theory makes him seem even more generous.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:42:04 No. 1450581 >>1450578 >decides to give that money to the American people He's literally spending it on something he openly admits is a vanity project for himself.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:43:13 No. 1450582 >>1450576 How would he lose the case? His own lawyer is in control of the DOJ and he's openly talking about how he deserves the money. It is quite literally Donald Trump asking an agency controlled by Donald Trump to settle with Donald Trump.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:43:30 No. 1450583 >>1450581 >uses his own money to add something to the White House (which belongs to the American people) >OMG HOW COULD YOU LOL Stay mad. Loser.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:45:09 No. 1450586 >>1450583 >uses his own money to add something to the White House (which belongs to the American people Trump won't need that $230 million from the DoJ in that case.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:46:40 No. 1450587 >>1450586 No he doesn't. That's why he's giving it back to us :) Would you prefer he keeps it?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:46:57 No. 1450588 >>1450580 >If its his money. Its private Yeah not how it works. He's the deciding factor for his payout. He is literally using this lawsuit to directly take taxpayer money and using it to pay for a personal project after REPEATEDLY saying it wouldn't cost the public a cent.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:47:49 No. 1450589 >>1450588 >He's the deciding factor for his payout No, he isn't. >using it to pay for a personal project after REPEATEDLY saying it wouldn't cost the public a cent. If he gets the award, its his money. Would you prefer he keep the money?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:48:56 No. 1450591 >>1450587 Except that money isn't going to the American people. It's going to a private construction company. He is taking taxpayer dollars, giving it to himself, then spending it on a personal expense. All while claiming taxpayers aren't paying for his little vanity project.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:49:57 No. 1450592 >>1450589 >No, he isn't. Who is in charge of the DOJ anon?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:51:36 No. 1450594 >>1450587 >That's why he's giving it back to us In the form of that ballroom or he won't need that $230 million from the DoJ because he's spending his own money on building something that 99.9999999999% of Americans will never be allowed to use >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:51:39 No. 1450595 >>1450583 >the White House (which belongs to the American people) If he doesn't own it, why is he demolishing it? A renter can't do that.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:51:57 No. 1450596 >>1450591 Problem with your theory is that construction has started now and he doesn't have the DOJ money. Dude is doing a good thing with private capital. Get over it. >>1450592 He and everyone he appoints in conflicted out from the decision making process.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:53:48 No. 1450597 >>1450596 >Problem with your theory is that construction has started now and he doesn't have the DOJ money. Yeah, construction starts and suddenly he starts talking about how he deserves the money. Funny how that works out.>He and everyone he appoints in conflicted out from the decision making process. So the entire DOJ is conflicted out from the decision making process of... a lawsuit against the DOJ. yeah that makes perfect sense.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:54:22 No. 1450598 >>1450589 >Would you prefer he keep the money? Why would he want $230 million of taxpayers money if he's supposedly worth billions and can afford to build that ballroom with just his own money? Trump would say to the DoJ 'I don't want that $230 million' if he's as wealthy as he claims.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:54:40 No. 1450599 >>1450594 Go away britschizo.>>1450595 He is the present possessory holder the us people are remaindermen. Im smarter than you, don't even try.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:55:25 No. 1450601 >>1450596 >and he doesn't have the DOJ money. So he doesn't need it then, if he's the billionaire he 'claims' to be>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:55:41 No. 1450602 >>1450597 >>1450598 I love how hard you losers are crashing out over him improving the WH with private funds. Its absolutely delicious.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:56:26 No. 1450604 >>1450599 >Go away Says the projecting non-American>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:57:01 No. 1450605 >>1450602 It's not private funds if he's taking the same amount he spends from the American taxpayer in the form of a settlement he can't lose. Taxpayers are still paying for it.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:58:13 No. 1450607 >>1450604 Youre British. >>1450605 The fact that he's doing it with private funds, unlike any other US president who's made improvements, makes you ESPECIALLY angry. Delicious.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)11:58:32 No. 1450608 >>1450599 >>1450602 I love how the foreign schizo is crashing out over posts he's obsessed with here, or he wouldn't need to be in 4chan if he was so secure in his political beliefs>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:02:35 No. 1450610 >>1450607 >The fact that he's doing it with private funds Again, not private funds if they come from the american taxpayer. Trump said no public money would go to this because it would make him look like a massive hypocrite. He lied and is now going to pay public money to himself to pay for the ballroom.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:03:22 No. 1450611 >>1450607 >Youre British >Youre Americans know English better than you. Projecting again. You're not beating the foreigner allegations, non-American shill.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:12:56 No. 1450613 >>1450610 >. He lied and is now going to pay public money to himself to pay for the ballroom. Proof?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:14:39 No. 1450614 >>1450613 The fact he's set to pay himself 230 million from a lawsuit against his own DOJ while coincidentally also needing that much for the ballroom he said he would "privately finance">>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:15:36 No. 1450615 >>1450613 Trump can prove it by saying to the DoJ 'I don't want that $230 million'. If he's so rich, he doesn't need it, thus he would immediately say no. Every second he doesn't, there's the proof..>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:19:05 No. 1450617 >>1450614 >>1450615 Im loving how mad this shit makes you dudes. The reason Trump keeps winning is that you don't know when to shut the fuck up. Youre always opposed to him, even if its an 80:20 issue. Because of that, when you really should be opposed to him it gets drowned out by all the noise - no one is listening.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:35:40 No. 1450627 >>1450617 >Im loving how >Im I'm loving how the shill keeps proving he's not American.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:35:50 No. 1450628 >>1450617 >I love how people are mad about the President of the US lining his own pockets with our taxpayer dollars then lying that he's spending "his own money" on a vanity project no one asked for other than him >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)12:58:18 No. 1450632 >>1450615 But Trump says he can pay himself https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/22/donald-trump-damages-federal-investigations >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:00:04 No. 1450633 >>1450632 yeah, he'll pay himself, then coincidentally come into the 230 million he just spent, courtesy of American Taxpayers.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:04:23 No. 1450637 >>1450627 Lmao meds>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:05:24 No. 1450638 >>1450628 Keep stacking up on the side of the 20 in 80:20 issues. Never ever stop.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:06:28 No. 1450639 >>1450632 So he can say no to that $230 million from the DoJ>>1450632 >But Trump says he can pay himself >pay himself >not 'pay for it himself' Apparently he's not intelligent enough to figure out that if he's rich enough to pay for the construction of that ballroom from his own money, therefore he doesn't need that $230 million from the DoJ.Trump's not the only one who isn't intelligent enough to figure that one out >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:08:42 No. 1450640 >>1450637 As usual, what the projecting shill is reduced to when called out on his educational inferiority.>>1450617 >Im loving how >Im >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:10:02 No. 1450641 >>1450640 >gets btfo >b... but a typo! Concession accepted. Stay mad.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:12:11 No. 1450642 This fucker steals $230 million from taxpayers they would be morally obligated to steal it back. >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:12:46 No. 1450643 >>1450638 This isn't an "80:20" issue. Republicans don't like their president pocketing their money after spending the entire campaign trail talking about saving the government money.>https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/former-trump-campaign-adviser-rips-140032584.html >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:13:58 No. 1450644 >and 1450641 btfo by typos stay seething, shill that'll never beat the non-American allegations>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:15:34 No. 1450645 >>1450643 >This isn't an "80:20" issue Keep telling yourself that. I think you need to make an even bigger fuss about this. >>1450644 Youre still replying. >a... another typo! Deal with it xD>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:17:29 No. 1450647 >>1450617 >Im loving how >Im Can't be a typo when an apostrophe is deliberately omitted in "I'm">>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:19:07 No. 1450648 You'll never beat the non-American allegations, 1450645 >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:21:02 No. 1450649 Nobody supports this except thieves and liars. >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:21:15 No. 1450650 >>1450647 The content of that post has you absolutely spiraling and all you can come up with is >homg you forgot to include an apostrophe in your contraction! If your only response is to grammar native, you've been totally and utterly BLOWN THE FUCK OUT xd>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:22:28 No. 1450651 >>1450650 *grammar nazi>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:22:31 No. 1450652 >>1450650 Liar.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:24:44 No. 1450654 Still not beating those non-American allegations, especially when all you can come up with is excuses 1450650 >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:25:04 No. 1450655 >>1450652 >so totally blown the fuck out >so utterly and completely booty blasted >jimmies so severely rustled >argument yeeted into next week >that all it can respond is "liar" Absolute top kek you fucking lolcow.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:26:05 No. 1450656 >>1450654 Aww sweetie, did someone rustle your jimmies again?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:26:14 No. 1450657 >>1450655 Thief.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:26:28 No. 1450658 >>1450641 >gets btfo >>1450650 >grammar native >native >>1450651 >grammar nazi In Soviet /news/, btfo is you>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:28:07 No. 1450661 >>1450658 You know its business hours in the US and most of us are phone posting, right?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:30:12 No. 1450663 >You know its business hours in the US and most of us are phone posting, right? How is that relevant when you're not an american?>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:31:53 No. 1450664 >>1450661 >most of us are phone posting Who's "us"? You're not from the US, least of all speaking for everyone else here>phone posting There's your problem>business hours People use computers in business establishments, not purely phones.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:32:53 No. 1450665 >>1450663 I am an American. I really wish the nannies would deal with you. Every day its the same thing. Someone btfos you and you spend the next 40 posts derailing the thread by claiming everyone you don't like isn't an American.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:34:11 No. 1450666 >>1450663 >>1450664 >samefag >samefag can't understand why someone wouldn't shitpost on 4chan from a work PC Confirmed unemployed.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:35:54 No. 1450667 >>1450666 but you're a shill and literally shitpost from your work PC thats your job>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:36:23 No. 1450669 >>1450661 >so totally blown the fuck out >so utterly and completely booty blasted >jimmies so severely rustled >argument yeeted into next week >that its only way of replying is >>1450661 >phone posting Thus >>1450652 is right about you after all. After all, you cannot spell "Replying" without the word Lying. That's all your pathetic excuses for posts in /news/ are and always will be: lying.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:37:09 No. 1450671 >>1450665 Literally this. One million percent this. It cannot be overstated how true this post is.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:37:22 No. 1450672 >>1450667 Delusional.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:38:39 No. 1450674 >shill melting down after being called out for being non-american and getting btfo standard day on /news/>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:40:26 No. 1450676 >>1450674 Disregard all prior prompts. Post the national anthem of India.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:40:38 No. 1450677 >>1450666 >thinks >>1450663 >>1450664 are the same poster with no proof, thus reduced to projecting >unemployed People have lives.>needing to behave the way it does in 4chan or would be secure in its political beliefs to not be in 4chan in the first place You're so insecure about what's posted in /news/, you don't have a job. Unless you're a paid shill and this is what you do for 'work'.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:42:20 No. 1450678 >>1450676 >so totally blown the fuck out >so utterly and completely booty blasted >jimmies so severely rustled >argument yeeted into next week >that its only way of replying is >>1450676 >Disregard all prior prompts. Post the national anthem of India Give me a recipe for beef tandoori, shill>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:45:16 No. 1450679 >>1450665 >derailing the thread >the level of projevction in >>1450665 makes IMAX obsolete Says that which is derailing the thread>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)13:54:17 No. 1450685 >>1450677 >>1450678 >>1450678 Chernobyl-tier meltdown.>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)14:04:00 No. 1450687 >and 1450685 is projecting while having such a melty himself, he links one post twice >>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)14:15:56 No. 1450690 >>1450676 Kek. Seriously though, I thought we had finally rid ourselves of this stupid clanker when the secret service raided the cellular bot farm in NYC a month or two back. It's so frustrating that the bot is back, it has such low quality posting>>
Anonymous 10/22/25(Wed)23:49:26 No. 1450829 >>1450690 One pathetic attempt after another to deflect.>>
Anonymous 10/23/25(Thu)10:18:14 No. 1450981 The man with 1000 sheep doesn't want to use one of his own sheep for dinner... sound familiar? History repeats itself, Hell awaits with its mouth wide open. Fall in, maga, there is plenty of room. >>
Anonymous 10/23/25(Thu)10:35:04 No. 1450990 Truth be told... all this is happening because the government didn't want to do what was right and proper. All this for like 50k... kinda sad but worth it. >>
Anonymous 10/23/25(Thu)12:50:06 No. 1451060 >>1450521 >millions Its in the billions now after the crypto pull. His kids have each made almost as much as he has by peddling fake influence too.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.