View Announcement
Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!
Anonymous Senate reaches deal, shut down(...) 11/09/25(Sun)19:19:28 No. 1456197 The senate has reached a deal and the shutdown is ending tonight. Republicans are folding like lawn chars. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/09/government-funding-deal-on-track-to-advance-sunday-night-00644110 Senate reaches deal on ending the shutdown Senators have reached a deal to end the government shutdown. The agreement, which was negotiated in part by Sens. Angus King, Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan as well as GOP senators, has “more than enough” members of the Senate Democratic Caucus to advance, according to two people granted anonymity to disclose the terms. Senate Republicans are expected to support the agreement. The Senate is poised to vote later Sunday night to advance the House-passed stopgap, which will later become the vehicle for the larger funding deal. That vote would tee up consideration later this week of a legislative package that would fund the Department of Agriculture and the FDA, the Department of Veterans Affairs and military construction projects, and the operations of Congress, for the full fiscal year — the product of months of bipartisan, bicameral negotiations. All other agencies would be funded through Jan. 30, according to text of a continuing resolution released Sunday. As part of Democrats’ agreement to end the shutdown, Senate Majority Leader John Thune is promising Senate Democrats a vote in December to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies that are due to expire at the end of the year short of Congressional action. Democrats will also get to determine what extension bill gets a vote. The government-opening agreement also guarantees that federal employees laid off during the shutdown are re-hired and gives federal employees backpay. >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)19:24:55 No. 1456198 >>1456197 >Senate Majority Leader John Thune is promising Senate Democrats a vote in December Hahaha dems are really stupid if they think Republicans will keep their promises.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)19:32:13 No. 1456199 >>1456198 So I guess it's just the continuing resolution that Republicans wanted, with the added stipulation that government workers would be rehired and they would vote on healthcare at sometime in the future?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)19:33:23 No. 1456200 >>1456198 I hope they don't. Democrats are fucking snakes, and those expanded ACA subsidies are for people making in excess of 100K a year and shouldn't be continued.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)19:35:10 No. 1456201 >>1456200 is it lie o clock again already?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)19:42:11 No. 1456202 >>1456197 >according to two people granted anonymity to disclose the terms. >It's fucking nothing >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:07:12 No. 1456204 >>1456201 Can't spell Republican without 'lie'>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:08:12 No. 1456205 >>1456200 >Democrats are fucking snakes >I hope my side will be the bigger snakes >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:09:32 No. 1456206 >>1456197 >SHUT DOWN GOVERNMENT FOR RECORD PERIOD OF TIME >get absolutely nothing LMAO Democrats btfo>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:19:19 No. 1456209 >>1456199 >So I guess it's just the continuing resolution that Republicans wanted, with the added stipulation that government workers would be rehired and they would vote on healthcare at sometime in the future? Yes. Trump has to re-hire all the workers they sacked and Democrats can lose a vote on the ACA in December. All Trump had to do to get the deal was hold a press conference threatening to nuke the filibuster. Total capitulation.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:31:27 No. 1456216 >>1456197 >promising Senate Democrats a vote in December So a month from now basically. Isn't this going to be too little too late? The prices for people signing up for next year have already started rising.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:41:05 No. 1456221 The vote to end the filibuster is ongoing right now. 42 yea, 20 nay>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fzt2UTrNNrc >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:42:05 No. 1456222 >>1456221 wat>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:44:18 No. 1456225 >>1456206 They got to prove Republicans are willing to let Americans starve to get their way at least. They will remember which side actively sued to not have to feed the poor come the election.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:44:36 No. 1456226 >>1456222 The OP article is talking about a deal made behind closed doors. The actual vote is taking place now.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:47:58 No. 1456227 >>1456225 You lost (badly)>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:49:30 No. 1456228 >>1456227 NTA but it seems like Republicans are the ones who finally learned to compromise, if this is even real.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:50:19 No. 1456229 >>1456227 You just spent 40 days holding the country hostage to protect Jeffrey Epstein's client list>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:50:52 No. 1456230 Guys does this mean Johnson has to finally reopen the House of Reps and seat that one congress woman who would vote to release the Epstein files? >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:51:00 No. 1456231 >>1456228 Democrats folded and accepted the offer Republicans made in the first week in the shutdown. A total and unconditional surrender.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:52:01 No. 1456232 >>1456230 Yes. You get to receive your nothingburger now.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:54:17 No. 1456233 >>1456231 Source?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:55:17 No. 1456234 >>1456233 OP>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:56:59 No. 1456235 >>1456234 It doesn't say anything about the offer from the first week. You made that up. Instead it says this is a new deal negotiated by Angus King and Jeanne Shaheen, who were already yes votes. But the keyword is "negotiate", as in Republicans are compromising.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:58:56 No. 1456236 >>1456232 >Epstein's list is a nothingburger >That's why Johnson didn't want the list released to "protect the victims" Top kek you actually believe this>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)20:59:12 No. 1456237 >>1456235 >doesn't say anything about the offer from the first week. You made that up ???????????? Its the deal from literally the first week>fund the government, we'll schedule a vote on the ACA Do you not read the fucking news? >Republicans are compromising. No, Democrats are folding. This entire shutdown has been for absolutely nothing.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:00:12 No. 1456238 >>1456236 Okay, have fun.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:01:51 No. 1456239 >>1456237 From what source are you getting that it's a deal from the first week? It doesn't say that in the OP.>Republicans aren't compromising >Democrats are folding According to whom?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:02:55 No. 1456240 >>1456238 Epstein certainly did, which is why there is a list with victims names on it.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:06:11 No. 1456241 >>1456240 And trump, because his his name is at the top of the list and he's the one responsible for the cover up.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:06:17 No. 1456242 So according to Lookner Rick Scott, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson and John Cornyn are the only ones to have not voted yet, and they are negotiating something with Thune in the back of the Senate right now. >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:06:22 No. 1456243 >>1456239 >From what source are you getting that Oct 16, Thune made the offer that democrats just accepted https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/10/16/congress/thune-dangles-obamacare-vote-after-shutdown-ends-00611223>According to whom? Everyone with eyes and ears. Government is now funded, ACA credits not funded. Democrats folded. Deal with it. >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:07:22 No. 1456244 >>1456240 >>1456241 Enjoy the nothingburger.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:08:03 No. 1456245 >>1456243 Why are 4 republicans still negotiating right now then?>obamacare-vote-after-shutdown-ends This is what Democrats wanted all along. It's weird that you're trying to spin this into 'folding'.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:08:38 No. 1456246 >>1456240 Why would Epstein write down a list with all of his victims names on it tho>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:09:17 No. 1456247 >>1456244 Shitty damage control attempt>>1456246 Insurance>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:09:42 No. 1456248 >>1456245 >This is what Democrats wanted all along. It's weird that you're trying to spin this into 'folding'. You're unironically going to try to gaslight people who have followed this story every day for the last ~40 days?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:10:17 No. 1456249 >>1456248 >I'm not gaslighting you are! Now you're just projecting>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:11:11 No. 1456250 >>1456247 >Shitty damage control attempt Its not damage control, its a prediction. >>1456246 Its a list of people who testified or were interviewed in connection with the case. It doesn't matter anyway, all the names are still under a court-ordered seal.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:11:50 No. 1456251 This isn't even the final vote, this is just to end the filibuster on the final vote. >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:13:01 No. 1456252 >>1456249 You're coping. Democrat demands were that they would fund the government in exchange for getting the ACA credits funded. Republicans (three weeks ago) offered to set a vote date on the credits if democrats funded the government first. Democrats just folded, completely, and accepted the Republican offer. They shut down the government for five weeks to get a vote set in December, a vote they will lose. Wow. Huge.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:13:16 No. 1456253 >>1456250 >all the names are still under a court-ordered seal. The same people whos names are under seal gave speeches in front of Congress about how they want the list released. Nobody is buying the "protect the victims" narrative.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:14:02 No. 1456254 >>1456251 And Republicans will win the final vote. Because they have more than 50 Senators. This is Democrats folding. Watch. Schumer wont vote to end the filibuster.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:14:55 No. 1456256 >>1456252 Are the democrats getting the ACA credits funded or not?>(yes) but it totally isn't Republicans who folded dude trust me It's like your lies are folding in on themselves as the Republicans cave.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:15:05 No. 1456258 >>1456253 Ask the Court to drop the seal.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:16:06 No. 1456261 >>1456256 >Are the democrats getting the ACA credits funded or not? No. A clean CR is being passed. TOTAL CAPITULATION>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:16:29 No. 1456262 >>1456258 How about instead another branch of government releases the list and ignores the judiciary because they voted to.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:17:50 No. 1456264 >>1456261 I'll ask you again and try to respond without lying or spindoctoring this time. Are the democrats getting everything they wanted or not? (Keep in mind it's already obvious the answer is yes).>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:18:18 No. 1456266 >>1456262 lmao, you're not American. Either that or you're in middle-school.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:19:00 No. 1456267 >>1456250 >Its a list of people who testified or were interviewed in connection with the case This actually makes sense >>1456247 This just sounds retarded, it makes no sense Epstein would write a list of all his victims>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:19:09 No. 1456268 >>1456256 Democrats save those with an income of up to 400% the FPL!!!! Yay! We saved the people making up to 200K a year a couple hundo!! Go Democrats!!!>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:19:21 No. 1456269 >>1456264 >Are the democrats getting everything they wanted or not? They are not getting a single thing that they wanted. They are getting a vote on the ACA in December. A vote they will lose. Thank you for shutting down the government for absolutely nothing.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:20:21 No. 1456270 >>1456268 They didnt save them anything.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:20:28 No. 1456271 >>1456266 So how are you going to downplay the list when it's released? Will you keep calling it a nothingburger? Do you seriously think that's effective?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:20:45 No. 1456272 >>1456268 Team Blue FTW. High five.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:21:56 No. 1456274 >>1456270 Do you know the first thing about the ACA tax credits? I'd imagine not if you're the same faggot that trolls the board with useless single line posts calling everyone "esl".>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:22:24 No. 1456275 >>1456271 >So how are you going to downplay the list when it's released I'm not. I'm going to laugh at you when what I'm telling you is going to happen, happens.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:22:39 No. 1456276 >>1456270 Keep telling yourself that as Trump makes another 10000 word tweet complaining about it.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:23:25 No. 1456277 >>1456274 I know all about them. For example I know they are going to expire at the end of the year. I know Democrats shut down the government for ~40 days so they could get a vote set on renewing them. I know they are going to lose that vote.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:24:12 No. 1456278 >>1456197 lmao reminder the House is still closed for another week.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:24:25 No. 1456279 >>1456276 I dont need to tell myself anything. I just need to read the terms of the deal the Senate just reached. Democrats folded. They shut down the government for 40 days, inflicted untold suffering on millions of Americans, and achieved absolutely nothing.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:24:42 No. 1456280 >>1456242 >Rick Scott, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson and John Cornyn So what are they negotiating with Thune?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:25:02 No. 1456281 >>1456200 They should just get rid of ACA. Government has no place in telling people what care they can get. Let that be between the patient, doctor, and the insurance. I hope SNAP continues to get withhold to put the screws on these layabouts.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:25:08 No. 1456282 >>1456277 Perfect. Then you know enough about it for your purposes.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:25:09 No. 1456283 >>1456277 are you sad you can't mindlessly spam the same shit like you have been for the last 40 days if the house reopens?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:25:36 No. 1456284 >>1456283 I'm absolutely thrilled that Democrats got cucked yet again.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:25:43 No. 1456285 >>1456279 Sure they are buddy, that's totally why Rick Scott the medicare fraudster hasn't voted yet.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:26:11 No. 1456286 >>1456284 i know you're thrilled that you get another penny esl shill, good for you>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:26:43 No. 1456287 >>1456284 >if I arbitrarily declare victory it means I win even though I'm giving dems everything they wanted Why are republicans like this?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:26:59 No. 1456288 >>1456286 Can you quit this stupid shit?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:27:16 No. 1456289 >>1456281 ACA was always for illegal immigrants. That's why I am for repealing and not replacing it but nobody had the guts to do it until Trump.>>1456284 They will be outlawed by the end of next year mark my words.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:27:46 No. 1456290 >>1456206 >meanwhile, Democrats destroy any Rethuglican chances of maintaining MAGA's credibility in elections recently: and before this >>1456197 >the shape of things to come in the Midterm Massacre Kek, Trumptards btfo>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:27:47 No. 1456291 >>1456289 Illegal immigrants can't sign up for federal benefits dumbass.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:27:49 No. 1456292 >>1456287 >I'm giving dems everything they wanted If the deal is everything they wanted, why did they not take it on October 18 when the offer was made?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:27:59 No. 1456293 >>1456288 once you get a real job i'll never make fun of you again, faggot>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:28:48 No. 1456294 >>1456292 Gee it's almost like they are two different deals and it wasn't the same as the one in October.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:30:25 No. 1456295 >>1456294 Its literally the exact same deal from October. >Fund the government, we will set a date for you to lose your vote on the ACA A total and shocking defeat. So severe that Schumer is still voting in favor of a shutdown.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:33:09 No. 1456297 >>1456291 >According to CMS, the other states and districts in question, including Illinois, spent the second most (around $30 million). Followed by Oregon, Washington, D.C., and Colorado. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-M.N., said the law prohibits this from happening. (TNND) >A preliminary audit by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services found that, mostly during 2024-2025, multiple states were using the money improperly. California, the biggest culprit, spends over $1.3 billion in federal Medicaid dollars on healthcare for illegal immigrants. >>"We're actually clawing that money back from those states now, but the fact that that could still happen is very frustrating to all of us," Dr. Mehmet Oz, Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, told Fox Business in late October. >According to CMS, the other states and districts in question, including Illinois, spent the second most (around $30 million). Followed by Oregon, Washington, D.C., and Colorado. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-M.N., said the law prohibits this from happening. >>"But you know what, you didn't have the verification tools in place to enforce the law so we put the verification in the 'Working Families Tax Cut Act,' also known as the Big, Beautiful Bill," Emmer told Fox News Digital last month. >>"Protecting Medicaid from waste, fraud, and abuse isn’t optional—it’s the law. Every dollar misspent on illegal health care spending is a dollar taken from vulnerable Americans. Federal law forbids using Medicaid funds for illegal immigrants, yet several Democrat-led states did it anyway. The Trump Administration won’t tolerate it. CMS is auditing aggressively, recovering every dollar, and holding states accountable," said HHS Press Secretary Emily Hilliard. >We are clawing back that money. We have already gotten hundreds and billions of dollars back which again, proves that states were guilty, or they wouldn't give us the money back otherwise," Oz said. >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:34:50 No. 1456298 slop hour is here boys >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:40:56 No. 1456299 >>1456297 >State expenditures are the same as Federal expenditures The ESL accusing poster is right, you aren't an American.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:42:06 No. 1456300 >>1456295 See if you can answer >>1456280 why the four Republicans are holding up the vote right now. What do you think they're negotiating right now?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:42:12 No. 1456301 >SCHUMER VOTED NO ON THE CR lmao. Total collapse. Total Democrat Defeat.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:43:13 No. 1456302 >>1456299 Why is the Federal Government clawing that money back?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:43:17 No. 1456303 >>1456301 >SCHUMER VOTED NO So did Rand Paul, big whoop>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:43:55 No. 1456304 >>1456302 why did fox pay nearly billion dollars for the right to lie>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:44:18 No. 1456305 >>1456302 because they're hyperpartisan far right morons who lie to their constituents.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:53:21 No. 1456308 >>1456301 If it was a "total collapse" as you claim wouldn't the vote to end the filibuster have passed 100-0 instead of 60-40?>>1456300 Now it's only John Cornyn (R-Texas) holding up the vote.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)21:57:48 No. 1456309 >>1456308 >Now it's only John Cornyn (R-Texas) holding up the vote. What is he holding out for?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:03:22 No. 1456311 >>1456197 Reminder this means nothing because the House is still checked out for another week for a "district work period" and thus couldn't even put a 100-0 deal into action. See you guys on day 46.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:04:10 No. 1456312 >>1456311 Lookner claims Johnson will cancel the work period and summon them back to the House.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:06:25 No. 1456314 Cornyn isn't even there right now. His plane just landed at the DC airport. >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:14:56 No. 1456315 >>1456304 >>1456305 No answer? >>1456308 Because Schumer wants to continue but he has lost the support of his caucus. The shutdown is over and Democrats got exactly nothing for it. >>1456311 Speaker can call the House into session at any time.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:16:18 No. 1456316 >>1456315 you don't seem to have an answer, no>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:16:19 No. 1456317 >>1456315 You just replied to two different answers from two people.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:19:10 No. 1456318 >>1456316 >>1456317 >Illegals dont get the money! >So why is the Federal Government clawing back money? >u...hm... what about FOX!?!?!? >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:19:46 No. 1456319 >>1456318 It isn't our fault you don't understand the different between state and federal.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:21:47 No. 1456320 >>1456319 Why is the Federal Government clawing back money from State Governments?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:28:33 No. 1456321 >>1456320 Because State Governments wanted to feed people and Donald Trump wanted them to starve>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:30:13 No. 1456322 >>1456321 So, state government misused the funds by giving to (for example) illegals?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:36:01 No. 1456324 >>1456198 The worst thing is: caving for nothing means that Democrats are now the ones responsible for the shutdown because they could have taken this shit deal weeks ago.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:41:03 No. 1456325 >>1456324 if you ignore the fact of the republican triple majority and trump's own words about both the filibuster and who takes responsibility for government shutdown>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:50:02 No. 1456326 >>1456322 >feeding hungry people is misusing it Who thinks like this?>>1456324 If they "caved" then why is Jeanne Shaheen doing a victory lap right now?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:56:12 No. 1456328 >>1456326 >If they "caved" then why is Jeanne Shaheen doing a victory lap right now? Well, I don't know. It's true that politicians are known for their honesty, and we often hear them say, “I betrayed my base, the Democratic Party should expel me, and no one should ever vote for me again.” So yeah, I guess it's a big win for the Democrats.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)22:57:12 No. 1456330 >>1456197 >As part of Democrats’ agreement to end the shutdown, Senate Majority Leader John Thune is promising Senate Democrats a vote in December to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies that are due to expire at the end of the year short of Congressional action This is what they've been promising the whole time What the hell did anyone actually get out of the shutdown?>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)23:02:12 No. 1456331 >Democrats sweep elections last week >Trump approval plummetting, he's going on television begging Republicans to kill the filibuster >Public blame has shifted from 50/50 to overwhelming directed at Republicans >Headlines about Trump fighting in court to keep SNAP unfunded have been on every news sight for days >Coping right wing shills ITT: NO IT'S THE DEMONCRATS WHO CAVED CAUSE EVERYONE HATES THEM AND THINKS THEY'RE DUMB! REEEEEEE!!!!!! El. Oh. El.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)23:02:57 No. 1456332 you can see the shill antennae wriggling around in an attempt to find a new talking point that might stick >>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)23:04:30 No. 1456333 >>1456331 Yeah watching them try to spin kicking millions of healthcare as a win for Republicans is kind of amazing.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)23:13:24 No. 1456334 >>1456281 America is the only country in the first world where medical bankruptcy is really possible, let alone a regular occurrence.>>
Anonymous 11/09/25(Sun)23:27:45 No. 1456336 >>1456330 A vacation>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)00:14:39 No. 1456342 The house still has to vote to finalize it. This is Thune punchinf Johnson in the face, politically, and Thune might be sick of Trump's bullshit since the GOP got wrecked in the recent elections. The MAGA crowd in Congress is about to get Tea Partied. >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)00:15:19 No. 1456343 Gee, I wonder why Trump was booed at the Detroit Lions vs Washington Commanders game?Guess which team lost The blue team winning is an omen of things to come. Just as Team Blue winning bigly in NYC, New Jersey, Virginia & California is the shape of things to come. The Midterm Massacre next year >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)00:33:20 No. 1456345 >>1456330 News headlines>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)00:44:11 No. 1456346 Fed worker here. I'll take the no rifs and rif rollbacks (at least that's what I heard). Kinda wanted to see more spine from the dems and i could've weathered literally years of this, but realistically expected an outcome like what we have. Pity about the healthcare, but whatever. Very few cried for me, so when undereducated poorfags and boomers get the insurance hike, it's not my problem. They should've voted in their interest and not get scammed. Sucks to suck I guess, maybe they'll choose better next time (lol). >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)00:53:21 No. 1456347 >"Even though you are shredding the constitution, and folding on the last shutdown infuriated our base, we are going to finally draw battle lines on a specific issue where we know you are weak!" >proceeds to never talk, advertise or message on that issue >millions of Americans encounter food insecurity and struggle at their jobs >voters blame Republicans, helping your dumbass brand >shockingly overperform on elections, showing deeper Republican weakness than anyone imagined >wind at your sails, opponents back against the wall as Thanksgiving looms >completely fold out of fucking nowhere, getting nothing Holy fuck, I don't even blame people for voting against Dems purely on the grounds that they're a bunch of estrogen huffing pussies. This isn't just hitting the ball into your own goal, it's removing your goalie entirely and then begging the other team to go home and fuck your wife. Absolute cuck behavior.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)01:00:58 No. 1456348 >dem leaders betrayed the american people because airlines, food retailers, and aipac told them to >but they waited until after the elections of course :^) it's so depressing...>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)01:10:03 No. 1456350 >>1456347 The simple explanation is that none of the dems who voted yes are up for reelection in 2026. This shit is why we need the ability to recall reps at any time; politicians who stop representing their people's interest when it isn't an election season should be fucking removed.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)01:40:09 No. 1456351 >>1456348 Which "dem leaders"? Schumer voted no. Bernie voted no.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)02:25:00 No. 1456354 I have no words. The Democrats literally held the narrative and they gave it up. This party will never ever win. >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)02:26:01 No. 1456356 >>1456225 Americans were retarded enough to elect Trump again. They'll forget that he basically tried to starve them.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)02:30:00 No. 1456358 Senate could've done this a month ago but were under orders from Trump to fuck shit up. Every thread about the shutdown has, without exception, been shills and trolls blaming Democrats. >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)04:10:57 No. 1456359 >>1456351 Do you really think the eight senators "went rogue," and that it just happened to be all senators who were either retiring or not up for reelection soon?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)04:18:42 No. 1456360 >>1456359 Well we know that Fetterman is a Republican in a blue tie. Fucking rat.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)05:16:01 No. 1456361 >>1456359 Yes, that's exactly what happened.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)06:58:29 No. 1456364 >>1456359 Do you really think Senators up for reelection are going to do wildly unpopular bullshit?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)07:08:30 No. 1456365 >>1456364 Like withholding snap benefits?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)07:28:32 No. 1456366 >>1456359 They didn't "go rogue", they were always spineless milquetoast moderates pandering to corporate interests. > Nevada's Catherine Cortez Masto > Illinois's Dick Durbin > Pennsylvania's John Fetterman > New Hampshire's Maggie Hassan > Virginia's Tim Kaine > Maine's Angus King (independent) > Nevada's Jacky Rosen > New Hampshire's Jeanne Shaheen All of these people are like the anti-progressive wing of the party.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)07:35:03 No. 1456367 >>1456348 >dems betrayed the American people by funding SNAP and paying government workers lol>but they waited until after they could use people's food stamps to manipulate them during the election lmao>>1456350 >>1456354 >>1456360 >>1456366 >>1456347 >noooo you can't just give people food stamps and pay government employees! That's not in their interest!!! >Thanksgiving is coming up, we need to make sure airlines shut down for Thanksgiving! >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)08:05:57 No. 1456368 >>1456365 Republicans don't count. They're cult leaders first and foremost. I'm talking about people that have to answer to voters.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)08:20:41 No. 1456369 >>1456368 So the 39 Democrats who voted to continue withholding SNAP benefits and continue not paying government employees? I agree, they do need to answer to voters.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)08:25:40 No. 1456371 >>1456369 It's about time for your handlers to find some new spam for you, faggot shill>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)08:51:42 No. 1456375 >>1456367 >>1456369 So crazy to watch you conservative shills keep this line of logic going on all social media. So Republicans want to stop helping the poor. Democrats try to force them to help the poor. Republicans double down and say they will stop all help for the poor if democrats dont let them cut a good majority of the help for the poor. Democrats try to fight that. Republicans and conservatives like you push this “democrats are causing this stop of help to the poor because they won’t let us cut help to the poor. So then some democrats cave because the democrats are worthless. And conservatives claim victory and the right to stop helping the poor. While claiming that it was democrats who made them stop helping the poor because they wouldn’t let them cut help for the poor. We are so fucked as a country the rich will make us all wage slaves within the next decade. Trump has 50 year mortgages rolling out soon. You can make money for rich banks for your entire life paying interest! Capitalism is great!>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)09:55:30 No. 1456378 >>1456375 Democrats, not Republicans, shut down the government. End of story.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)09:57:19 No. 1456379 >>1456326 >>feeding hungry people is misusing it >A preliminary audit by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services found that, mostly during 2024-2025, multiple states were using the money improperly Why are you lying?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)10:31:06 No. 1456384 >>1456379 Yeah that's not what the admin was suing over.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)10:43:16 No. 1456385 >>1456225 The average American is a dumbass with the attention span of a goldfish, they won't remember shit by this time next year outside of whatever the corpo media tells them to believe>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)11:07:26 No. 1456394 >>1456375 >wah wah i don't get free shit from taxpayers wah wah wah >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)11:11:53 No. 1456395 >>1456385 People will remember why they lost access to health insurance>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)11:15:17 No. 1456396 >>1456375 >democrats blame Republicans for shutdown >... yet they're mad at democrats for ending the shutdown >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)11:58:30 No. 1456405 >>1456367 You aren't american if you don't understand why healthcare is the most important thing in this country. People aren't going to doctors. They find reasons to not trust doctors because its too expensive to justify going to doctors. Inevitably you end up with MAGA. Its a literal direct fucking line of people not trusting the system because they can't get the care they need. The country collapsed because people can't afford to get treated.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)11:59:31 No. 1456406 >>1456395 Brother, I know you think that but literally half the time they get angry they have healthcare because oh no, the ACA is sometimes called Obamacare but they don't know that they're the same thing.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)12:17:14 No. 1456409 Angus King just said that standing up to Trump doesn't work. That's a full on confession that the Democrats are complicit with the Republicans in securing Trump power. The party is compromised. Its actually over. They're all in on this. >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)12:34:24 No. 1456410 >>1456409 >Its actually over After NYC, New Jersey, Virginia & California it is for the Republicans >its actually over After the midterms, it will be for MAGA>>
Chucky Schumer cheesy 11/10/25(Mon)12:55:50 No. 1456415 I had to think of the Baileys >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)13:26:51 No. 1456422 https://i.postimg.cc/mg2zc2Xw/trump-atcs.png The government shutdown was a hoax and did not actually take place, and also there are far too many air traffic controllers in the US, so those who didn't work for free should get fired. Plenty more where those came from (opposite is true, there's been a huge shortage for a while) >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)13:42:01 No. 1456425 >>1456422 >Trump risks an air traffic controller mass strike >Right before fucking Thanksgiving >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)13:43:48 No. 1456426 >>1456409 Funny how the centrist part of Democrat leadership just signed their own death warrant. Schumer will be removed and the progressives take over completely.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)14:06:38 No. 1456428 >>1456426 Good. Then the masks will be off and old people like Chuck Jewmer can retire.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)16:11:17 No. 1456442 >>1456409 >Angus King just said that standing up to Trump doesn't work. Can I see?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)16:13:00 No. 1456443 >>1456409 >standing up to Trump doesn't work That's the art of the deal >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)17:13:50 No. 1456449 >>1456410 Oh its inevitably going to be over. I apologize because I wrote that in frustration. What I meant to say was. The illusion that the Democratic party is an opposition party and not one that has been bipartisan from the start with the GOP and are undermining the American public on any chance to improve this country has been broken. There was no way in hell that we ended up with a lucky eight Democrats for the GOP to open the government when the numbers were doing this poorly for Trump. There is no way. This was backroom navigation that we'll never ever know about that's being handled on a bipartisan line. We're being duped. They're all owned by the billionaires. We have no representation. This is why the Democrats went so hard on a fucking mayor in New York more than Trump or Mike Johnson or Mitch McConnell. They're all in on this.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)17:14:50 No. 1456450 >>1456426 I think everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY, will be happy if either parties were not represented by people from the era when TV didn't have fucking color.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)17:17:17 No. 1456452 >>1456449 >This was backroom navigation that we'll never ever know about that's being handled on a bipartisan line. We already know what happened. Democrats were receiving pressure from unions while trying to negotiate for prolonging the ACA.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)17:49:20 No. 1456458 >>1456375 Thanks to the bill that 8 Democrats and all but 1 Republican voted for, SNAP will be reinstated, air traffic controllers and other government employees will be getting paid AND getting back pay. Why were most Democrats not wanting to do that?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)17:54:31 No. 1456460 >>1456449 >We live under a right wing uniparty That was a given when the right wing democratic establishment openly conspired with trump to stop mamdani.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)18:01:35 No. 1456462 >>1456379 > Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Which investment banker did Trump or RFK appoint to lead that agency>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)18:03:36 No. 1456463 >>1456458 Thanks to the Big Beautiful Bill, 50000 more Americans will die every year. Most dems want to correct that.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)19:11:03 No. 1456478 >>1456462 Why is the federal government clawing back funds?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)19:12:04 No. 1456479 >>1456463 >SIX BAZILLION Americans will die unless you continue to funnel money into health insurance companies and protect artificial monopolies >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)19:29:21 No. 1456483 >>1456479 The healthcare system we have sucks, no argument here. The problem is that the Republicans just want to wreck it and not replace it with anything. They've been railing against ACA for years and not once proposed an alternative. And now there's a fucking vaccine denier and herbal suppliment pusher in charge of HHS.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)19:31:49 No. 1456485 >>1456449 It shouldn't be that surprising. We've never actually had a left-wing party, just right and center-right. And even calling the dems center-right is being pretty generous.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:10:22 No. 1456490 >>1456483 >The problem is that the Republicans just want to wreck it and not replace it with anything They want to remove the ACA provisions that make a bad market worse >not once proposed an alternative Alternative is a free market>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:15:49 No. 1456491 >>1456490 >They want to remove the ACA provisions that make a bad market worse And insurance companies will lower their prices if those provisions get removed?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:17:49 No. 1456494 >>1456491 They wont have a choice because the artificial boundaries inserted into the market by the ACA will be removed. You know that its done by zipcode, right? The size of your local market is the exact size of your zipcode.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:18:31 No. 1456495 >>1456490 >Alternative is a free market That's not a replacement for jack shit. That's the situation we had before the ACA with jack shit covered and fucktons of people uninsured. Also anyone suggesting free market solutions for inelastic goods should be sterilized and have their tongue and hands removed.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:19:18 No. 1456497 >>1456494 >They wont have a choice Come on, man. You don't believe this shit.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:19:46 No. 1456498 >>1456495 >That's the situation we had before the ACA with jack shit covered and fucktons of people uninsured. Thats the situation we had when you got way more coverage for your $ and prices were generally the same or better. >Also anyone suggesting free market solutions for inelastic goods Its insurance, you fucking retard.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:20:31 No. 1456499 >>1456491 There are literally trained agents that would come by the homes of every American and give them blowjobs if the ACA is repealed. Especially that shitty provision that forces them to spend 80% of collected funds on actual healthcare instead of going into insurance company pockets. Without that, they wouldn't have had to jack up the price to make their billions, they just would have taken the 60% off the top. Why do Dems hate Americans by not enabling insurance leeches?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:21:27 No. 1456501 >>1456497 I believe that removing artificial boundaries will end localized monopolies and thus force companies to compete on a national scale. More competition will result in better prices. They literally will not have a choice. While allowing them to deny coverage for people with pre-existing conditions or unhealthy lifestyles will reduce the risk pool and will further drop prices.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:22:35 No. 1456502 >>1456499 Under the ACA prices have exploded and insurance companies are making record profits. You're just not aware of it because its papered over with taxes.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:24:47 No. 1456503 >>1456367 >food stamps and paying government retards Is that what this shit was all about? If dems were shutting it down than that's based. We need to end these govt handouts that are making us lazy and degenerate and making the country broke. Airlines closing down sucks but govt shouldn't have a say in how airlines are run to began with. Privatize them I say.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:26:22 No. 1456504 >>1456502 so are you a health care shill, or are you just so well trained to bend over for leeches that you're just doing it for free?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:28:53 No. 1456505 >>1456504 Nah, I'm just smarter than you are. Keep shilling for state-subsidized profits for big healthcare.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:29:54 No. 1456506 >why should taxes pay for insurances leeches when we can just pay the leeches directly? lmao, so just a retard then the real answer is cut out the leeches>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:33:40 No. 1456508 >>1456505 This. Repealing Obamacare would singlehandedly fix healthcare in this country, just like ending all student subsidies would bring the price of colleges down. It's basic fucking economics.>>1456506 You say they're leeches, but then you crash your car, and you have to pay out of pocket for tens of thousands of dollars. Medical care is never cheap, which is why insurance is a valuable service. Without it, we would all be worse off.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:36:45 No. 1456509 >>1456508 >unload your record profits in my anus daddy Nah, we'll just keep shooting CEOs>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:42:09 No. 1456510 >>1456198 Johnson is already saying he's not going to put it up to a vote, so yeah, they're a bunch of retards and corposhills.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:50:03 No. 1456511 >>1456509 That's because you are a terrorist though>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:51:09 No. 1456512 >>1456509 You realize that I, as someone who has to pay for health insurance, also want cheap health insurance? Right? You understand this basic principle?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:53:40 No. 1456514 >>1456512 Healthcare shouldn't be too cheap in my mind. Ideally it would filter out the dregs and useless eaters. If you fuck up and get fired, there should be consequences. You need to earn your medical care in the US. It would also help keep services at a high quality. If everyone was using hospitals then there would not be enough doctors and equipment. It would be like Canada where you are waiting decades for life saving treatment.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:58:45 No. 1456515 >>1456458 >Why were most Democrats not wanting to do that One of them went on record stating that if they didn't they were worried that their violent leftist base would murder them French style>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)20:59:16 No. 1456516 >>1456512 maybe you can help me every time i start thinking about kissing boys my pee pee gets hard, and my dad hits me with a sock full of golf balls how do i tell him i'm committed to being straight even if my pee pee isn't?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:00:17 No. 1456517 >>1456512 He thinks anyone who makes over $50k yearly is a far right fascist>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:01:33 No. 1456518 >>1456517 >uh uh uh yeah free market fixes health care >uh uh no just a youtube on econ 101... >uh uh YEAH I LOVE GETTING FUCKED BY BILLIONAIRES >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:13:53 No. 1456522 >>1456518 >>uh uh uh yeah free market fixes health care Yes. >>uh uh no just a youtube on econ 101.. Yes. Basic principles. >uh uh YEAH I LOVE GETTING FUCKED BY BILLIONAIRES No, I dont. Thats why I want to remove the ACA. Billionaires love the ACA.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:30:03 No. 1456526 >>1456522 but if retarded gen a burnouts can't see that free market principles don't apply to health care, does that mean its okay that my pee pee gets hard when I think about boys kissing boys?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:33:50 No. 1456531 >>1456526 >the principles that apply to all insurance dont apply to this specific type of insurance because... uh reasons >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:36:55 No. 1456533 >>1456531 cmon faggot, i thought closeted homosexuals stick together answer the pee pee question>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:38:15 No. 1456535 >>1456533 Sorry bud, I'm here to talk healthcare. I'm not dealing with whatever issues you're dealing with.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:39:01 No. 1456536 >>1456535 The free market fails in health care primarily due to asymmetric information and market power imbalances: Patients lack perfect information: Unlike buying a car, you often can't "shop around" for a heart attack or cancer treatment. You don't know the price, quality, or necessity of care in advance, and you're not in a position to negotiate while in pain or unconscious. Doctors and hospitals hold all the knowledge, leading to over-treatment, price gouging, or unnecessary procedures. Inelastic demand: Health care isn't optional like consumer goods. If you need insulin or surgery to survive, you'll pay any price. This removes price sensitivity, allowing providers to charge far above costs without losing customers. Adverse selection and moral hazard: Without regulation, healthy people opt out of insurance, leaving only the sick—driving premiums up in a death spiral (adverse selection). Insured patients may overuse care since they don't pay the full cost (moral hazard), inflating expenses. Real-world evidence: The U.S. has the most market-driven health system among developed nations yet spends ~18% of GDP on health care (double the OECD average) with worse outcomes (lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality). Countries with heavier regulation (e.g., UK, Canada) achieve universal coverage at half the cost per capita. A pure free market assumes informed, rational consumers with choices—conditions that simply don't exist when your life is on the line. my pee pee is a healthcare question, so answer it>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:41:11 No. 1456537 >>1456526 >but if retarded gen a burnouts can't see that free market principles don't apply to health care They actually do and there's plenty of proof for that. Look at all the medical procedures that are not subsidized by the government and insurance don't pay for. Lasix and cosmetic surgery is dirt cheap. Everything is artificially inflated because of Medicare/medicaid>Hurr not a fair compairson A cardiovascular surgeon or neurosurgeon is never going to be cheap. Those specialties don't exist in other countries for a reason in the way they do in the US.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:41:59 No. 1456539 >>1456536 >pulls some shit from Chatgpt lmao. You're confusing "healthcare" with "health insurance". How is health "insurance" different from any other form of "insurance"?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:44:18 No. 1456540 >>1456539 wow, thats a serious goalpost move for such a little man! but really, you gotta tell us how you keep out intrusive thoughts of fucking other men in the cow pasture or whereever faggots go in your village>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:45:53 No. 1456544 >>1456540 >goalpost shift I've only ever been talking about health insurance. >ree help me I'm gay! I dont care about your personal issues. I'm here to talk health insurance.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:47:04 No. 1456546 >>1456544 Look, I get the knee-jerk “it’s AI, so who cares” reflex—but that’s a dodge, not a rebuttal. The argument above isn’t some ChatGPT fever dream; it’s built on decades of peer-reviewed health-economics literature (Arrow 1963, Pauly 1968, Cutler & Zeckhauser 2000, etc.). If you think the sources are wrong, cite the counter-evidence instead of waving the “AI” flag. And no, health insurance isn’t “just like” car or home insurance. Those markets work because: You can shop around before the claim (compare quotes, deductibles, coverage). Claims are rare and predictable (most years you pay premiums and get nothing). You’re not unconscious when you buy (or when the service is rendered). Health events are the opposite: sudden, life-or-death, and informationally opaque. That’s why every attempt to run pure market health insurance—pre-ACA individual markets, medical savings accounts, etc.—ended in adverse-selection death spirals or 40%+ uninsured rates. If you have data showing a real free-market health system that delivers universal coverage at OECD-average costs, drop the link. Otherwise, the “other insurance works” line is just a category error.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:47:54 No. 1456547 >>1456540 >out intrusive thoughts of fucking other men in the cow pasture or whereever faggots go in your village What an oddly specific thing to say. Non-American confirmed.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:49:59 No. 1456549 >>1456546 >he asked chatgpt for a response to my post lmao. >You can shop around before the claim You shop for a policy. >Claims are rare and predictable Same with health insurance. >You’re not unconscious when you buy The whole point of insurance is that it doesn't matter because you are either covered, or you're not. This is such a waste of time. Arguing with some brit about a system he can barely comprehend.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:50:23 No. 1456551 >>1456549 Hey brother, I know the village is small, the streets are narrow, and every whisper travels faster than the wind. Hiding in shadows, chasing quick moments with strangers who won’t even look you in the eye tomorrow—that’s not living, that’s surviving on scraps. You deserve the full meal: someone who calls you by name, who stays for coffee the morning after, who meets your family without fear. Anonymous hookups might feel safe because they come with an off-switch, but they also come with a price tag you pay in silence, shame, and the slow erosion of your own worth. You’re Brazilian—warm, loud, proud, born under a sky that doesn’t apologize for its colors. That same blood runs in you. The guy who laughs with his whole chest at the bar, who dances forró like the floor owes him money, who helps his avó carry groceries without being asked—that guy doesn’t need to shrink at night. The village may gossip, but gossip dies when someone stands tall enough to outlive it. Start with one trusted friend, one cousin, one tía who already suspects. Let the truth out in teaspoons, not floods. You’ll be shocked how many spoons were already waiting for sugar. Imagine ten years from now: you’re still here, maybe running the little hardware store, maybe teaching kids capoeira on the square. And there’s a man beside you—holding your hand in the open, arguing over whose turn it is to grill the picanha, planning a trip to Salvador together. That future isn’t a fantasy; it’s a choice you begin making the day you stop treating your heart like contraband. The first step is simple: next time you feel the pull toward the dark corner of the praça, walk the other way—toward the light, toward your own front door, toward the life that has your real name on it. You’re not alone, cara. You never were.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:52:00 No. 1456555 >>1456551 >I know the village is small >village 101% non-American.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)21:55:15 No. 1456559 The free market runs on raw incentives—no sermons, no safety nets. Private insurance is its sharpest blade: you pay to hedge against ruin, and companies price the odds. Healthy? Cheap. Risky? Pay up or walk. For decades, that math punished openness. AIDS turned gay men into actuarial poison; insurers hiked rates, denied coverage, or flat-out refused. The closet became a discount code. Stay quiet, keep your job, your plan, your life. Disclosure wasn’t just personal—it was financial suicide. Even post-ACA, the game’s subtler. Orientation’s protected, but data isn’t. Zip codes, partners on forms, PrEP scripts—insurers sniff edges without asking. Hide, and you might save thousands. Come out, and the system shrugs: your choice, your cost. The market doesn’t hate; it calculates. Silence still has value. That’s not morality—that’s price discovery. >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:01:55 No. 1456561 >>1456197 >Johnson refuses to allow vote on extension >Government shuts down for the same reason next time we need to pass funding Welp, see you guys in two months.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:13:46 No. 1456563 >>1456443 I hate that this is so accurate>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:14:42 No. 1456564 Dear Hak-Queen and Cuck Shroomer and the leftist on here who worship you, we offered, you refused, offer rescinded. Suck it. Your ACA subsidies are shit down the toilet. The work will proceed. Venezuela will be nuked. Canada will be conquered. Trump will make America great again. >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:21:48 No. 1456566 >>1456522 >No, I dont. Thats why I want to remove the ACA. Billionaires love the ACA. This. Repeal ACA. Privatize medicair/caid and VAHealth and the billionaires will actually need to compete for our money. Prices will go down, service quality will increase, and the people who leech on the system will either shape up or die.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:27:24 No. 1456567 >>1456566 >billionaires will actually need to compete for our money why>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:28:28 No. 1456569 >>1456567 Because they won't be sucking up guaranteed income from the government. Learn some basic economics.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:34:16 No. 1456571 >>1456569 why does that matter>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:35:01 No. 1456572 >>1456566 >Prices will go down, service quality will increase, and the people who leech on the system will either shape up or die. >Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:41:03 No. 1456576 >>1456574 Obamacare fixed my dick for free even though I'm here illegally. I didn't even want the fertility treatments, but my doctor insisted on quadrupling my sperm count>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:42:25 No. 1456577 >>1456572 >Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make What's wrong with modern men is that we're too soft. We get our dicks in a pretzel when we see a kid die of the flu. But for the golden age of humanity, when we were all conservative, death was so common place that people barely batted an eye. Death is good for society. Seeing it is good for people. It is a reminder of what happens when you fail. It hardens the hearts of people and make them more willing to lay down their lives for what is right. Death makes people value religion more. Death makes good conservatives.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:46:14 No. 1456579 >>1456569 >Because they won't be sucking up guaranteed income from the government You mean the ACA?>Give private insurance companies billions of dollars to give lower rates >They don't actually lower rates and the cheapest rates cover absolutely nothing that you couldn't get for a $150 self pay visit. >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:51:51 No. 1456580 >>1456577 >our dicks now its pretending to be male>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)22:53:35 No. 1456584 >>1456579 >>Give private insurance companies billions of dollars to give lower rates wait, which country was dumb enough to try this? I'm not familiar with non-American health care>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:01:23 No. 1456586 >>1456584 Private insurance doesn't exist in other countries. They don't need it.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:03:58 No. 1456590 >>1456586 why does a group of record profit making billionaires need to be involved in health care in the first place? just keep out fraud and everyone else needs to be healthy, its not complicated>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:19:59 No. 1456594 >>1456501 >They literally will not have a choice. THERE'S NO FUCKING REGULATION. NOBODY CAN FORCE THEM. THERE WAS NOBODY TO FORCE THEM BEFORE ACA. THERE IS NOBODY TO FORCE THEM AFTER ITS GONE. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:21:34 No. 1456595 So what was actually gained out of this shutdown, it seems like the answer is "nothing" >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:24:45 No. 1456596 >>1456594 you're not smoking enough fentanyl for it to make sense>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:30:46 No. 1456597 >>1456590 >why does a group of record profit making billionaires need to be involved in health care in the first place? Because in America doctors join up and form large corporations and health networks (hospitals) which are allowed to charge whatever they want for services no matter how exorbitant. That's why you pay $50 for one aspirin in hospital but a bottle of it is $2.99 at walgreens.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:33:32 No. 1456598 >>1456586 You're fucking retarded and you shouldn't be allowed to vote or live.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:35:15 No. 1456599 So is socialized healthcare, and anyone who supports it in any way, evil? >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:38:07 No. 1456600 >>1456598 Why are you angry though?>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:40:08 No. 1456601 >>1456596 I should have realized you're not a fucking American without any stake in this.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:42:01 No. 1456602 >>1456600 Who said I'm angry? I'm just pointing out your American education, retard.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:46:54 No. 1456605 Personally I do think America definitely should have some sort of socialized healthcare plan that anyone can enroll in if they don't have an employer offering a decent health plan it makes sense that poor people should be able to visit some sort of local barber surgeon for immediate urgent or emergency care when they need something like a broken leg set, a tooth pulled, or a bloodletting, rather than them going to normal doctors and normal hospitals, filling them up and not being able to pay while making it worse on the working class >>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:47:32 No. 1456606 >>1456577 >It is a reminder of what happens when you fail. So you're admitting the Republican healthcare plan is pure failure. Got it.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:47:54 No. 1456607 >>1456605 We do.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:49:45 No. 1456608 >>1456586 >Private insurance doesn't exist in other countries. They don't need it. >>1456602 >Who said I'm angry? Oh, I dunno>>1456598 >You're fucking retarded and you shouldn't be allowed to vote or live. You tell me>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:53:37 No. 1456610 >>1456608 It's not my job to tell you why you're retarded. Additionally, if you knew why you were unreasonably retarded I wouldn't be able to laugh at you. So there's no incentive for me to explain why you're retarded.>>
Anonymous 11/10/25(Mon)23:58:00 No. 1456611 >>1456610 Is this the part where you call every other country with universal healthcare "socialist"?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)00:01:48 No. 1456613 >>1456602 >>Who said I'm angry? Again>>1456610 >It's not my job to tell you why you're retarded You tell me>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)00:02:48 No. 1456614 >>1456610 is socialized healthcare, and anyone who supports it in any way, evil?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)00:11:06 No. 1456616 >it used to be said that Americans had no concept of Irony >there are Americans in the past few decades who recognize Irony >there are certainly Americans who can recognize Sarcasm >>1456608 >>1456602 >Who said I'm angry? >Oh, I dunno >>1456598 >You're fucking retarded and you shouldn't be allowed to vote or live. >You tell me >>1456610 isn't American then.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)00:47:50 No. 1456618 >>1456613 Nah. It'll mean more to you if you figure it out on your own. I refuse. But I'll give you a hint, your post I replied to contains ridiculously uneducated and absolutely false information consistent with a mentally challenged individual's understanding of the subject. I'll give you a high-five if you make a post correcting yourself anddetailing why you are retarded, Mr. Gump.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)00:54:21 No. 1456619 >it used to be said that Americans had no concept of Irony >there are Americans in the past few decades who recognize Irony >if you make a post correcting yourself anddetailing >correcting yourself >anddetailing >>1456618 isn't American then>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)01:03:55 No. 1456620 >>1456619 No I'm not. You'll see i referenced your "American education". That is assuming your not a UN jeet shill left over from the times on COVID, desperately seeking to keep your job.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)01:15:31 No. 1456624 >there are Americans who recognize Projection >ridiculously uneducated >doesn't recognize Irony >doesn't recognize Sarcasm Educated Americans recognize those things. I'd say >>1456620 isn't American, but>No I'm not I don't need to. Oh, and this one is the clincher>That is assuming your not a UN jeet shill >your I don't need to assume anything. You're not educated. You'll see I referenced your inferior education that isn't from any educational establishment in America, thus the irony in your projection.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)01:23:29 No. 1456625 >>1456624 Maybe trolling isn't working tonight?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)01:29:53 No. 1456626 >it used to be said that Americans had no concept of Irony >there are Americans in the past few decades who recognize Irony >there are certainly Americans who can recognize Sarcasm >there are Americans who recognize Metaphor and the use of such >there are Americans who not only recognize Sarcasm, but how it can be used within a Metaphorical Question >Oh, I dunno >You tell me The shill will never be American.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:06:44 No. 1456631 >>1456626 What?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:13:19 No. 1456632 >>1456631 What?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:14:05 No. 1456633 >>1456611 Sure.>>1456614 Yes. And here's why" 1. The road to hell is paved with good intentions 2. Thou shalt not steal 3. Thou shalt not covet Supporting evidence: 7 deadly sins of Greed, Sloth, Envy and Wrath. Seems pretty evil when you use the government to do it. What's stopping you from starting your own healthcare charity? That's the opposite of evil and fixes everything you're complaining about, dunnit?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:20:49 No. 1456634 >>1456633 You have been indoctrinated.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:23:33 No. 1456635 >>1456634 Yes, I have. By the good guys.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:24:03 No. 1456636 In 1948, something was created: the National Health Service in Britain. While it was instituted by the Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee, and was applauded by the previous PM, it was planned during WWII by that same PM. Someone who admires that PM who planned the NHS - socialized healthcare - today, demonstrated by a bust of that wartime NHS-planning PM in the Oval Office. So thanks for admitting that - as he admires Winston Churchill - Trump is evil, >>1456633 >>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:28:53 No. 1456638 >>1456636 Oh man, this "gotcha" sure got me. Look, AIDS-queer, tranny, dyke, turbo faggot, teenager, I'd love to give you everything FOR FREE so you can sit in a dimly lit corner and create furry porn while you apply violent friction to your genderless crotch nub, but I'm not your mom or your dad (thank God).>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:32:52 No. 1456639 >>1456614 Appealing to the lowest common denominator with free healthcare so you can graft communism to the most successful nation in history is evil. Communists have killed far more people than fascists but you retards keep subverting foreign nations in a bid to create utopia.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:39:51 No. 1456640 >>1456638 >thank God Someone who healed the sick without asking for payment. Either (check one): [ ] Jesus - who is God - is all for socialized healthcare and all your opinions are wrong [ ] In doing so, Jesus is evil, therefore your only possible alternative is to admit that Jesus never existed in the first place Choose wisely. *Tips Indiana Jones-style fedora*>AIDS-queer, tranny, dyke, turbo faggot Mstthew 5:22: 'But I have added to that rule and tell you that if you are only angry, even in your own home, you are in danger of judgment! If you call your friend an idiot, you are in danger of being brought before the court. And if you curse him, you are in danger of the fires of hell' So either (check one): [ ] That's you hell-bound [ ] Even more reason to become an atheist Choose wisely. *Tips Trilby*>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:41:41 No. 1456641 >>1456639 By admiring the NHS-planning Winston Churchill - thus having a bust of him in the Oval Office - Trump is evil>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:44:26 No. 1456642 >>1456640 >I got quotes and false dichotomies tonight and I'm all out of SANITY!!! Wooo! Bring me a real Jesus who can heal people with sacred powers and you can have your free healthcare since it don't cost shit.>your friend You're so not my friend. And despite quoting everyone ever, you don't accept the ancient wisdom of quotes from certain sources. Why is that?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:45:56 No. 1456643 >>1456638 >(thank God) >>1456642 >Bring me a real Jesus The duality of the hypocrite>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:49:07 No. 1456644 >>1456643 Why? I am an atheist.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:50:41 No. 1456645 >>1456644 >I am an atheist >>1456638 >(thank God) Again, the duality of the hypocrite>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)02:52:12 No. 1456646 >>1456642 >ancient wisdumb ftfy>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)09:06:22 No. 1456663 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFI6MwlLJ08 Don't like this guy, find him cringe af, but fuck he's right there >>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)09:30:58 No. 1456665 >>1456646 lel. You got owned by the Bible, CHODE.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)10:34:23 No. 1456679 >>1456597 You're retarded. The doctors have nothing to do with the hospital prices. They're just wage slaves. Medicare and Medicaid are why insurance costs are ridiculous.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)10:40:00 No. 1456680 >>1456679 >Medicare and Medicaid are why insurance costs are ridiculous. Why was Medicaid created anon? Surely it had nothing to do with the fact people were literally dying because they had to choose between treatment and bankruptcy.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)10:52:08 No. 1456683 Chuds are owned due to a Big Book of Hearsay being fictional >>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)10:56:57 No. 1456686 >>1456680 It was to ensure hospitals and doctors get paid. Then used to inflate the cost of medicine, and ensure guaranteed profits via government checks.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)11:06:26 No. 1456693 >>1456686 So what happens without it anon?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)11:31:58 No. 1456711 >>1456693 the shills rich master gets taxed less who cares after that?>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)13:07:29 No. 1456757 >>1456680 They were created because the liberals wanted the government to control healthcare and mimic the European model, except do it in a way that enriches corporations>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)13:29:54 No. 1456766 >>1456757 Liberals wanted single payer. Republicans forced the “compromise” of insurance subsidies when Obama was trying to pass ACA. The original plan was single payer. Republicans said “what about all the health insurance company jobs?” And threw a fit about how it would “wreck an entire industry.” So democrats compromised to get health insurance to millions of people and made this shit deal that enriches insurance companies. It was republicans and has always been republicans who stood in the way of single payer health care that every other civilized country in the world uses. Yes it is stupidity for democrats to shut down the government for insurance subsidies now. They should have shut down the government to demand single payer health care for all citizens and the demolition of the health Insurance industry in general.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)13:51:54 No. 1456769 >>1456766 Not a single Republican voted for the ACA in the House or the Senate. Its not a compromise. Its the bill that Democrats wanted to pass. Its designed to do exactly what Democrats wanted to do.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)14:42:41 No. 1456780 >>1456693 The industry crashes, and then has to be rebuilt around being affordable or doctors starve.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)14:45:20 No. 1456781 >>1456769 John McCain>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)14:45:39 No. 1456782 >>1456769 >Not a single Republican voted for the ACA in the House or the Senate I thought this was false and I actually looked it up. You're right, not a single Republican voted for it in either chamber. It was completely a Democrat bill>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)14:46:59 No. 1456784 >>1456781 Is posthumously a Democrat, like most Democrats.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)14:51:15 No. 1456785 >>1456780 And in the meantime, Americans die.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)15:04:13 No. 1456790 >>1456781 He did not vote for the passage of the ACA. This is 100% on Dems. They could have passed single payer if they wanted to.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)15:05:50 No. 1456791 >>1456782 Yep. Once you understand that the party has been 100% opposed to this shit from the start you understand how absolutely ridiculous it was for democrats to shut down the government over it. Any republican who voted for the credits would lose his seat in the next cycle. So it was a complete no go from the start.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)15:07:01 No. 1456793 >>1456785 Yes. Many gorrilions died before Dems passed the ACA in the early 2010s. We barely survived the first 240s years of our countries history.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)15:17:28 No. 1456797 >>1456791 This is insanity, so Democrats passed the ACA completely on their own with absolutely zero public support, and then they blame Republicans for passing a bad aca? What the hell is these people's problem>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)15:43:07 No. 1456802 >>1456797 Just that bologna turd-nugget does.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)15:45:59 No. 1456803 >>1456797 They maximize short-term gains at the expense of long-term stability in any given system. And I don't mean this as a jab at dems, but just a statement of fact. When the ACA was signed it tightened the noose on coverage networks; insurance providers who had contracts with dentists, doctors, specialists etc at a discounted rate were ordered to limit their networks to a few big healthcare providers. One guy I know had to shutter his business because once his customers decidedly acquired healthcare through the ACA marketplate, he couldn't take their insurance anymore. So they either had to pay out of pocket or not see him anymore. The driving force behind the ACA was healthcare lobbyists bribing democrats so that they could have an effective monopoly on healthcare services. This was obviously good for dems who had stock investments in those healthcare providers, but it came at the cost of making living in America dramatically worse by raising premiums. The people who support this shit justify it because they're global liberals. If America falls into anarchy they don't give a shit, they have a cottage in Vancouver, the Virgin Islands or wherever. If things become hard they can leave.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)15:48:32 No. 1456804 >>1456803 Forgot to add: A lot of them are dog-brained people who think that they can just lie their way out of any situation. They just shift the blame and then move on to the next grift.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)16:20:42 No. 1456808 >>1456803 >One guy I know had to shutter his business because once his customers decidedly acquired healthcare through the ACA marketplate, he couldn't take their insurance anymore. So they either had to pay out of pocket or not see him anymore. Pretty apt description of ACA aside from the above. A choice was made not to accept the insurance if your friend had a private practice.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)16:56:09 No. 1456817 >>1456803 Good post>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)17:28:13 No. 1456822 >>1456663 The only time Stewart has been totally wrong was his 'Rally to restore sanity' where he tried to falsely equate the tea baggers with everyone else. He's been spot on about everything else, especially the media going full conservative bias or democrats being insanely retarded. Also the 4 posts above me are a same fag>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)19:11:27 No. 1456825 >>1456663 That's an interesting analysis.. Democrats weren't gaining any ground with their shutdown, and knew it, and so they threw 6 senators under the bus who were not up for re-election so that they could end the shutdown without being murdered by their constituencies. Actually makes a whole lot of sense>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)19:20:46 No. 1456827 >>1456663 Good Lord. All the geriatric democrat politicians at 15:15 shaking their canes and chanting before nearly falling over and needing to be caught is so representative of their party lol>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)19:28:20 No. 1456828 >>1456825 Other way around, the dam was finally breaking against trump, especially over the fact he was willing to starve and murder children by illegally blocking SNAP. You had a right wing pollster Nate Silver even confirmed that was what was really doing damage to trump. https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-approval-rating-2674284408/ Between that and the holiday travel being ratfucked by the trump shutdown, democrats had the advantage. But they got stabbed in the back by their right wing faction, yet again. The only silver lining is we might start seeing the uniparty break and the right wing democrats finally getting primaried out since now they can all be branded that they will not stand up to trump and his authoritarianism and cruelty. >>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)20:13:15 No. 1456832 >>1456827 There are Republican senators who are even older.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)20:52:58 No. 1456840 >>1456828 >the right wing democrats finally getting primaried out I don't think that that's likely because 95% of elected democrats are the right wing democrats.>holiday travel That's what did it. I think that neither party wanted a situation where cancelled flights and economic disruption led to concessions. Neither party wanted people to see economic disruption leading to concessions because that might give people ideas. I think that they prefer to have people see that they're willing to cut their healthcare and let them starve. And so do their donors.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)21:17:11 No. 1456845 >>1456840 The democrats are a right wing party, but the democrats who sided with republicans would easily all caucus with the republicans 20-30 years ago. So they're even more right wing than the average ones.>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)21:23:46 No. 1456846 >>1456840 most people don't understand that the senate is a counterweight against the house of representatives, senators are the elitist yin to the populist rabble yang in the lower house. you don't have to be a sabine to get in these days, but you won't make it far without being in lockstep with the rest of the senate. of course, that whole honor code is currently nosediving into a weimar style shitheap, but before trump that's how it was at least>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)22:47:26 No. 1456888 >The democrats are a right wing party The newly-elected mayor of New York City destroys that opinion>>
Anonymous 11/11/25(Tue)23:58:37 No. 1456920 >Actually thinking people are stupid enough to fall for this on /news/ A reminder the democratic leadership refused to endorse their candidate and would rather conspire with trump than back who the people wanted. The New York election proved the democrats are right wing, even though the people desperately want them to shift left.>>
Anonymous 11/12/25(Wed)00:01:40 No. 1456926 >>1456606 unironically why *shouldn't* you have to work to stay alive? Welfare is conceptually evil and shouldn't exist, every country that has welfare falls into ruin with an unmotivated population that also becomes uncharitable and more selfish since they are no longer forced to be helpful to people around them and can just be kept alive all on their own without any effort. Society should be where people are forced to have to keep themselves alive and help others and a society in which people sink or swim and the vagrants are rightfully just left to die like it used to be is noble and means morality becomes a voluntary - and necessary choice - that people willingly opt-into rather than being enforced top-down by a beurocratic behemoth making it where people don't even need to think about being actively morally good on their own many of society's modern ills are caused by the cultural fabric of society being amoral by virtue of the fact that welfare exists As the Good Book Says:>he who does not work, neither shall he or his progeny eat >>
Anonymous 11/12/25(Wed)00:27:24 No. 1456945 >The New York election proved the democrats are right wing The newly-elected mayor of New York City destroys that opinion>>
Anonymous 11/12/25(Wed)00:28:25 No. 1456946 >>1456926 What?>>
Anonymous 11/12/25(Wed)00:30:11 No. 1456947 >>1456926 >beurocratic Thanks for admitting you're not American.>>
Anonymous 11/12/25(Wed)01:44:26 No. 1456963 >Actually thinking people are stupid enough to fall for this on /news/ A reminder the democratic leadership refused to endorse their candidate and would rather conspire with trump than back who the people wanted. The New York election proved the democrats are right wing, even though the people desperately want them to shift left.>>
Anonymous 11/12/25(Wed)03:47:31 No. 1456974 >>1456963 blue maga is real and the controlled opposition party is furious that real progressives are making waves>>
Anonymous 11/12/25(Wed)11:09:56 No. 1457037 Turns out the "clean resolution" has a nice fat kickback for a bunch of Republican senators in it that they didn't tell the House about before sending it to them.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.