[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: coffee-cup-rings.png (243 KB, 600x422)
243 KB
243 KB PNG
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5644455-democratic-bill-health-insurance-subsidies/


Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked a motion to advance a Democrat-drafted bill to extend enhanced health insurance premium subsidies that are due to expire at the end of 2025, tax credits that Democrats say are needed to keep premiums from rising by double digits next year.

The legislation, which needed 60 votes to advance, failed by a vote of 51 to 48.

Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voted for the Democratic plan to extend the enhanced health insurance tax credits, even though both lawmakers have called for reforms to the program. Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), who is up for reelection next year, and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) also voted for the Democratic proposal.

The unusual vote on a Democratic-crafted health care plan while Republicans control the Senate was set up by a deal Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) struck with centrist Democrats to end the recent 43-day government shutdown.

The proposal, unveiled by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), would have extended the enhanced subsidies, which were first enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic, another three years.

“Our bill is the last train to leave the station. After this, we will not have time to try again before premiums shoot through the roof next year,” Schumer said on the Senate floor before the vote.

Schumer touted the Democratic plan as a “simple extension of these health care tax credits.”

“It’s time for Republicans to join us,” he urged his colleagues.

Earlier in the day, they voted on a Republican plan to convert funding for enhanced insurance premium subsidies into contributions to health savings accounts to pay for out-of-pocket costs. That proposal failed to advance on a mostly party-line vote.
>>
The cost of health plans on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are projected to increase by 26 percent on average in 2026, according to an analysis by KFF, a health policy research group.

Enrollees on the ACA’s marketplace who receive enhanced premium subsidies are expected to see their monthly premium payments more than double if those tax credits expire in January.

Schumer signaled that Democrats would campaign on the issue next year ahead of the midterm election.

“The American people will not forget which way senators vote today,” he warned on the floor.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), a leading advocate for extending the enhanced subsidies, said millions of Americans will “face a crushing financial blow” when the enhanced subsidies expire.

“These credits have helped millions of families, including tens of thousands of people in New Hampshire, keep their coverage and balance their family budgets,” she said.

Shaheen has participated in bipartisan talks to extend the subsidies, but those negotiations have failed to produce a bipartisan bill that could get the 60 votes needed to advance.
>>
Hope it was worth flipping on the shutdown for.
>>
>>1464498
Great. Add rising insurance costs to the list of things Trump can’t gaslight people about.
>>
Why are they so obsessed with subsidies to insurance companies that don't actually lower the cost? Oh right, most Democrats get kick backs from it.
>>
>>1464516
hi esl shill
>>
>>1464520
You are not white. You are not American. You will never stop shitting in the street.
>>
esl shill is projecting again
>>
>>1464515
This is part of the plan.

Bankrupt and stress a large enough percentage of American's that; some die and the others are unable to mount a meaningful resistance.

Greed is driving this. Trump is folding on his campaign promises daily.
>>
>>1464516
>Why are they so obsessed with subsidies to insurance companies that don't actually lower the cost
Why?
Because
>most Democrats get kick backs from it.
>>
>>1464523
Just don't reply to him, he has a meltdown and implodes whenever you ignore his schizoposting
>>
>>1464527
I mean, this actually makes sense, it's why the russian people are such cucks to putin and what conservatives in America are aiming to do.
>>
esl shill is talking to himself again
>>
>>1464498
>due to expire at the end of 2025
And that's just Trump, politically. The midterms.
Gee, I wonder why?
>>
>>1464535
At least Putin cares enough about his people to stop Ukraiggers from putting NATO bases on the order. Putin obliterated the manlet Jew grifter zelenskike
>>
>>1464564
why do you make it this obvious that you suck russian dick for pennies
>>
>>1464564
>Putin cares
Which is why Russia is AIDS Central
>Putin cares
https://www.military.com/video/off-duty/odd/akward-moments-with-vladimir-putin/3129473236001
About not making pedophilia illegal in Russia. So much for your 'moral' and 'based' nation, amirite? Unless you consider being a pedo to be 'based'.
>Trump & Putin. Pedos of a feather nonce together
QED.
>>
>>1464564
>he care
>While sending a million to die for his imperialist ambitions
LOL
>>
>>1464498
I've never seen leftists so angry that billionaires aren't getting money thrown at them by the government since, like last Tuesday.
Are you sure you leftards know what you're doing?
>We're trying to win an election
I know. I just hope I don't die when you do, which you will win because of the 1000% propaganda.
Then you'll fuck up again.
>>
I've never seen a rightist so angry between this post and >>1464592, that it needs to post in /news/ in the first place due to being so insecure.
Because if it was psychologically secure, it wouldn't need to post here.
>>
>>1464611
>Because if it was psychologically secure, it wouldn't need to post here.
So, you don't know what your doing?
>>
>you don't know what your
A rightist which is illiterate doesn't know how to spell "you're".
>>
>>1464498
Obamacare is backwards. All it does is increase and guarantee insurance profits.

These subsidies don't help the insured, it is just free money for the insurance company to overcharge for the same coverage.

Insurance should be illegal.
>>
>>1464619
Just nationalize the system under medicare and also ban medicare advantage or force private insurance companies under very strict rates where they can only post a single digit profit.

Suddenly healthcare is cheap.
>>
>>1464621
Imagine being this much of a child?
How about a real solution?
And what's your beef with Medicare Advantage?
>>
Republicans really gave a $trillion in tax cuts so they could take healthcare away from everyone else.
>>
>>1464626
It's the most fraudulent program in the entire US. For national health care to work, Medicare would need to be completely dissolved and a new system put in place.
>>1464637
You're retarded. Tax cuts help the middle class and they incentivize the rich to actually pay tax instead of keeping it all in assets.
>>
>>1464515
So were insurance costs (just on ACA plans) wildly unaffordable before covid? Because this just does away with covid relief credits.
>>
>>1464642
Yes, but the media, who is owned by the same investment firms as healthcare companies, is manufacturing consent to raise it's prices.
>>
>>1464640
>Tax cuts help the middle class and they incentivize the rich to actually pay tax instead of keeping it all in assets.
>Tax cuts encourage the rich to pay taxes
LMAO that other anon was right you are a fucking child.
>>
>>1464626
>Get a real solution
>That doesn't count!
No.jpg
>>
>>1464498
Republicans like it that way…
>>
>>1464649
You are retarded because you don't know how money even works. Dumbass liberals think billionaires just have billions sitting in their bank accounts. No one is going to sell assets that are being taxed at 90%
>>
>>1464667
>90%
Nah, they were only taxed like that during the 50s and 60s: a time in which the US economy was famously doing quite well. In Donald's A++++++++ economy however, capital gains are taxed lower than normal income. Billionaires generally pay lower effective tax rates than most of the middle class due to clever loophole-optimization.
>>
>>1464669
He's the same retard that keeps claiming trickle down economics works even though it is infamous for wrecking economies since the rich just hoard their wealth.
Taxing it forces them to invest, which is why you saw so much growth in the 1950s, they couldn't just hoard it or shift it around like they are now.
>>
>>1464498
Great, now block the 19 censorship bills since you tried to capitulate the anonymous internet to the FREAKING GLOBALISTS. FOSI, JULIE INMAN GRANT AND CORRUPT POLITICIANS WILL FALL AND INTERNET WILL BE FREE AND UNCENSORED!!
>>
>>1464669
>due to clever loophole-optimization
You mean standard deductions. Billionaires
>>1464672
>since the rich just hoard their wealth.
How about you actually explain this instead of using buzzwords and give some examples. Having your entire net worth in the valuation of business is not hoarding
>>
>>1464715
>How about you just ignore the evidence
Nah, tax the rich.
>>
>>1464669
>Nah, they were only taxed like that during the 50s and 60s: a time in which the US economy was famously doing quite well.
Might wanna fact check that for yourself.
>>
>>1464717
>Nah, tax the rich.
Tariffs for large importers?
>No, no, no, no. NOT LIKE THAT!!!
>>
>>1464755
>Tax on consumers is a tax on the rich
Brilliant move Louis XVI
>>
>No one is going to sell assets that are being taxed at 90%
So why did Republicans vote for a Republican president twice when that top rate of tax was 91% in the 1950s?
Certainly for a president who was not only all for free trade without tariffs, but saw such as a way of promoting Freedom.
If you hate free trade without tariffs, you're an enemy of America. Even Reagan was very pro-free trade.
I wonder why so many families will see Nintendo Switch 2s under their trees to ensure smiles on their children's faces just twelve days from now? And because those consoles didn't cost extra, thus causing less financial strain on family budgets, because their countries' economies are better, thus people have more disposable income due to the fact that the leaders of said countries value said families more than billionaires.
>>
>>1464776
Prices are going to increase even more outside of trump's massive tax hikes because the trump AI bubble has caused RAM pieces to explode.
https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/nintendo/nintendo-switch-2-ram-prices-rise-41-percent-nand-flash-up-8-percent-console-giant-shares-nosedive-in-face-of-increased-cost-warnings
>>
>>1464759
>The rich couldn't possibly pass all their taxes on to their consumers!!!
>They can only do it with tariffs!!!
What the shit?
>>
>>1464850
god you're esl
>>
>>1464850
>Not just taxing the rich's income and assists
>And passing laws that ban price gouging
>And if necessary nationalizing certain industry so the billionaires can't throttle vital systems and supply lines
Man, is it really that hard?
>>
>>1464855
Twenty years ago Democrats were saying that the rich were people making 250k and now 400k for a couple in SF is now considered a middle class lifestyle. Explain to me how you're going to tax the non existent incomes of jews like Zuckerberg first
>>
>>1464858
You're simping for national socialism unironically.
>>
>>1464853
Mind broken in under 50 characters? Ahahaha.
>>1464858
Actually, that's extremely hard. And still doesn't do anything to ensure the taxes aren't passed to the consumer and is an entirely different subject.
>>
>>1464860
explain to us which imaginary person you're arguing with, but first make me stop ridiculing you for being an antisemite who shills for the most zionist president since truman
>>
>>1464715
>standard deductions
You aren't American. Please stop posting. Thank you :)
>>
>>1464863
>>1464861
>How would you tax the rich?
>Give a comprehensive way to do it along with the means to keep them from abusing an subverting the system
>SocALIsm! DoesN'T CoUnT!
Looks like we got a working solution, we only need to will to implement it.
>>
>>1464869
>Looks like we got a working solution, we only need to will to implement it.
It's childish bullshit, not a solution.
>>
>>1464870
>It just doesn't work, okay!?
Keep seething. Time to go back to the 90% tax rate of the 1950s.
Also remove the cap on taxable income for social security, to make it solvent indefinitely
>>
>>1464873
>>It just doesn't work, okay!?
The rich in the 1950's didn't have the benefit of the internet. If NY (or wherever) raises the taxes, moving their wealth is as simple as picking up their laptop and getting on a plane. Which is what many have already done to escape democratic totalitarian bullshit after COVID.

The US government also controls the amount of money in the US economy. This means it controls the rate of inflation by increasing or reducing the velocity of money. Taxing the rich doesn't put a dollar in your pocket, it removes money out of circulation. If you wanted the government to give you exorbitant social programs to fulfill your socialist utopian lifestyle, it would be better to pull out of NATO and cut military spending.
>>
>>1464875
>If NY (or wherever) raises the taxes, moving their wealth is as simple as picking up their laptop and getting on a plane. Which is what many have already done to escape democratic totalitarian bullshit after COVID.
lmao no they didn't. If anything they exploited COVID to try and pay even less of their share.
>>
>>1464876
>lmao no they didn't.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/510829-cuomo-calls-on-wealthy-to-return-to-new-york-city-you-got-to-come-back/
>>
>>1464877
>Known corrupt scumbag Andrew Cuomo gives an excuse why we shouldn't do a wealth tax with literally 0 evidence any of that shit was actually happening
L M A O. They didn't do shit.
>>
>>1464878
>literally 0 evidence
>“They’re not coming back right now. And you know what else they’re thinking? ‘If I stay there, I pay a lower income tax,’ because they don’t pay the New York City surcharge,” Cuomo said on Monday. “That would be a bad place if we had to go there.”
Why would anybody want to live in a smelly city full of homeless, drugs, crime and high taxes?
>>
>>1464877
Yeah just like when they all said they'd leave if Mamdani got elected lmao. What you're seeing was literally them going on vacation; it didn't do shit to NYC's economy (all the damage was from the pandemic itself) and they all came back as soon as the pandemic ended and the city was open again.
>>
>>1464879
Except they didn't do that then, and they still aren't doing it now even after Mamdani won.

This fucking cope of "Oh but if we tax the billionaires, they'll leave!" is fucking ridiculous. The internet doesn't mean the same principles of the 90% tax don't apply; if they were willing to fuck off to an entirely different country, they would just do so tax or no tax. It's all a pathetic attempt to get out of paying their fair share (and they ironically spend more than they would be taxed trying to lower their taxes every year) and lick boots.
>>
>>1464880
>they all came back as soon as the pandemic ended
Source?
>>
>>1464881
>This fucking cope of "Oh but if we tax the billionaires, they'll leave!" is fucking ridiculous.
What is 'the Berlin Wall' for $500, Alex.
>>
>>1464883
Not even remotely comparable lmao. The irony is, all of the people who would be affected by a wealth tax would barely even fucking notice it. They OBJECTIVELY spend more trying to avoid it than they would pay under it.
>>
>>1464884
Mamdani said he wanted to do race-based taxation.
Also, the Berlin wall was constructed because totally-not-socialists realized that all of the wealthy kept leaving the despotic economic hellscape that was East Berlin. So they literally had to build a fucking wall and shoot people to prevent them from escaping.
Nobody likes to be taxed. You're a retard for arguing otherwise.
>>
>>1464885
>Mamdani said he wanted to do race-based taxation.
Source?
>>
>>1464885
>More bullshit more bullshit more bullshit
Yada yada yada. No one likes to be taxed, but the majority also don't like the 1% hoarding money for themselves while there's never enough money for any of them. So either pay up or deal with the people who want your head on a pike for your greed. The system is not sustainable the way it is now, with stagnant wages and ever increasing prices, being driven almost entirely by higher ups and CEOs pumping their paychecks while everyone at the bottom gets fucking squat.
>>
>>1464885
>the Berlin wall was constructed because totally-not-socialists realized that all of the wealthy kept leaving the despotic economic hellscape that was East Berlin. So they literally had to build a fucking wall and shoot people to prevent them from escaping.
The wealthy weren't the ones being kept in by the berlin wall lmao.
>>
>>1464887
Seriously. This shit IS going to break, one way or another, it's just not mathematically possible for it to continue.
>>
>>1464875
>They'll just move away!
No they won't, the rich new yorkers didn't even leave NYC after Mamdani won. Stop with the empty threat
>>
>>1464886
>Mamdani also stood by his proposal to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods,
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvge57k5p4yo
>>
>>1464892
It's been like a fucking week since he won.
>>
>>1464672
No he isn't. I'm the one who keeps saying trickle down works and that Democrat politicians obviously understand it does as they give tax breaks to corpos all the time.
Your the trolling faggot who can't even believe St. Democrat would even think of such a thing.
Trickle down does work. It doesn't work good, but it works better than most left wing economic solutions which are generally punitive in nature.
>>
>>1464895
>Trickle down does work
The trump recession and massive wealth inequality proves you're wrong.
>>
>>1464893
Oh, so address the racial tax brackets that have been there for decades? You do realize New York's taxes were DELIBERATELY done so that the minority neighborhoods paid more, right? Somehow there are low income neighborhoods that have higher property tax assessments than the rich ones, and conveniently they're all minority communities.
>https://furmancenter.org/thestoop/entry/racial-inequities-in-new-york-citys-property-tax-system
It isn't a "race based tax", it's removing it.
>>
>>1464895
Democrats believe in trickle up, meaning we give all government and citizen money to corporations and obey them. They have a schizophrenic reaction if you date mention that taxing the shit out of everyone and balancing the budget are better options
>>
>>1464922
>Literally describes Republican trickle down
>"Uh, it's Democrats and their trickle up"
>>
>>1464922
It's amazing that you worship a billionaire corporate titan president but still think Democrats are the party of corporations.
>>
>>1464925
They love their immigrants; Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, David O Sacks, just to name a few South African immigrants to the USA that made BILLIONS off the American tax payer.

Deep down they love being abused, its their kink.
>>
>>1464930
Some of them are also a part of FOSI,



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.