Anonymous Republicans vote to explode he(...) 12/11/25(Thu)18:45:29 No. 1464498 https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5644455-democratic-bill-health-insurance-subsidies/ Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked a motion to advance a Democrat-drafted bill to extend enhanced health insurance premium subsidies that are due to expire at the end of 2025, tax credits that Democrats say are needed to keep premiums from rising by double digits next year. The legislation, which needed 60 votes to advance, failed by a vote of 51 to 48. Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voted for the Democratic plan to extend the enhanced health insurance tax credits, even though both lawmakers have called for reforms to the program. Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), who is up for reelection next year, and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) also voted for the Democratic proposal. The unusual vote on a Democratic-crafted health care plan while Republicans control the Senate was set up by a deal Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) struck with centrist Democrats to end the recent 43-day government shutdown. The proposal, unveiled by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), would have extended the enhanced subsidies, which were first enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic, another three years. “Our bill is the last train to leave the station. After this, we will not have time to try again before premiums shoot through the roof next year,” Schumer said on the Senate floor before the vote. Schumer touted the Democratic plan as a “simple extension of these health care tax credits.” “It’s time for Republicans to join us,” he urged his colleagues. Earlier in the day, they voted on a Republican plan to convert funding for enhanced insurance premium subsidies into contributions to health savings accounts to pay for out-of-pocket costs. That proposal failed to advance on a mostly party-line vote. >>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)18:46:00 No. 1464499 The cost of health plans on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are projected to increase by 26 percent on average in 2026, according to an analysis by KFF, a health policy research group. Enrollees on the ACA’s marketplace who receive enhanced premium subsidies are expected to see their monthly premium payments more than double if those tax credits expire in January. Schumer signaled that Democrats would campaign on the issue next year ahead of the midterm election. “The American people will not forget which way senators vote today,” he warned on the floor. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), a leading advocate for extending the enhanced subsidies, said millions of Americans will “face a crushing financial blow” when the enhanced subsidies expire. “These credits have helped millions of families, including tens of thousands of people in New Hampshire, keep their coverage and balance their family budgets,” she said. Shaheen has participated in bipartisan talks to extend the subsidies, but those negotiations have failed to produce a bipartisan bill that could get the 60 votes needed to advance. >>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)19:32:14 No. 1464514 Hope it was worth flipping on the shutdown for. >>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:01:47 No. 1464515 >>1464498 Great. Add rising insurance costs to the list of things Trump can’t gaslight people about.>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:04:59 No. 1464516 Why are they so obsessed with subsidies to insurance companies that don't actually lower the cost? Oh right, most Democrats get kick backs from it. >>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:06:20 No. 1464520 >>1464516 hi esl shill>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:15:28 No. 1464523 >>1464520 You are not white. You are not American. You will never stop shitting in the street.>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:24:17 No. 1464525 esl shill is projecting again >>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:57:06 No. 1464527 >>1464515 This is part of the plan. Bankrupt and stress a large enough percentage of American's that; some die and the others are unable to mount a meaningful resistance. Greed is driving this. Trump is folding on his campaign promises daily.>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:58:36 No. 1464528 >>1464516 >Why are they so obsessed with subsidies to insurance companies that don't actually lower the cost Why? Because>most Democrats get kick backs from it. >>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)20:59:37 No. 1464529 >>1464523 Just don't reply to him, he has a meltdown and implodes whenever you ignore his schizoposting>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)21:03:58 No. 1464535 >>1464527 I mean, this actually makes sense, it's why the russian people are such cucks to putin and what conservatives in America are aiming to do.>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)21:04:33 No. 1464536 esl shill is talking to himself again >>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)22:49:27 No. 1464556 >>1464498 >due to expire at the end of 2025 And that's just Trump, politically. The midterms. Gee, I wonder why?>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)23:04:57 No. 1464564 >>1464535 At least Putin cares enough about his people to stop Ukraiggers from putting NATO bases on the order. Putin obliterated the manlet Jew grifter zelenskike>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)23:06:01 No. 1464566 >>1464564 why do you make it this obvious that you suck russian dick for pennies>>
Anonymous 12/11/25(Thu)23:33:41 No. 1464572 >>1464564 >Putin cares Which is why Russia is AIDS Central>Putin cares https://www.military.com/video/off-duty/odd/akward-moments-with-vladimir-putin/3129473236001 About not making pedophilia illegal in Russia. So much for your 'moral' and 'based' nation, amirite? Unless you consider being a pedo to be 'based'.>Trump & Putin. Pedos of a feather nonce together QED. >>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)01:01:33 No. 1464592 >>1464564 >he care >While sending a million to die for his imperialist ambitions LOL>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)03:30:11 No. 1464610 >>1464498 I've never seen leftists so angry that billionaires aren't getting money thrown at them by the government since, like last Tuesday. Are you sure you leftards know what you're doing?>We're trying to win an election I know. I just hope I don't die when you do, which you will win because of the 1000% propaganda. Then you'll fuck up again.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)03:34:10 No. 1464611 I've never seen a rightist so angry between this post and >>1464592 , that it needs to post in /news/ in the first place due to being so insecure. Because if it was psychologically secure, it wouldn't need to post here. >>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)03:37:03 No. 1464613 >>1464611 >Because if it was psychologically secure, it wouldn't need to post here. So, you don't know what your doing?>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)03:42:28 No. 1464614 >you don't know what your A rightist which is illiterate doesn't know how to spell "you're".>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)04:24:14 No. 1464619 >>1464498 Obamacare is backwards. All it does is increase and guarantee insurance profits. These subsidies don't help the insured, it is just free money for the insurance company to overcharge for the same coverage. Insurance should be illegal.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)04:46:10 No. 1464621 >>1464619 Just nationalize the system under medicare and also ban medicare advantage or force private insurance companies under very strict rates where they can only post a single digit profit. Suddenly healthcare is cheap.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)07:28:17 No. 1464626 >>1464621 Imagine being this much of a child? How about a real solution? And what's your beef with Medicare Advantage?>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)09:12:00 No. 1464637 Republicans really gave a $trillion in tax cuts so they could take healthcare away from everyone else. >>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)09:43:07 No. 1464640 >>1464626 It's the most fraudulent program in the entire US. For national health care to work, Medicare would need to be completely dissolved and a new system put in place. >>1464637 You're retarded. Tax cuts help the middle class and they incentivize the rich to actually pay tax instead of keeping it all in assets.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)10:01:50 No. 1464642 >>1464515 So were insurance costs (just on ACA plans) wildly unaffordable before covid? Because this just does away with covid relief credits.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)10:21:42 No. 1464643 >>1464642 Yes, but the media, who is owned by the same investment firms as healthcare companies, is manufacturing consent to raise it's prices.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)11:30:41 No. 1464649 >>1464640 >Tax cuts help the middle class and they incentivize the rich to actually pay tax instead of keeping it all in assets. >Tax cuts encourage the rich to pay taxes LMAO that other anon was right you are a fucking child.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)11:58:14 No. 1464654 >>1464626 >Get a real solution >That doesn't count! No.jpg>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)12:25:37 No. 1464666 >>1464498 Republicans like it that way…>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)12:28:14 No. 1464667 >>1464649 You are retarded because you don't know how money even works. Dumbass liberals think billionaires just have billions sitting in their bank accounts. No one is going to sell assets that are being taxed at 90%>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)12:36:08 No. 1464669 >>1464667 >90% Nah, they were only taxed like that during the 50s and 60s: a time in which the US economy was famously doing quite well. In Donald's A++++++++ economy however, capital gains are taxed lower than normal income. Billionaires generally pay lower effective tax rates than most of the middle class due to clever loophole-optimization.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)12:45:02 No. 1464672 >>1464669 He's the same retard that keeps claiming trickle down economics works even though it is infamous for wrecking economies since the rich just hoard their wealth. Taxing it forces them to invest, which is why you saw so much growth in the 1950s, they couldn't just hoard it or shift it around like they are now.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)16:20:07 No. 1464700 >>1464498 Great, now block the 19 censorship bills since you tried to capitulate the anonymous internet to the FREAKING GLOBALISTS. FOSI, JULIE INMAN GRANT AND CORRUPT POLITICIANS WILL FALL AND INTERNET WILL BE FREE AND UNCENSORED!!>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)17:29:02 No. 1464715 >>1464669 >due to clever loophole-optimization You mean standard deductions. Billionaires >>1464672 >since the rich just hoard their wealth. How about you actually explain this instead of using buzzwords and give some examples. Having your entire net worth in the valuation of business is not hoarding>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)17:30:29 No. 1464717 >>1464715 >How about you just ignore the evidence Nah, tax the rich.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)19:17:33 No. 1464754 >>1464669 >Nah, they were only taxed like that during the 50s and 60s: a time in which the US economy was famously doing quite well. Might wanna fact check that for yourself.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)19:18:33 No. 1464755 >>1464717 >Nah, tax the rich. Tariffs for large importers?>No, no, no, no. NOT LIKE THAT!!! >>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)19:25:30 No. 1464759 >>1464755 >Tax on consumers is a tax on the rich Brilliant move Louis XVI>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)19:58:56 No. 1464776 >No one is going to sell assets that are being taxed at 90% So why did Republicans vote for a Republican president twice when that top rate of tax was 91% in the 1950s? Certainly for a president who was not only all for free trade without tariffs, but saw such as a way of promoting Freedom. If you hate free trade without tariffs, you're an enemy of America. Even Reagan was very pro-free trade. I wonder why so many families will see Nintendo Switch 2s under their trees to ensure smiles on their children's faces just twelve days from now? And because those consoles didn't cost extra, thus causing less financial strain on family budgets, because their countries' economies are better, thus people have more disposable income due to the fact that the leaders of said countries value said families more than billionaires.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)20:16:46 No. 1464785 >>1464776 Prices are going to increase even more outside of trump's massive tax hikes because the trump AI bubble has caused RAM pieces to explode. https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/nintendo/nintendo-switch-2-ram-prices-rise-41-percent-nand-flash-up-8-percent-console-giant-shares-nosedive-in-face-of-increased-cost-warnings >>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:01:01 No. 1464850 >>1464759 >The rich couldn't possibly pass all their taxes on to their consumers!!! >They can only do it with tariffs!!! What the shit?>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:04:41 No. 1464853 >>1464850 god you're esl>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:19:06 No. 1464858 >>1464850 >Not just taxing the rich's income and assists >And passing laws that ban price gouging >And if necessary nationalizing certain industry so the billionaires can't throttle vital systems and supply lines Man, is it really that hard?>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:20:34 No. 1464860 >>1464855 Twenty years ago Democrats were saying that the rich were people making 250k and now 400k for a couple in SF is now considered a middle class lifestyle. Explain to me how you're going to tax the non existent incomes of jews like Zuckerberg first>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:22:11 No. 1464861 >>1464858 You're simping for national socialism unironically.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:23:03 No. 1464863 >>1464853 Mind broken in under 50 characters? Ahahaha.>>1464858 Actually, that's extremely hard. And still doesn't do anything to ensure the taxes aren't passed to the consumer and is an entirely different subject.>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:23:47 No. 1464864 >>1464860 explain to us which imaginary person you're arguing with, but first make me stop ridiculing you for being an antisemite who shills for the most zionist president since truman>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:30:06 No. 1464866 >>1464715 >standard deductions You aren't American. Please stop posting. Thank you :)>>
Anonymous 12/12/25(Fri)23:59:24 No. 1464869 >>1464863 >>1464861 >How would you tax the rich? >Give a comprehensive way to do it along with the means to keep them from abusing an subverting the system >SocALIsm! DoesN'T CoUnT! Looks like we got a working solution, we only need to will to implement it.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)00:01:15 No. 1464870 >>1464869 >Looks like we got a working solution, we only need to will to implement it. It's childish bullshit, not a solution.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)00:39:52 No. 1464873 >>1464870 >It just doesn't work, okay!? Keep seething. Time to go back to the 90% tax rate of the 1950s. Also remove the cap on taxable income for social security, to make it solvent indefinitely>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:14:48 No. 1464875 >>1464873 >>It just doesn't work, okay!? The rich in the 1950's didn't have the benefit of the internet. If NY (or wherever) raises the taxes, moving their wealth is as simple as picking up their laptop and getting on a plane. Which is what many have already done to escape democratic totalitarian bullshit after COVID. The US government also controls the amount of money in the US economy. This means it controls the rate of inflation by increasing or reducing the velocity of money. Taxing the rich doesn't put a dollar in your pocket, it removes money out of circulation. If you wanted the government to give you exorbitant social programs to fulfill your socialist utopian lifestyle, it would be better to pull out of NATO and cut military spending.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:18:03 No. 1464876 >>1464875 >If NY (or wherever) raises the taxes, moving their wealth is as simple as picking up their laptop and getting on a plane. Which is what many have already done to escape democratic totalitarian bullshit after COVID. lmao no they didn't. If anything they exploited COVID to try and pay even less of their share.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:21:31 No. 1464877 >>1464876 >lmao no they didn't. https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/510829-cuomo-calls-on-wealthy-to-return-to-new-york-city-you-got-to-come-back/ >>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:22:58 No. 1464878 >>1464877 >Known corrupt scumbag Andrew Cuomo gives an excuse why we shouldn't do a wealth tax with literally 0 evidence any of that shit was actually happening L M A O. They didn't do shit.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:25:45 No. 1464879 >>1464878 >literally 0 evidence >“They’re not coming back right now. And you know what else they’re thinking? ‘If I stay there, I pay a lower income tax,’ because they don’t pay the New York City surcharge,” Cuomo said on Monday. “That would be a bad place if we had to go there.” Why would anybody want to live in a smelly city full of homeless, drugs, crime and high taxes?>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:27:22 No. 1464880 >>1464877 Yeah just like when they all said they'd leave if Mamdani got elected lmao. What you're seeing was literally them going on vacation; it didn't do shit to NYC's economy (all the damage was from the pandemic itself) and they all came back as soon as the pandemic ended and the city was open again.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:30:17 No. 1464881 >>1464879 Except they didn't do that then, and they still aren't doing it now even after Mamdani won. This fucking cope of "Oh but if we tax the billionaires, they'll leave!" is fucking ridiculous. The internet doesn't mean the same principles of the 90% tax don't apply; if they were willing to fuck off to an entirely different country, they would just do so tax or no tax. It's all a pathetic attempt to get out of paying their fair share (and they ironically spend more than they would be taxed trying to lower their taxes every year) and lick boots.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:30:24 No. 1464882 >>1464880 >they all came back as soon as the pandemic ended Source?>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:31:50 No. 1464883 >>1464881 >This fucking cope of "Oh but if we tax the billionaires, they'll leave!" is fucking ridiculous. What is 'the Berlin Wall' for $500, Alex.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:33:34 No. 1464884 >>1464883 Not even remotely comparable lmao. The irony is, all of the people who would be affected by a wealth tax would barely even fucking notice it. They OBJECTIVELY spend more trying to avoid it than they would pay under it.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:37:12 No. 1464885 >>1464884 Mamdani said he wanted to do race-based taxation. Also, the Berlin wall was constructed because totally-not-socialists realized that all of the wealthy kept leaving the despotic economic hellscape that was East Berlin. So they literally had to build a fucking wall and shoot people to prevent them from escaping. Nobody likes to be taxed. You're a retard for arguing otherwise.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:41:07 No. 1464886 >>1464885 >Mamdani said he wanted to do race-based taxation. Source?>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:41:41 No. 1464887 >>1464885 >More bullshit more bullshit more bullshit Yada yada yada. No one likes to be taxed, but the majority also don't like the 1% hoarding money for themselves while there's never enough money for any of them. So either pay up or deal with the people who want your head on a pike for your greed. The system is not sustainable the way it is now, with stagnant wages and ever increasing prices, being driven almost entirely by higher ups and CEOs pumping their paychecks while everyone at the bottom gets fucking squat.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:46:37 No. 1464888 >>1464885 >the Berlin wall was constructed because totally-not-socialists realized that all of the wealthy kept leaving the despotic economic hellscape that was East Berlin. So they literally had to build a fucking wall and shoot people to prevent them from escaping. The wealthy weren't the ones being kept in by the berlin wall lmao.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)01:54:09 No. 1464889 >>1464887 Seriously. This shit IS going to break, one way or another, it's just not mathematically possible for it to continue.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)02:29:22 No. 1464892 >>1464875 >They'll just move away! No they won't, the rich new yorkers didn't even leave NYC after Mamdani won. Stop with the empty threat>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)02:53:54 No. 1464893 >>1464886 >Mamdani also stood by his proposal to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods, https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvge57k5p4yo >>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)02:54:55 No. 1464894 >>1464892 It's been like a fucking week since he won.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)03:19:04 No. 1464895 >>1464672 No he isn't. I'm the one who keeps saying trickle down works and that Democrat politicians obviously understand it does as they give tax breaks to corpos all the time. Your the trolling faggot who can't even believe St. Democrat would even think of such a thing. Trickle down does work. It doesn't work good, but it works better than most left wing economic solutions which are generally punitive in nature.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)05:21:56 No. 1464903 >>1464895 >Trickle down does work The trump recession and massive wealth inequality proves you're wrong.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)09:58:44 No. 1464916 >>1464893 Oh, so address the racial tax brackets that have been there for decades? You do realize New York's taxes were DELIBERATELY done so that the minority neighborhoods paid more, right? Somehow there are low income neighborhoods that have higher property tax assessments than the rich ones, and conveniently they're all minority communities.>https://furmancenter.org/thestoop/entry/racial-inequities-in-new-york-citys-property-tax-system It isn't a "race based tax", it's removing it.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)10:59:47 No. 1464922 >>1464895 Democrats believe in trickle up, meaning we give all government and citizen money to corporations and obey them. They have a schizophrenic reaction if you date mention that taxing the shit out of everyone and balancing the budget are better options>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)11:00:45 No. 1464923 >>1464922 >Literally describes Republican trickle down >"Uh, it's Democrats and their trickle up" >>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)11:04:01 No. 1464925 >>1464922 It's amazing that you worship a billionaire corporate titan president but still think Democrats are the party of corporations.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)11:43:41 No. 1464930 >>1464925 They love their immigrants; Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, David O Sacks, just to name a few South African immigrants to the USA that made BILLIONS off the American tax payer. Deep down they love being abused, its their kink.>>
Anonymous 12/13/25(Sat)12:23:48 No. 1464936 >>1464930 Some of them are also a part of FOSI,
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.