https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/22/denamark-to-summon-us-ambassador-over-trumps-greenland-special-envoy.htmlDanish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said Monday he will summon the U.S. ambassador to Denmark for a conversation about President Donald Trump’s appointment of a special envoy to Greenland.“I’m deeply upset about the appointment and the statement, which I find completely unacceptable,” Løkke Rasmussen told Danish media TV2 in an interview Monday morning. He added he hoped a meeting could take place today or tomorrow.Since starting his second term as president, Trump has repeatedly said that the U.S. needs the resource-rich Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force.Meanwhile, Greenland has shown little interest in becoming a top mining nation, and its leaders have criticized the U.S. administration’s calls for the country to become a U.S. territory.Late Sunday, Trump posted on social media that he had appointed Governor of Louisiana Jeff Landry, as the U.S. Special Envoy to Greenland.The Danish foreign ministry declined to comment further and referred to Løkke Rasmussen’s TV2 interview.In an Instagram post translated by CNBC, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said: “Greenland belongs to Greenlanders, and the U.S. should not take over Greenland.”“No one should be allowed to change national borders by force. Neither politically nor militarily,” Frederiksen wrote Monday, adding that she expected respect for the territorial integrity of Denmark.
So would trump be insane enough to use the US military to Annex greenland.And in case he is actually is removed from power, assuming he doesn't stage another coup and the democrats win. Will be handed over to Danish authorities to stand trial?
>>1468241If he did use the military to take it over the US would become a pariah state like Russia and the dollar would collapse. It would also give other countries an excuse to act on land claims like China with Taiwan and Egypt with Gaza/Israel. > Will be handed over to Danish authorities to stand trial?lol no that would never happen. They tried to go after Kissenger for decades and never got him. Even if it somehow did magically happen, he's so unhealthy he probably wouldn't live long enough.
>>1468222So, why not fill Greenland with foreigners divide the population and force a referendum using a propaganda campaign?
>>1468260Who tf wants to live in a place where it never thaws?
>>1468241It only has the population of 57,000. And NATO wouldn't do anything because America is still stronger than the rest of NATO combined.
>>1468280>And NATO wouldn't do anythingNATO would expel the US, dump their dollar reserves thus collapsing our economy, and we'd be sanctioned to fuck.
>>1468283LOL your dreaming, NATO is fulled with countries with no ambition or purpose other than to maintain control of their population as they fuck them in the ass endlessly.
>>1468283>NATO would expel the USThen NATO would lose more than half of its military power, including the ability to patrol shipping lanes. And then the EU would be responsible for dealing with Russia.
>>1468296If we allied with Russia and China, nobody could stop us. It would be like WW2 but this time /pol/ will win.
>>1468299>locust empire + alcoholic caliphate larping as eastern orthodox stateNo thanks
>>1468295>LOL your dreaming, NATO is fulled with countries with no ambition or purpose other than to maintain control of their population as they fuck them in the ass endlessly.What the fuck do you think NATO does?>>1468296>Then NATO would lose more than half of its military powerYes, and? Less than half of NATO is still enough to deter Russia or intervene anywhere they want.>including the ability to patrol shipping lanesThe only shipping lanes NATO would have to take up the slack for would be through the red sea and NATO currently has enough ships to cover that shit if they have to while they build more.The bigger problem in the long term would be the reliance on US manufactured and maintained military equipment, but that just means new jobs in NATO countries to replace all that shit as it wears out, but you all are so fucking stupid, you didn't even think of that shit.
>>1468299I like how young people are so bored and disillusioned nowadays that they want WW3 to break out.
>>1468299>Russia>Still can't beat the poorest country in the US>Implying China would play ball with either the Russians or trump unless they get to lead any allianceAll that would happy would be trump would betray NATO and be backed by what's left of Russia's forces and have to deal with the total destruction of the dollar if they liquidate the US's debt.
>>1468303>Yes, and?Every subsequent NATO member would need to reallocate money earmarked for social programs towards military spending. Which means universal healthcare in Canada, Germany etc would disappear. Europoors in a certain age bracket would also be required to enter the military to create and maintain military readiness. >but that just means new jobs in NATO countries to replace all that shit as it wears outIt takes decades to create the infrastructure necessary to produce and maintain military equipment. The US specializes in being able to mobilize anywhere in the world within a matter of weeks. NATO would lose that benefit if they kicked the US out.
>>1468303>What the fuck do you think NATO does?Suck US cock so hard I no longer need a wife or a little femboy twink on the side.
Ivanposting is strong ITT
>>1468382it was a particularly bad day for them, that's always when they show up in droves
