Anonymous Video From ICE Agent’s Cellpho(...) 01/09/26(Fri)18:21:30 No. 1475077 > Thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PMR3GI5YE4 > https://news.wttw.com/2026/01/09/video-ice-agent-s-cellphone-captures-fatal-confrontation-minneapolis CNN) — Video captured by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jonathan Ross gives a raw, up-close perspective of the pivotal moments surrounding his fatal shooting of Renee Good in Minneapolis. A Department of Homeland Security official confirmed the video, obtained by CNN, was recorded on the agent’s cellphone camera; the video was originally obtained by the conservative Minnesota media outlet Alpha News. Vice President JD Vance shared it, saying it shows the officer was endangered. “Watch this, as hard as it is. Many of you have been told this law enforcement officer wasn’t hit by a car, wasn’t being harassed, and murdered an innocent woman. The reality is that his life was endangered and he fired in self defense,” Vance posted on X. The video begins with Rossin front of the vehicle driven by Good, who had stopped her burgundy SUV perpendicular to the street, obstructing the flow of traffic. Ross does not say anything as he walks across the front of the car toward the driver’s side of the car. As he rounds the car, Good can be seen with her window down looking directly at the officer. In the video, Good then talks to Ross. “That’s fine dude. I’m not mad at you,” she says. Ross does not respond. In the car window a reflection can be seen of Ross, holding his phone up, as he continues to walk. You can also hear the victim’s wife, Becca Good, say “show your face” to Ross. The video shows Ross walking around to the back of the car. Becca Good, the passenger in the car, who had gotten out of the vehicle prior to the confrontation, tells Ross that,“We don’t change our plates every morning, just so you know. This will be the same plate when you come talk to us later.” She holds a cellphone up to Ross’s face as she addresses Ross.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)18:21:58 No. 1475078 >>1475077 “You wanna come at us? You wanna come at us? I say go get yourself some lunch, big boy,” she says to Ross.She then tries to get back in the car, but the door is locked. You then hear another officer tell Good, the driver, to “get out of the fucking car.” Good is then seen reversing the car and glancing forward as she turns the steering wheel to the right, away from where the officer is standing. The car moves forward, and Ross cries out “whoa” and then three gunshots are heard in rapid succession. The video does not show if the SUV made contact with Ross, as the camera angle jerks up to the sky. An earlier video shot by a bystander shows that the SUV may have made contact with Ross as it lurches forward, and he moves to the side. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the newly released video backs up what the agency has said – that the ICE agent acted in self-defense. “This footage corroborates what DHS has stated all along – that this individual was impeding law enforcement and weaponized her vehicle in an attempt to kill or cause bodily harm to federal law enforcement. The officer was in fear of his own life, the lives of his fellow officers and acted in self-defense. The American people can watch this video with their own eyes and ears and judge for themselves,” McLaughlin said in a statement on Friday. The shooting itself is not visible, but three gunshots are heard as the phone in his hand jostles further and then is facing the house behind Ross. The camera then captures the SUV as it barrels forward.Someone can be hearduttering “fucking bitch.” The impact of the SUV crashing into a parked car can be heard as well as the camera pans down to the street. >FINISHED >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)18:47:24 No. 1475110 >An earlier video shot by a bystander shows that the SUV may have made contact with Ross as it lurches forward, and he moves to the side. It's over The leftists knee-jerk mass outrage ritual is finally coming to a close>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)19:44:41 No. 1475153 >>1475077 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkhWwlKsl4E I'm just going to leave this here. And by the way, everything he said was correct and factual - including the 911 transcripts that show that angry mob wrecking the crime scene and vandalizing police vehicles. >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)19:46:03 No. 1475155 how many threads do you need, esl shill brigade? jesus christ >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)19:49:18 No. 1475161 >>1475110 >may have Oh so still no actual footage of collision? Cute. Thanks for proving this guy is a retard willing to step in front of a k-turning car and insult someone he just killed for annoying him though.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)19:51:04 No. 1475165 They released a video to justify the shooting, and it cleared ICE so hard that.... oh, they're investigating other ICE shootings now because they're obviously lying https://www.thebanner.com/community/local-news/glen-burnie-shooting-police-ice-TTTM7RJEYRGQLEGQ6RCX5UZRZA/ >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)20:00:31 No. 1475176 >>1475165 Wait wait wait, what the fuck is this shit?>However, Thursday evening, the Anne Arundel County Police Department released clarifying information, saying, "one ICE detainee who was injured during the incident was already in custody in an ICE vehicle, and the other individual injured was struck by gunfire while operating a separate vehicle." So you're telling me they shot two people and initially said they were in the same car that was "trying to ram them". But then had to clarify one of them was IN CUSTODY and in an ICE car? How the fuck did he got shot then?>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)20:45:58 No. 1475211 >>1475153 Good post. I didn't know that actually hitting someone wasn't a prerequisite for deadly force. Apparently you just need to feel like your life is in danger.>same officer was dragged 300 yards by a vehicle six months ago Holy shit>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)20:47:48 No. 1475215 >>1475211 >>same officer was dragged 300 yards by a vehicle six months ago Don't feel too sympathetic for him; it happened because he busted open a window trying to get an illegal and stupidly decided to hang on even as the car kept moving. He seems to have a history of disobeying the training and procedure for being around active vehicles, as we further saw here when he decided to stand in front of a moving car.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)20:56:14 No. 1475222 >>1475215 No one believes you>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:19:46 No. 1475249 >>1475211 No you don't have to be hit by a car first before shooting the same way you don't have to be shot first before shooting back.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:32:15 No. 1475253 >>1475222 Everyone ought to believe it. It's pretty obvious. All you can do here is pretend you don't as a moronic distraction.>>
angry I.C.Er 01/09/26(Fri)21:32:58 No. 1475254 Stupid bitch...always putting her head in front of my bullet >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:36:33 No. 1475256 >>1475249 >No you don't have to be hit by a car first before shooting Nah. You should have to be hit by a car first before shooting. Fuck you. Otherwise you could get the fuck out of harms way and a shooting isn't justified. Cops don't get to use force for funsies or just cause someone pissed them off.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:41:03 No. 1475259 >>1475161 Cars don't move or run people over when parked>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:51:31 No. 1475264 >>1475256 Not how that works. Stay mad.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:52:39 No. 1475265 >>1475259 they also don't hit people when they don't make contact with them.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:58:12 No. 1475266 >>1475265 More likely to hit someone than a stationary vehicle. I don't think misinput works for irl>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)21:59:27 No. 1475267 >>1475266 He didn't get hit though. And that was AFTER putting himself in front a visibly k-turning vehicle like an incompetent dumbass. Literally one of the first things they teach law enforcement is no matter what you never get in front of a moving car.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:08:35 No. 1475270 >>1475267 >He didn't get hit though. >still pushing this lie >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:09:12 No. 1475271 >>1475270 Project harder, MAGA.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:09:19 No. 1475273 >>1475270 i think he's just responding to a shill, kind of like i am>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:11:33 No. 1475274 >>1475270 Please explain how one gets hit by a car veering away from them in a way that allows them to not only stay on their feet with no issue, but also have such little force he was able to keep one hand on his phone and immediately get out his gun?>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:15:04 No. 1475276 >>1475271 >>1475273 >>1475274 https://www.aol.com/news/ice-agent-shot-woman-minneapolis-205645313.html>The ICE agent who shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis was hospitalized and lucky to be alive after the “disorderly” woman hit him with her vehicle, President Trump said. >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:16:53 No. 1475277 >>1475276 >lucky to be alive >Meanwhile you literally see him stand around with zero complaints and drive off without issue in the videos Yeah I'm thinking Trump is actually full of shit. Legit there is no way to watch that video and think that guy was wounded seriously enough to say he's "lucky to be alive". Even fucking Trump backpedaled when a reporter pressed him on it.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:20:29 No. 1475281 >>1475277 >and think that guy was wounded seriously enough to say he's "lucky to be alive". More like he was lucky to be alive and not ran over completely and/or dragged by that car. Lucky the car bounced him out of the way and didn't put him under the tires.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:22:42 No. 1475282 >>1475267 >Didn't get hit >In front of vehicle 1. If someone is in front of a vehicle, you shouldn't try to step on the gas 2. He was making his way around the vehicle while it was parked at which point she starts to reverse while the other office is attempting to open the door to apprehend her 3. Had the car been parked, it would not have moved to been on any form of collison course as that'd be next to impossible Even presuming that he didn't get hit, the direction of the vehicle at the moment of acceleration was pointing toward him (any part of a moving vehicle can cause damage). This authorises lethal force. I have been detained before. When the sirens turned on, I didn't accelerate and try to outrun the cruiser. You might have a different strategy but I understand that it's generally ill-advised>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:23:21 No. 1475283 >>1475281 he'd be luckier if he didn't decide to be a member of the neo-brownshirts, but maybe that comes down to the genetic lottery or something>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:24:15 No. 1475284 >>1475282 He positioned himself in front of a k-turn. This is textbook "Shit you don't do" in law enforcement.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:25:39 No. 1475285 >The car is clearly making a steep right turn after reversing to move away >gunshots and dialogues are muted at the crucial moment >took two days to release the footage as if they had to edit some part out beforehand >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:26:52 No. 1475287 >>1475282 >1. If someone is in front of a vehicle, you shouldn't try to step on the gas He wasn't even in front of the vehicle. He was to the left of the front, and she's turning to not hit him. Argue about whether or not she should've fled but she absolutely wasn't trying to hit him. And even if she was, the fact he can (and did) move out of the way easily means that under DOJ procedure, he did NOT have authority to use deadly force.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:29:33 No. 1475290 >>1475285 >The car is clearly making a steep right turn after reversing to move away Doesn't matter.>gunshots and dialogues are muted at the crucial moment They aren't.>took two days to release the footage as if they had to edit some part out beforehand More unfounded lies.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:30:07 No. 1475292 >>1475287 The steering and the direction of front tires clearly shows that the driver was doing the opposite of trying to run ice officers over. Also the video is heavily editted out>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:30:33 No. 1475293 >>1475284 So?>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:31:02 No. 1475294 >>1475287 That's not what the evidence shows.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:31:38 No. 1475295 >>1475287 >He wasn't even in front of the vehicle. Another lie.>she's turning to not hit him. She hit him.>but she absolutely wasn't trying to hit him. Still hit him.> he did NOT have authority to use deadly force. But that's wrong you fucking retard.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:32:04 No. 1475296 >>1475293 It means he endangered himself, which annihilates a "self defense" excuse. He was not following police procedure and it resulted in a woman's death. That's at minimum grounds for a wrongful death lawsuit and at most a murder charge.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:32:39 No. 1475297 >>1475292 >Also the video is heavily editted out >My source is that I made it the fuck up! >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:33:36 No. 1475298 >>1475295 >She hit him. How did she hit him but apparently did it so softly he didn't fall, didn't lose his footing, didn't drop his phone, and was able to draw his pistol with one hand to fire at her 3 times within about two seconds?>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:34:08 No. 1475299 >>1475296 >which annihilates a "self defense" excuse. But that's wrong you fucking retard.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:35:09 No. 1475301 >>1475298 >she didn't hit him hard enough so she didn't hit him >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:37:51 No. 1475302 >>1475301 >She was trying to hit him with her car full speed! >Ignore how he apparently experienced such little force on his body he didn't even drop his phone It seems a whole lot more like he jumped back to shoot her.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:40:49 No. 1475305 >>1475302 >multiple camera angles show him getting hit >the president and others under him said he was hit >had to go to the hospital because he was hit >"I don't think he was hit though!" Whatever.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:41:41 No. 1475307 >>1475295 There’s nothing in this footage that shows whether the car hit the phone owner or not.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:43:22 No. 1475308 >>1475305 Sorry to inform you this Hassan, but he did not go to any hospital.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:45:22 No. 1475309 >>1475305 >>multiple camera angles show him getting hit Surely you have a clear screenshot showing him making contact with the car then?>>the president and others under him said he was hit President also said he was "lucky to be alive based on what I saw" even though he's visibly unharmed on the video and was able to stand around with zero complaints before driving off by himself>>had to go to the hospital because he was hit We have no evidence of this. No photos of his "injuries", no hospital records, nothing but the words of an admin that has repeatedly been caught lying to justify ICE activity. Like for fucks sake; reminder we had a similar case last year where an ICE member shot a woman repeatedly for "ramming" him. Except she survived and, despite the Trump admin repeatedly claiming she was a terrorist who was shot in self defense, won in court that she did nothing wrong and had all charges against her dismissed.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:45:45 No. 1475310 >>1475308 Prove it>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:46:58 No. 1475311 >>1475308 >The ICE agent who shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis was hospitalized >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:48:05 No. 1475312 >>1475309 >even though he's visibly unharmed on the video You do not have to be injured to be lucky to be alive.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:49:27 No. 1475314 >>1475310 >>1475311 Prove he was in a hospital. Medical records, pictures (since Noem already leaked his identity), literally anything beyond the word of an admin that has lied to justify ICE brutality in the past.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:50:27 No. 1475315 >>1475312 Come on man even Trump backed off this claim when pressed on it.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:52:00 No. 1475316 >>1475077 they should investigate every donating to her fundraiser and charge them with domestic terrorism.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:52:03 No. 1475317 >>1475314 >no you can't use Trump or Krisi Noem's statements. You can only use what I think happened even if it deviates from standard police procedure >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:52:11 No. 1475319 Lies? From the Trump administration? Why, I never! >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:53:04 No. 1475320 >>1475315 >Come on man even Trump backed off this claim when pressed on it. Trump said he's not lucky to be alive?>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:56:12 No. 1475323 >>1475317 If it's standard procedure to take him to a hospital regardless of actual injury that's the opposite of proving your point.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)22:58:20 No. 1475324 >>1475323 >sending injured police to the hospital is against police policy >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:00:42 No. 1475326 >>1475324 You're trying to PROVE he was injured. While at the same time saying it would be standard procedure to take him to the hospital as a given before you've proven he was injured.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:00:58 No. 1475327 >>1475309 >President also said he was "lucky to be alive based on what I saw" Also said he was "run over". There has yet to be any footage of the agent underneath the car.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:02:17 No. 1475328 >>1475326 He was hit by a car so he's taken to a hospital to check for injuries.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:10:01 No. 1475331 >>1475328 >circular logic >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:19:04 No. 1475334 >>1475331 Meme all you want, officials said he went to the hospital. Prove how he didn't.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:19:52 No. 1475335 >>1475327 Faggot.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:20:51 No. 1475336 >>1475328 >My evidence that he was hit by a car was because he was in the hospital >My evidence that he was in the hospital was because he was hit by a car You really don't see the issue there that you're using one as proof for the other?>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:21:51 No. 1475337 >>1475334 Prove he did. Officials word means little when they've been caught lying to cover for ICE before. It means even less when he shows no signs of injury and they've released zero evidence of him being in any hospital even after they IDed him>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:25:42 No. 1475340 >>1475335 >no argument Concession accepted>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:26:17 No. 1475341 >>1475336 >video shows him getting hit by the car >he's later taken to the hospital to get looked at >Well how do you know he even went to the hospital? >because officials said he did, and he was hit by the car >That doesn't prove he was hit! >why else would they take him to the hospital >Circular logic! >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:28:17 No. 1475342 >>1475341 >>video shows him getting hit by the car Provide a frame of his body in contact with the car. We have 4 angles of this event. No one has been able to provide a single frame of contact.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:32:44 No. 1475343 >>1475342 https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1TLzBB.img?w=768&h=512&m=6 >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:35:46 No. 1475344 >>1475343 Yeah that sure is about 10 pixels of him standing in front of the car, like we already knew he did.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:38:21 No. 1475345 >>1475343 >at least angles of the same incident and the only "proof" of contact is the literal lowest quality furthest away footage >And it still seems to show the same frame we can see him standing aside to shoot her L M A O>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:41:50 No. 1475346 >>1475344 Actually it's 10 pixels of him making contact with the car. > and the only "proof" of contact is the literal lowest quality furthest away footage Sorry liberals are too poor to buy the latest iPhone with 2622x1206 pixels.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:44:32 No. 1475348 >>1475346 Yeah cross compare this with the other two footage; this is him stepping back and following the car to shoot her. It never makes contact.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:45:08 No. 1475349 >>1475348 >It never makes contact. But that's wrong you fucking retard. You can clearly see his hand on the hood of the car.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:47:30 No. 1475350 >>1475349 First of all, that's physically impossible based on his own footage; one hand is on his phone and the other on his gun. He had no hands free to do that with. Secondly, if he did somehow put his hand on the car, that doesn't count as being hit by it.>>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:56:57 No. 1475354 >"I-Is that a car with its engine on???!" >"AAHH I'M GONNA STAND IN FROONT OF IT! "(I did this before and got run over. I did not learn my lesson) >lightly bumped >"I GET TO KILL YOU NOW! I GET TO KILL YOU NOW! I GET TO KILL YOU NOW! I GET TO KILL YOU NOW!" >>
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)23:59:47 No. 1475356 >>1475077 Textbook FAFO>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:02:42 No. 1475360 >>1475354 He didn't even get bumped lmao. He literally steps back and shoots her just for getting close to him, even though he's the dumbass getting in front of a moving car.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:23:13 No. 1475364 >>1475350 >First of all, that's physically impossible based on his own footage But that's wrong you fucking retard. You can clearly see his hand on the hood of the car, and if you watch the video you can clearly see his hip being bumped by the edge of the car.>one hand is on his phone and the other on his gun. And you notice how the camera angle from his phone changes when he puts his hand down?>He had no hands free to do that with. Apparently it's impossible to hold your hand out while holding an object.>Secondly, if he did somehow put his hand on the car, that doesn't count as being hit by it. Counts as making contact with the car, which you still claim didn't happen.>>1475360 >He didn't even get bumped lmao. Even if this were true, and it isn't, he still has justification to shoot.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:25:33 No. 1475365 >>1475354 >They had no right to shoot a driver accelerating towards the officer! Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:43:44 No. 1475366 >>1475365 Unironically not permitted by DOJ guidelines. He can and was able to get out of the way; ICE (and law enforcement in general) aren't allowed to shoot moving vehicles unless they have no other way of getting away from them.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:47:12 No. 1475367 >>1475366 Oh well. He still deserves a medal>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:47:53 No. 1475368 >>1475364 >And you notice how the camera angle from his phone changes when he puts his hand down? It doesn't go to the hood of the car. He's got one hand on his phone, one on his gun... it really seems like, shockingly, he didn't actually put a hand on the car and you're seeing things in video footage that's about 15 pixels.>Apparently it's impossible to hold your hand out while holding an object. It is when you have one hand on your phone (on his side and not on the car judging by the footage literally shot from it) and one on your gun. >Counts as making contact with the car, which you still claim didn't happen. Him touching the car with his hand isn't the same as his body making contact with it. You were trying to prove he was hit by the car and are now arguing that he actually hit the car instead.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:48:57 No. 1475370 >>1475367 He deserves a warrant out for his arrest. Which state officials are likely to give him soon since they've started their own investigation after the FBI tried to lock them out of it to protect him.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:50:10 No. 1475371 >>1475370 Any prosecution would be ridiculous and politically motivated. Go eat a whole turd, fuckface.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:51:37 No. 1475373 >>1475371 >It's ridiculous and politically motivated to investigate a federal agent killing a civilian Sorry anon but justice is getting served. Better hope he turns himself in so he gets a day in court, because the alternative isn't very good for him.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:51:38 No. 1475374 >>1475371 >Which state officials are likely to give him soon Tim Walz is about to be charged with treason. I wouldn't trust anything coming out of that state. By the way: the federal government knows the names and street addresses of everybody stupid enough to threaten a federal agency. Please don't be retarded.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:52:16 No. 1475375 >>1475370 Terrorist collaborator, Tim Walz, barely counts as an official. And if he does so to quell his terrorist base, well maybe he'll become even more unpopular.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:52:40 No. 1475376 >>1475374 >Tim Walz is about to be charged with treason Man you illiterate idiots saw him drop out of reelection and took it as everything other than him not wanting to do a reelection campaign huh?>By the way: the federal government knows the names and street addresses of everybody stupid enough to threaten a federal agency. Please don't be retarded. It's a threat to point out people don't like murderers?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:53:20 No. 1475377 >>1475373 There's no justice involved in putting a man in prison for almost being run over by a trained agitator.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:55:02 No. 1475378 >>1475377 There is in imprisoning a murderer who abused his position to kill another human being. But hey, if he's so in the right, why not let him prove his innocence in court instead of proclaiming him innocent with no trial and trying to kill all investigation?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:56:08 No. 1475380 >>1475376 >Man you illiterate idiots saw him drop out of reelection- He threatened to use Minnesota National Guard against ICE.>It's a threat to point out people don't like murderers? It's a federal crime to obstruct, let alone organize pogroms against federal officers.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:57:07 No. 1475381 >>1475378 Nah>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:58:47 No. 1475382 >>1475380 >He threatened to use Minnesota National Guard against ICE. Which he can actually do, as they're now infringing on state sovereignty by acting as judge jury and executioner.>It's a federal crime to obstruct, let alone organize pogroms against federal officers. Murder and helping a murderer escape justice is also a federal crime. And the people of Minnesota have their own right to the 1st amendment. And soon I expect they'll start making use of the 2nd as well since ICE has made it clear they are an active threat to the people.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)00:59:48 No. 1475383 >>1475381 >He's so innocent, we're actually going to block all attempts to even determine wrongdoing Not suspect at all. BTW you are aware ICE lied about previous shootings as well to cover their asses?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:01:15 No. 1475384 >>1475378 >why not let him prove his innocence in court instead of proclaiming him innocent with no trial and trying to kill all investigation? That's literally a form of punishment. The current evidence shows the fucking bitch was entirely in the wrong. There's no need to hang the threat of imprisonment over someone's head in this situation. Of course, you won't agree, but you also don't even care about your arguments, just that you're allowed to keep making them. THAT is sociopathic behavior..>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:01:36 No. 1475385 >>1475380 No he didn't.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:02:16 No. 1475386 >>1475383 >ICE lied about previous shootings as well to cover their asses Nah.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:02:20 No. 1475387 >>1475366 >Unironically not permitted by DOJ guidelines. But that's wrong you fucking retard.>He can and was able to get out of the way But that's wrong you fucking retard.>ICE (and law enforcement in general) aren't allowed to shoot moving vehicles unless they have no other way of getting away from them. But that's wrong you fucking retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:03:29 No. 1475388 >>1475384 >That's literally a form of punishment. It's a form of punishment to actually investigate an officer-involved shooting? Even when there's so much debate over whether or not the shooting was justified? No that's fucking justice you retard. He shot and killed someone. He needs to be investigated; declaring him innocent within hours of the shooting and literally denying any investigation is suspect as fuck. Being a fed doesn't make you immune to going to trial.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:03:45 No. 1475389 >>1475384 No it doesn't, and that's not how it works.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:04:16 No. 1475390 >>1475387 >please, you need to accept my talking points >i don't get paid if I don't get positive reactions to my shilling >please, just accept that it wasn't a murder >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:04:27 No. 1475391 >>1475368 >It doesn't go to the hood of the car. His arm is clearly out toward the hood.>It is when you have one hand on your phone It's impossible to stretch your arm out while holding a phone? How do dumb cunts take selfies then, retard?>You were trying to prove he was hit by the car and are now arguing that he actually hit the car instead. No I'm adding the additional his hand was also on the car making extra contact, retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:05:28 No. 1475392 >>1475390 >cops aren't allowed to shoot vehicles driving at them >pay no attention to all these several thousand other cases of cops being cleared for shooting a driver that drove at them Retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:05:30 No. 1475393 >>1475388 >It's a form of punishment to actually investigate an officer-involved shooting? Even when there's so much debate over whether or not the shooting was justified? Pretty sure you just changed the subject. You want to re-reply and maybe respond to what I said properly?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:05:36 No. 1475394 >>1475387 >https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force#1-16.200 >Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force. Oh and please, PLEASE quote the part where the latter half of the sentence you retards keep excluding completely ends any and all excuses for him. PLEASE.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:06:36 No. 1475395 >>1475391 >It's impossible to stretch your arm out while holding a phone? How do dumb cunts take selfies then, retard? It is when you have one hand on your phone and one on your gun.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:07:37 No. 1475396 >>1475393 You're literally arguing it is a punishment for him to have to prove in court that him shooting and killing a mother of 3 was in-fact justified. Nice fucking try bootlicker.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:07:45 No. 1475397 >>1475394 You know she hit him, right?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:09:42 No. 1475398 >>1475397 You know have no proof of that, right? The blurriest camera footage from half a mile away doesn't prove shit, especially when the other footage just shows that was him deciding to stand in front of a k-turning car like a retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:09:52 No. 1475399 >>1475396 Yes it is a punishment to bring charges for the purpose of debate. Charges would need to be assessed by a grand jury in this case, then brought if applicable. I'm not sure in what world putting someone on trial for murder with the threat of imprisonment isn't a punishment. If it's not, let's bring charges against you for murder every weekend. Shouldn't be an issue for you, right?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:10:06 No. 1475400 >>1475395 >It is when you have one hand on your phone and one on your gun. https://img.freepik.com/premium-photo/overjoyed-young-african-ethnic-lady-is-laughing-sincerely-while-holding-smartphone-her-stretched-arms-taking-selfie_283617-4200.jpg>this is impossible according to retarded leftists >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:11:11 No. 1475401 >>1475400 Wow, you'd have a good point if it wasn't for the fact we literally have footage from his phone showing that didn't do that. Retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:11:13 No. 1475402 >>1475394 >or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, Retard.>and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Which he couldn't do in the short amount of time while standing on an icy road, retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:12:14 No. 1475403 >>1475401 Except the footage suddenly goes dark when the angle changes, retard. Show me a still that proves it doesn't.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:12:20 No. 1475404 >>1475398 Alright fuckface, go argue with yourself. You've posted on this topic like 3000 times. You have been wrong since the first post. Not one post has been intelligent correct or even one you've cared about making, You're an empty husk of a piece of shit. So, go fuck yourself.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:12:54 No. 1475405 >>1475399 >Charges would need to be assessed by a grand jury in this case, then brought if applicable. They are applicable and he will be charged. What he did was unlawful use of deadly force at best and outright murder at worse. The sheer amount of debate surrounding this footage proves that.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:14:38 No. 1475406 >>1475405 >What he did was unlawful use of deadly force at best and outright murder at worse. But that's wrong you fucking retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:14:41 No. 1475407 >>1475402 >Which he couldn't do in the short amount of time while standing on an icy road, retard. You mean like he literally does, which allowed him to shoot her twice through the driver-side door? Especially since she was literally turning AWAY from him so he wouldn't be hit; at most, all he would've needed to do was take a step back.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:14:44 No. 1475408 >>1475405 >They are applicable and he will be charged. Coping. Hopefully roping, when it's fantasy doesn't play out.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:15:42 No. 1475409 >>1475404 Ooooh someone's mad the defense for their murderer isn't gonna hold up in court.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:16:05 No. 1475410 >>1475407 She turned at him. It's in all the videos.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:18:04 No. 1475411 >>1475410 Leaving aside how you can literally see on Ross's cellphone camera her shifting the wheel to the right: Please explain how a car turning to hit someone to the left of it somehow rolls right after the driver is shot. Not towards Ross, not forward. RIGHT, where he fucking isn't.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:18:18 No. 1475412 >>1475409 Nah, you're still going. You've been pulling this same shit for over 48 hours. You do it every time there's a police involved shooting too. You're a retarded sack of shit, and no one believes you. You are changing no minds because you're wrong. You're simply wasting time as a target to berate because you're obviously being a completely disingenuous stupid fucking ass.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:19:07 No. 1475413 >>1475382 >Which he can actually do Right. Because the civil war worked out so well for the rebels.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:19:39 No. 1475414 >>1475412 Yeah so when the state brings charges and puts a warrant out for his arrest in a week, you think you'll be doing ok?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:19:46 No. 1475415 >>1475410 Other way around, actually.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:20:26 No. 1475416 >>1475407 >You mean like he literally does, No he's literally pushed out of the way when the car bumps into his hips, retard.>which allowed him to shoot her twice through the driver-side door? As it was driving past at speeds high enough to seriously injure someone, retard?>Especially since she was literally turning AWAY from him so he wouldn't be hit; Which further explains why two rounds taken in less than a second were from the side, retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:20:59 No. 1475417 >>1475414 Yeah, I'll live. And I'll have yet another reason never to vote Democrat ever again if true.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:21:14 No. 1475418 >>1475413 ICE isn't welcome and is overstepping their bounds as a federal agency. They've embarked on a kidnapping and now murder campaign; and don't think I'm saying them arresting illegals is kidnapping. Just today they disappeared 5 NATIVE AMERICANS under the guise of "immigration control" and are refusing to say where they even are. Treating them as a rogue militia is entirely warranted.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:24:42 No. 1475419 >>1475416 >No he's literally pushed out of the way when the car bumps into his hips, retard. Yeah no. He stepped back. No one has been able to provide a single picture showing contact without making up headcanon about the literal furthest and blurriest image of the incident.>As it was driving past at speeds high enough to seriously injure someone, retard? Oh now we move on to a new stage of cope. Yeah that car going at like 2 mph was a real threat. Apparently it was simultaneously able to move so slowly that it "hitting" an officer did nothing but make him step back with one hand still on his phone and the other able to immediately take out his gun, but it was also a lethal threat.>Which further explains why two rounds taken in less than a second were from the side, retard. So you're admitting the car was turned away from him. Meaning it wasn't driving at him, and he wasn't in any danger.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:25:14 No. 1475420 >>1475418 >ICE isn't welcome and is overstepping their bounds as a federal agency. Same could be said of the Union soldiers in the South... but look how that turned out.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:26:49 No. 1475421 >>1475418 >They've embarked on a kidnapping and now murder campaign God I wish.>Treating them as a rogue militia is entirely warranted. No nation in the world tolerates rebellion you stupid idiot.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:27:47 No. 1475422 >>1475419 >Yeah no. He stepped back Yeah no he didn't, retard.>No one has been able to provide a single picture showing contact Several pictures and videos have. You're the retard demanding frame-by-frame evidence, dismissing it, and then not producing any counter-evidence. Because you're retarded.>Yeah that car going at like 2 mph was a real threat. Oh you know for a fact how fast that car was going, retard? Why don't you provide a source.>Apparently it was simultaneously able to move so slowly that it "hitting" an officer did nothing Apparently you haven't been shoved enough in school. We need to bring bullying back.>So you're admitting the car was turned away from him. After it drove into him, retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:29:07 No. 1475423 >>1475420 ICE are actively committing terrorist acts against the population and lying to cover up their crimes. Civil War comparisons aren't going to change that Donald Trump gave a federal agency about 15x their budget and they immediately used it to terrorize americans.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:30:28 No. 1475424 >>1475421 And yet, this particular nation tolerates people like you, someone who longs for government paramilitary groups to go around kidnapping and murdering people. How sad.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:31:29 No. 1475425 >>1475422 The idiot anon is simply having fun with you by producing multiple bullshit arguments. It's sad to see someone so bored.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:31:31 No. 1475426 >>1475422 >You're the retard demanding frame-by-frame evidence, dismissing it, and then not producing any counter-evidence You're literally producing the blurriest possible image, proclaiming it shows contact, then ignoring the other videos that sync up to that moment and shows that was just him recklessly getting in front of a moving car. My counter-evidence is the entire rest of the video where you cannot see him get touched by that car.>Oh you know for a fact how fast that car was going, retard? Why don't you provide a source. Do you know how acceleration works?>After it drove into him, retard. You literally just admitted it drove AWAY from him. That's the only possible way he could be in a position to shoot through the drivers window.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:31:42 No. 1475427 >>1475423 >How dare you take away my mexicans! >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:33:05 No. 1475428 >>1475421 >No nation in the world tolerates rebellion you stupid idiot. Yeah so why are we tolerating a federal task force meant to be enforcing immigration laws against migrants instead kidnapping native americans and shooting citizens before lying about it. This shit should've ended after Marisol Martinez was found innocent and proved that ICE was actively lying to cover up brutality.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:33:31 No. 1475429 >>1475426 >You're literally producing the blurriest possible image, So produce something better, retard.>My counter-evidence is the entire rest of the video where you cannot see him get touched by that car. So after the car drives away, retard?>Do you know how acceleration works? Do you, retard?>You literally just admitted it drove AWAY from him. After it hit him, retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:35:47 No. 1475430 >>1475427 >THINK OF THE FOOOOD!!! >*Walks into Taco Bell >See Tyrone and Lakesha Dang, we can make food without Mexicans? Who in the fuck knew?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:37:26 No. 1475431 >>1475285 Probably used AI as well.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:37:49 No. 1475432 >>1475428 Shit happens. And expected outliers in all manners of policing.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:38:52 No. 1475433 >>1475429 >So produce something better, retard. Ok>https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/01/when-just-showing-the-video-isnt-enough-minneapolis-shooting-puts-news-orgs-visual-forensics-chops-to-the-test/ Here's an analysis showing that his feet literally prove he was not being hit by the car. Unless you can somehow prove that he got hit by a car moving to the right while being to the left of the left wheels.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:39:53 No. 1475434 >>1475432 This is a clear pattern of behavior now; ICE is more interested in terrorizing the population opposed to them then doing their jobs as immigration enforcement.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:42:42 No. 1475435 >>1475429 >>1475433 Oh wait even better; here's a gif showing the front view of the incident that pretty clearly shows that Ross never makes contact with the car.>https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/01/video-shows-minnesota-womans-car-blocking-part-of-road-gif.gif It's from Fox News too. Your favorite.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:43:11 No. 1475436 >>1475371 Pahliterally motervhated? Jesus Christ MAGA fags are insufferable. I work with morons like you and holy shit are you people fucking stupid.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:43:55 No. 1475437 >>1475432 >Shit happens. >A lot. >So we shouldn't investigate it or hold anyone accountable for it. >And if you protest that then you're a terrorist. >That's how policing works. >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:44:57 No. 1475438 >>1475374 So does Google maps you dumb fucking idiot. Nobody is afraid of your gay ghetto ass.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:45:24 No. 1475439 >>1475433 >using ai from a left-wing biased source Retard.>>1475435 >posting a gif that shows the car bumping into him Double retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:46:21 No. 1475440 >>1475433 >Refute my stale info!!! Nah. Doesn't include the 3rd vid so let's pass on it.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:47:52 No. 1475441 >>1475437 So, you're strawmanning me into a slippery slope? What a faggot.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:48:04 No. 1475442 >>1475439 >>posting a gif that shows the car bumping into him You can literally see the headlights are past him when it would've "bumped into him". >>1475440 Third vid only shows he was a reckless POS. Since he puts down his camera the moment he decides to fire, it literally offers no evidence other than showing he intentionally got in front of her car.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:49:04 No. 1475443 >>1475441 You can't claim "single incident" when this has happened multiple times.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:49:37 No. 1475444 >>1475284 Assuming she was in the middle of a three-point and not using her vehicle to impede officer activity, the point from when he is walking around the car is when it is stationary. At this point, she has been told to halt and step out of the vehicle which she does not comply with. She subsequentely reverses, with him positioned approximately the midline of the car. The car halts again, in order for her to put it into drive. She has the opportunity not to do so but does not comply with law enforcement. She puts the car in drive with the officer walking around the car approixmately at driver 1/3 of the vehicle whereby he is forced to both react immediately to get into a position where he MIGHT not get hit (which need not be debated because it doesn't change the outcome) and is authorised to use lethal force as his safety has been compromised by unlawful action. This comes from the footage so far available and taken as a whole has a partial consensus that this was a lawful shooting>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:49:42 No. 1475445 >>1475439 No, it doesn't. At all. Jesus christ, this has got to be THE lowest point for you shills. You're literally telling people their eyes are wrong and that they're not actually seeing what they're seeing. You're acting like the Ministry of Truth but without the broken, brainwashed population, as if modern Americans are going to hear "2+2=5" and go "Yup, sounds good!" It's fucking embarrassing. So fucking embarrassing. >>1475441 No.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:50:03 No. 1475446 >>1475442 >got in front of her car. Oops>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:51:42 No. 1475447 >>1475442 >You can literally see the headlights are past him when it would've "bumped into him". You see her left headlight bump into him, retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:52:15 No. 1475448 >>1475444 She has no reason to comply with ICE as they have no jurisdiction to order her to do anything. We also see from his own camera he deliberately went in front of her car even though she was k-turning to get out, defying official protocol and intentionally endangering himself right before using it as a reason to shoot her, not just once through the windshield, but twice more through her driver side window.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:54:03 No. 1475449 >>1475448 \n1m m1n/>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:54:34 No. 1475450 >>1475447 >>1475446 He stands in front of it. We already know this from his own video. When the car starts moving the headlight goes past him before the car reaches him, meaning he wasn't even tapped by it. Ross intentionally put himself as close to the front of that car as he could, even with the driver veering to not hit him, so he could justify shooting her.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:55:35 No. 1475451 >>1475449 You seem upset.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:56:02 No. 1475452 >>1475450 >He stands in front of it Ah. Aha.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:58:27 No. 1475454 >>1475452 It's like she was being arrested and someone demanded that she exit the vehicle.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)01:59:37 No. 1475455 >>1475450 >He stands in front of it. Yeah we know, retard. That's why she got shot when she drove towards him.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:00:18 No. 1475456 >>1475452 Yeah he stands in front of the car, hence why she turns to avoid hitting him. Meaning he intentionally put himself in a position where he could try to justify shooting her, even though every single law enforcement officer is told to never get in front of a running car as part of basic training. And yet he still doesn't actually get hit because she turns to not hit him.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:01:12 No. 1475457 >>1475455 Attempting to flee while detained no less.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:02:19 No. 1475458 >>1475452 >>1475455 >Uh you just admitted he stood in front of the car! This totally proves she hit him! Retard stood in front, which is against protocol btw. She then turns to not hit him when she completes the k-turn she was mid-way through when he moved there, and he promptly shoots her despite her not hitting him. Which we can see on the footage from the position of the headlights.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:02:34 No. 1475459 >>1475456 >Muh driver has no culpability Yeah, sure.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:03:57 No. 1475460 >>1475458 Nah that's wrong.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:04:37 No. 1475461 >>1475459 >Uh well she shouldn't have moved Debatable considering the dubious legality of her "arrest". But now you're starting to accept that she didn't actually hit him, so I'll take that.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:05:41 No. 1475462 >>1475458 >Retard stood in front, which is against protocol btw. Nobody fucking cares, retard! Just because a cop is an incompetent dumbass doesn't make it okay for you to drive towards them when you're being detained. Write him a pink slip and then shut the fuck up.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:05:49 No. 1475463 >>1475448 If she has been impeding law enforcement activity, they can detain her. Obstructing ICE is impeding activity. It is also generally ill-advised that a citizen, especially one that has done nothing wrong, not cooperate with officers during their detainment. The officer made the motion across the vehicle whilst the vehicle was parked - she had to defy orders and specifically reversed during this period. A k-turn was not an appropriate action on her part and him moving across the vehicle doesn't put him at risk prior to (and even after) the reversal.At this time, a fellow officer is simultaneously attempting from the driver side to open the door and apprehend her which would have been where was where the first officer was going to assist. This is not particularly unusual protocol as I would not expect an officer to standby without assisting and crossing the vehicle was necessary. The discharge of the firearm and whether it was excessive is at best up for debate. It's best not to comment on this as interpretation may be incorrect>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:06:18 No. 1475464 >>1475460 >Don't believe your lying eyes You know considering ICE track record, it's gonna be really funny when evidence for the trail begins and we immediately see him texting his buddies something like "Fucking bitch thought she could walk away. Shut her up real fucking fast." in their group chat. Already happened in the Martinez case and apparently whatever else was in those texts was so bad they dropped it then and there before the court could see more.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:06:30 No. 1475465 >>1475458 Don't feel the need to reply to me, you shitposting faggot. The video shows that she turned toward him and he moved left out of the way. Then she slammed on the gas, hit him and got a new face hole. So, KYS.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:07:56 No. 1475466 >>1475464 >trial lol.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:08:44 No. 1475468 >>1475462 If a cop is an incompetent dumbass in a way that results in him seeing no other way but to shoot a civilian in the head, he should be charged with murder. Self defense doesn't fly when you put yourself in the danger zone.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:08:57 No. 1475469 >>1475465 *Attempting to move out of the way>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:11:18 No. 1475470 >>1475468 >Stop! >Get out of the vehicle! >MUH DRIVER HAS NO RESPONISBILITY! Back and forth with the same shit. Why not get a real hobby?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:11:53 No. 1475471 >>1475465 >The video shows that she turned toward him and he moved left out of the way. He was always to the left of her car retard. She's literally turning to leave and avoid hitting him, as you can see from the fact the car veered right afterwards. I like how you guys seem to think a car turning right can hit a guy on the left of it, even with footage clearly showing his legs are past the left wheel when it moves forward.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:12:56 No. 1475472 >>1475470 They had no authority to stop or order her. ICE can't do traffic stops and she committed no crimes.>But she was blocking the street There's enough room for people to get past her. Ironically ICE was blocking the street more than she was.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:13:15 No. 1475473 >>1475468 >Self defense doesn't fly when you put yourself in the danger zone. But that's wrong you fucking retard. Just because a cop is dumb enough to step in front of a car doesn't mean he can't defend himself from a driver coming at him while they're fleeing arrest or detainment. Christ I feel like I'm getting a migraine from explaining simple concepts to fucking incompetent morons. There should be an IQ test you have to take before browsing 4chan.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:14:28 No. 1475475 >>1475471 >He was always to the left of her car retard Uh? Did you watch the video? I'm not talking to you anymore until you watch at least one of the videos and admit that he walked in front of the car at the very least. Which you already admitted, so I'm not sure what you're doing in this post?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:14:39 No. 1475476 >>1475471 I love that you guys saying that she turned right exonerated her https://i.imgur.com/L4eFgyA.png As if going straight or turning left were viable options. She could have gone straight up an elevated sidewalk into a home, or through a fence into into a house. The road was to her right so she turned right>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:15:03 No. 1475477 >>1475473 >Just because a cop is dumb enough to step in front of a car doesn't mean he can't defend himself from a driver coming at him while they're fleeing arrest or detainment. Except she didn't come at him and in fact deliberately turned to avoid the retard trying to stand in front of her. Argue whether or not it was legal for her to flee all you want, it absolutely wasn't to shoot her in the head because this fucking idiot can't obey his own training.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:16:31 No. 1475479 >>1475476 >The road was to her right so she turned right Yes and Ross was too her left. Which really blows a hole in your "SHE WAS DRIVING RIGHT AT HIM" excuse. He positioned himself in front of her car. She tries to turn past him. The moment she gets close he blows her fucking head off and then fires two more shots through the drivers side window to make sure.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:16:40 No. 1475480 >>1475450 >He stands in front of it. >>1475477 >Except she didn't come at him RETARD!>it absolutely wasn't to shoot her BUT THAT'S WRONG YOU FUCKING RETARD!>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:17:40 No. 1475481 >>1475480 He stood in the front left of her car. She turns to avoid hitting him anyway. He decides he's close enough and opens fire, not just once through the windshield, but two more times through the drivers side window to ensure she dies.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:17:41 No. 1475482 >>1475477 She actually turned toward him. You do know in the original video posted there's two cops, one near the door, and one at the front-left of the car, right? Holy shit. Did you watch the fucking video or no?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:19:31 No. 1475484 >>1475482 >She actually turned toward him. Why do you need to lie? The only time she turns "towards" him is when he literally gets in front of her car mid-turn while she's in reverse. The fact the car veers to the right instead of going straight forward or in his direction proves she was turning away from him when she was shot.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:20:40 No. 1475485 >>1475484 >He was always on the left Explain this before moving on.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:22:57 No. 1475487 >>1475485 He literally walks around her car before settling on being on the left of her front. Meaning at no point was he the direct front of the car while it was accelerating, but also shows that she was turning to AVOID hitting him, not trying to run him over. Combined with the fact the car did turn and we can see on the footage it never makes contact, it means his "self defense" reasons for shooting were full of shit. He shot because she got close enough he thought no one would notice he wasn't actually in danger.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:23:46 No. 1475488 >>1475481 >He stood in the front left of her car. So the front, retard?>She turns to avoid hitting him anyway. We clearly disagree on how successful that was.>He decides he's close enough and opens fire, Yes he is you fucking retard. To a vehicle COMING AT HIM! Fuck>not just once through the windshield, Which he would have to be in the front to fucking do?>but two more times through the drivers side window to ensure she dies. You clearly don't know jack shit about firearms. Which is a good thing because I don't want anymore retarded people handling them.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:25:46 No. 1475490 >>1475487 https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/01/when-just-showing-the-video-isnt-enough-minneapolis-shooting-puts-news-orgs-visual-forensics-chops-to-the-test/ the vid in this link shows otherwise. It shows that she accelerated straight at him, then turned the wheels. https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/01/when-just-showing-the-video-isnt-enough-minneapolis-shooting-puts-news-orgs-visual-forensics-chops-to-the-test/ Maybe watch the vid? >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:26:56 No. 1475492 >>1475488 >So the front, retard? Yes, we've established he's a retard walking in front of a moving car.>We clearly disagree on how successful that was. The gif literally shows it never makes contact, something supported by the fact that he apparently gets "hit by an accelerating car" yet doesn't drop his phone, lose his footing, or even stumble before being able to shoot.>Yes he is you fucking retard. To a vehicle COMING AT HIM! Which never made contact and was in fact moving to not hit him. AFTER he put himself in front of it.>You clearly don't know jack shit about firearms We literally have clear footage of the shooting showing he fires two more times after redirecting aim to the driver window. Don't try to pull some burst fire shit.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:29:34 No. 1475493 >>1475492 >The gif literally shows it never makes contact, something supported by the fact that he apparently gets "hit by an accelerating car" yet doesn't drop his phone, lose his footing, or even stumble before being able to shoot. It actually looks like the shot happens right as he's being hit, which points to a possibility that he wasn't intending to fire, but the impact caused the gun to go off. Watch the video and quit acting clueless. You're a fucking idiot.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:31:41 No. 1475494 >>1475490 Oh the vid that shows he opened fire literally the moment the car moves forward, completely destroying the narrative that he was hit? The vid that, contrary to what you say, also shows the cars wheels turned away from his direction before he takes out his gun? That vid? That vid right there? Maybe if you're gonna post a frame by frame, make sure what you're saying actually aligns with it. BTW >>1475488 , same vid also clearly shows he moves from aiming the gun at the left end of her windshield to her door well after the car has cleared him completely, meaning he deliberately shot through to ensure she was dead.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:33:07 No. 1475495 >>1475493 >It actually looks like the shot happens right as he's being hit, which points to a possibility that he wasn't intending to fire, but the impact caused the gun to go off. Uh uh uh anon. So now you're arguing that he actually did try to shoot her before he was "hit" and that the shooting was an accident? Even though that same clip shows him deliberately moving the gun to the driver window and shooting two more times?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:35:23 No. 1475496 >>1475492 >Yes, we've established he's a retard walking in front of a moving car. And the car is driving forward, retard?>The gif literally shows it never makes contact, Y'know what? I don't even give a fuck anymore. I'll just let you have this one because I'm tired of arguing this dumb point with your stupid fucking nigger ass. I legit have a headache right now and you're like 75% responsible for it. So fuck it.>AFTER he put himself in front of it. Yeah, we get it. He's dumb for standing in front of that. He's like your relatives. Still doesn't mean he can't shoot the bitch for driving towards him WHILE ESCAPING POLICE.>We literally have clear footage of the shooting showing he fires two more times after redirecting aim to the driver window. Don't try to pull some burst fire shit. No I'm going to pull some burst fire shit because you're a dumb fucking nigger who needs to be punched in the throat for talking about defensive shootings as if you think cops can only take one shot at a time and then stop to assess the situation. How many police videos have you seen where someone charges a cop with a knife and they dump at least five rounds into the cocksucker? But you expect this guy to only fire one shot while being charged by a massive hunk of fucking metal. This is why people like you shouldn't be allowed to breathe air. The cop fired three fucking rounds in less than a second while nearly getting killed. Shut the fuck up about firearms until you actually know how the fucking work you incompetent fucking retard.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:36:09 No. 1475497 >>1475495 >So now you're arguing that he actually did try to shoot her before he was "hit" and that the shooting was an accident? >Maybe if I continue to act like a retard people will speak to me. >Here's a shitty strawman I made for you, please speak with with >I'm so lonely, someone, please anyone! KYS.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:43:21 No. 1475499 >>1475496 >Y'know what? I don't even give a fuck anymore. I'll just let you have this one Oh good to know. Because that was the one claim to defense he had was that he was hit and had no choice but to open fire. Thank you for the concession.>Still doesn't mean he can't shoot the bitch for driving towards him WHILE ESCAPING POLICE. He actually can't; DOJ protocol forbids use of lethal force on moving vehicles unless the officer can't get out of the way. And seeing as you just admitted he wasn't actually hit, there literally was no risk to him at all.> But you expect this guy to only fire one shot while being charged by a massive hunk of fucking metal Yeah he fires the other two shots while the car is clear past him. There's a clear delay. Blame it on adrenaline all you want; he still fired two shots just to kill her after deliberately moving to fire through the driver side. The guy is an Iraq veteran; it isn't like he never had to use a weapon before.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:47:02 No. 1475504 >>1475499 As drivers we enter into a social contact.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:49:48 No. 1475505 Can't wait until liggerals start using sovereign citizen arguments>she was not DRIVING she was TRAVELING, she is in INTERNATIONAL WATERS and NOT SUBJECT TO US SOVEREIGNTY >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:50:31 No. 1475506 >>1475505 She crossed state lines too.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)02:51:51 No. 1475507 >>1475499 >Oh good to know. Because that was the one claim to defense he had was that he was hit and had no choice but to open fire. Thank you for the concession. Oh that's great that you accept my concession because I don't give a fuck, you're still wrong you fucking retard. Even if the car didn't hit him he still has justification to shoot the dumb cunt. It's a shame she wasn't your fucking mother.>He actually can't; DOJ protocol forbids use of lethal force on moving vehicles unless the officer can't get out of the way. And he's making decisions in milliseconds while a car is driving towards him you worthless monkey. Even if he did manage to get out of the way in a split second, his body is already committed to the shooting because his fucking lizard brain is telling him threat and his body is falling back on it's fucking training - something your dumbass knows fuck all about. This isn't some fucking event where he had all god damn month to process. The entire shooting took like two fucking seconds from the time she accelerated at him to the time she got shot three times (I'm assuming all those shots it). So just because he managed to clear out of the way in time (assuming he wasn't hit) he's still allowed to shoot because no fucking judge is going to argue that he had enough time to realize he was clear in time to avoid getting hit.>Yeah he fires the other two shots while the car is clear past him. No he's still to the side of the car. God fucking damn do you people have some kind of special disability to where you don't understand how objects in space work? >There's a clear delay. No there isn't you fucking monkey. This is the problem. You chimp motherfuckers have never been in a stressful situation - other than trying to solve 4th grade math - and want to judge this cop by actions taken in less time that it takes you to drool on the floor. >The guy is an Iraq veteran; it isn't like he never had to use a weapon before. And that makes him super human?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)03:04:35 No. 1475509 >>1475507 Well he's not a superhuman and if he was going to be run over he would have been run over regardless whether he shot or didn't shoot. Bottom line is he put himself in a situation where he had no control except to kill and not even in real defence, but to make some kind of example.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)03:11:02 No. 1475511 >>1475509 No the dumb bitch put herself in that situation. None of this shit would've happened if: A) She didn't go around stalking ICE with her stupid ICE-watch fanclub. B) Didn't block the road, only letting non-ICE vehicles through, in front of an ICE vehicle that was stuck in the road they were trying to assist. C) Got out of the fucking car when she was told to at least three times after refusing to move. D) Didn't drive at a cop standing in front of her car. E) All of the above.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)03:17:21 No. 1475512 >>1475511 See this is the real danger of not shooting her, right? People like her would think they wouldn't get summary executions.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)03:19:28 No. 1475513 >>1475512 >People like her would think they wouldn't get summary executions. Which didn't happen like that, but I guess you people need to bring back "Hands Up Don't Shoot" 2.0 - white bitch boogaloo. I guess the George Floyd references aren't working so try something else.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)03:20:51 No. 1475514 >>1475512 There goes my ticket to hit-and-runs>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)03:29:11 No. 1475516 >>1475513 Let's say his thought process was literally "I'm going to get this bitch to graze me with her car so I can ventilate her skull" would that actually be morally bad or not?>>
Nintendojitsu 01/10/26(Sat)03:30:07 No. 1475517 >>1475295 I can see why dumb people love Trump.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)11:47:35 No. 1475582 >>1475517 Trump loves the poorly educated. https://www.politico.com/video/2016/02/donald-trump-i-love-the-poorly-educated-044575 >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)14:58:19 No. 1475778 >>1475516 It's hilarious that he can't answer this.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)15:12:26 No. 1475798 >>1475077 Why does she back up from every video I've seen of the incident it seems like she had an open road for her to turn and drive away without having to reverse if she really wanted to run>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)15:13:38 No. 1475800 >>1475798 She wanted to pick up speed before running over cops>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)15:26:44 No. 1475814 >>1475798 She was K-Turning and ICE ironically blocked the road.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)15:28:28 No. 1475816 >>1475798 The cops were illegally blocking the road. She needed to pick up speed to legally ram into them while legally fleeing from arrest.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:19:00 No. 1475854 >>1475814 She was there to cause shit.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:24:11 No. 1475857 >>1475778 I just got off work, dickhead.>>1475516 >Let's say his thought process was literally "I'm going to get this bitch to graze me with her car so I can ventilate her skull" How would you prove his thought process?>would that actually be morally bad or not? Morally? That he wanted to kill someone? Sure maybe. Legally, still a good shoot. So if you want to argue whether he was a good person or not, I don't know or care.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:28:45 No. 1475860 >>1475857 >Legally, still a good shoot. It isn't actually. Shooting at a moving vehicle is usually banned for law enforcement other than if they literally have no other way to save themselves, including just moving out of the way.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:32:14 No. 1475863 >>1475814 Old narrative, his phone footage disproves this. She and her wife were clearly there protesting and starting shit, not just trying to turn around. desu I'm still split on if it was justified since he probably could have gotten out of the way, but she definitely wasn't just trying to turn around like the early argument was.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:32:28 No. 1475864 >>1475479 He positioned himeslf in front of the vehicle as she was in the process of being arrested. That is why her vehicle was surrounded by law enforcement from all sides which were repeatedly trying to open the door to her vehicle, including reaching through her open window to try and disengage the locks on the doors. As soon as she reversed her vehicle, the guy in front of the car drew his side arm. She ignored that warning, and hit the gas while he was still in front of the vehicle, to attempt to flee law enforcement, which resulted in her being shot>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:33:22 No. 1475865 >>1475077 https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/2010037103665787019 Oh look. Another video showing the dumb cunt starting this whole thing.>s-she was just making a u-turn >she was dropping her kids off >she wasn't blocking the road What now? What excuse do you leftist cocksuckers have now? >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:41:04 No. 1475868 >>1475865 >>she wasn't blocking the road anon that video literally shows cars passing her.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:45:02 No. 1475869 >>1475865 What's it like being a lying faggot?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:46:53 No. 1475870 >>1475865 DELETE THIS>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:48:07 No. 1475871 >>1475868 Non-ice cars passing her.>>1475869 You tell me.>>1475870 DO NOT REDEEM>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:50:53 No. 1475872 >>1475868 >vid shows her car blocking an entire lane >no she's not blocking the road! >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:56:08 No. 1475874 >>1475872 Do cars get past her, yes or no?>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:57:05 No. 1475875 >>1475874 Non-ICE vehicles, yes. Is she blocking an entire lane? Yes or no.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:57:08 No. 1475876 >>1475871 >Non-ice cars passing her. Amazing how ICE doesn't even try to do so. Almost like she wasn't blocking them at all.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:58:54 No. 1475878 >>1475876 >Amazing how ICE doesn't even try to do so. Because she's in front of an ICE vehicle stuck in the snow they were trying to assist.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)16:59:20 No. 1475879 >>1475875 Did she have some kind of forcefield preventing ICE and only ICE from driving past her like those other cars? Because then she isn't blocking anything.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:00:49 No. 1475880 >>1475878 Why do you lie about what's depicted in your own video? That snow isn't anywhere near thick enough to be "stuck in".>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:02:13 No. 1475881 >>1475880 >Why do you lie about what's depicted in your own video? That snow isn't anywhere near thick enough to be "stuck in". https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/08/questions-follow-after-ice-agent-kills-renee-good-in-minneapolis>It started as a winter driving mishap — federal agents trying to pull their vehicle out of snow slush Wednesday morning on a slippery day in south Minneapolis. Then it spiraled into tragedy when an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed a woman. Retard. >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:03:47 No. 1475882 >>1475879 >Did she have some kind of forcefield preventing ICE and only ICE from driving past her like those other cars? Yeah, her car. Which she can move. Which she did move when ICE got tired of her childish bullshit.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:10:18 No. 1475883 >>1475882 They could have easily just passed her like those civilian vehicles. Merge into that traffic, bam, you're no longer blocked. Either they're clinically retarded or they're cold-blooded killers. You decide which is more damning.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:17:19 No. 1475884 >>1475883 >They could have easily just passed her like those civilian vehicles. And she could have easily moved to block them like she's already doing. But sure, just assume the retard currently fucking with ICE isn't going to do anything else to fuck with ICE. If nothing else it's nice to see your dogshit narratives from a few days ago were completely blown the fuck out with each new release. We've gone from 'she was just dropping her six-year old kid off' to 'oh they can just go around her blocking the road'.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:23:45 No. 1475885 >>1475267 >He didn't get hit though. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/CBJZm6-hsyM>The ICE agent walked away with a hip injury >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:34:50 No. 1475886 >>1475885 >the agent was gravely hurt >he walked away fine to his car and drove himself away instead of reporting an injury >but the sprain on his trigger finger from murdering an innocent american is a serious injury you should care about >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:38:11 No. 1475890 >>1475886 So he was hit, like Frey said.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:50:11 No. 1475894 >>1475155 uh-oh lefty melty>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:52:52 No. 1475897 >>1475886 His ego was gravely injured when the woman refused to exit the car>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)17:57:03 No. 1475898 >>1475886 Fortunately the violent agitator was neutralized before she could cause any more harm.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:04:20 No. 1475900 >shill spent a week complaining about imaginary libs making fun of Kirks death looks like we have another few days of them making fun of an innocent American being murdered>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:13:19 No. 1475908 >>1475898 Already been discussed at length. ICE has no authority to enforce traffic laws or pull a US citizen out of their car. Her wheels are clearly turned to the right. He is standing in front of her vehicle against training. He killed her through the open window while standing next to the car after he was out of the vehicles path. The bar for self defense is the same for LEO as it is for regular citizens. If this was just a dude who was taking it upon himself to enforce traffic on a residential street he would already be in jail for murder. All your bullshit boot licking means nothing when we all have eyes and can watch it ourselves.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:15:56 No. 1475910 Shot through the neck, and you're to blame. Libs give Green a bad name. >>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:17:45 No. 1475911 >>1475908 no one believes in your fictitious alternate reality>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:27:53 No. 1475920 >>1475077 you leftists are such shameless liars it's unreal. you really would apologize if you had any soul and honesty in you.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:31:46 No. 1475921 >>1475911 >>1475920 can you keep it to one post next time esl shill>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:38:40 No. 1475922 >>1475921 you're hallucinating again, turdie.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:40:20 No. 1475924 >>1475922 I like how you don’t. Address the tiny of facts presented that contradicts your bullshit. But instead you just call names and deny deny deny keep licking those boots.>>
Anonymous 01/10/26(Sat)18:42:33 No. 1475926 uh oh turdie's having a melty
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.