Turns out Republicans were the real trannys all alonghttps://www.thebulwark.com/p/candace-owens-tpusa-charlie-kirk-death-conspiracy-theories-elijah-schafferTURNING POINT USA COMMUNICATIONS staffer Aubrey Laitsch was called into a meeting last month and abruptly told she was being fired, according to a video she posted online last week.In her telling, the reason Laitsch was given for being let go involved a convoluted story about an Uber ride. It went like this:A TPUSA executive had taken an Uber and asked his driver what he thought of the organization. The driver replied that he had heard it was in chaos in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and that no one inside TPUSA liked Erika Kirk, Kirk’s widow and now TPUSA’s CEO. Then the Uber driver revealed to the TPUSA executive that the source of his information was Laistch, who the driver claimed was a high school friend of his daughter’s.A strange story, and one Laitsch said she didn’t buy. She then offered up another explanation—one she said didn’t come up during her discussion with TPUSA executives but which she sensed was a factor in her termination.Laitsch, as she outlined in her video, seems to genuinely believe that her own organization had something to do with its founder’s murder or an ensuing coverup.The unfounded claim that Charlie Kirk’s assassination was some sort of inside job is growing in popularity on the right after being promoted by YouTuber and former TPUSA employee Candace Owens. Laitsch claims that others at TPUSA are suspicious about Kirk’s murder too—and that they had been discussing among themselves how they couldn’t raise the issue internally.“I just have a gut feeling that I was terminated from Turning Point because I am questioning the narrative of what happened to my role model and CEO, Charlie Kirk, on the day of his assassination,” Laitsch said in the video.
>>1488937>Muh fuggin' e-celeb podcast shit!!!
Charlie didn't kirk himselfIt's a conspiracy wake up sheepleShe already took down his wedding photo
Why would the company pass to his wife? That makes no sense she's not CEO material just because she was sleeping with Charlie why don't they have someone confident take over
>>1488937someone is trying to steal Charlie's movement and take advantage of his legacyits not surprising they paid shills to spread their version of the story
>>1488957Who is the thief? His wife?
>>1488937Who cares who actually did it? Whether it was a tranny fucker or an inside job by da jews isn't the important part. Who actually killed Kirk doesn't matter as much, just like it doesn't matter whether Luigi Mangione actually did it or if he's a scapegoat.What matters is how democrats on the left reacted to his death.Like Luigi, they cheered for the murder and justified it. They called each shooter a hero. They danced on TikTok and Youtube celebrating his murder by the thousands. They are still to this very day mocking his death in comments, forums and videos. They seriously think this is acceptable. And the best part is when you call them out for their bloodthirsty behavior, they'll try to whataboutism to Trump making a shitty joke about Pelosi's husband before South Park did it, as if that's at all comparable - a president known for shitty bait making a lousy joke most Republicans didn't even know about or care until CNN cried about it vs. half the nation in support of vigilante murder. Or more recently they'll bring up the Good and Pretti shootings and how some on the right are saying they were justified - whether they are or not, that's not the same as Republicans hitting the griddy on facebook for their deaths. See the difference? But they'll still cheer for murder, call each shooter a hero, and still have the audacity to claim the moral high ground. That's why Kirk is so important now, how his death matters. It clearly revealed that these leftists can't be negotiated with - they want us dead. tl;dr the method of Kirk's murder matters less than the results.
>>1488969Way to prove it was rightoid on rightoid violence. Again. The rest of your post can be disregarded since you clearly are pro murder.
After that leaked audio of Erika giddily talking about how much money they grifted off Chuck's funeral, I don't know what to believe. The wife gives me demon in a skinsuit vibes. There is something really off about her.
>>1489001My headcannon is she didn’t have anything to do with it, but also never loved him to begin with, she just saw her chance to be rich. She literally went from an intern to his girlfriend in months, she’s just a cheap whore who got a payout and can barely contain her excitement over not having to look at Kirk’s ever shrinking facial features. She would have eventually turned into Melania if he was still alive.
>>1489001A psychopaths wife acts like a psychopath? How shocking!
>>1488969>tl:dr I'm a giant pussy and the details of a murder conspiracy don't matter as much as democrats being mean. I totally didn't cheer at Paul Pelosi being assaulted and hospitalized by some dude with a hammer. I think Cuck was a saint and won't talk about he said that guy was a hero and should be pardoned. I am silent as the pedophile I vote for does things that will cause death on a massive scale, some of which won't even be limited to party lines. I am a massive dipshit making sweeping generalizations because I am totally divorced from reality
>>1488969Democrat derangement syndrome. You did this to our politics and now you'll reap what you've sewn.
>>1488957>someone is trying to steal Charlie's movement and take advantage of his legacyYeah that person is his wife lmao. If you look at the background of one of her recent podcast clips and compare it to one of Kirk's old ones you can literally see she either took down or threw out their wedding photo. She's on camera putting fake tears in her eyes before the memorial and on audio laughing 2 weeks after he got shot about how much money she was making off his funeral.
>>1488969Look at what Trump said about Rob Reiner. You knew Trump was a piece of shit like that when you elected him. You liked that. You have no moral high ground. That's one good thing about Trump. He makes all his loser supporters hypocrites.
>>1489013But isn't it unfair to ignore all the foreign shills pretending to be democrats who cheered on Kirks death? They put in a lot of work to make it seem like democrats were evil, and its demeaning to ruin all their hard work for the sake of something as dumb as 'truth'
>>1488937If they didn't want to look complicit, maybe they shouldn't have wrung out his legacy for everything it was worth before his corpse even went cold. The sheer speed and efficiency with which they took advantage of his death was suspicious, without even considering any of the details of how he died.Also, dressing up as a couch for JD was just tacky.
>>1489011>I totally didn't cheer at Paul Pelosi being assaulted and hospitalized by some dude with a hammer.I literally didn't, but keep making dogshit comparisons of Trump making a shitty joke at a dinner of some guy who didn't die to half the country riverdancing on social media to a man who did die. >>1489013>You did this to our politicsI'm not the one who started calling the other side nazis. That whole 'punch a nazi' meme was your side. >>1489019>Look at what Trump said about Rob Reiner.And how many Republicans were breakdancing over that? Oh yeah, the GOP turned against him for making that joke. >You knew Trump was a piece of shit like that when you elected him. You didn't give me a choice. It was either him or Kamala. Perhaps if dems had a primary...>You have no moral high ground.Nor do you. You animals lost that with Kirk. Now you're at Trump's level. Cheering for murder is the kind of dumb shit he would do - and your entire voting base is doing it for Kirk.
>>1489041Good post
>>1489011>>1489013>>1489019Furthermore, you have no comparison of anyone on the right cheering for an assassin the way the left cheers for Luigi and Tyler. You can't name one. Go ahead and try!>in before durr the cop that shot Renee GoodNo, not a shooting that could be argued as self-defense (which that was). Name a blatant assassin where nobody in their right mind would dare suggest it was self-defense. Show me the right-wing shooter who sniped a public speaker from a rooftop or took someone out with a silenced pistol from the back of their head - and they're celebrated for it on the right. Name one.
>>1489045>Name one.I literally can't.
>>1488937Yeah i bet faggot tranny
>>1489047its hard when no one on the left cheered on Kirks murderLuigi killing health insurance leeches is based though
>>1489045>What is every joke made about Nancy Pelosi's husband almost getting murdered with a hammer
>>1489056A) Was he assassinated?andB) Did Republicans defend the assassin? Since neither A or B apply to your whataboutism, you can fuck off and don't come back until you learn how to read.
>>1489058>Guys it wasn't SUCCESSFUL so it doesn't countHow about the ones praising that guy who gunned down two dem representatives in minnesota?>https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/van-ordens-assassination-mockery-danger-sign>https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/16/republicans-trump-minnesota-lawmakers-killings
>>1488957>Charlie's movement>movementChuckie Kack always was a tiny-faced turd
>>1489061>Democrats have been unequivocal in condemning the shootings, as have Congress’s top Republicans. “Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it,” said House speaker, Mike Johnson.I'm sorry, I'm still not seeing the mass of Republicans dancing on TikTok. What else you got?
>>1489064Oh so now it's "No no no they have to be dancing on tiktok" too? Keep moving those goal posts.
>>1489063but there was a movementit was just a steady transition from smaller than normal sized face to very small face
>>1489066Still waiting for you to show me an assassin that's praised by the right the same way Luigi Mangione or Tyler Robinson is. Notice how we know their names but not this nobody you posted about? It's almost as if nobody gives a fuck about him. Try harder.
>>14890701. Tyler Robinson isn't praised and you've shifted arguments like 3 times2. Lmao you think only Dems were making tiktoks celebrating a healthcare CEO getting shot? Even the republican response got flooded with comments saying "nah fuck that guy"
>>1489072>1. Tyler Robinson isn't praised and you've shifted arguments like 3 timesI haven't shifted shit you dumb fucking nigger. Show me where that shooter in Minnesota was being praised by Republicans. You can't. Your own fucking links don't even show it. All they show is Trump using it to talk shit about how bad Walz is. That's not the same thing as the hero worship status that Tyler and Luigi get from the left. I can't believe I have to spell this out.>2. Lmao you think only Dems were making tiktoks celebrating a healthcare CEO getting shot? Even the republican response got flooded with comments saying "nah fuck that guy"Source? Other than Ben Shapiro's youtube comment section again?
>>1489075>I can't believe I have to spell this out.I can believe you're paid to post unsourced liesMaybe stop being a complete faggot by killing yourself
>>1489075>Your own fucking links don't even show it>Nightmare on Walz Street>Source? Other than Ben Shapiro's youtube comment section again?Check any comment section on any video on this. Everyone thought Luigi was fucking justified because Thompson was a death merchant who killed people for profit margins.
>>1489067>there was a movementBut(t) Toilet Paper USA wiped out and flushed away Kack
>>1489078>>Your own fucking links don't even show it>>Nightmare on Walz StreetSo once again, if you can fucking read (which you can't), not worshiping this shooter but using it to talk shit about Walz. Thank you for re-confirming what I just told you, dumbass.
>>1489081>Guys they aren't worshipping him but they are blaming everyone but the actual fucking shooter for the deaths of two peopleYou know the funny thing that if you want to talk about celebration look no further than Kirk's own fucking wife giggling over how much she made off the funeral.
>>1489084>>Guys they aren't worshipping him but they are blaming everyone but the actual fucking shooter for the deaths of two peopleNow look who's moving the goalposts.I know it's hard because I gave you an impossible task, almost like a trick question because it doesn't exist, but just show me ONE EXAMPLE of a political assassin that is celebrated on the right - similar to Tyler or Luigi. Show me an example of this right-wing vigilante that people on the right are calling a hero and claiming he did nothing wrong.... Like Rittenhouse, only again that was another example of self-defense so ....Yeah I guess you're kinda fucked. No examples exist.
>>1489086Well you literally discounted the two fucking ICE thugs that executed people in cold blood for one. Then you disqualified the guy who smashed Nancy Pelosi's husband's head in with a hammer because he didn't die. Now you're disqualifying this because "well they weren't tiktok dancing to him".
>>1489088>Well you literally discounted the two fucking ICE thugs that executed people in cold blood for one.Wow reading is hard for the left. It must be those public schools.>No, not a shooting that could be argued as self-defense (which that was). Name a blatant assassin where nobody in their right mind would dare suggest it was self-defense. Show me the right-wing shooter who sniped a public speaker from a rooftop or took someone out with a silenced pistol from the back of their head - and they're celebrated for it on the right. >Then you disqualified the guy who smashed Nancy Pelosi's husband's head in with a hammer because he didn't die.Yeah because that wouldn't make him an assasi- oh my fucking god you people!assassinnounas·sas·sin ə-ˈsa-sᵊn plural assassinsSynonyms of assassin1: a person who commits murderespecially : one who murders a politically prominent person either for money or from fanatical adherence to a cause… the location of the victim's gunshot wounds … might point to a professional assassin. — Wendy Fry >Now you're disqualifying this because "well they weren't tiktok dancing to him".Or cheering for him, or calling him a hero, or saying he did nothing wrong, etc.Y'know all the things they're doing with Tyler and Luigi? God damn, I didn't think it would be this hard to fucking communicate with leftists.
>>1489089>I didn't think it would be this hard to fucking communicate with leftists.we don't speak lies fluentlymaybe try speaking the truth instead
>>1489084I remember Alex Jones getting fined a billion dollars for saying a school shooting was fake because the parents of the dead kids were giggling before their press conference
>>1489056The jokes weren't about him getting assaulted, but being entangled in a love triangle with his secret gay lover.
>>1489109Exactly, its why its not gauche to talk about Kirk could take dozens of mouthshots and backshots, but apparently just one neckshot was too much for him.
>>1489110The key difference is that gay trysts are funny, but assassinations aren't.It's psychotic to equate the two and expect anybody to agree with you.
>>1489111>It's psychotic to equate the two and expect anybody to agree with youSo you admit its psychotic to believe that Dems were actually behind the foreigners posting pro-Kirk assassination celebrations on tiktokIts a step forward for you, and your backwards shithole of a country
>>1489112Americans were fired from their jobs for celebrating CK's death anon.This isn't the hill to die on.
>>1489115They got those jobs back + backpay btw. Easiest first amendment violation lawsuit of those lawyer's lives.
>>1489115'I think empathy is a made up New Age term that has done a lot of damage' -Charlie KirkInstead, hill dies on you
>>1489115>celebratingwhat an ESL way to spell, 'quoted Charlie Kirk directly'MAGA shills sure were angry that people were correctly calling out their bullshit propaganda sweep trying to pretend Charlie was a saint
>>1489056The base is going to what the base is going to do. The big difference between the two is that reaction from leaders. In the Pelosi case, you had many Republican politicians up to Trump downplaying or joking about how it was a spat between gay lovers. In the Kirk case, most of the democrat politicians were offering up condolences or scolding their base for not taking it seriously. You even had Erza Klein, eulogize Kirk, saying that he did politics the "right way." Additionally, you had people losing their jobs for quoting Kirk's statements (especially the empathy one), whereas nobody lost their jobs for making tranny jokes about Paul Pelosi.
>>1489117>They got those jobs back + backpay btw.All of them?>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reprisals_against_commentators_on_the_Charlie_Kirk_assassination#Employee_terminations_and_investigations>According to a November 2025 Reuters investigation, over 600 Americans were fired from their jobs over comments made about the assassination. The number was likely an undercount, since many terminations would not have been publicly disclosed.[53]
>>1489118Does he define what he means by empathy, and elevate another term he likes, sympathy or something else? I feel like this is one of those half quotes where if you see the other half like when Trump said there were very fine people at Charlottesville, and people interpreted that as meaning he was calling neo-nazis and white supremacists very fine people, when if you read the transcript it is very clear that is not what he was saying as he explicitly condemns them>Oh no, George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down – excuse me. Are we going to take down, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? Okay, good. Are we going to take down his statue? He was a major slave owner. >Are we going to take down his statue? You know what? It’s fine, you’re changing history, you’re changing culture, and you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats – you had a lot of bad people in the other group too. >I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally
>>1489121>In the Kirk case, most of the democrat politicians were offering up condolences or scolding their base for not taking it seriously.They still try to justify his death by saying he was a white supremacist, nazi, christian nationalist etc whenever they speak about him.
>>1489118>"I can't stand the word empathy, actually," he continued. "I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time."
>>1489125A lot of his quotes actually get worse with full context. Like his "death penalties should be public and kids should watch" goes on to have his co hosts ask what age they should see it at, 12 or 16? and then they go on to talk about letting corporations sponsor public executions at the super bowl. Context only makes it worse.
>>1489128NTA, doesn't change how often he's misquoted to push an agenda even when it's been spelled out to the letter what he said or didn't say. Like this both sides quote.
>>1489126Yeah, that's the twitter take. Most democratic politicians were saying that it was unjustifiable. Take the words of Newscum, the Dem frontrunner:>Governor Gavin Newsom issued the following statement today on the murder of conservative thought leader and activist Charlie Kirk: >“We should all feel a deep sense of grief and outrage at the terrible violence that took place in Utah today. Charlie Kirk’s murder is sick and reprehensible, and our thoughts are with his family, children, and loved ones. >“I knew Charlie, and I admired his passion and commitment to debate. His senseless murder is a reminder of how important it is for all of us, across the political spectrum, to foster genuine discourse on issues that deeply affect us all without resorting to political violence. >“The best way to honor Charlie’s memory is to continue his work: engage with each other, across ideology, through spirited discourse. In a democracy, ideas are tested through words and good-faith debate — never through violence. Honest disagreement makes us stronger; violence only drives us further apart and corrodes the values at the heart of this nation.”
>>1489126Leftist think that just because you think Hitler had some good ideas and admirable traits that that automatically makes you a nazi.
>>1489131Hitler had exactly 3 good ideas>Anti smoking laws>Anti animal cruelty laws>Shooting himself
>>1489132You forgot the Autobahn.
>>1489013not deranged when you factually are pieces of shit. its like someone has a mental illness when they're scared of cockroaches.
>>1489132He also gave newly wed families loans to buy homes and forgave 25% of the loan for each child they had.
>>1489019you supported murderers and still do today and now ur trying to project onto trump, i hope he exterminates you, trump 2028 ftw
>>1489132if i happened upon one of his paintings at goodwill i might buy it, for a frugal enough price that is
>>1488937>crazy guy carrying his grandfather's file murders charlie kirk>now kirk's employees are coping with his death by buying into candace owen's retarded conspiracy theoriesTragic.
>>1488947Surprisedly, he closed his eyes right before the shot, wasn't sure he was doing the freemason hand signal before then. So he planned this shit off with others and his wife.
>>1488937I'll be locking this thread due to it being a duplicate of: >>1488756
>>1489199In after lock
>>1489223that shills just panicking because they flubbed their assignment to control the narrative on this issue after their shill thread failed
>>1489199lmao
>>1489129>misquoted>out of context'I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights'He said it that way, he meant it that way.It's not reality's fault that all of ol' Chucko's wrong opinions blew up in his face. Or his neck at least.Imagine: if he never allowed wrong opinions to exist in his mind in the first place, he would still be alive to this day.>that quote by ChucklesThat aged well. He won't.
>>1489418>Imagine: if he never allowed wrong opinions to exist in his mind in the first place, he would still be alive to this day.>If you would just agree with us we wouldn't have to kill you!And here you have it, ladies and gentlemen: the average democrat.
>'I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights'>someone is pro-gun control>someone is anti-Trump>Arnold Schwarzenegger is a RepublicanGuess who is still alive to this day.And here you have it, ladies and gentlemen: >>1489419, the average rightard.
>>1489419When you say people deserve to be die so we can have devices only designed to kill, people are going to rightfully call that out if you get killed by that very thing.
>>1489419'Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.'-Charlie Kirk: 24 hours before being shot
>>1489423Video of him saying that?
>>1489449https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/leaked-texts-reveal-rift-over-israel-before-kirk-murder-508834https://www.instagram.com/p/DPfCqYQDYDV/A What'sApp message isn't a video
>>1489421>When you say people deserve to be dieStopped reading there. That's not what he said you fucking hack. Imagine thinking that someone deserves to die because they're pro-2A. This is why I will never vote for a democrat in my entire life.
>>1489421Do you think it is a good thing or a bad thing when someone is murdered for their speech?Does that strengthen or weaken the first amendment?
>'I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights' -Charlie Kirk>the pro-gun control Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger is still alive>This is why I will never vote for a democrat in my entire lifeAnd yet, Republicans voted Democrat in Miami, Texas & Louisiana. It's the shape of things to come.>I will never vote for a democrat in my entire life>IAnd nothing of value was lost. But enough about Charlie Kirk
>>1489142the frame by frame vids of his death show his neck expand so much for a split second it breaks his chain.that is not part of any fake your own death plot.that guy had a bullet go through him.
