The names appear in the files in a "wide variety of contexts", including some people who had "extensive direct email contact with Epstein or Maxwell" and others who were merely referenced in documents or news articles contained in the files, Blanche and Bondi wrote.

Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and Bill Clinton - who are included in the list - all had documented past relationships with Epstein and Maxwell. There is no suggestion that appearing in the documents implies any wrongdoing and each has denied any involvement in Epstein's crimes.

But the list also includes the names of deceased musicians Janis Joplin and Elvis Presley.

The letter was addressed to the Senate Judiciary Committee's chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking member Dick Durbin, as well as the House Judiciary Committee's chairman Jim Jordan and ranking member Jamie Raskin.

In an interview on ABC This Week on Sunday, Massie argued that, even though the DoJ "wants to say they are done with this document production", there are more crucial files that should be released.

The DoJ was "signing deliberative process privilege in order not to release some of the documents", he said.

"The problem with that is the bill that Ro Khanna and I wrote says that they must release internal memos and notes and emails about their decisions on whether to prosecute or not prosecute, whether to investigate or not investigate."

In response to the letter, California Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, who co-wrote the Epstein Files Transparency Act, accused the DoJ of "purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email".

"To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files is absurd," Khanna wrote on X on Saturday.

"Release the full files," he added. "Stop protecting predators. Redact only the survivor's names."

The BBC has contacted the Department of Justice for comment.

US lawmakers previously said files on Epstein were improperly redacted ahead of their release, leading to at least one document being unredacted after their criticism.

Lawyers for Epstein's victims have also said the latest tranche of files included email addresses and nude photos in which the names and faces of potential victims could be identified.

At the time, the DoJ said mistakes were due to "technical or human error" and they had taken down all the flagged files.

THATS ALL YOURE GOING TO GET

GOOD JOB YOU SAVED THE KIDS

>>1489798
Has anyone even found anything that implicates Trump in the files?

>>1489885
There's nothing to indicate that Trump was involved with Epstein, libs are just coping
Just because the new file release shows Trump was lying about his ties with Epstein doesn't mean anything. Its not like Trump is known for telling the truth

About 3 more yrs Pam, and all even more of that Putin, ashkeNAZI Zionist $ wi'll start pouring into your Swiss bank account, and then you can start moving up further toward the head of the human centipede chain. The shit gets sweeter and more kosher the further up you move

>>1489885
There was the file that the right wing propaganda machine tried to spin as Trump cooperating with authorities against Epstein that actually showed Trump called the chief investigator on the Esptein case as soon as the case went public to say he had known about Epstein's child trafficking but so did everyone else and that he had been present when Epstein brought out underage girls but he totally got the hell out of there.
Which means best case scenario he was aware of a child sex trafficking ring and said and did nothing about it for years, worst case scenario he was a participant and called as soon as he found out about the investigation to say "Yeah I was there with the girls but I didn't do anything with them, so if any of them start saying I was there that's why!"
It's so bad that after a full twelve hours of the right wing propaganda machine spinning it as Trump being a hero, the White House came out and denied there was any proof the call ever happened and the right wing propaganda machine immediately stopped talking about it.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26904744-reiter-2019-fbi-interview/

Nigel Farage is in the Epstein Files.
That's you & your party (Un)Reform(ed) then, Nigey

>>1489885
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/all-names
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/black-book-images/80.jpg

>>1489897
Is it illegal to not report a crime?

>It is illegal to not report a crime
ftfy

>>1489901
That's not the Epstein files bro that's a larp by a butler and he tried to sell it for 50k he has no credibility.

Thanks, but I was asking about the actual Epstein files.

>>1489906
https://legalclarity.org/is-it-illegal-not-to-report-a-crime/
Google says it's not illegal in the US

>>1489903
Setting aside the total moral cowardice of reacting with indifference to these crimes, it's illegal to knowingly be present in a situation where children are being sexually exploited
Trump said Epstein brought out the girls and that he knew the girls were underage

These posts implicate a defender of an orange pedo: >>1489885 >>1489910

>>1489911
>it's not illegal in the US
Now point out in >>1489903 where it says 'It's not illegal in the US'

>>1489917
Pretty sure trump is under US jurisdiction

Lol well I mean, right now he's on Top of it, but you get my point. US laws apply to him, and no other laws do.

I'm sure if he did anything bad he will either be punished or pardoned

>I'm sure he did anything bad he will be punished
ftfy

>>1489925
>I'm sure if he did anything bad he will get away with it scot-free because Americans are the most docile, cucked cattle to ever blight the world with their existence
FTFY

>>1489925
A presidential pardon is absolute, nothing you can do about it.

>>1489933
>What is state charges

>>1489936
>DeSantis would totally let charges against Trump stand
Oh sweet child

>>1489931
>>1489933
>Ford pardoned Nixon
>as a result, Carter won easily: including Texas
>JD Weird = Ford 2.0
>Republicans in Texas voting Democrat
>once Texas goes blue, the GOP are fucked
Total MAGA Death is inevitable, and there's less than nothing you can do about it

>>1489939
>JD Weird = Ford 2.0
Don't insult Gerry Ford like that

>>1489939
Keep me posted

>>1489941
JD 'Couchfucker' Weird is Ford 2.0 and there's nothing you can do about it

>>1489948
Exactly, he will pardon trump on the last day if a Republican doesn't win in 2028

>>1489885
never in the history of humanity has there been so much smoke without a flame... yet.

keep in mind the person in charge of releasing files is also in charge of editing them before releasing. not complying with the order to do so, and the editing being poorly done is right on brand.

>>1489958
We're coming up on the one year anniversary of the "Phase One" photo op, and Epstein hasn't gone away
A scandal lasting a full year is unheard of in modern American politics. And the longer this gets dragged out without anyone being held accountable in the United States, the worse it looks for Trump and by association the entirety of the Republican party.
If someone isn't held accountable in the next few months midterms are going to be a bloodbath and the Democrat House is going to do nothing for the next two years but focus on Epstein and the Trump admin's coverup.

>>1489961
Republicans became a single issue party, with the issue being protecting billionaire pedophiles

>>1489963
The files are fully released, happy hunting

>>1489965
you're either lying or were lied to.

>>1489885
There's no way they'd release anything like that that isn't redacted to hell.

>>1489975
Did you even read the article all the files are released

>>1489979
The article says that Bondi says the files are all released. Your reading comprehension is poor.

>>1489981
They're reading just fine
wanting pedophiles to get away with it is intentional

>>1489982
So when Joe Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland didn't bring charges against any of the Epstein perpetrators it was intentional?

>>1489983
Wow, way to redirect aggression away from Pedophiles and towards people interested in prosecuting pedophiles.
You're doing the work of billionaire child fuckers and getting paid, good for you

>>1489952
>if a Republican doesn't win in 2028
>if
If that senile orange thing isn't given the 25A treatment or resigns first, thus JD Weird becomes another unelected president just like Ford, pardons Trump, just as Ford pardoned Nixon, and as he did to Carter, hands 2028 to the Democrats. And the way things were going late last year & beginning of this year, with Miami, Texas & Louisiana: right up to the midterms, there'll be no 'If' about Total MAGA Death. Good

>>1489983
so he was bad at his job. what's the next whataboutism talking point?

>>1489989
Democrats have been angry at Garland slowrolling prosecutions for years

>>1489985
If Attorney General Merrick Garland was interested in prosecuting pedophiles, which pedophiles did he prosecute?
Who from Epstein's list of pedophile clients was prosecuted by Merrick Garland?

>>1489992
So you're fine with pedophiles not being charged?
Biden didn't, so they just get to go free now?
Trump is just too incompetent and friendly to pedophiles, so they get to go free

We only seem to get these questions about Biden's administration following up on the Epstein files in the context that pedophiles should go free.

>>1489992
>If Attorney General Merrick Garland was interested in prosecuting pedophiles
we've established garland didnt do his job. so now what do you suggest, we do nothing?

>>1489993
It sounds like you are fine with pedophiles not being charged, and that is why you are dismissing Merrick Garland protecting pedophiles from prosecution

>>1489997
Who has actual power to prosecute pedophiles right now? Merrick Garland or Pam Bondi?

>>1489999
you're in a circular conversation with someone named Ivan.

00000 get

>>1489997
You are talking about January 20th 2025-February 16th, 2026
I am talking about Janaury 20th 2021-2025
During the 4 years the guy you voted for was in charge, you were fine with pedophiles not being charged.
I don't remember Merrick Garland being forced to testify in Congress justifying why he didn't prosecute Epstein's perpetrators. Only Pam Bondi is receiving that grilling. Because when Merrick Garland was Attorney General you thought it was acceptable that pedophiles were not being prosecuted, it is only when a guy you didn't vote for entered office you had a problem with it

>>1490002
Who has actual power to prosecute pedophiles right now? Merrick Garland or Pam Bondi?

>>1490002
>you were fine with pedophiles not being charged
pure conjecture.

>>1490003
You sure do love your strawmen, Dorothy

>>1490002
>you were fine with pedophiles not being charged.
This may surprise you, but people were not fine with pedophiles being charged and were complaining daily that Garland wasn't moving those cases forwards
Don't let facts get in the way of your shill argument though

>>1490005
Throwing out terms you don't understand doesn't change the fact that Pam Bondi is currently the Attorney General and has power to prosecute pedophiles, and Merrick Garland is not currently in any position to prosecute pedophiles

>>1490003
>Pam Bondi
Pam "The Epstein files are on my desk right now and I'm reviewing them" Bondi
Pam "I'm the AG of Florida while Epstein is fucking kids raw in my state for a decade" Bondi
Pam "No one is getting charged for pedophilia and we're not releasing the Epstein Files' Bondi

>>1490004
Prove it.

>>1490006
I didn't see any stories covering this.
Can you show me some news stories on MSNBC, CNN, the New York times, or other left wing sources complaining repeatedly that Garland wasn't moving those cases forward?
Because I don't remember seeing those articles daily. I don't remember Merrick Garland being asked questions about Epstein when testifying before congress
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_8jHpldg94
Here's Merrick Garland testifying before a senate committee for 4 hours. I tried searching Jeffrey Epstein on the video transcript and got 0 results

>>1490012
you want me to prove that i was not fine with pedophiles being charged from 2020 to 2024?

your esl is glowing and reading comprehension is poor.

>>1490007
Sure. That's the part of the fallacy that you want to engage with.

The part you are willfully ignoring is that Merrick Garland had 4 years to prosecute them. If he didn't, there's a reason. That reason is, imo, either 1. Not enough for a prosecution or 2. He was protecting pedophiles.

Nice try Dorothy

>>1490016
Yes. I would like you to show some evidence that you had a problem with Merrick Garland not prosecuting pedophiles while he was Attorney General between January 20th 2021 and 2025

>>1490017
reason 3 he was bad at his job.

do you have a reason bondi said the files were on her desk then said the files dont exist?

>>1490018
your name is either ivan or you shit in the street, there is no other possible option.

>>1490019
She is bad at her job?

>>1490020
They're a pedophile and want to push the narrative that Pedophilia is legal now because Biden didn't prosecute it

>>1490019
She said the Epstein client list was on her desk. And it was. Now it's released, as are all the other files.

What doesn't exist is a "pedophile client list". He wasn't selling the girls he was keeping them all to himself and a few pedo buddies who are being prosecuted and ostracized currently, like former prince Andrew.

I know it's hard for anons to trust the government but you don't have to. There are lots of people looking at the files right now. If you want to be one of them you can download the full files yourself.

>>1490020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election
Did you see the 2024 election? Donald Trump got more of the popular vote. More than 50% of the country supports Donald Trump, and yet you think the only people who would support him are Russians or Indians
Why?

>>1490028
>More than 50% of the country supports Donald Trump
>Actual percentage of vote: 49%
lol

>>1490029
49.8% is larger than 48.3%
Because there are more than 2 parties, but barely

Trump is deporting fewer migrants than Obama or Biden and the economy is stagnant
It would be one thing if the right were turning a blind eye to his pedophilia and his administration actively protecting pedophiles because he was doing a good job. But he isn't even doing that
So I genuinely do not understand what makes him worth debasing themselves like this in the eyes of the right

>>1490027
she also said the files don't exist. so anything she says is fake and gay.

>Now it's released, as are all the other files
not all the files are released.

>>1490028
what does that have to do with anything?

>>1490043
>Trump is deporting fewer migrants than Obama or Biden
Source?

>>1490051
obama deported 3 million people.

trump 2.0 has been in office for 392 days. to match obamas 3m people, he would have had to deport 7653 people per day.

>>1490049
Did you even read the article? They're all released. They aren't all unredacted, and there should probably be more unredactions, but they're all released. Everything we are going to get access to, we have. Of course they won't release the VHS tapes etc. of the actual abuse so idk what you're complaining about not seeing.

>>1490058
the article says that pam bondi says that they are all released. pam bondi is the person that also said the files didn't exist, so you can interpret it as fake and gay.

your reading comprehension is bad. you are easily duped. you do not belong here.

>>1490056
This is so laughably disingenuous.

Obama didn't get his numbers all in one year either, the 3 million number (an overestimate by most sources btw but let's ignore that for now) happened over 8 years!

And Trump's been in office for 392 days THIS term. He already had 4 years.

Why are you comparing trump's 5th year data alone to all 8 years of Obama's? I genuinely don't understand how you think such charades will sway anyone. Would this kind of blatant data manipulation work on you??

>>1490060
>you don't belong here
Then deport me bro

>>1490062
Timeframe wasnt a factor until you just added it to move the goal post to help your narrative.

>>1490069
Anon divided 3 million by 392 days >>1490056
Are you high

>>1490072
392 days is how long Trump had been president this term.

>>1490073
And what's the 3 million? It's Obama's total numbers over 8 years.

Comparing 1 year to 8 would be stupid even if it really was 1 year but trump has been president for 5 years now, so it's extra stupid. I don't need to worry about convincing you, anyone else who visits the thread can easily understand this even if you're too obtuse.

>>1490078
original statement was that trump is deporting fewer migrants than obama, which was shown to be true. amount of time had nothing to do with it.

>>1489903
You're saying Trump's not a pedophile, he's just protects them. Look at what you've become. Disgusting.

>>1490125
Is it a crime? Yes or no.

>>1490089
>arithmetic isn't real, it can't hurt me

>>1490133
>ill inject variables and move the goal posts as much as i like to fit my narrative.

if its an obama vs trump thing then we should compare how many people trump deported in his first term instead of this current one.

>>1490130
As I said earlier >>1489912
and you didn't respond, it's illegal to knowingly be present in a situation where children are being sexually exploited
Which Trump admitted to in the file that the right wing propaganda machine claimed proved Trump worked with police against Epstein for half a day until the Trump admin decreed there was no proof the file was real, at which point the right wing propaganda machine dropped the subject entirely
Link to file: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26904744-reiter-2019-fbi-interview/

>>1490147
So is it a crime to not report a crime? Yes or no.

>>1490148
It's a crime to participate in a crime. Which Trump did by knowingly being present in a situation where children were being sexually exploited.
The fact that he then did not go to the police about it until after the Epstein case was made public is just moral cowardice on top of committing a crime.
You're clinging to a question that has been shown to be irrelevant to the topic because you don't have a response to the reality of the situation.

>>1490148
Also yes, concealment, which Bondi is now doing on Trump's order, is a crime.

>>1490078
Okay so how many did Trump deport during his first 4 years?

if Trump had built the wall like he said he was going to in 2016, biden wouldn't have been able to let people in. the blood is on Trumps hands.

>>1490190
This is why we need to give him a third term

Meanwhile conservative Broadcast Network is harboring pedos as long as they shill for Trump.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/articles/cbs-news-boss-bari-weiss-133108986.html

>>1490192
Donald Jr. 2028/2032
(OG trump probably dies somewhere in this decade, so the next are just speculation, but man would it trigger them)
Eric Trump 2036/2040
Ivanka Trump 2044/2048
Barron Trump 2052/2056

>>1489963
whatever makes you leftist mad

>>1490275
esl

>>1490177
its funny, I can't even find that information. the dude campaigned on building a wall and Mexico paying for it, neither happened, so it was completely dropped. for 4 years, nothing.

then biden "steals" the election from him so immediately everything is a problem. millions pour across the border! panic!! they are in your neighborhoods, they are bringing deadly drugs, they are all murderers, they are eating your cats and dogs!!!!

then within a month of term #2, the crossings are 100% over and they claim not 1 single person has illegally entered the usa since. no wall shown though, zero footage pictures information of anything changing there though.

its amazing people go for it as theyre just so brazenly lying.

>>1490277
its wild Trumps watergate is shaping up to be the investigation he campaigned on after they bungled the coverup so incredibly hard
they honestly expected to claim no one was going to be charged and get away with it

>>1490277
Sorry to hear you struggled. Here ya go!

Trump had 2,000,000 removals and 500,000 returns in his first 4 years of office. That's about the same as Obama, but far fewer than Biden.
https://infographicsite.com/infographic/deportations-under-us-presidents-statistics/

Why so few? One reason is that the Trump years had FAR fewer migrants entering the country than the Biden years.
>First chart, entitled "Total Border Encounters FY 2017-2024"
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-biden-immigration-border-record-charts-data-1925985

When Trump is in charge, illegals know they aren't welcome in America.

>>1490279
trump told me, so it must be true, that not 1 illegal person has entered the country since he took office. and that must be true because he said it. not 1!! that is a fucking completely tight ship compared to the one with gaping holes in it just months ago. it is amazing leader trump can bat 1000.

and you know what, it was worth it. life is so drastically different. what an improvement and difference in day to day from a year, 2 3 4 5 ago. thank you dear leader donald.

>>1490280
Source?
>Life's better, thanks Donald
Ikr? I am seeing way less Mexicans loitering around my local Home Depot. They used to have illegal taco and tamales stands that people would get food poisoning from, but now it's just 1-2 guys waiting to get picked up by contractors with no hiring standards. Hope ICE gets them first!

>>1490148
not a lawyer, but would this not count as obstruction of justice?
>>1490281
you dont go outside because this doesnt happen. retard

>>1490281
>Source?

the final throw. consider being serious with yourself.

>>1490279
...so Immigrants aren't a problem, because they don't stay in the country?
If deportation numbers go down in proportion with illegal entries, then there isn't a secret population staying in the US and deportation has been consistent across all administrations.

>>1489798
why is jewish feminist DEI shit okay when right wingers do it? why can't we have actual competent people (not women) in charge of things?

>>1490285
>DEI
She's white though

>>1490286
she's a woman though

>>1490282
No really, my local home depot used to have illegals blatantly serving food with no license, and there used to be like 50 of them waiting for work. My local laws don't allow them to gather in more than groups of 3, so they'd all have their little groups, spread out around the parking lot.

Since ICE started getting to work, I've only seen a few of these guys. Clearly they're the ones who either have their papers in order, or are desperate enough to risk it. The permit-less food vendors are completely absent.

There's also much less trash in the parking lot, but idk if that's related or not

>>1490285
bc the rightwing strategy is "they go high, we go low." thats why

>>1490290
>used to have illegals blatantly serving food with no license
you dont have proof for this
>there used to be like 50 of them waiting for work
usually jobs that americans arent already filling
>My local laws don't allow them to gather in more than groups of 3
and you're for this? lol thats pathetic, you really are under the boot of the State aren't you
>There's also much less trash in the parking lot, but idk if that's related or not
no, it isnt. you dont have any data to back up this claim.
you just actually have no idea what youre talking about why are you making this everyone's problem

>>1490294
The home Depot parking lot isn't zoned for food service, anon.
>Don't have any data to back up the claim that the area is cleaner now
Ah darn you got me, I dont have any data on parking lot trash levels guess I should vote democrat

All I'm saying is, I have noticed a real difference in my local community ever since illegals became too scared to go outside, and I approve.

>>1490296
>The home Depot parking lot isn't zoned for food service, anon.
You're joking, right?
If I had to find a hotdog cart as fast as I could, I'd go to a home depot parking lot

>>1490297
The hotdog cart is still there (although my local one is actually more like a hotdog shed).

That's because it's a legal business. It's also not in the parking lot, which would be illegal. It's on the home Depot property, and it has a lease agreement with the home depot

The tacos and tamales vendors selling under a pop-up canopy are what has disappeared.

>>1490299
Actually you know what I think they sell tacos now, too.

That's the power of America for you. Market forces at work!

>>1490299
>>The home Depot parking lot isn't zoned for food service, anon.
you're completely retarded

>>1490300
And everyone clapped./s

Fuck you maga faggot.

>>1490313
Papers, please.

How is he going to stop the next administration from releasing them? Torch all the documents WW2 style?

>>1490317
To what end? Utterly destroy any faith Americans have left in their government?

>>1489889
>Suckling on the cheeto's decrepit neck-cunt

Nothing new there

>>1490317
All the files. have been released.
None of you even read the article smh

>>1490288
White, so it overides

>>1489914
Thanks, pedo. You are NASA.

>>1490323
Fuck off boot licker. Victims have said their statements have not been released. Pedophile defenders have no shame.

>>1490329
I haven't heard this. Concerning if true. Do you have a source?

>>1490326
1 Timothy 2:12

Release them un-redacted, fuck national security. If society collapses then let it collapse. Maybe it deserves to.

>>1490332
Unredact everything except the victims names. Unredact the victims names that went on to become traffickers themselves, they can get lighter sentences due to mitigating factors.

Nothing will collapse. We can get new elites, we have plenty to spare.

>>1490294
What data do you have about illegals working in your city?

>>1490341
https://data.cmsny.org/

Here's state level data. If you live in a large city, there may be city-specific studies, but if you're in a smaller area, this might be the best you'll get

>>1490333
That's literally what the law that saw passed by veto proof majorities in both Houses of Congress demands. Bondi, Patel, and the rest of the funny bunch are all currently in violation of that law.

>>1489798
>>1490361
Not really. I get that you're mad, I'm mad too. But here's how reality works:

>Epstein Transparency Act
>https://www.congress.gov/119/plaws/publ38/PLAW-119publ38.pdf
Sec 2.c.1 Permitted Withholdings details a number of reasons that names of non-victims may remain classified.
Sec 2.c.2 says that each and every one of those reasons must have a publicly available justification, published on the federal register:
>https://www.federalregister.gov/

The only part of the Act that they didn't do perfectly is the timeline, which was unrealistic. 30 days (Sec 2.a ) to go through millions of files. It took them 90 days instead (Nov 19 2025 - Feb 16 2026), which still required a Herculean effort.

Now that the full release required in Sec 2 has happened, Sec 3 triggers, and they have 15 days to provide a legal summary for the justification of the redactions.

If those redaction justifications aren't legitimate, they will be challenged in a court of law and the rulings will determine if they are ultimately unredacted or not.

Like I said, I get it, we are all mad. And they took 90 days instead of 30 days! But there's nothing nefarious here. The Act is being followed (minus the arbitrary and insane timeline) and if it's determined to have not been followed, there are mechanisms which will be enacted to enforce compliance.

This is America. We have the rule of law. Sorry it's not always as fast as people want.

Not a single pedo will get away. When we are done with them they will be punished to the full extent of the law, and socially ostracized beyond that.

>>1490317
Do you honestly think Democrats will still be asking for the files once a Democrat is in office?

>>1490385
The part that you're not going to like, which I will now explain directly so that you can feel like I'm not holding anything back:

The determinations on whether the redactions remain in place or not will be done by a Court which handles classified material, called an article III court. We likely will never see those arguments, or they will be released in like 50 years.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S1-8-6/ALDE_00013562/

>>1490387
Article III Specialized Jurisdiction Court* my bad

>>1490385
>Not a single pedo will get away.
True, Republicunts are doing their best to make sure all pedos get away with it.
They won't go away though, they'll remain in the US raping kids, and MAGA will continue to cheer them on to spite the libs

>>1490389
That's why we need to re-elect the Democrats
Nobody went after pedos like Joe Biden and his attorney general Merrick Garland

>>1490390
You're still pretending that Trump isn't getting dragged for the shitty coverup job
But at least you can cheer on ICE murdering Americans.. nope, they TACO'd out too
No progress on deportations?
Tariffs continuing to fuck over the economy?
Rest of the world working around the US because of Trumps toxicity?

shit, you don't have any wins, so I guess keep making baseless accusations against democrats to cope

>>1490389
>>1490390
>>1490391
Catching pedos has no party. Grow up, both of you.
You both agree pedos are bad. Keep pushing for justice, in your own partisan ways if you must, but don't let this issue be swept under the rug.

>>1490392
>don't let this issue be swept under the rug.
Israel is insisting this be swept under the rug, sometimes you gotta GOProtect your bros at the expense of the American people
sometimes is every time

>>1490393
I take it from your comment that you don't like Israel. Great, if you think they are trying to cover the pedos up, don't let them. Whatever motivates you bro

>>1490391
That's right, Trump tried to cover up the Epstein files, that's why none of them got released while he was president. All the publicly accessible Epstein files were released by Merrick Garland, because nobody goes after pedos like Joe Biden and his attorney general Merrick Garland

>>1490396
Catching pedos has no party we are all in this together until the end. Push for garlands prosecution too if you want, just don't let anyone including yourself distract you

>>1490396
Why is trump still censoring things and his mentions and refusing to investigate?
Why isn't the whole thing public?

>>1490402
>>1490385
That's why.

>>1490396
>Merrick Garland didn't prosecute pedos so we just have to turn a blind eye to child rape forever
A day later and you're still on this, huh

>>1490405
Is pizzagate real?

GOP = Guarding Our Pedophiles.
Is, was, always has been.
Trump is a pedophile.
Trump sold his daughter to the Jews to be bred out.
Trump is a pedophile appeaser of Jews.
Cry moar, MAGAts.

>>1490401
I thought we needed to vote blue to catch pedos.
I keep seeing democrats telling me to vote for them because of the Epstein Files.

>>1490428
That's why we need democrats like Joe Biden and his attorney general Merrick Garland. They don't defend pedophiles. Look at all the indictments Merrick Garland filed against the pedophiles from the Epstein Files as attorney general.

>>1490445

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/ghislaine-maxwell-sentenced-20-years-prison-conspiring-jeffrey-epstein-sexually-abuse

You mean like Ghislaine Maxwell? Who they charged and put in a maximum security prison hoping that she would falter under the pressure of hard time and flip on the men who are still alive and were free ends and pedophiles with Epstein?

And then Trump regained power and moved her to a country club prison and is toying with giving her a pardon so she wouldn’t tell on all the rich pedophiles who run our country.

Is that an example of what you are talking about?

>>1490447
I didn't realize Trump's fingerprints were on her current prison accomodatons
How did Trump accomplish this? Did he pass an executive order? Did he pressure Pam Bondi to change Ghislaine Maxwell's prison? I would just like to know some specifics as I have not heard this before.

>>1490466
She literally met with his personal lawyer in private and then the next day got transferred to a cushy prison. Pam Bondi even recently lied under oath that she wasn't transferred to a lower security facility even though the DOJ literally had to make special exceptions for the transfer since the place was below the usual limit for where sex offenders can be incarcerated.

>>1490466
Trump moved her soon after she promised she wouldn't snitch on him personally
https://newrepublic.com/post/198727/ghislaine-maxwell-transferred-nicer-prison-epstein-trump

As if she had a choice, the other choice was another "suicide" where the cameras cut off

>>1490473
Yeah I read through your article but it still doesn't explain how Trump was responsible for her change in accommodations
>A spokesperson for the U.S. Bureau of Prisons confirmed that Maxwell had been moved to the Federal Prison Camp Bryan, a women-only, minimum-security prison in Bryan, Texas. She had previously been held at FCI Tallashassee, a low-security facility in Florida.

>Just 24 hours earlier, a Trump administration official told CNN that the government had no such plans to go easy on Maxwell. “No leniency is being given or discussed. That’s just false,” the official said. “The president himself has said that clemency for Maxwell is not something he is even thinking about at this time.”

>Maxwell’s sudden move arrives amid swirling rumors that the president may try to offer her a presidential pardon in exchange for helping him disperse the heightened scrutiny over his numerous mentions in the Epstein files, which the government had coincidentally decided not to release.

>The family of Virginia Giuffre, the former Trump employee who claimed she was recruited by Maxwell at 16 to travel with the convicted sex offender, previously warned against giving Maxwell leniency and blasted Maxwell’s favorable treatment in a Friday statement.
It doesn't actually explain why she changed prisons, or who was responsible. It vaguely mentions Trump might benefit if she testifies in a way that exonerates him, but it doesn't say Trump changed her prison accomodations.
>>1490447
>A spokesperson for the U.S. Bureau of Prisons confirmed that Maxwell had been moved to the Federal Prison Camp Bryan, a women-only, minimum-security prison in Bryan, Texas. She had previously been held at FCI Tallashassee, a low-security facility in Florida.
So that was a lie. She wasn't in a Maximum security prison. She was moved from a low-security facility to a minimum-security facility.

>>1490468
According to google, Alina Habba is Trump's personal lawyer, and she never met with Ghislaine Maxwell.
What personal lawyer are you talking about?

>>1490476
sheesh anon, you're really slobbing on billionaire dick tonight

>>1490478
Todd Blanche, who WAS Trump's personal lawyer before he got promoted to Deputy Attorney. However, his meetings with Maxwell weren't done as part of his job in the government and were completely unrecorded and private.

>>1490473
Maxwell met with Trump's Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for 9 hours over 2 days starting July 24, 2025.

In August 2025, Maxwell was moved to a nicer "prison camp" with much fewer restrictions and many more inmate privileges. Incarcerating institutions of this type are commonly known as "Club Fed" because they more closely resemble a country club than any actual prison.

Here is the transcript for the interviews.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24-cft%20(Redacted).pdf

Speculation is rife that Maxwell was prepped for this interview, given carefully phrased questions, such as "I never personally saw Trump doing anything illegal" which allowed her to avoid perjuring herself and to keep the door open to more indepth testimony down the line, should she want to expose more details.

What is clear, and undeniable, is that shortly after giving Trump's DOJ an interview which painted Trump in a positive light Maxwell received a highly desirable transfer.

>>1490488
Notably, 8 days ago on Feb 9, 2025, when given the chance to share more details on the Epstein case Maxwell invoked her 5th amendment rights and refused to say anything.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ghislaine-maxwell-house-oversight-committee-deposition-fifth-amendment/

Clearly, she is holding some card back. What that card is, and what Maxwell is willing to exchange for it (beyond her request for total clemency, which was rejected) is not public knowledge at this time.

>>1490489
Feb 9th 2026*

>>1490476
Scemantics. FPC Bryan in Texas is considered a luxury prison in comparison to where she was with maybe with a few extra security measures but the experience is clearly prefferential.

>it still doesn't explain how Trump was responsible for her change in accommodations
>secret meeting with trumps personal lawyer that just coincedentally happens to currently be the deputy attorney general
>says "she didnt see twump do a thing"
>instantly moved to a prison that lets her have a dog

>>1490512
>>1490488
Here is a full transcript of the meetings. They were not secret.

Just because it was Trump's DOJ doesn't make it Trump's personal lawyer. But it is highly likely that Trump sent him personally. A subtle distinction.

>>1490489
If she had shit on Trump Dems would have her freed she'd be a hero, and be buried next to John McCain when she died.