Trump Under Fire After Unearthed Tape Captures Him Joking About Sleeping With 13-Year-OldsFresh audio fuels outrage as questions mount over missing records, elite ties and calls for accountabilityA resurfaced audio clip has reignited fury around Donald Trump, with critics demanding answers after he appeared to joke about sleeping with girls as young as 13. The recording, which has begun circulating widely online, emerges as scrutiny intensifies over the long shadow of Jeffrey Epstein and the powerful men once linked to him.The timing of the tape's reappearance has amplified its impact. With public pressure mounting over the release of millions of pages of Epstein-related files, critics argue that long-buried material continues to emerge in ways that demand accountability. Supporters, however, insist the comments were flippant humour, not intended seriously.In the newly circulated recording, Trump speaks candidly during an appearance on Howard Stern's radio show in 2006. When asked about dating younger women, he boasts that he would have no difficulty attracting women in their twenties. Pressed further on whether he had an age limit, he replies that he does, before adding comments referencing 12-year-olds and suggesting that 13 to 16 would be acceptable.The tone in the clip is flippant, with laughter heard in the background. Critics argue that even as a joke, such remarks are deeply troubling given longstanding allegations tied to Epstein and his social circle. Supporters insist the comments were off-colour humour taken out of context.The resurfacing of the tape comes at a moment when attention is once again focused on elite networks connected to Epstein. For many observers, the timing has amplified its impact, fuelling suspicions that long-buried material continues to surface as public pressure grows.https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trump-audio-epstein-scandal-1781692
The controversy does not exist in isolation. It lands amid renewed debate over documents linked to Epstein and questions about missing records, including claims involving Trump from past civil filings. While Trump has denied wrongdoing and has not been convicted of any crime connected to Epstein, critics argue that transparency is long overdue.Elsewhere, Bill Gates recently acknowledged that spending time with Epstein was a 'huge mistake'. According to reports in The Wall Street Journal, Gates apologised to his foundation for his association with the disgraced financier, though he maintained he saw no illicit conduct and was never involved with Epstein's victims.Gates admitted meeting Epstein multiple times between 2011 and 2014 and flying on his private jet, though he said he never visited Epstein's private island. He also revealed that he had extramarital affairs that Epstein later learned about, information that reportedly became a source of leverage.For critics, the pattern is troubling. They question why influential figures continued relationships with Epstein years after his 2008 conviction. For supporters of those implicated, guilt by association is not proof of criminality.Epstein survivors have used the renewed spotlight to press for accountability. In public statements, some have questioned why there have been limited investigations into individuals named in various documents. They argue that justice requires a full accounting, regardless of status or wealth.The broader frustration extends to federal authorities. Commentators have criticised the leadership of agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, accusing them of failing to pursue high-level leads aggressively. The sense that powerful individuals are shielded has become a recurring theme in online discourse.Political voices across the spectrum have seized on the controversy. Some conservative commentators argue that the focus on Trump distracts from systemic failures.
Others say the tape underscores why scrutiny of all elite figures must continue.The political ramifications remain uncertain. Trump has weathered controversy before. Yet in an era where past remarks can resurface in seconds and spread globally within hours, the cost of such comments may prove lasting.
>>1492113What is IBTimes?
>>1492119International Business Times.
>>1492113Lawd the liggerals are taking Howard Stern shit seriously now.90% of all Democrats in office have given a dude a handjob on Stern
>>1492144do you get paid to defend pedophiles or do you do it for free
>>1492119Irritable Bowel Times, it's an indian publication
>>1492152Well their coverage does seem kind of shitty
>>1492113the howard stern interview has been floating around for a while.It's sus, but It's not as damning as the article makes it seem.
