The ruling states that Neufeld “ended the post saying he belonged in a country like Russia or Paraguay, ‘which recently had the guts to stand up to these radical cultural nihilists,’” and linked to an article titled “Parents Defeat Gender Ideology in Paraguay.”

Neufeld later apologized for his post.

However, the decision states that, “Over the next five years, Mr. Neufeld made dozens of public statements expressing his opposition to SOGI 1 2 3 and gender affirming care for trans youth, characterizing the reality of transgender and gender diverse people as simply a ‘theory’ or ‘ideology,’ and warning that teaching children about SOGI undermines social order and primes them for abuse.”

The decision said Neufeld’s public statements “caused or contributed to a poisoned workplace for LGBTQ teachers and, as such, adversely impacted them in connection with their sexual orientation and gender identity.”

According to the decision, between 45 and 163 teachers in the Chilliwack School District identified as LGBTQ between 2017 and 2022, meaning individual compensation could range from approximately $4,601.23 to $16,666.67.

Neufeld was also ordered to pay $442.00 in lost wages to a teacher identified as “Teacher C” who lost 17 hours of wages while attending hearings and testifying on the matter.

>>1492402
i can't believe they're dead naming her and fining her for her gender.
WTF Ganada?

>>1492402
>He said “‘allowing’ children to ‘change gender’ was child abuse.’”
i wonder what his thoughts are on circumcision?
>Neufeld later apologized for his post.
cuck

>>1492402
Reminds me of a case in Brazil where a woman could go to jail for posting that trannies are male. I really don't understand why western/western influenced society goes to the bat so fucking hard for trannies, it's baffling to me. I don't get why people with that particular mental illness are made such a focal point.

>>1492402
So what did he even say?

>>1492429
Here's why: barely anyone actually thought about trans people until it became illegal to bitch about the gays. The rightoid grifters and schizos moved on to a new target without protections.

>>1492427
>i wonder what his thoughts are on circumcision?
And here we go again with this dogshit whataboutism. Most people who are circumcised aren't completely ruined for life. The suicide rate doesn't skyrocket for circumcised vs uncircumcised people.

>>1492429
There's big money behind pushing men to become trannies.

>>1492444
I thought it was like the Vietnam War protestors who moved onto social issues once the war was over instead of closing up shop

>>1492444
>without protections.
>arguably the most protected class in America right now

>>1492402
i mean academia in leafland is compromised just look at how many were celebrating murder post-kirk.

>>1492444
>without protections

This is a thread about a dude getting a massive fine cause he said mean things about trannies

>>1492472
If they were actually protected, we would not be having this conversation right now.

>>1492591
Being protected doesn't mean nothing ever happens to you.

>>1492591
>If they were actually protected, we would not be having this conversation right now.
You mean the conversation where a guy is getting fined almost a million dollars for hurting tranny feelings? Tell me more how they're not protected.

>>1492591
>if murder was illegal.. no one would die!
wow such insight you goddamn retard.
what, going to fine me $750,000 for pointing out how retarded you sound?

>>1492447
>look only some of the kids we abuse are fucked up from it, GET OVER IT

You're satanic.

>>1492626
>>look only some of the kids we abuse are fucked up from it,
>therefore it's okay that we abuse and fuck up kids over a million times worse
>comparing apples to skyscrapers
How's that glass house you live in?

>>1492615
You're literally arguing the same class of people that just got universally had their drivers licenses revoked in Kansas solely for existing is "The most protected class in the US".

>>1492648
>solely for existing
NTA, nice try. The law requires you to have your gender you were born with on your license.

>>1492654
Yeah and who is literally the only people that affects?

>>1492656
Delusional people with mental health problems.

>>1492657
>Guys they're the most protected class in america
>Which is why we're actively making laws to harass them and make things difficult for them and solely them
Well that doesn't sound like protection

>>1492656
it affects all of us. I am also required to have my actual sex on the driver's license.
The law also requires my actual birthday. If I "identify" as a 70-year-old, am I being oppressed because the law requires my actual birthday?

>>1492658
you just hurt my feelings. Now give me $750,000.

>>1492427
male genital mutilation is wrong and should be illegal, but that would require people actually giving a shit about males.

>>1492658
Guess you'll have to blow your nose and wipe your tears with the hundreds of thousands of dollars people have to pay if they hurt your feelings. Can you name any other class that has it this good? Not even Jews have such privilege.

>>1492660
>it affects all of us. I am also required to have my actual sex on the driver's license.
Yeah the same way ID voting laws "affect all of us" meanwhile it's just a coincidence that all the poor and minority communities have to drive far further to acquire a new one.

Oh, and it also creates so many more problems than it solves, if it solves any problems at all considering biological sex is pretty much irrelevant information for ID. I'm sure forcing the 5'11 trans guy with a massive beard to explain his entire life story every time he has to show ID to prove it isn't fake isn't an issue created for no reason at all.

>>1492661
Actually harassing people will usually get you sued if you intentionally keep at it. But keep living in your field of strawmen where every trans person is a wojak drawing instead of the real world.

>>1492664
>Actually harassing people will usually get you sued if you intentionally keep at it.
Someone said something I don't like on fagbook. Give me $750,000 dollars, bigot.

>>1492402
>28 replies
>nobody citing what he actually said and getting outraged by conjecture instead
Low IQ board

>>1492673
>He said “‘allowing’ children to ‘change gender’ was child abuse.’”
Apparently this costs 750k.

>>1492688
The truth hurts, and Progressives will make it expensive too.

>>1492688
Wow! That’s the only thing he said? Across 5 years he somehow only made a singular statement? Despite the NYP article saying he made dozens?

>>1492704
I don't care if he woke up every morning for five years shouting NIGGER out the window each day. $750,000 dollars is fucking retarded. Thank Christ I'm not Canadian.

>>1492712
My comment is asking what he said you dumb nigger not whether the punishment was reasonable because it’s obviously going to be appealed. It’s like saying America is a third world shithole because you let repeat offenders out in a revolving door justice system which encourages repeat offences or encourages pedophiles to receive protection at the executive branch level

>>1492688
Way to leave out this dude was a school board trustee and directly led harassment on over 200+ LGBT students and teachers, who are the actual recipients of the payout.

>>1492712
>Thank Christ I'm not Canadian
Canadians also thank God that you're not Canadian

>>1492662
>we've reached the point in the thread where leftists got BTFO so hard they have to change the topic to something unrelated
every thread lol. But I accept your concession.

btw minorities are more likely to live in cities where getting to the DMV is easy, while white people are more likely to live in the middle of nowhere far from a DMV. Why do you think minorities are so stupid and helpless that they can't do something as simple as get an ID? That's pretty racist of you.

>>1492726
>>1492704
>>1492664
he didn't harass anybody, he just stated basic facts and opinions that no sane person consider controversial
>However, the decision states that, “Over the next five years, Mr. Neufeld made dozens of public statements expressing his opposition to SOGI 1 2 3 and gender affirming care for trans youth, characterizing the reality of transgender and gender diverse people as simply a ‘theory’ or ‘ideology,’ and warning that teaching children about SOGI undermines social order and primes them for abuse.”
He just posted things on Facebook that every sane person agrees with, but since mentally ill people got their feelings hurt, he has to pay $750,000

>>1492724
>My comment is asking what he said you dumb nigger
So what all did he say? I'm dying to see you justify this shit.

>>1492726
>Way to leave out this dude was a school board trustee and directly led harassment on over 200+ LGBT students and teachers, who are the actual recipients of the payout.
And? Your point? If he was fired it wouldn't be an issue, but having to pay thousands of dollars for "offending" people by posting facts on social media - or whatever the fuck you consider harassing to be - really makes me appreciate free speech in my country.

>>1492724
It's reasonable to get outraged over someone getting fined for saying things a minority doesn't like. Further information isn't necessary.
>>1492726
He "harassed" them by posting things they disagree with.

>>1492731
Further information is absolutely necessary. Was he using his position as a trustee to encourage people to harass trannies working in the school district for 5 years? Did harassment of trannies increase during his tenure? There’s a huge difference in saying “as an American I love it when my politicians publicly fly Israeli flags” and American congressmen actually doing so
>>1492729
>So what all did he say?
I don’t speak pajeet please rephrase your question into English

>>1492733
In other words, you don't know. That's what I thought.

>>1492737
Yes that’s what I originally asked like 2 replies before. Do you have dementia?

>>1492712
if he did that then he would deserve a BAFTA award.

>>1492444
>without protections
lol
>rightoids are the ones who made trannies an issue
lmao

>>1492729
>>1492731
>Pay no attention to how he effectively accused over 100+ coworkers of child abuse

>>1492740
>Pay no attention to the fact that he is correct in saying that “‘allowing’ children to ‘change gender’ was child abuse.’”

>>1492738
Oh I'm sorry, I thought (don't know why I did) that you were trying to make a point when you were sperging out here >>1492704 saying
>Wow! That’s the only thing he said? Across 5 years he somehow only made a singular statement? Despite the NYP article saying he made dozens?

So since you don't know what he said, we can safely assume it was posts on social media. Which to normal people doesn't rate a $750k fine - or any fine at all! But then again I'm spoiled rotten for living in a nation with free speech.

>>1492740
>This guy posted a mean comment on the internet! I'M FUCKING OUTRAGED!!! GIVE ME ALL OF HIS MONEY!!!
This is what happens when you let redditors run your government.

>>1492733
>>1492740
Unless he actually named names, it's a big nothingburger. But he hurt their feefees so now he has to pay up.

>>1492741
>>1492743
>Uh it's not libel because I think he's right
The law disagrees with you.
If I said all my coworkers I disagree with are pedophiles, I'd be fired.

>>1492743
this is what happens when you let the government take your guns.

>>1492745
>No no he didn't name names
>He just generally accused a specific group of his coworkers and their families
>It's basically just gossip

>>1492746
>The law disagrees with you
Only in oppressive shithole countries. I live in a country that doesn't punish people for disagreeing with the government, so if I say "tricking boys into thinking that they can become girls is child abuse" then I will not be punished at all.

>>1492742
>we can safely assume it was posts on social media
You can’t assume that at all. What a low IQ take. This is the point im trying to make to your fifth grade level reading comprehension. We do not know what he said or whether he abused his position as a school trustee of the board of education to do so. So either come back to us with direct quotes of what he said, fuck off from this thread with your smoothbrain takes or, kindly die in Iran on behalf of Israel.

>>1492745
>Unless he actually named names, it's a big nothingburger
Irrelevant if he used his position to encourage others to attack a community of trannies

>>1492750
the only examples given in the article are Facebook posts so unless you have something else, we will assume that's all there is.
>>1492748
this is why we won't let you ban our guns in the US, because we know how tyrannical you pieces of shit are when you're no longer worried about getting shot for your tyranny.

>>1492748
If he didn't actually name specific people I don't see the problem. He was making general points about how he views the practice of transitioning kids to be abusive, and not actually calling any people out in particular. Seems reasonable to me. Especially given it's very easy to ignore stuff posted on social media...just don't fucking look at it.

>>1492750
>You can’t assume that at all.
Actually I can because you can't prove otherwise. All you have is the OP article that accuses him of making facebook posts. You heavily implied he was harassing people, but can't demonstrate that anywhere. You're so fucking confident he was abusive towards staff and students, but can't tell anyone why.
>So either come back to us with direct quotes of what he said, fuck off from this thread with your smoothbrain takes or, kindly die in Iran on behalf of Israel.
You first faggot. Either show us he did something worth a $750,000 fine or join your tranny brethren and hang yourself.

>>1492746
>>Uh it's not libel because I think he's right
>stating facts is libel

>>1492753
he used his position to advocate for children and defend objective reality, which is exactly what anybody in education should be doing.

They know he is correct which is why they have to resort to censorship, which is also why you are supporting censorship. This is no different than a flat-Earther suing his co-worker because his co-worker posted that the Earth is round.

>>1492753
>Irrelevant if he used his position to encourage others to attack a community of trannies
Which he didn't do.

>>1492758
Is it the case under law? No? Then it's accusing people of child abuse.

>>1492756
>>1492757
>>1492760
>However, the decision states that, “Over the next five years, Mr. Neufeld made dozens of public statements expressing his opposition to SOGI 1 2 3 and gender affirming care for trans youth, characterizing the reality of transgender and gender diverse people as simply a ‘theory’ or ‘ideology,’ and warning that teaching children about SOGI undermines social order and primes them for abuse.”
>The decision said Neufeld’s public statements “caused or contributed to a poisoned workplace for LGBTQ teachers and, as such, adversely impacted them in connection with their sexual orientation and gender identity.”
>According to the decision, between 45 and 163 teachers in the Chilliwack School District identified as LGBTQ between 2017 and 2022, meaning individual compensation could range from approximately $4,601.23 to $16,666.67.
>Neufeld was also ordered to pay $442.00 in lost wages to a teacher identified as “Teacher C” who lost 17 hours of wages while attending hearings and testifying on the matter.
Read retards read. Accusing over a 100+ people in your organization of child abuse purely because you consider them abusers under your own personal beliefs and not law is defamation. It doesn't matter if you don't use specific names. I can say every male teacher over 40 is a pedophile and if I was on a school board, they could absolutely fucking sue me for it.

>>1492761
Yes he did. Read the actual article. Literally saying that every teacher teaching anything about gender or trans people is a child abuser is an attack no matter how hard you cope.

>>1492765
>Literally saying that every teacher teaching anything about gender or trans people is a child abuser is
a fact no matter how hard you cope. Furthermore, your quoting the article here >>1492764
said he made dozens of "public statements expressing his opposition", not abusing people like you claimed, not committing libel like you claimed, and not even directly accusing anyone but making a general statement of his opinion on the subject. Which is protected speech - or at least it is in free countries.

Hey I get it, you hate free speech and think anyone who insults fags should be put to death. That's great. Go move to Canada where you belong.

>>1492768
>Guys he just said they were abusing children while sitting in a position of authority over them on his account that openly stated said position of authority
>But he didn't say they were ABUSING people
>Oh wait

>>1492769
You said he was abusing people. Prove it.

Protip: giving a generalized statement on social media without naming anyone is not abuse, as much as you'd want it to be.

>>1492768
Good post.

>>1492771
>Guys he wasn't abusing anyone
>He was just constantly accusing them of abusing the children under their care while literally holding power over them
Reminder he is only paying out to the teachers in his district. Don't accuse your co-workers of abusing kids.

>>1492774
You said he was abusing people. Prove it.

>>1492776
>Guys he was just accusing his coworkers of child abuse
>He wasn't ABUSING anyone

>>1492777
>>He wasn't ABUSING anyone
Exactly. He wasn't and you can't prove he was. This fine is bullshit on so many levels. And you defending this punishment makes you such a massive faggot that you put actual faggots to shame. Now fuck off.

>>1492778
Once again, may I point out he accused dozens of his coworkers in his district of being child abusers. This is generally considered a bad idea, ESPECIALLY when your co-workers are teachers.

>>1492779
>Once again, may I point out he accused dozens of his coworkers in his district of being child abusers.
No he didn't. Posting a generalized statement on social media is not the same thing as directly accusing a co-worker.

>>1492781
Yeah he accused dozens of his coworkers instead. That's why the fine is so high. Literally saying "oh any teacher that is trans/is teaching about trans is abusing children" isn't gonna help your case of 'Well he didn't say anyone SPECIFICALLY so he basically accused no one at all."

>>1492782
>Yeah he accused dozens of his coworkers instead.
Except he didn't.

>>1492783
Did he or did he not say "anyone who teaches gender ideology or transgender is doing child abuse"?

>>1492785
On social media.

Gender is a biological and a social construct.

>>1492786
So yes. Meaning he did accuse dozens of his coworkers of being child abusers.

>>1492798
You are such a faggot it’s unreal. Should the Catholic Church be able to sue for damages if someone posts that they believe the Catholic Church has a child abuse problem? Because that’s what you’re arguing for, making it illegal to make general statements about certain protected groups.

>>1492764
>I can say every male teacher over 40 is a pedophile and if I was on a school board, they could absolutely fucking sue me for it.

Could they really, or would they just can you?
Also, he wasn't making specific statements like that. He wasn't saying that tranny teachers are pedos or anything like that. It's not wrong to believe that "gender affirming care" for minors is abusive or to express such an opinion, anymore than it's wrong for some libshit Redditor to say that people who oppose "gender affirming care" are abusive evil nazis who should have their kids taken away from them.

>>1492764
>purely because you consider them abusers under your own personal beliefs and not law is defamation
The law doesn't inform reality anon. All this means is that trannies are now writing the laws to punish anybody that disagrees with their deranged worldview.
Defamation also requires real damages to be demonstrated in civilized nations. Hurting your feelings doesn't qualify.

>>1492764
>Accusing over a 100+ people in your organization of child abuse purely because you consider them abusers under your own personal beliefs and not law is defamation
child abuse in this context is subjective and therefore in any civilized country he would not be punished. He's only being punished because he lives in a dystopian shithole.
>between 45 and 163 teachers in the Chilliwack School District identified as LGBTQ
completely irrelevant. Nothing he said had anything to with LGBQ, just T, and his statements were purely about the views being promoted. Non-trans teachers could have also been promoting those sick views.

>>1492769
he was very specific in what he was accusing them of, he said that teaching the false ideology they were teaching was child abuse. There is no libel in any civilized country. Again, if he didn't live in a dystopian shithole, he would be fine.

>>1492813
Good points, this whole case is bizarre to me. How was he targeting LGBT teachers by posting his personal opinions on his own social media? Like you said, there's plenty of non-LGBT people who push this stuff too and I'm sure there's LGB teachers who don't really want to be associated with this. He wasn't going to anyone's homes and harassing them. He wasn't calling them pedo rapists at board meetings. I'm sure you could find shittons of liberal school board members and teachers posting freely about how people like Barry Neufeld are being abusive or nazis or what have you. Should they be fined too?

>>1492806
You seem to be forgetting he's being sued by the people working under him, not by the entire Canadian LGBT community. Also there's a difference between saying the Catholic Church has a child abuse problem and taking a child to Church at all is child abuse.

>>1492811
>Defamation also requires real damages to be demonstrated in civilized nations. Hurting your feelings doesn't qualify.
Which they did by pointing out he made it much harder to do their jobs by making them out to be child abusers. Did you read the actual ruling or are you just going off the headline?

>>1492807
>He wasn't saying that tranny teachers are pedos or anything like that.
He actually did. From the actual deposition:
> He equates gender identity with the perception of sex offenders that “I was born this way!”
> alleged that the BC Ministry of Education was promoting “child abuse” and forcing a “biologically absurd theory on children in our schools” – through the medium of public-school teachers
>expressed certainty “that there are far more teachers who abuse kids than Catholic Priests. But the teachers seldom get caught because they have powerful unions to protect them”
>accused “teachers from the LGBT” of being “very evangelistic” and suggested that schools were behaving like “sex offenders” by “getting kids to question their sexuality”

Here's the link if you wanna read the case instead of a headline
>https://web.archive.org/web/20260220092309/https://www.bchrt.bc.ca/law-library/decisions/recent/2026-bchrt-49/

>>1492823
>2SLGBTQIA+
What does that even stand for? Anyone who takes this seriously and lets these “people” have special protections is thoroughly jewed.

>>1492851
2SLGBTQIA+
I order this at Starbucks.

>>1492851
It's legal jargon. Most people just keep it at LGBT+ alone.

>>1492851
>2S
Two-spirit. Intersex native americans.
>LGBT
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, tranny.
>Q
Queer. Pedophiles, unironically.
>I
Intersex.
>A
Asexual

>>1492823
Where does he say that? I'd like the specific line. All I'm seeing is that he says teachers can abuse kids but are protected by unions.

>>1492867
>Well he kept comparing them to groomers and pedophiles and said what they were doing is child abuse, but he didn't SAY "I consider all trans people pedophiles" so he basically said nothing

>>1492868
Yes, it is nothing. It's a big fat nothingburger and I can't believe Canada is rewarding the stupid fuckers who sued him. He should be able to express criticisms without being punished for it. Even if he had said outright that troons are pedos, I still wouldn't support fining him. I'm sure you could find plenty of similar criticisms of conservatives or people who otherwise express anti-trans views on the social media pages of the people getting paid, and I wouldn't want them being sued or fined either...not that they'd be in danger of that in Canada.

>>1492876
because you're a retarded esl shill who needs this thread as a safe space to slide talks about being tricked into another israeli war

>>1492798
>So yes.
So no.
>Meaning he did accuse dozens of his coworkers of being child abusers.
No he didn't. He didn't call anyone out by name. If I post online "anyone who owns a cat is gay" am I making a general opinion to the world or am I directly calling the few cat-owning coworkers at my job faggots?

By your standard, anyone who has an opinion and shares it can be fined thousands of dollars if that opinion offends random people at your job, school, neighborhood, etc. It's antithetical to free speech.

>>1492890
>No he didn't. He didn't call anyone out by name.
That doesn't matter. If I work at a school and I say "Oh by the way every black/male/christian/gay/whatever teacher is actually doing something that is child abuse", that's still using my position to slander everyone else at my job. An indirect accusation is still an accusation, especially when you keep fucking doing it over the course of five years in spite of multiple attempts by the people you're slandering to tell you it's harmful and making it hard at their jobs because you're falsely accusing them of crimes in way that can and has lead to complete innocents being fired.

>>1492820
>Also there's a difference between saying the Catholic Church has a child abuse problem and taking a child to Church at all is child abuse.
And by your standard, all the fedora-tipping leftists who say this online can be sued into poverty. Which also means that super-Karen who reported parents to CPS for bringing their children to a TPUSA event, citing child abuse, is now fair game for legal retaliation.

>>1492868
>asked to provide a specific line
>can't provide it
And there you go.

>>1492892
You're forgetting he got sued BY THE TEACHERS IN THE DISTRICT HE WAS A TRUSTEE OF. You can't sue some random retard online for saying this, but you sure as hell can when someone at the same employer does.

>>1492891
>That doesn't matter.
Yes it does, especially when he was accused of libel earlier ITT. Having a general opinion posted on social media is not the same as specifically calling people out by name and calling them child abusers.

>it's harmful and making it hard at their jobs
Having an opinion online makes it hard to do their jobs? Here's an easy fix: don't look at it. Don't browse that person's social media. Then the mean words won't hurt your feelings and you can go on with your life teaching 10 year olds that they're actually born the wrong gender and need life-altering treatment that will fuck them up for the rest of their lives.

>>1492893
>Gentlemen, can you say exactly where the mob boss said "I want you to kill that man"
You're literally just arguing the semantics of "Well he didn't say specifically that he just very very strongly implied it multiple times." He already lost in court. Continue to seethe.

>>1492894
>You're forgetting he got sued BY THE TEACHERS IN THE DISTRICT HE WAS A TRUSTEE OF.
So you're okay with living in a world where we can sue anyone we work with for wrongthink. Great. Y'know what? That's actually great. Now I can file lawsuits against any coworkers that don't share my right-wing stances and get them fired.

>>1492896
>He wasn't saying that tranny teachers are pedos or anything like that.
>He actually did. From the actual deposition:
>Where does he say that?
>Gentlemen, can you say exactly where the mob boss said "I want you to kill that man"
I should be able to sue you right now for lying. You're slandering this man.

>>1492897
Don't publicly and baselessly accuse your coworkers of child abuse dipshit.

>>1492914
>baselessly

>>1492429
The only reason it's become a hot topic is because it's a trick by the elites to distract the population from actual issues that actually affect them and would make a measurable difference in their quality of life. If all the poor people and middle class are bitching about drag queen story hour that nobody gave a shit about or just ignored before are now fighting about it or if chicks with dicks are actually dudes who can play men's sports, then they are not talking about things like affordable housing, universal healthcare, or cheaper post-secondary education or federalized homeless management.

Remember, when you fight over this dumb shit, you lose in the long run.

>>1492914
Anon any parent or teacher that allows children to change their gender is abusing children.

Now sue me. Oh wait, you can't. I live in a free state.

>>1492427
facts are facts even if you dont like them gender change is child abuse

>>1492918
>You don’t need to care about the kike degeneracy. Just focus on one side of the issue.
You know that you can oppose gender bullshit and (((the international money class))). They are the same people.

>>1492931
>>1492952
It's real fucking funny you say this, because children are not allowed to change genders, and qualified medical professionals evaluate their psychology before they are given gender affirming care, so the actual fact is that gender affirming care is not child abuse.

You can't engage with facts because you're a closeted faggot, and you're so insecure about the idea of someone else getting the care you need it makes the fragile sham of your identity implode.

Fuck you, faggot.

>>1492894
>You're forgetting IRRELEVANT FACT THAT I PUT IN ALL CAPS BECAUSE I'M A CHILD AND THINK THAT MAKES IT IMPORTANT
kek
>>1492914
>baselessly
he accused them of pushing tranny bullshit on kids which is a fact.

>>1493001
>children are not allowed to change genders
wrong, not only are they allowed to but they are encouraged and groomed to do it, often behind the parents' back as the schools actually coach the kids to lie to their parents.
Like this 11-year-old girl whose school brainwashed her into thinking she was somehow a boy and kept it hidden from the parents:
https://www.newsweek.com/california-mom-payout-school-transitioned-daughter-1823317

>You can't engage with facts
KEK. Not only are you objectively wrong on this post but you also unironically believe that a boy can become a girl. You have no facts, you're a brainwashed child.

>>1493005
>>You're forgetting IRRELEVANT FACT
Actually the fact he got sued by the people he was an overseer of as opposed to generally is very relevant, you just don't want to acknowledge it because it makes you think harder than the headline does.

>>1493001
>qualified medical professionals evaluate their psychology before they are given gender affirming care, so the actual fact is that gender affirming care is not child abuse
Yes, anon, I'm sure there has historically never been a case when qualified medical professionals did something that today would be considered abuse. It's best to trust the experts and suppress all discourse because this time they absolutely have everything right.

>>1493022
>Laughs in 1% regret rate

>>1492402
What did he say that was an objective fact?

>>1492952
yes, facts are facts
transgender surgery (jewish mutilation) happens to <0.1% of boys, and circumcision (also jewish mutilation) happens to about 60% of them
why do you cry about the one that barely happens while never mentioning the one that happens in all hospitals every day?

>>1492746
>>1492746
The law in Sandnigstan commands gays be thrown from rooftops, while the law in Germany commands gays be given a medal. Blatant and profound contradictions.
Ergo, your appeal that which is law is moral; is patent bullshit. There’s simply no objectivity to law. It’s made up.

>>1493001
>It's real fucking funny you say this, because children are not allowed to change genders,
They're doing that all the time. Where the fuck have you been? We have hundreds here in American that have had surgery under the age of 18 - despite fucks like you saying it doesn't happen.

>so the actual fact is that gender affirming care is not child abuse.
It absolutely is. You're coercing children into thinking they're something they're not and will never be, and forcing unhealthy treatments on them that will fuck them for life.

>You can't engage with facts because you're a closeted faggot
lol project harder.

>and you're so insecure about the idea of someone else getting the care you need
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, needs this (((treatment))). The world would be better off if it didn't exist. It helps no one. You have to be a complete leftist to think a "treatment" that increases the odds of suicide to 50% is so beneficial we should push that idea onto 5 year olds.

>Fuck you, faggot.
Sue me, faggot. Oh wait, you can't. My country is better than yours.

>>1493025
>laughs in 48% self-deletion rate

>>1493035
The suicide rate doesn't skyrocket for boys that get circumcised. Unlike trannies, they live to have normal lives and be productive members of society without most of them either killing themselves or molesting children in bathrooms.

>>1493073
Literally, not figuratively, literally every major organization of physicians in the world agrees that gender affirming care has value. So I think I'll listen to every doctor in the world instead of your stupid faggot ass claiming nobody needs this surgery.

Under the age of 18? So 17? 16? So what, you think it's okay for the president to fuck them, but they can't make a decision about their identity after counseling and psychological evaluation with the approval of licensed medical professionals? But they can drive a car that could kill people? Shut up, stupid faggot. I don't want to hear about your trash country, I live in the US, where people are supposed to have basic freedoms. It's not my fault you live in some shithole where being your true faggot self would see you ostracized or killed. I hope one day you get to live your truth.

>>1493075
There's no evidence assaults go up in mixed gender bathrooms, the regret rate is lower than most cosmetic surgeries by an order of magnitude, and the suicide rate for people who recieve care goes down dramatically. The reason it is so high for trans people in the first place probably has more to do with bigoted dipshits like you.

Why can't you fucking people engage with facts? Why can't you make the argument, " I am a closeted faggot, and thinking about someone else being allowed bodily autonomy makes me insecure about my fragile masculinity?" Why can't you just say that shit instead of lying? I mean, it wouldn't be a good argument, but it'd be better than just pulling easily disprovable bullshit out of your cock-famished asshole.