https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/03/us/politics/trump-law-firm-orders-reversal.htmlThe Trump administration indicated on Tuesday that it planned to renew its defense of executive orders that it had leveled against law firms, a sharp reversal a day after asking a court whether it could abandon the fight.In a motion filed with the appeals court in the District of Columbia, where the cases are playing out, the Justice Department formally asked to withdraw its request on Monday to abandon the cases against four law firms. It was not immediately clear how the court would respond; the department is scheduled to file a brief in the case on Friday.The Justice Department did not comment. The White House declined to comment.On Monday, the administration, in a court filing, asked an appeals court if it could walk away from its appeal of victories the firms had won against the White House. The move was a significant concession by the White House that it could not stand behind its orders.
But on Tuesday morning, the Justice Department abruptly changed its position. In an email to the four firms contesting the executive orders, a department official apologized for the short notice and said it would file a motion to withdraw its voluntary dismissal.The email was sent to the firms shortly after 10 a.m. The Justice Department asked the firms to indicate whether they planned to oppose its attempt to reverse course by 10:30 a.m. It was not immediately clear how the firms would respond.But nearly two hours later, the Justice Department formally filed a motion to withdraw the motion from the previous day.A White House official said that there were ongoing discussions in the White House Counsel’s Office about how to proceed.The orders seek to bar firms that refuse to capitulate to President Trump from government business and suggest that their clients could lose government contracts. They had spurred widespread panic in the legal profession and led many firms to submit to Mr. Trump rather than face the existential threat his directives represented.But four firms — Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block and Susman Godfrey — fought the orders, quickly receiving favorable rulings from district court judges. Nine others struck deals, most notably Paul Weiss, drawing sharp criticism.It was not immediately clear on Tuesday what had prompted the about-face. One question that the administration’s decision a day earlier to abandon its cases raised was whether the deals it made with the nine firms would survive and whether those contracts — which were not made public — were considered unconstitutional given that the district court ruling would be final.
Shira A. Scheindlin, a former federal district judge in Manhattan, said on Tuesday morning that assuming the Justice Department went through with its plan to withdraw its motion to dismiss, it may have been looking to avoid that outcome. She expected that the administration would lose at the appeals court level but might have some faint hope at the Supreme Court.She said the abrupt take back was highly unusual. “How embarrassing to reverse yourself after all the bad press,” she added.
FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT ISNT A RIGHTGET IN LINE OR GET REPLACED, LAWYERS
>>1493546Donald Trump isn’t going to go out like Godzilla vs. Destroyah, is he?!
>>1493554Jesus christ kid learn to read
>>1493593Jesus was illiterate
>>1493546So his flesh is not only rotting away on his hand, but now his neck.And we can safely assume other parts are rotting away given these are just the few visible parts we can see.
>>1493611It's not rot it's bruising from a lot of dripsHe's sick, but the marks aren't a symptom of that, they're a symptom of some sort of intravenous drug. The internet thinks it's an experimental anti-alzheimers drug
When Trump knows he will die he will start a nuclear war so he will be known as the greatest president to the few that survived.
>>1493615Maybe we should have a president who doesn’t have Alzheimers instead of fussing with experimental drugs.
>>1493801The Internet is usually wrong.I wish Biden had experimented with alzheimer drugs more tbh
>>1493803I’d say the same thing about Biden. Can we just not have these fantastically old people in charge? Nothing against the elderly, mind, but there’s a point where you have to take their keys.
>>1493806Nope, you'll be ruled by octogenarians and you'll like it
>>1493806Forget old - Can we please get rid of the pro Israel faculty - they’re very annoying…
