>>1504027

But Pentagon officials have debated whether that justification is valid, according to a third official who, like others interviewed, was granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. The tension revolves around where to draw the line between military and civilian targets, such as water desalination plants, which could be considered targets because military forces also need water to drink.

Trump has threatened to launch strikes on infrastructure Tuesday night if the Iranians don’t reach a deal with the U.S. by 8 p.m. Eastern time. The U.S. alone has hit more than 13,000 targets in Iran, according to U.S. Central Command.

The Pentagon referred questions to the White House.

“It’s the job of the Pentagon to make preparations in order to give the commander-in-chief maximum optionality,” said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. “It does not mean the President has made a decision. The Iranian regime has until 8:00 p.m. tomorrow to make a deal with the United States. If they fail to do so, the president will send them back to the Stone Age, just as he promised.”

Trump, during a press conference Monday on the Iran war, said the Iranian people would welcome energy infrastructure strikes. They “would be willing to suffer that in order to have freedom,” he said. “They want us to keep bombing.”

The American-Israeli bombing campaign has generally spared the country’s supply of electricity and fuel. But as frustrations grow at the White House over Iran’s refusal to capitulate to what are — publicly at least — somewhat vague American demands, the target list has grown.

Trump, at the annual White House Easter event earlier Monday, said he is “not worried” about bombing civilian power plants and that it was Iran committing the war crimes.

>>1504027
“You know what’s a war crime? Having a nuclear weapon,” Trump said. “Allowing a sick country, with demented leadership, [to] have a nuclear weapon — that’s a war crime.”

The Geneva Convention, which spells out the international humanitarian law, allows for leeway when strike sites are used by both the military and civilians.

“Before targets get approved, they have to go under operational legal review,” said Sean Timmons, a former Army Judge Advocate General. “Some civilian infrastructure, if dually used by the military, can under the laws of war be a legitimate target. The concern that people have, that this will get excessive, is legitimate … but there are checks and balances.”

But Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last year gutted the Pentagon offices that assist with military targeting and preventing civilian harm, which may mean less oversight of such issues.

Hegseth instead chose to reduce the number of employees working on the issue from 200 to less than 40. The laid-off staff assisted military commanders in choosing targets that would spare civilian lives, and investigated strikes after they occurred to better spare civilians in the future.

Hegseth last month announced he would further cut the lawyers who advise commanders of an operation’s legality, known as judge advocate generals. He fired Army, Navy and Air Force lawyers in the first days of the administration.

>>1504029
But Timmons also noted that Trump has repeatedly called for the Iranian population to help overthrow regime leaders. Attacks against key civilian support facilities could work against that goal.

“If your objective truly is degrading their military capacity … then indiscriminately bombing would only prolong the suffering of the individual people,” he said.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, in a statement, blasted Trump’s threats to attack infrastructure targets as “reckless, dangerous, and indicative of a mindset that shows indifference to human life and contempt for religious beliefs.”

>>1504028
>which could be considered targets because military forces also need water to drink.
They also need to breath air. Have they considered chemical weapons?

>>1504028
>The tension revolves around where to draw the line between military and civilian targets, such as water desalination plants, which could be considered targets because military forces also need water to drink.
By this fucked up logic of "Can the military use it" instead of "Is the military using it" literally everything short of a fucking playground is a valid military target.

We didn't start this fight, but we sure as hell are gonna finish it. Give em Hell, President Trump.

>>1504033
>Cause the complete collapse of the gulf states and an international oil and gas crisis that will continue for decades, President Trump

>>1504034
Fake news.

>>1504029
>“You know what’s a war crime? Having a nuclear weapon,” Trump said. “Allowing a sick country, with demented leadership, [to] have a nuclear weapon — that’s a war crime.”
Every accusation is a confession.

>>1504027
>The Pentagon is expanding a list of Iranian energy sites it can target for attacks to include ones that provide fuel and power to both civilians and the military, a likely workaround if the administration is accused of war crimes for striking basic infrastructure
Its like they don't get deliberately targeting civilians is seen as monsterous.
The sad thing is Trumpy will be genuinely confused when the rest of the world and most Americans condemn him for it

>>1504044
Iran can and will blow up every power and desalination plant they can in the gulf states if they're truly cornered. Do you think they won't for some fucking reason? He's threatening to annihilate them, to make life literally impossible to sustain in the country. They'd have nothing to lose doing as much damage on their way out. This is why you don't go no quarter; never give them NOTHING to lose.

>>1504060
False. Trump knows what Iran is capable of already has a plan to stop it.

>>1504061
Alright, how? Israel can't stop the sheer amount of munitions Iran is lobbing at them WITH THE FUCKING IRON DOME. Unless you're suggesting he literally nuke the entire area, in which case congrats Trump just ended the fucking world.

>>1504062
>pretends Trump is dumb
>is actually dumber than Trump
lol

>>1504062
>Alright, how?
NTA
Iran is highly dependent on desalination plants. There was unrest in Iran precisely because Iran has a shortage of fresh water.
If trump bombs the plants then gg no re, Iran becomes uninhabitable and millions of people die from thirst.

>>1504064
>If trump bombs the plants then gg no re, Iran becomes uninhabitable and millions of people die from thirst.
Retard the whole point is Trump does that, they do the same to the Gulf. They have zero reason not to and we have zero ability to stop them from at least doing major damage.

>>1504065
>They have zero reason not to and we have zero ability to stop them from at least doing major damage.
They have more to lose by a wide margin. It's 100m+ people versus the 10m living in Israel that has permanent support from the zionist base in America.
The only thing stopping Trump is his ego and narcissism. He doesn't want to be known as the President that oversaw the single worst foreign policy decision of the last 200 years.

>>1504045
It's all DAVRO

>>1504068
>It's 100m+ people versus the 10m living in Israel that has permanent support from the zionist base in America.
Israel isn't the problem. The problem is them disabling every gulf state and cutting off most of the world's oil supply for YEARS.

And not a peep from Congress because they're all on vacation. You'd think from a purely cynical point of view that the Dems could score some easy points for chimping out about this shit, but the best they can muster is some weak-wrist complaints about how Trump isn't following proper procedure or Trump said a mean word. Nothing about war crimes or how we shouldn't have even started this shit.

This fucking country. There's no fixing it. Even if you get in a bunch of diehard commies or fascists, there's no way to kill neoliberalism. It'll be a gradual thing, just worse and worse every year, and one day, like the ancient Romans did, you'll wake up, and despite being in an urban center, the water won't be running, and the bridge on your commute to work will have collapsed, and it will stay that way because nobody will ever care to fix it, and then you'll know that America has fallen.

>>1504071
Some of them are calling this out, but given the US media is fully controlled by the Republicans and conservative billionaires, of course it's getting buried.

>>1504070
>The problem is them disabling every gulf state and cutting off most of the world's oil supply for YEARS.
There's three parties in this conflict with different war goals
>Israel: Destroy Iran
>America: Stabilize the region to save the west
>Iran: Survive
if you read the two strategic outlook reports the military and government put out last year, both say that they do not view europe as long term defense partners due to the high rates of immigrants and muslims no longer making Europe culturally similar to the USA. You may disagree with this assessment but it is what the US government is using to plan for the future.
Which is to say, Trump doesn't give a fuck about the rest of the world. Keeping the strait open is only important insofar as it is beneficial to Israel.

>>1504048
>The sad thing is Trumpy will be genuinely confused when the rest of the world and most Americans condemn him for it

It's funny that they always go jokermode. Hitler, Bibi, and now Trump. At least with the first two, they had/have a radicalized population and military who see Enlightenment values as weaknesses, so that propaganda pumps them up. Trump is still operating with a largely Enlightened Liberal culture (as in, values life, liberty, and being the "good guy," even if in the abstract) whose most important relationships are with other culturally Enlightened Liberal nations (as much as he might not want that to be the case), so the whole "we will slaughter millions of Iran's children if Iran does not agree to our demands" is a surefire way to destroy morale and turn your nation and allies against you. It has the added benefit of making the enemy fight you even harder, rather than striking fear into them. You can still get away with all sorts of warcrimes as an Enlightened Liberal culture with the right propaganda, but maintaining the facade of a just cause, of being the good guy, is always of utmost importance. Once you lose that, you've basically lost the war.

>>1504071
Two reasons. First, party leadership wants the war. Cuck Schumer and Jeffries have wanted this for ages, they just didn't want the political blowback. They're overjoyed that Trump took one for the team.

Second, like >>1504072 said, the media aren't giving them any airtime because 90% of it has been consolidated under oligarchs aligned with Trump. This feeds into the narrative that the Democrats are just passively letting Trump do whatever, and also squelches any effective leaders or frontrunners for energy to coalesce around.

What they'd want is somebody like Gavin to take the Democrat mantle, because he'd put the nail in the coffin for voter enthusiasm for generations. People are already dispirited and tuned out. It's why the Iraq War protests were much larger than the Iran War protests, despite the Iran War being far more unpopular. It won't take much more.

>>1504072
>>1504072

Which congressional Dems are talking about the war crimes, principle among them the whole War of Aggression thing itself? Are they numerous enough to not be countable on fingers? Are any of them in leadership or ranking members of any committees?

And no, I don't take "He's putting 'murrican lives at risk! It's being done wrong! He didn't run it by us!" as calling this out.

>>1504076
>It's why the Iraq War protests were much larger than the Iran War protests, despite the Iran War being far more unpopular.
That's an association fallacy given those who would be protesting the Iran War are already protesting the fascist policies of trump and the Republicans. The big problem is because the conservative controlled media and republican will give trump a pass on everything, it normalizes all his atrocities to the point the American people will just think war crimes are acceptable.
Although handing trump over to the Hague to face trial in the ICC would kill multiple birds with one stone. But that assumes the right wing democrats who still control the party would have the balls to do that. They won't.

>>1504077
>Already moving goalposts

The "war powers" resolution failed in the House 212-219. Four Democrats voted against it or it would've passed by a vote.

AIPAC money well spent. I'm suprised they even got 212 "Yea" votes.

>>1504074
The longer trump's war drags on, the worse it will look because Iran already has the perfect message frame: "The Regime Changed, But the West Hasn't”. This is the line that rewrites the entire conflict. The US stated objective was regime change. The Supreme Leader is dead. A new leader governs, but the bombs keep falling. Iran doesn't need to win the argument — it just needs to keep asking the question: "What exactly are you still fighting for?"

>Tollkeeper on the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran now controls selective passage through 20% of global oil and LNG transit. Ships pass with Iranian permission. The US Navy no longer guarantees freedom of navigation.
>Sanctions-proof oil revenue.
Crude above $100/barrel, buyers desperate, sanctions architecture functionally collapsed. Iran went from struggling to sell oil to naming its price.
>Domestic unity.
The largest protests since 1979 disappeared overnight. The population that was in open revolt in January is unified behind the government by March. And protests have also been further crippled by trump admitting he was personally arming them. So now they'll be written off as puppets of trump and Isreal.
>Generational leadership renewal.
Mojtaba Khamenei inherits with wartime martyr legitimacy instead of through a messy backroom succession crisis.
>Regional military credibility.
Demonstrated the ability to strike US bases across six countries and hold the entire Gulf at risk simultaneously after trump said they couldn't.
>Moral high ground.
Attacked during active negotiations. Schools hit. Hospitals, research centers, and Red Crescent warehouses intentionally bombed. Iran doesn't need propaganda — it needs cameras. Trump actually ordered sat maps to be cut because of this.
>Coalition fracture.
NATO allies — France, Spain, Italy — withdrew military support. France recognized Iranian authority over Hormuz by requesting passage.

Either way, trump openly committing war crimes will only make it worse for him.

>>1504076
>It's why the Iraq War protests were much larger than the Iran War protests, despite the Iran War being far more unpopular.
Could be that there was a huge crackdown on protests in 23-24. Lots of commentary on the lack of college protests and young people at rallies. Media says that it's because the youth just don't give a shit. The youth give more of a shit than ever. They're angry and scared as fuck. It's because the oligarchs, police, government, counterprotesters, and many schools have all gotten together to basically harass you on campus, arrest you, and permanently blacklist you from jobs if they catch you protesting. Seeing Democrats join in, all in the name of stomping down antisemitism, just took so much wind out of our sails. It was like that scene in Braveheart, where William Wallace gets betrayed by Robert.

>>1504078
>But that assumes the right wing democrats who still control the party would have the balls to do that.
They'd be afraid of normalizing the practice. They understand that if they open that box, Republicans will use it against them too.

>>1504081
At this point, they need to just go for broke and do everything possible if they ever get power. That means ending the filibuster, reforming the courts completely, breaking up conservative monopolies, refusing to do anything is why republicans continue to get emboldened to act worse.

>>1504079
At least AIPAC can't buy off every democrat given the amount of money they poured into the distract with the most Jewish voters in America to push their puppet candidate and they still lost.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-district-aipac-couldnt-conquer_n_69b86b61e4b09a39145e45a2
Even worse for them was the openly pro-palestinian candidate came in 2nd place and you know they ran any and every smear against her.

>>1504082
At this point, our global nobles have moved so much capital into blacksites that no one nation can really claw back the power. It would take a coalition of nations, and it would get really ugly. The Epsteinite class could rip apart America if it were in their interests. Some money here and there, get some propaganda going, and you'd have yourself some nice little civil wars like the Mexican drug war popping up across the states and/or states trying to pull away from the union.

>>1504080
Also to add to this is trump has given Iran a massive boost in income by turning the Strait of Hormuz into a toll both for the Iranians to collect on top of trump permanently raising insurance costs for ships using the strait, not to mention Iran can demand extra payments for reparations over the damage trump and israel have done since they'll never agree to any payments themselves.
Insurance: $8 to $14 per barrel, permanent
Tollbooth: $1 to $3 per barrel, if Iran holds the strait
Reparations: $1 to $2 per barrel, if Iran collects

We're looking at $10 to $19 per barrel in new, permanent costs on every barrel that passes through the Strait of Hormuz thanks to trump and Israel. And before you think this will magically get countries to side with trump and Israel, it won't. It's still cheaper to pay Iran than let oil go up to $150 a barrel, seeing as France already cut a deal with the Iranians.
So hope you like the new, permanent trump tax on fuel that's going to drive up the costs of everything.

>>1504084
That's why we need young blood in politics who haven't been corrupted by the Epstein class and will actually prosecute them.
This is one of the more retarded defenses republicans make for trump over epstein where if democrats prosecute him for being a child rapist, they must also go after the clintons, when young dems would have zero problem throwing the clintons under the bus since they're see as part of the problem too.

Although it's hard to get new faces since conservative biased media go all out destroying them. They're still running a smear campaign against Zohran Mamdani even after he beat the right wing uniparty.

>>1504072
Sort of like how they refuse to cover Luigi. You'd think that'd be the trial of the century, but nada.

>>1504027
>it’s not “civilian” infrastructure if it can be used by “civilian AND military”
The law says it’s illegal to dispose of concrete down a storm drain, this doesn’t mean it’s legal to dispose of cement dust in the same manner

>>1504081
>It's because the oligarchs, police, government, counterprotesters, and many schools have all gotten together to basically harass you on campus, arrest you, and permanently blacklist you from jobs if they catch you protesting.
Land of the free.

>>1504032
No anon, the military needs future recruits

>>1504060
They’ll blow up every American power and water plant they can reach too. They’ve been retaliating in kind against whatever they can reach, and let’s not forget the universities

>>1504065
Not only the Gulf but whatever Israel has. I saw something that Iran gets 15% of their water from desalination, maybe a bit higher but it’s certainly not all and it’s probably only some regions relying on it.

>>1504094
There's a 99% chance that Iran targets Dubai's desalination plants in retaliation to trump's latest attacks, which would make it uninhabitable.

the plan is simple: Iran has two main enemies, Israel and KSA. When they are down to desperation tactics, they will launch everything in their arsenal at both KSA and Israel, completely destabilizing the region. Then the US, China and Russia come in and divvy it up.
Europe totally missed the opportunity here.

>>1504074
>America: Stabilize the region to save the west
They’re doing the worst job ever.

I want to talk about the other two sides. If Israel’s goal is to destroy Iran that’s easy to comprehend, and I don’t mean the why of it I mean exactly what it means it’s clear that Israel wants to keep attacking Iran forever until there’s no more Iran. Now for Iran to survive this there’s only one way, Israel just stops attacking them.
So how can Israel stop attacking Iran, there’s a few ways for this outcome; Israel is conquered and subdued, Israel gives up due to cost and/or exhaustion, Israel/US conquer and subdue Iran.
The two about conquest are easily understood, the one about Israel giving up will require some further assurances given the past history of ignoring ceasefires and that goes for the US too.
It’s also plainly obvious that Israel requires US supply and support, Iran knows this and knows that to survive by conquering Israel or for Israel to give up fighting it’s imperative that the US no longer supports Israel

>>1504071
>Democrats are not entirely silent on the Iran conflict, but their response is muted by a mix of political caution, fears of appearing weak on national security, and internal divisions. While some, like Sen. Mark Warner, express skepticism regarding the intelligence and the lack of a clear endgame, others fear political backlash for opposing a conflict that could be framed by Republicans as a defense of U.S. interests. Some leadership figures are accused of wanting the conflict to become a political liability for Trump rather than forcing a direct, divisive vote, say reports.

>Political Risk and Unity: Democratic leadership is cautious of messaging that could split the party, as some members, such as Sen. John Fetterman, have broken with the party to support Trump's actions in Iran.

>"Weakness" Concerns: Many Democrats, including figures like Chuck Schumer, are historically hawkish on Iran, having previously termed it an "existential threat" to Israel, which complicates their opposition.

>"Letting it Burn" Strategy: Some believe leadership is choosing to allow the conflict to become a "long-term, messy entanglement" that acts as an "albatross" around Republicans' necks, rather than offering immediate, loud opposition.

>Focus on Process: Rather than a simple "no war" stance, many Democrats are focusing their criticism on the lack of a formal congressional hearing or clear intelligence briefings regarding the administration’s strategy, say reports.

AI summary, but I agree with it.

>>1504097
*USA not KSA

>>1504096
Yeah probably higher than that. The Iranian position is clear, if you blow up our stuff we will blow up your stuff. The UAE are allowing the US military to attack from UAE territory this means they aren’t neutral therefore they are belligerent.
My point also is that if they can they will blow up American civilian infrastructure, those are now legitimised targets in this war.
The Americans need to be careful about ceasefire violations (if there ever is a ceasefire), because the Iranians right now can’t reach US civilian infrastructure (or if they can, maybe they’re waiting for the invasion), but under a ceasefire they’ll be able to move into better position.
The Israelis always break ceasefires and, now, the US always joins whatever war Israel starts, so once Israel attacks it is as if the US also attacks and the US is a legitimate target for retaliation against any Israeli attack.
This is what the Americans claimed Iran were doing when they weren’t doing it and now it’s what Iran will have to do

>>1504101
>The Americans need to be careful about ceasefire violations
Given trump and israel outright assassinated the old leader of Iran right when it looked like he would have caved to all their demands, any cease fire is worthless.
At this point, Iran just needs to keep the strait closed to anyone who doesn't play ball with them and keep running the clock against trump and israel to mount international pressure against them since it's clear no one likes Iran, but they like trump and israel fucking up the world economy even less.

>>1504100
no, KSA. The Shia and Sunni have been at war for 1400 years. Iran believes strictly in bloodline leadership and KSA believes in elected leadership.

As soon as we pulled out of Iraq, they started butchering each other. Hussein was the only person holding the country together.

>>1504104
no they haven’t been at war the entire time and KSA has the bloodline kings and Iran has appointed leaders

>>1504027
Russia provided Iran with list of Israeli energy targets, Ukrainian intelligence finds.

https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-892256


Read the comments section, the Zionist really got their dander up.


Mad King of ashes zelinsky really trying to stir shit up (He's a secret Zionist)

>>1504031
>>1504032
>>1504048
The thing is that there is a grain of truth to that. In general it can be possible to attack infrastructure like that without it being a warcrime. The classic example is a well defended armament factory that is impossible to destroy but is hooked up to a power plant, here you could make a case for attacking the plant without it being a warcrime. And I'm sure you could construct a similar example for a water treatment plant, but "soldiers drink water too, lol" certainly ain't it.
Especially because if the suffering of civilians is proportional to the military gains is an important factor in this consideration. Like hitting an airbase and killing the civilian pizza delivery guy who happened to be there is fine, but cluster-bombing a kindergarten because some sergeant was picking up his kid isn't

>>1504119
They can attack whatever they want to and expect the enemy to respond in kind. The reason why there’s an idea of war crimes itself is so that both sides of a conflict can agree to limit the long term effects of the war and not cause unnecessary suffering to civilian populations, a noble idea brought about by mutual agreement between the great powers that survived the two world wars of the 20th century. If both sides for example agree tacitly to not use chemical or biological weapons then when the war ends there’s a reduction in the potential long term suffering inflicted upon not only the combatants but also the civilians, and everyone can live in peace, if there’s no limit warfare their will also be grievances after the war.
It’s all very basic stuff

>>1504095
mostly the coastal regions near the persian gulf, the rest of the country has plenty of fresh water springs coming from the mountains and underground aquifers

>>1504027
>“where every bridge in Iran will be decimated by 12:00 tomorrow night, where every power plant in Iran will be out of business, burning, exploding and never to be used again.”
The thing about making a threat like that is ... once you've said it, you have to do it. If just once you threaten to do something and you don't, then every towel-head and liberal knows you are a big pussy and you can't get anything accomplished.

latest trump post:
>A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will.
>However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116363336033995961

>>1504135
there is no way that Trump posted that. Probably Don Jr or Stephen Miller.

>>1504132
where have you been? Trump has backed down on every threat he ever made. TACO. You are in denial.

>>1504135
>President of the US openly admitting he intends to do a genocide
You know what? I don't care if he chickens out: we cannot have someone with access to nuclear weapons saying this kind of shit. Get this motherfucker out of office right now.

>>1504139
He kept one of his threats. It’s TAACO - Trump Almost Always Chickens Out…

>>1504132
Decimated means one in every ten will be destroyed

>>1504146
yeah nah he already said he's gonna wipe out the whole civilization. Fucking supervillain level shit.

>>1504147
I’m sure he thought decimated was just a cool way to say blown up

>>1504148
>A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will.
That's pretty explicit.

It's TACO Tuseday again?
nothing will happen.

>>1504149
It's his classic mob boss talk too, explicit but enough wiggle room for his shills to claim the opposite.

>Regime Change
But Iran already had a Regime Change given a majority of their leadership was killed.
So what does trump and his Israeli masters really want?

>>1504151
Literally what wiggle room is left by "I'm going to wipe out their entire civilization lol"

The cause of this war is South Korea.

South Korea is famous for Samsung and K-pop.

Because South Korea smuggled strategic materials into Iran, Iran was able to acquire weapons of mass destruction, including biological weapons.

South Korean Firms Violate International Controls on Shipping Materials for WMDs to Iran and Syria
https://japan-forward.com/south-korean-firms-violate-international-controls-on-shipping-materials-for-wmds-to-iran-and-syria/

S. Korea should clearly explain fire-control radar incident
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20181228/p2a/00m/0na/017000c

>>1504156
>"I already wiped out their regime. We actually changed it 4, 5, 6, 7 times. Many Regime changes. Regimes are the heart of a country - can you imagine an America without me? You just can't. America wouldn't be as rich, as prosperous, or as well regarded without me in charge. Maybe keep 2028 open, if certain people can fix that little problem with the consteetution. American Civilization will be completely wiped out if they don't.

>>1504164
Orwellian the way he just uses words like they don’t mean anything

At this point we all need to agree to vote in the most boring procedural milquetoast person running regardless of party. Vote in the most stable person that still wants to be president and campaigns on pre-2010s Americana

>>1504156
The
>Probably
part is what his shills will cling too.

>>1504183
Fuck that. My vote to whoever will prosecute this entire admin. Prison sentence at minimum, death sentence for some of them for crimes against humanity and treason against the US.

>>1504186
I hate to break this to you but if they are willing to delete an entire country that they don't really have an actual gripe with, what do you think they are going to do with people that that hate? What makes you think that you'll ever have another election?

>>1504187
>what do you think they are going to do with people that that hate?
They're only willing to genocide people they think are antisemites or could potentially be antisemites in the future anon. And you're not antisemitic, right?