https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ex07l1qvpoFirst Lady Melania Trump has denied connections to Jeffrey Epstein, telling reporters at the White House that any claims linking the two "need to end today".In a surprise announcement on Thursday, the first lady called for congressional hearings for survivors of Epstein's sex trafficking.She also denied online rumours that Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump, calling them "mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation". Melania Trump on Thursday additionally called on lawmakers to "give these victims their opportunity to testify under oath in front of Congress with the power of sworn testimony"."Each and every woman should have her day to tell her story in public if she wishes, and then her testimony should be permanently entered into the congressional record," she said. "Then, and only then, we will have the truth."Several prominent business leaders have been forced to resign their positions in recent months after new details emerged about their ties to Epstein - a fact that Melania Trump referenced in her remarks."Of course, this doesn't amount to guilt, but we still must work openly and transparently to uncover the truth," she said.
>>1505080If she actually wanted to make a statement she would ask to testify under oath to congress. Instead she suggests dragging the victims into a congressional hearing so Trump defenders can call them liars.This all comes as reporting suggest a taped conversation is about to come out of Jeffrey Epstein saying that he introduced Melanie to Trump and they first had extra on Epstein’s plane on the way to the sex island.
>>1505085"Melania Trump on Thursday additionally called on lawmakers to "give these victims their opportunity to testify under oath in front of Congress with the power of sworn testimony"."???
Don't talk about this. Delete this thread. Nothing to see here.
2 things are about to happen very soon that Melania really doesn't want1. Amanda Ungaro, a former "model" (prostitute/mail order bride for the elite), is the baby mama of Paolo zampolli, a Trump ally. They have a custody battle for their child and Zampolli leaned on Pam Bondi to have ICE deport her so he could get a leg up in the custody battle. She's understandably pissed and one day before Melanias announcement, went on a twitter tirade claiming shes known Melania for 20 years (zampolli was their modelling agency "agent", aka their pimp) and that she was going to expose Melania and Trump. She has an interview with Spanish TV dropping this weekend2. Michael Wolffs anti-slapp lawsuit against Melania is moving forward. Her lawyer is now out of legal tricks to delay the case and soon discovery will start and Melania (possibly even Trump) will be subpeona'd. Michael Wolff, former Trump biographer, interviewed Epstein and has over a hundred hours of audio tapes with the guy. Hes been claiming for years that Epstein and Trump are in some elite sex trafficking ring or something like that.
>>1505080She knows
Posting the other thread, read this stay here>>1505089>>1505091>>1505092>>1505096>>1505097>>1505099>>1505100>>1505105>>1505117>>1505136
>>1505095Michael Wolff was born in 1953[2] in Paterson, New Jersey, the son of[3] Lewis Allen Wolff (1920–1984),[4] a Jewish...Well, that was a fun. Enjoy the grifter's fantasy.
>>1505194It gets even better>In 2004, when the owner of New York magazine, Primedia (now Rent Group), put the magazine up for sale, Wolff helped assemble a group of investors, including New York Daily News publisher Mortimer Zuckerman, Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, and financier Jeffrey Epstein to back him in acquiring the magazine.[Wow.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Wolff_(journalist)#2000s
>>1505095https://x.com/AmandaUngaroA/status/2042045231244165374You seem to be on to something here...it also explains to me at least why Pam Bondi suddenly got "nicely fired" from her position so she conveniently doesn't have to deal with this...
>>1505197https://www.latintimes.com/who-amanda-ungaro-why-internet-thinks-she-triggered-melania-trumps-epstein-statement-596500
>>1505080Michael Wolff fueled.
>>1505198Tired of liggeral rumors.
Beejeezus.. The Iranian boondoggle ismaking Trump look so bad, he had to get melania too bring up the Epstein files again.
>>1505197Oh pams got a lot more than Epstein to worry about. Her and her brother Brad Bondi are corrupt as fuck. Brads a white collar lawyer at Paul Hasting. He represents clients who are facing investigation by the Department of Justice. He's been using his sister's position as AG at the DOJ to get his clients pardons and dropped charges People like>Carolina Amesty>Sid Chakraverty>Trevor MiltonOh and the cruise industries lawsuit against Hawaii? The DOJ intervened in support of the cruise industry. Whose representing the International Association of Cruise Ships? Brad Bondi. Pam should be fine though, Trump will pardon her before he leaves office LMAO
>>1505200i’m tired of migagolems existing
>>1505212Next president needs to honest to god make a rule that the president cannot pardon people who work for him directly. Enough is enough.
>>1505229We all know how that one will work outhttps://www.npr.org/2024/12/03/nx-s1-5213625/biden-pledged-multiple-times-he-wouldnt-pardon-his-son-hunter-then-he-did
>>1505237>oh no but what about biden-I don't care. Fuck him, ban these corrupt ass pardons because then we won't get criminal admins where everyone involved is corrupt because they know they'll have every charge dismissed on the way out.
daily reminder that Garland presented all of the findings to Dianne Feinstein and the US Senate, and she shelved them.
>>1505237>Biden's son's laptopReally? Forgot all about Hegseth's cell phone already?
>>1505245Don't you get it?When Joe Biden entered office January 20th, 2021, he promised he would never pardon his son.December 3rd, 2024, after his party had lost the election on November 8th, before Trump got inaugurated a month later on January 20th 2025 was when Joe Biden decided to use his pardon power to give a blanket pardon for his family.The next president can make a rule at the start of his term that he won't pardon anyone who works for him directly. What happens when he is a lame duck in December when a president of the opposite party is taking over the white house next month? What is his incentive to not break the rule he just set out?
>>1505275...do you not see the difference between a personal promise and written law?I don't want there to be a promise; I want the ability taken off the fucking table. There are already limits to who and what the president can pardon; expand them to include everyone in his cabinet in the "no" category.
>>1505276How?The President has the pardon powerIf the next president passed an executive order at the start of his term saying he's not allowed to pardon people who directly work for him, what is to stop him as a lame duck from passing a new executive order allowing him to pardon whoever he wants?If it is a rule passed by the House and Senate, how do you stop the Supreme Court from ruling it as unconstitutional, as it would be legislature taking away power from the executive
>>1505276You're guaranteeing that the US will become a banana republic, with each new admin prosecuting the old one.
>>1505288>Literally just a slippery slope fallacy. Guess we just have to let our overlords break the law with impunity.
>>1505288>You're guaranteeing that the US will become a banana republic, with each new admin prosecuting the old one.This can't happen if the old one didn't commit any crimes.
>>1505288The alternative seems to be the US becomes a country where ever admin does whatever they want, line their pockets blatantly as much they want, and then pardons themselves at the end
>>1505291Can you provide some examples of presidents which didn't commit any crimes?
>>1505295W.H. Harrison
>>1505299He's responsible for War Crimes at Tippecanoe.It wasn't while he was president, but he was a war criminal prior to entering office
>>1505291A pardon is only valid if the person accepting the pardon admits guilt first. We're already at the point where dems try to use lawfare to hurt people, your idea is stupid.
>>1505080She is right, we need to give victims an opportuntiy to testify under oath in front of congress. I'm glad she has her husbands support
>>1505455Reminder: if there were anything about Trump in the files you would've heard about it by now.That is all. Please do not cope at me that another scam to get Trump didn't work out.You should know by now.
