>>1507222
>I'm a Christian. I support war
Matthew 5:9: 'Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God'
And according to the 9th of the (Catholic) Big 10, you're going to Hell for Lying, Sean.
>Although the pope has opposed Trump's war, he has not shown support for the country in the Middle East to have nuclear weapons, as the president had suggested
As is your orange Antichrist for lying too.

>>1507222
Power and money are more important than anything to these people. They cannot be trusted. They should never have been given control of our country.

>>1507223
The antichrist is, according to the bible, an extremely charismatic, beloved figure who unites the entire world under a new religion. If you think trump is the antichrist, it's because you don't read your Bible.

It's cute that you cherry pick a single out of context 'anti-war' quote in a book where the eternal unchanging basis for objective morality commands genocide and dashing infants heads against rocks.

Counter point, Jesus says he is the way the truth and the light, no one shall come to the father but thru him. That the path to salvation is not contingent on being a good person (god expressly says his followers are bad people all the time, which is why they need salvation in the first place), but in accepting jesus' sacrifice, believing him, loving him above all else, and asking for forgiveness.

According to your own logic, you're going to hell for judging Sean. According to your rulebook, all Sean has to do is love Jesus and ask forgiveness and he can warmonger as much as he wants.

Religion is bullshit. Don't judge these pedophilic fascist dipshit based on the 'morality' of religion, that can be twisted to justify literally anything (including pedophilia!). Condemn what these stupid bastards do and support because they're objectively horrible and do nothing positive while causing mass suffering to everyone except the people shorting the stock market.

>>1507223
I wish we heard democrats talking this way when the war was between Ukraine and Russia, and they controlled all the branches of government

>>1507231
We weren't the fucking aggressor. This war was started by Trump.

>>1507230
You are a hypocrite

>>1507242
Please don't engage with the demons in human suits. They know they're calling white black and black white.

>>1507230
The antichrist defense force has arrived.
trump is clearly the anti christ, the only thing is he's united the world. Against him.
Satan must be pissed he picked this guy.

>>1507230
Well, all Satan... I mean Sean and all his hypocritical ilk have to say is 'God doesn't exist' and become atheists. As if it would kill them to do so.
...but if they're right about the existence of their Judeo-Christian god, then they're fucked regardless.
>Don't judge
*loads iron ore-bearing rocks into railgun*
Oh, I can more than judge, because I'm not subhuman hypocrites such as these inferior Christains. They only have the right to admit that their god never existed in the first place. Olympic gold medallist athlete & long time Christian Jonathan Edwards came to the conclusion that he could be a good person without a god, thus became an atheist. So all these Christains don't have the right to any excuses, but to admit god doesn't exist - also to simply say 'I wouldn't like it if others harmed me in any way so I don't have the right to harm others: all the morals one needs without retarded religion - and become atheists. No Excuses. No Exceptions. Especially with the orange anti-christ and its vile religion that is MAGA that is their actual god, or they would completely purge not only the political system of all those infected with that vile disease.
...besides, Sean & co: point out in the US Constitution where the words 'God', Jesus' and 'Creator' appear verbatim. I'll wait. But every second you can't, religion never had the right to exist anywhere in US politics in the first place. Why - two years ago - did voters in UK elect the first atheist PM, Keir Starmer?

Christianity is all about giving all of your possessions away to the less fortunate and then selling yourself as a slave to Caesar in the hopes you get murdered as a martyr.

There are no faithful christians, the religion is suicidal.

>>1507254
Nobody voted for Labour just because their leader is an atheist, I didn’t even know he was an atheist until now

>>1507269
>implying that 'Oh, If I don't know something, nobody else will'
Seems that those who don't allow the retardation that is ignorance to exist in their superior minds did. And Starmer's atheism is but one of the reasons why he was elected prime minister.

Pope Lius the turd?

>>1507274
No it wasn’t you’re full of shit. That election was more about getting the Tories out than anything, all Labour had to promise was no more austerity

>>1507222
I cannot be Catholic because The Pope is supposed to be infallible, and he's obviously not.
He's yet another Pope who fixates in the Sermon on the Mount and kisses feet in an act of living idolatry.

Anyway, who gives a shit about Hannity?

>>1507349

https://www.britannica.com/topic/papal-infallibility

papal infallibility, in Roman Catholic theology, the doctrine that the pope, acting as supreme teacher and under certain conditions, cannot err when he teaches in matters of faith or morals. It was officially defined as dogma in 1870 during the First Vatican Council (1869–70), which was convoked by Pope Pius IX. Essentially, the doctrine holds that the pope, as a direct successor of St. Peter the Apostle, cannot be wrong in definitive statements about faith. The proclamation was vigorously debated during the council and continues to be a subject of controversy in the modern Roman Catholic Church.

As an element of the broader understanding of the infallibility of the church, the doctrine is based on the belief that the church has been entrusted with the teaching mission of Jesus Christ and that, in view of its mandate from Christ, it will remain faithful to that teaching through the assistance of the Holy Spirit. As such, the doctrine is related to, but distinguishable from, the concept of indefectibility, or the doctrine that the grace promised to the church assures its perseverance until the end of time.

The term infallibility was rarely mentioned in the early and medieval church. Critics of the doctrine have pointed to various occasions in the history of the church when popes are said to have taught heretical doctrines. The most notable case was that of Honorius I (reigned 625–638), who was posthumously condemned by the Third Council of Constantinople (680–681; the sixth ecumenical council) for his role in promoting monophysitism, a heresy teaching that Christ has only one nature rather than two (i.e., human and divine), and monothelitism, a heresy maintaining that Christ has only one will.

>>1507355
>>1507349
papal infallibility has only been invoked two times in history (immaculate conception and assumption of mary). its importance is overblown

>>1507356
Trump infallibility, on the other hand, never invoked