[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1793315593299600.jpg (77 KB, 1024x576)
77 KB JPG
https://radaronline.com/p/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-argued-13-year-old-girl-virginity-house-report/
>Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Allegedly 'Argued Over Who Would Take 13-Year-Old Girl's Virginity,' Per Explosive House Report
>>
>>1545845
FAKE NEWS

This was actually a story about Joe Briben and Zelenskike but they swapped the names out. Joe Briben and Zelenskike would regularly gang fuck children and would argue to the point of coming to blows over who would get to rob that innocent child of their virginity.
>>
>>1545850
Boring.
>>
>>1545889
It's after hours on Friday. The regular shill has clocked out. We're dealing with the weekend shift.
>>
Do you have juicy info - click here!

Sign up for your daily dose of dope!

>/news/
>>
>>1545894
Anything to deflect from the fact trump is a child rapist and epstein's right hand man in their global child sex trafficking ring.
>>
>>1545938
No one but you is pushing this because most people actually implicated in the Epstein files are Dems
>>
>>1545940
If the Dems are all implicated, why's nobody doing time?
Why's he hiding all the records? What's he scared that we might find?
What's the difference between me and you?
You talk a big one, but you don't do what you're supposed to do.
You let the right-wing hypocrites avoid their prosecutions,
While hiding pedophiles away from legal institutions.
What's the difference between me and you?
You talk a big one, but you don't do what you're supposed to do.
You demand that they be punished, but your guy gets a pass,
All that talk about the files, but you won't look at the facts.
>>
>>1545944
For the same reason if Trump was implicated in the files why isn't he doing time? Why did Biden hide the files? What was he scared we might find?
What is the difference between Trump and Biden? The same logic can be applied to both with the exact same conclusions. You'll just try to argue why Trump was obligated to release the files and Biden wasn't, but not why
>>
>>1545945
>You'll just try to argue why Trump was obligated to release the files and Biden wasn't, but not why
And?
Trump's breaking the law by not releasing the files. Biden didn't. You can try and worm your way around that fact as many times as you want, it's not going to change.
>>
>>1545945
>conservative retard can only whataboutism
What's the difference between me and you?
You talk a big one, but you don't do what you're supposed to do.
You say the Dems are guilty, but you can't produce a conviction,
And when we bring up Trump, you change the subject and the victim.
What's the difference between me and you?
You talk a big one, but you don't do what you're supposed to do.
You wanna talk about Biden? That's a different fucking issue.
We're talking about your guy. What you so afraid to get into?
>>
>>1545947
Trump released 3.5 million Epstein files, Biden released 0 Epstein files. You can try and worm your way around that fact as many times as you want, it's not going to change.
>>
>>1545950
Cool, now release the rest of them unredacted.
>>
>>1545950
I'm not disputing that. You're trying to turn this around on me, but you can't, because I'm not doing what I'm accusing you of doing. Of what you're doing in this very post, in fact.
Trump is required by law to release all the files. Not 3.5 million of them, all of them. He is refusing to do so. Trump is required by law to release the files unredacted. He is refusing to do so.
Trump is breaking the law. Biden didn't.
>>
>>1545950
You keep bragging about 3.5 million pages. How many pedophiles have been convicted as a result of those releases? Zero.
Biden and Trump have produced exactly the same number of convictions based on their respective public releases: zero.
And Trump hasn't even fulfilled the law's requirements. He missed the statutory deadline, withheld records, and continues claiming the files have all been released despite the dispute over missing documents.
You keep confusing publishing paperwork with delivering justice. How many convictions? How many prosecutions? Or is dumping millions of pages on a website supposed to count as accountability?
>>
>>1545952
And why was the law passed requiring all the Epstein files to be released?
>>
>>1545954
Who in the fuck cares? Democrats have mostly abandoned the Epstein files because they've seen them and there's nothing there.
>>
>>1545950
>Trump released 3.5 million Epstein files,
Yeah because he wanted to release the ones that didn't have his name in them lmao
Biden didn't because he wanted the house investigation committee to look at it first. A retarded mistake because he should have just released it all unredacted since we'll never get al the files, now
>>
>>1545954
To make Trump release the files.

>>1545962
We don’t know if they don’t have his name in them. He illegally redacted them.
>>
>>1545962
The next president will be able to release them after Trump's 3rd term in 2032.
>>
>>1545940
You mean republicans and trump.
>>
>>1545967
lol no.
>>
>>1545967
>I haven't even looked a the files that have been released.
>I'm just using this as a tool to be a Democrat cultist!!!
We know. That's why no one takes your stupid shit serious, faggot.
>>
>>1545845
E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump is the name of two related civil lawsuits filed by American author E. Jean Carroll against United States President Donald Trump. The two suits, both overseen by U.S. District Court Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, resulted in a total of $88.3 million in damages being awarded to Carroll and are undergoing appeal efforts. The cases were related to Carroll's accusation from mid-2019 (during Trump's first term) that he sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996. Trump denied the allegations, prompting Carroll to sue him for defamation in November 2019.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump
>>
• "Katie Johnson" (Pseudonym): In 2016, a woman using the pseudonym Katie Johnson filed a federal civil lawsuit alleging that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly sexually assaulted and raped her in 1994 when she was 13 years old. The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff prior to the 2016 presidential election, with reports later indicating she dropped it due to safety concerns and death threats.

• Jennifer Araoz: In August 2019, Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit under New York's Child Victims Act against Jeffrey Epstein's estate and his alleged enablers, including Ghislaine Maxwell. Araoz alleged that Epstein groomed, sexually assaulted, and forcibly raped her when she was a 14- and 15-year-old high school student.
>>
>>1545845
This was the white house response:
>"This 'report' is nothing more than a desperate attempt by crazed Democrats to distract Americans from the surging Republican momentum driven by President Trump's historic achievements."
LOL this basically an admission
>I have never fucked kids, I'm also 7 feet tall and am a certified genius
you fuck kids
>>
>>1545981
>the surging Republican momentum driven by President Trump's historic achievements
Their gaslighting is just so pathetic.
>>
>>1545976
This story was crazy
They changed the statute of limitations exclusively so they could go after 1 guy. If that's not lawfare I'm not sure what is
>>
>>1545850
Hey i am glad you survived the bombing attack in Kaluga, your mom is currently telling us where you are stationed now.
>>
>>1545984
>Republicans have so much momentum that we're losing in Iowa and Kansas
>>
>>1545996
>They changed the statute of limitations exclusively so they could go after 1 guy. If that's not lawfare I'm not sure what is
As pointed out in the Wikipedia article linked in the post you reply to, her initial lawsuit was only for defamation. That first lawsuit started in 2020, which is before that law had passed in 2022.

The law just enabled her to sue him for battery. It didn't have any affect on the claim of defamation.
>>
>>1545996
>They changed the statute of limitations exclusively
Actually the primary reason for the Adult Survivors Act was because they passed a similar law for child victims in 2019 and then they realized "hey isn't it fucked up we're only giving this right to child victims?"
>>
>>1546009
"For reference, $420,000,000 is more than all of the fraud that the Trump admin has uncovered in the Minnesota Somalian community combined"
That's wrong, there's more than 1 billion in fraud
https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2025/12/yes-theres-something-wrong-with-walz-and-it-cost-taxpayers-1-billion/
>>
>>1546014
Key part of that sentence is "that the Trump administration has uncovered". Most of the Minnesota Fraud was uncovered and prosecuted by Biden back in 2022.
>>
>>1546014
Wrong thread, retard
>>
>>1546014
You already linked that article in the correct thread, anon. It's bullshit.
>>
>>1546012
Basically, until that law passed, she was just suing Trump for calling her a liar.
>>
>>1546031
Yeah because she couldn't legally sue him for having raped her due to the statute of limitation laws, but she could sue him about lying about raping her.

And if you're saying "That's ridiculous" well yeah no shit this kind of situation is why they fucking amended the law.
>>
>>1546031
And he had to pay her six million dollars for it
And now he's about to have to fork over 83.3 million more dollars to her because the court told him "Don't publicly call her a liar again, retard", but he's so stupid and arrogant that he thought he could just ignore a court order so he did exactly that
>>
>>1546026
A whitehouse press release is not bullshit.
>>
>>1546044
It objectively is bullshit
>>
>>1546044
It is from this white house
>>
>>1546047
What you are doing is called "Bias" and "Prejudice"
Trump's White House Press Releases carry the same weight as Obama or Biden White House Press Releases, or that of the founder of the Republican Party Abraham Lincoln.
>>
>>1546044
I'm old enough to remember when the White House put out a press release saying Iran's nuclear program had been completely obliterated and that anyone who said otherwise was spreading fake news
Then eight months later started a war with Iran because they were "two weeks away" from obtaining a nuclear weapon
https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news/
>>
>>1546048
What I’m doing is called pattern recognition. This administration lies constantly and is wholly corrupt.
>>
>>1546049
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I wonder what Iran spent money doing in the 8 months in between.
People keep talking about how Iran has been able to rebuild or restore functionality to facilities during the war, but them doing the same thing even faster during peacetime is unfathomable.
>>
>>1546050
And if I bring up the lack of credibility in other administrations it's whataboutism. It's like saying "Joe Biden has cancer, that makes it okay for Trump to funnel 420,000,000 in taxpayer dollars to his buddies in the private prison industry "
>>
>>1546052
>We set their nuclear program back years and if you suggest otherwise you're peddling fake news!
>But also they were able to salvage it so well in eight months that they were two weeks from a bomb and we have no choice but to bomb a school full of little girls!
>>
>>1546053
Yes. Prior administrations were nowhere near as dishonest and corrupt.
The anon you are quoting was describing a whatabout argument your side was making about this administration being corrupt.
>>
>>1546048
>Trump's White House Press Releases carry the same weight as Obama or Biden White House Press Releases
That implies a Whitehouse press release is a magic medium that makes everyone who delivers it equally trustworthy. That's fucking retarded. Obviously it is as reliable as the people delivering it. Obviously a chomo that keeps lying about all the epstien files being released and breaking the law by not releasing them doesn't carry a fraction of the weight a serious admin would.
How many arrests have been made based on the files Ttump released? That's right chomo, a big fat fucking goose egg.
>>
>>1546053
So are we to infer from your argument that you personally believe that official communications from the Obama and Biden administrations were as trustworthy as the Trump administration?
>>
I am inferring that esl shill is here posting yet again
>>
>>1545940
I don't give a fuck. If there is ONE Republican in that fucking list, both Dems and Reps are trash.
>>
>>1545969
>>1545968
Then why is trump and his goons running a full cover up on the files?
>>
>>1546057
>>1546059
One state of the Union is as good as the next
If you watch the video half the audience claps, the other half of the audience sits on their hands, and the side that claps tries to shame the other side for not clapping their achievements
every
single
time
>>
>>1546078
The vast majority of actual Americans don't watch SOTU addresses, not sure why you would
>>
>>1546066
That's retarded logic.
>>1545940
That's even more retarded logic, and would imply the republican government is protecting democrat pedophiles.
Normal people do not care what party pedophiles are in, we just want them prosecuted. Release the files, chomo.
>>1546079
That's a failing on their part, and has no bearing on the event's credibility. It's weird you accept the false premise they're pushing here that they're using to avoid talking about how Epstein and Trump argued over who got to rape a girl first.
>>
>>1546083
Biden protecting Republican pedophiles along with Democratic pedophiles, and Trump protecting Democratic pedophiles along with Republican pedophiles is internally consistent logic which explains why neither president released the files, and why the next president democrat or republican might not release all the files. There was an order to release the JFK files, and they're still suppressed with democrats or republicans in charge
>>
>>1546088
Biden didn't have a statutory obligation to release the files. Trump's DOJ does. Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which gave the DOJ 30 days to release the records, and his administration missed the deadline. A federal judge subsequently found that the DOJ had likely violated the law and ordered it to release improperly withheld material or justify the redactions. The DOJ is still fighting disclosure in court. So no, this isn't internally consistent logic. You're equating an administration that wasn't under the same disclosure mandate with one that is legally obligated to release the records and is fighting to keep some of them secret. That's an attempt to excuse Trump's documented conduct by inventing equivalence with Biden, because all you fucking disingenuous water-headed faggots can do is whataboutism. Kill yourself.
>>
>>1545845
watch the leftards go WHY COULDN"T THAT BE ME.
>>
>>1546046
>>1546047
democrats gaslighting and being bullshit artists again by denying reality that's inconvenient for them. It's why democrats are incapable of discourse and shouldn't be of mentally enough sound mind to vote let alone walk the streets.
>>
>>1546100
Either you're retarded or trolling.

Trump's admin is the least transparent ever, and is basically reaching China/Russia levels of disinformation where they just make bullshit up.
>>
>>1546102
Trump released 3.5 million Epstein files. Biden released 0.
How can you repeat these facts and in the same breath say Trump's admin is the least transparent ever?
>>
>>1546102
You're talking to a literal shill who defends pedophiles all day
>>
>>1546120

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/why-were-epstein-files-not-released-biden/
>Epstein case was an open investigation under Biden

>The Epstein case was an open criminal investigation during the Biden administration, Miami Herald investigative reporter Julie K. Brown explained on social media. Brown’s extensive reporting since 2017 has shone a light on the crimes of Epstein and his longtime accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. Her book about Epstein, titled “Perversions of Justice,” is a New York Times bestseller.


>“They had an open grand jury. … And even after Maxwell’s conviction, the case was on appeal — anyone in law enforcement knows you don’t open your case file when it’s still under appeal,” Brown added.

>Victims were still going to the FBI with information during Biden’s term, but that changed when President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice reviewed the files and closed the case in July, Brown said.
>>
>>1546125
I asked ChatGPT if there was any precedence for files being sealed because of associates (like Maxwell) being prosecuted. Like sealing the Al Capone files while going after his accountant or his associates, or John Gotti and his associates.
No, there is no strong historical precedent for keeping high-profile criminal investigation files entirely sealed for years solely because of prosecutions against associates, in the way sometimes claimed for the Epstein files. Standard legal practices involve targeted protections (e.g., grand jury secrecy, victim privacy, ongoing investigation risks, or appeals), but not blanket, multi-year sealing of entire case files during associate prosecutions.
Historical Precedents: Capone and Gotti
Al Capone (tax evasion conviction 1931):

His prosecution focused on taxes, not the full organized crime network. Extensive records (raids, ledgers, witness statements) were used at trial and became public. No multi-year blanket seal on "Capone files" while chasing associates.
Grand jury testimony and some evidence had standard protections, but core trial documents and IRS/FBI materials were accessible post-trial. Capone's downfall generated massive public records without long-term sealing tied to co-conspirators.

John Gotti (convicted 1992):

Racketeering/murder case relied heavily on Sammy Gravano's testimony. Trial evidence (tapes, surveillance) entered the public record. No evidence of entire investigative files sealed for years due to other Gambino prosecutions.
Post-conviction appeals and related mob cases proceeded with normal disclosures. FBI files later became available via FOIA/Vault releases. High-profile organized crime cases often see significant public exposure at trial.

In both cases, selective sealing (e.g., protecting cooperators, grand jury info, or fugitives) was common, but not a years-long embargo on core files. High-profile prosecutions typically generate public trials and records to demonstrate justice.
>>
>>1546126
maxwell wasn't a minor associate. she played nearly as big a roll as epstein.
>>
>>1546127
No strong historical precedent exists for keeping high-profile investigative files sealed for years solely because an associate was appealing a conviction or a grand jury remained open, in the way sometimes claimed regarding the Epstein files and Ghislaine Maxwell.Al CaponeCapone was convicted of tax evasion in 1931. His organization involved multiple associates who faced their own charges and proceedings around the same period.
Core investigative materials (especially IRS Intelligence Unit reports by agents like Frank Wilson) were generated for the prosecution and later became publicly available through historical releases and FOIA processes. The IRS itself eventually released key Capone investigation documents, noting their historical significance.
FBI files on Capone have long been available in the FBI Vault. There is no record of the government maintaining a multi-year blanket seal on Capone-related investigative files because associates were appealing or grand juries were active.
Capone’s own appeals and related proceedings occurred, but trial evidence and key records entered the public domain through the normal course of litigation and later archival release. Selective confidentiality (e.g., protecting informant identities at the time) existed, but it was not an indefinite embargo on the broader files.

John GottiGotti was convicted in 1992 on racketeering and murder charges after a highly publicized trial that relied heavily on wiretaps and the testimony of underboss Sammy Gravano.
Some specific materials (pretrial submissions, certain electronic surveillance-related filings, or materials related to jury protection) were temporarily sealed during active proceedings for fair-trial or security reasons. Courts later unsealed many of those records.
The overall investigation, trial evidence, and subsequent related Gambino family prosecutions produced extensive public records. FBI files on Gotti were later released via FOIA and are publicly accessible.
>>
>>1546128
There is no historical pattern of the government keeping the bulk of “Gotti files” sealed for years simply because other associates were appealing convictions or because grand juries had been used in related probes. Grand jury secrecy (under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)) protected specific grand jury materials, as it always does, but that did not equate to locking away the entire investigative file indefinitely.
Key Distinctions from the Epstein Claims
Grand jury secrecy is a longstanding rule that protects the secrecy of grand jury proceedings themselves. It does not automatically seal every investigative document connected to a case for the duration of any associate’s appeals.
In both Capone and Gotti eras, once major prosecutions concluded, substantial portions of the investigative records entered the public domain through trials, appeals, FOIA, and historical interest. Temporary sealing of discrete items for specific reasons (witness safety, ongoing surveillance, fair trial) was common and limited.
High-profile organized-crime cases of that period generated significant public transparency precisely because of the public interest and the use of the materials in open court.
In short, while prosecutors routinely protect sensitive materials during active investigations and appeals, the historical record for Capone and Gotti does not show the kind of prolonged, comprehensive sealing of investigative files attributed by some critics to the Epstein/Maxwell situation.
>>
>>1546127
It's pretty sad that he's so dumb he has to let ai speak for him
>>
>>1546127
What evidence do you have that Maxwell wasn't a minor associate, and she was as nearly as big a roll as Epstein?
>>
Are you going to let the shill drag you into another passe argument? You could just call him a faggot If you want
>>
>>1546124
and you're a democrat shill who wishes he could be trump seething going THAT SHOULD"VE BEEN ME.
>>1546102
Ahh yes the democrat retard whose ignoring the fact biden's administration actively commuted a facism censorship campaign removing from print anything inconvenient to them over social media outlets as confirmed by mark zuckerberg. so you're fucking stupid.
>>
>>1546145
Faggot
>>
>>1546147
Good one bro
>>
Reminder, this thread is about Trump arguing with his BFF over who gets to rape a 13 year old girl first.
>>1546145
>Democrats working with public health officials to set standards to control the spread of a global pandemic is fascism. Trump raped a 13 year old girl with his BFF, and all I can do is deflect and whataboutism.
That's as retarded as saying not being able to yell fire in a crowded theater is a violation of your free speech.
Now remind me which president tried to ban major media outlets from the Whitehouse for reporting on his corruption and incompetence, projecting fascist chomo?
>>
>>1546155
democrats working to undermine public interests by hiding the side effects of a vaccine on the public is fine.
you should just kill yourself for being this stupid.
>>
>>1546120
https://newrepublic.com/post/217060/white-house-intervened-shut-down-epstein-files-investigation
>>
Leave Donald Rump alone!
>>
like how the migger tries to frame COVID response as a democrat thing when the entire response plan was fabricated by trump and his administration and it was just as much of a disaster as his response to anything. "KEEP EVERYTHING OPEN but shut everything down THEN SAY CHINA DID IT but then claim it was natural FAST TRACK THE VACCINE oh I'm not president anymore, the vaccine is le bad."
>>
>>1546158
The headline doesn't match up with the article?
>“Have something I can edit?” Budowich emailed FBI Director Kash Patel two weeks before the memo was released. The email’s subject line read: “Re: Draft memo from DOJ—we have not edited it yet.”

>“Just got it from DOJ. Here you go. Thanks,” Patel responded hours later.

>The next day, Budowich told Patel that he had passed the draft along to the White House communications team, noting that the message needed to be pasted on DOJ and FBI letterhead, according to Raw Story.

>Almost a week later, then–Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche sent a “final version” to Budowich. It failed to meet Budowich’s expectations, however, lacking the identifying seal of the Justice Department.

>“I need a version on letterhead,” Budowich repeated. “Someone needs to own this. I can’t give a doc to a reporter that could easily be confused with a [high school] term paper, so need to provide some validation of the doc.”

>Diego Pestana, Blanche’s counsel, fulfilled Budowich’s request an hour and a half later.
>>
>>1546194
>the draft needs to be on letterhead, otherwise I can't leak the draft
What a faggot



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.