>>28600579
you mean like the audi a8? or the mercedes s-class? or the bmw 760i? or any rolls royce? or bentley? have you considered killing yourself you retarded faggot?

>>28600579
didn't read
sexy blackwing

File: 2007_bmw_alpina-b7_IMG_26(...).jpg (311 KB, 2048x1365)

311 KB JPG

Well, for starters sedans are dead as fuck now so time to shop used.

>not looking at alpina
>not looking at amg
>not looking at jaguar
>not looking at lexus

>>28600582

Those all have tiny, low-displacement shit-tier boosted V8s. The Bentleys and Rolls are good but they are also 300k+

Bring back the Lincoln continental, put a 7.3L V8 in it, and let me cruise around in style.

>>28600607
>I want luxury!
>nooo, that's too expensive
Then I guess you can't afford luxury.

>>28600637
Dinghy money, yacht expectations. Many such cases!

>>28600579
You’re not gonna like the answer.
You’re going cry and say “that’s not what I meant!”?
But you’d be wrong, you’re just not ready to accept it.
F-150 platinum or king ranch, super crew.
Yukon XL Denali ultimate.
Escalade ESV
spoiled for choice but you have to take your blinders off.

>>28600579
it sucks that we've come to this point but the biggest and easiest thing that can be done to improve ride quality is to put the smallest wheels that can fit over the brakes and tyres that at a minimum, match the diameter of the original wheels. the preferred option would be the tallest sidewalls possible but that can throw off the speedo if you're bothered by that

>>28600579


I understand your frustration. It's sad to say that the Xantia Activa was made in 1994 and suspension technology has not advanced any since then. There's no principle reason you can't have both comfortable bump eating and high G cornerability at the same time. For that matter, there's no reason you can't have nice comfortable seats and non-NPC primer coloured interiors either in any 'economy' car too, but people fucking around.

>>28600670
This is indisputably true
>bring back the luxury barges
I can tell you first hand the Escalade drives like a boat
The newest goes 0-60 in the fours
What OP wants is everywhere

>>28600796
Based.

>>28600579
You're low IQ and don't know what you want

>>28600579
>Why can't we have a big, luxurious cruiser with a thiccboi v12 or a chonky v8? I want power and luxury.
You can... There are multiple options readily available. The only difference is they have beds now instead of trunks.

>>28600579
>Bring back the luxury barges. I want a 6000lbs sedan that goes 0-60 in 3 seconds
the luxury barges are still here, but theyre SUVs. sorry, I guess you’ll have to cry all the way home with your extra ride hight, extra headroom, extra cargo space

>>28601072
>>28601080
Sounds gay as FUCK

>>28600729
>Xantia Activa was made in 1994 and suspension technology has not advanced any since the

thats wrong tho

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHYpe65dnoM

>>28600607
You want a Jag, you just don't know it yet.

>>28600637
>>28600655
>No you idiot you don't understand
>Of course it makes sense that a car company can pour billions of dollars of R&d, manufacturing and assembly to sell you a street legal race car with a racing chassis, racing suspension, racing interior and racing engine for 60 to 80 grand
>But it does NOT make sense for them to be able to sell you that literal same exact car but with a softer suspension and more comfortable seats at a similar price point, even as a special order package that they can build on demand so they don't have to produce and stock a bunch of low popularity parts
>For that, you simpleton, you would have to go to the English who want 10 times the price for half the car because it was hand built by Ranjeet and Muhammad using only the finest Chinese pleather Alibaba has to offer
>Or the Germans who are so autism riddled that if told to engineer their way out of a wet paper bag they would come up with something twice as complicated as a Swiss watch that requires a full tear down and service every 3 inches of cutting and falls apart immediately upon opening the bag

>>28601515
Have you considered getting a job, poor son?

>>28600582
Is there any new car under 50K with good suspension? All the examples you gave are 70K+ cars.

>>28601354
That's just more variations on a theme, not any significant departure. And no slapping 'AI' on the title doesn't change it.

>>28602178
you are such a tiring benchracing moron and you just cannot help yourself can you

>>28602178
there is no good new car under $100k

>>28602244
What's not good about a $100k luxury trim crew cab pickup truck?
>every tech feature your autistic ass could ever wish for
>the same luxury comfort features you find in a flagship sedan
>smooth ride
>lots of power
>interior room that rivals a Rolls Royce
Even if you never use it to do actual truck things it's still a great vehicle for $100k.

>>28602274
it's not a car

>>28602334
Mechanically it's just a beefed up car. It does everything a car does. Don't be a retard and bring up "muh handling" in a thread about modern vehicles going to shit because they need to handle.

>>28602338
Your argument is that a truck is a car?

>>28600579
>0-60 in 3 seconds
'tard
You don't want that in a croozer. You don't want to break the speed limit and spin into the ditch after 1.5 seconds of WOT.
What matters is part-throttle and especially off-idle response. A malaise barge with an infinity liter v8 and six horsepower feels great to drive because of the torque.
This could be done today while meeting emissions restrictions thanks to variable cam profiles. Simply give the base cam a shallow, lift-biased profile with no overlap. This will give you superb torque. Then, bump up the secondary cam to allow for passing within a few seconds (300 hp?) and all is good.

>>28602178
C Class on airmatic

>>28602342
Sure. A modern half ton is just a car with a bed.

>>28600579
Sounds like you want a hellcat with leather seats anon.

>>28600579
What you described exists, and your to poor to buy it