It's hard to go wrong with a snake killing a muslim
>>28625195>>>/gd/The answer is Borgward, though.
>>28625195I like the ones with animals on them
Objectively I'd say it's Mercedes and I don't think there's even a close second. Whichever metric you're using whether it's the design itself, history of the logo, meaning, recognizability, etc. Mercedes takes it in every regard.
>>28625195Coat-of-arms are always nice. Cadillac, Porsche, Alfa Romeo, et cetera.Bentley, Aston Martin, Chrysler, and Genesis all have the same idea. But it's a good idea.Most logos made out of stylizing their name are bad. E.g. Hyundai, Lexus, are bad. Ford is a good exception. The old Kia logo is bad, the new one, surprisingly, is kinda nice.Iconic pictographs, like Mitsubishi or Mercedes, are good. Old Jaguar, Maserati, Ram, Lincoln, Corvette, good.Audi, BMW, Chevrolet, Volks VVagen, Citroen, Opel, Subaru, Peugeot, are okay.Volvo is goofy, but I kinda dig it ngl.
old volkswagen logo was cool before they added that retarded line through it
>>28625195
>>28625195The original Cadillac coat of arms. The modern, less detailed one - especially in black and white - is very unsoulful. Runner up is Bentley, which, in modern logo designs takes the No. 1 spot.Best as hood ornaments is the Lincoln gunsight, and the Jaguar jaguar.
>>28625449>all the name only logos in shit tier>ford in ace tier???
>>28625510Not him but Ford's take on it is stylish and they're one of very few manufacturers to actually have colour on their badge.
HE WAS NUMBER ONE
>>28625195unironically ford
