>>28682720
What am I even supposed to think?
It's a Tesla.
not ugly, or good looking .
just a soulless EV.

File: Screenshot_20251021_194340.png (1.2 MB, 1920x1018)

1.2 MB PNG

it pretty good looking if this is actually what it'll look like. but the main problem would be weight, which conveniently hasn't been disclosed

>>28682720
It looks nice. I'd buy it except that I like manual transmission too much.

Interesting that they went full Blade Runner with the truck, but this thing looks like it could be the new MR2

>>28682885
If electric cars can be fun like this it isn't so bad. Just be nice to keep a mix of gas and electric vehicle choices.

>>28682720
looks like a great car to lose my licence in

I feel like now that there's the Rimac and the Buttfista there's no point in trying to make "the roadster" as it was envisioned. I would be stoked if they just made a Model S Coupe. The weight savings might be just enough to put into the 8s. Stripped Plaids have gone on record as going that low. They could at least take back "quickest production car under 1 million"

>>28682852
I'd hope that they'd sacrifice capacity to ensure reasonable weight, but they won't because numbers for bench racers are more important to the bean counters and marketers than making a sports car that actually drives like a sports car.

>>28682891

I just mean the styling. It looks like a Toyota. I'm sure it'll be fast as hell

>>28682852
>GR86/C8 corvette bastard love child "looks good"

>>28682895
I'm so tired of spec sheet racing it's unreal.

why would I get this instead of a ZR1X with equivalent performance, but sustainable across a whole day, with a lift-out roof, and with a historically shorter order delay?

>>28683017
the same reasons you would get a plaid over a z06 z07 z71 zl1 lt2 4g lte

>>28682852
>laid out like a mid engine car
why

>>28683054
A plaid has more space, the Tesla still only has two usable seats.

>>28683085
small backseats and a trunk are still better than no backseats and no trunk