That’s what they get for acting like Ferrari
>>28687113Can someone ID the shoes?
>>28687113Germany brought this on themselves by deciding that a windmill could power Europe's industrial heartland.
>>28687113They made a lot of money this year.But operating costs mostly from EV shit was too high.It's basically EV shit that murdered their chances of a profit.
>>28687113>acting like FerrariDamn, did they finally start sending cease and desist letters to RWB and Singer? Did they kill off their manual transmissions and decide to become a lifestyle brand? No?
>>28687113They used to affordable to those further in their career and maybe 35-55. Now, even making $150k year and minimal expenses outside my mortgage, I can't afford the lower tier Porsches. A 718 is about $80-$100k depending on options. That means even on a payment with $16k down, $85,000 car, 48 month..... It's basically $1600 a month. They lost their fucking mind.
>>28687113Firstly, cool brand with a Great history. But that doesn’t forgive them for making steel Audis and up charging when Audi is made of aluminum. The Taycan can cost $5k for diagnosis if the battery has to come out and that’s before they fix anything. The 911 had McDonald’s and open diff.
>>28687855Don't forget that this 718 you're talking about is a turbo 4 cylinder.
>>28687939Audisteering autist is back. Still obsessing how much aluminum and steel is in a chassis while ignoring curb weight between cars.
>>28687113how do you fuck up this bad
>>28687942It's 103k for the GTS, with the 4L H6.
>>28687843>basically EV shit that murdered their chancesShocking
>>286879451. 911s understeer 2. Audis cost less but use better material 3. Porsches cost more but use cheaper materials4. Porsche could weigh less if it used aluminum instead of steel and still be more profitable than an Audi 5. Your car has an open diff and McDonald struts
>>28687960>911 understeer
>>28687855I bought mine when I made 400k desu. Anyway this is all ev shit. They have no problems selling 911 and 718.
>>28687960>porsche nu911>open difflmao, is this real?
>>28687960>1. 911s understeerBecause the tires in the rear are so much wider>2. Audis cost less but use better material So VAG is cheating themselves and you're the first to figure it out? You're a fucking moron lmao.>3. Porsches cost more but use cheaper materialsSee above>4. Porsche could weigh less if it used aluminum instead of steel and still be more profitable than an Audi My 911 is almost 50% aluminum>5. Your car has an open diff and McDonald strutsMy car has an electronic differential and MacPherson Strut front suspension so it can have a usable frunk. My car also rapes your car on every track.Look dude, people made fun of your wife's Macan Turbo, and I get that really hurt you, but you've been doing this little performance for more than a year now. It's time to find new material.
>>28687114Pagliacci
>>28688182Rear biased weight means the front tires responsible for turning have less traction. It’s the trade off for the extra traction for acceleration
>>28688182Weird becuase a $45k A3 is 85% aluminum. A 1985 A8 is 100% aluminum.
>>28689004a2 105% aluminininium
>>28688025no
>>28687960>Your car has an open diff and McDonald strutsWhat's crazy is they're selling open diff McDonald's cars with 6cyls and steel chassis for V8, aluminium, bones money and somehow they're still losing 1m a year wtf
>>28689004You're the only person that cares lmao
>>28687113Germany just assumed that the Chinese will forever buy their shit and never advance in cars. Too bad for them the Chinese just stole their technology and put into into their domestic companies. It's funny how fucking buick is doing better than most European brands, and all because of European hubris
>>28687960steel is lighter
>>28688025For a long time LSD had to be optioned on a regular 911. No idea if that's still how it is though.
>>28688023The EU wants to make gas cars illegal in 10 years so there wont be anything else left
