>wrong wheel drive
The Civic has never been anything BUT a grocery getter. Just because a bunch of faggot-ass fanboys got delusions of grandeur does not make it any less true.

>i buy economy cars priced and spec'd for unskilled immigrants and single moms
>but i swear i'm a super cool racer chad on instagram

>>28691025
>waah my normal car gets used by normies for normal car stuff

>>28691025
>with native doordash integration
you have to be kidding me

>>28691110
it makes no sense to make a small car that's meant to be practical be rwd
for a small benefit in handling you dramatically lose interior space
what's weird is that they never put any effort into making the Si or R interiors any nicer other than some red trim
and they can't get 30-40 more hp out of it?
I don't get why they can't combine the 1.5T engine with a hybrid battery

>>28691199
nobody even wants the shitty 1.5t. The K24 and K20 in previous gens were much better and there's a reason they havent plummeted into being worthless. Why tf would I want a tiny shitty economy engine with a tiny turbo when I can have a reliable N/A motor that doesnt blow head gaskets. The car doesn't need more than 200hp either with some gay hybrid system. Its a grocery getter.

>>28691199
>it makes no sense to make a small car that's meant to be practical be rwd
Exactly my point. It's meant to be practical, not fun or sporty. Trying to make a fast Civic is about balancing cope and disappointment.

>>28691199
Does it REALLY chew up that much interior room to have a hump in the floor for a driveshaft? You have to raise the boot floor a bit for a differential but you can use the extra room under it for a bigger fuel tank and a spare tyre, which both benefit a practical car

>>28691210
It's not wrong-wheel drive then. It has the correct layout for its purpose.

>>28691025
Don't usually see jeets in Hondas. Mostly whites and Asians. Jeets are in Camrys (white with black roof) or Teslas.

>>28691025
I've never seen someone so hurt by the si. Just drive past it bro, it's not going to hurt you.

The base Civics are maybe jeetmobiles, but the Si? Those are for sub-5'10 sub-6 figure white collar white dudes that only date Asian women. Handsome based Chads drive the hybrid since it gets the NA 2.0L and no CVT while dunking on the Si's acceleration

>>28691604
an e-cvt is still a cvt.

>>28691471
I see them in older Accords and Civics cause the new shit is probably too expensive
In Ontario Canada aka jeet central, the Civic Hybrid is around $7000 more all in vs a base Corolla Hybrid and about $6000 less than a Model 3, leaving it in a strange middle ground.
ICE is just generally off the table except for the punjabis who prefer Challys/Chargers/Mustangs with Haryana stickers and AKs plastered on them.

>>28691025
You guys see jeets/niggers where you live? Ngmi

>>28691611
It's actually worse because it isn't even continuously variable, you get two ratios.
Real world these things only get like 35mpg highway, Toyota blows them away.

>>28691611
E-cvt don't use belts they have a planar gear set. They're one of the most reliable transmissions.

Civic Hybrid is a pretty fuckin sick DD and is the only correct civic to buy right now, but the civic is so fucking overpriced. It costs $1000 more to get a base civic hybrid than it does to get a fuckin ford maverick hybrid.

>>28691893
Highly doubt the 35mpg highway hybrid civic thing, I'm averaging like 40 in my Maverick highway doing 60mph.

>Only 2 ratios

Extreme doubt. The engine doesn't even drive the wheels, the electric motors have pretty much infinite ratios with the ecvt