>kinda want an m2>also kinda want a cayman gts >also really want a c8 z06>or a ct5-v blackwing>also maybe want an emira>a civic type r might be nice tooHOW THE FUCK ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO DECIDE
you take a look at your bank account then proceed to buy a 20 year old Camry
>>28691765You realizing nothing exists that checks all your boxes so you pick an old platform and build it yourself. That's the last (optional) redpill as a car enthusiast.
>>28691765ask your mom
>>28691772This.
>>28691765Test drive
>>28691765You want a CT5-V Blackwing. It's the Goldilocks choice among those cars. Loud, brutal V8, excellent handling, luxury, good size rear seats, good trunk space, comes in manual.
>>28691765>c8 z06One of the best sounding cars ever in my opinion, and 670hp from an NA V8? There is no substitute
>>28691851This. Numbers in no way tell you how a car feels on the road. Turbo lag sucks. No low-end torque sucks. Bad gearing sucks. Numb steering sucks. Wiiiiiiiide cars suck on narrow back roads and wide/long can't zip through highway traffic. Bathtubs suck. Not being able to see your corners sucks. Droning sucks. By performance numbers you'd never be able to tell why the 3-Series was a 10Best winner for 22 years straight. Driving one will tell you just how good they were.
>>28691765You pick one dude
>>28691765>>28691936CT5 without the blackwing. Trust me, a lot more comfy and still plenty hecktic if you want to floor it.
>>28694172>the 3-Series was a 10Best winner for 22 years straightWhich year did it end? Cause the last time I drove a 3-series, I was not able to tell why anyone would consider it a winner in any sense of the word.
>>28691765how did civic type r make it on this list?
>>286942212014.
>>28691765I literally made you a thread here: >>>28688834Type R is the budget choice on this list, so if you can really afford all the other ones its between the top 3.>>28691936Except no one on this board actually needs a full-size sedan.>>28694149Unless you want a manual.>>28694172The GTS is objectively the best driving of the bunch, end of story. Just not for the money.
>>28694225Honorable mention. It's what you get when you are on a budget but can't be as slow as a Miata or Toyobaru. Though the Miata/Toyobaru pull on you while you spin in first if not on warm stock/summer sport tires. You spend the least and get the least depreciation / costs of ownership. Really, all your questions are answered in the other thread.
>>28691765Test ride, buy used, swap the car for a different one after two years. Only way to try them all out.
Elantra N
>>28694225Afterthought.
>>28691765ct5 for dailymr2 for side huzz(have driven both and they great cars for different reasons)
>real performance cars>a CTR might be nice toowhat the fuck
Drive them and see? Contrary to what the retards here think, you can't fully comprehend the experience of a car by just looking at quantifiable metrics.
>>28691765Get a used Toyota Corolla or a pickup truck and spend the rest on a motorcycle
>>28694336Not a mature enough design to have conclusive reliability data yet, no amount of LLM rationalization will change that.
>>28694468cope
>>28691772>buy a 20 year old CamryAre there really no worthwhile FFs over in the states? Why does this particular car keep getting posted here? Are they just the choice of people who are too good for a Corolla?
Just skip everything and get a cgts. You'll end up at Porsche anyway you're you're poor.
>>28694592>unless you're
>>28691765>civic in the same list as a $100,000 porsche, a $120,000 corvette, $100,000 cadillac, $100,000 lotusThe M2 is also ridiculously outclassed in that list, but the civic just doesn't make any sense. I'm guessing you can't afford any of them which is why you have such a bizarro world list.
>>28694628The Civic performs the same as them on track, dont be mad brokie. If you were actually rich you wouldn't be flexing on /o/ and realize an Si is a stretch purchase for someone making 150k, let alone anything on that list.
>>28694638>civic fanboy calling others broke
>>28694641Post net worth and income if you are >>28694628
>>28694642>N-NO U!!!!!!!!1Dumb fanboy
>>28694641>>28694642Since you won't, I will give you a hint, if its not 200k and 2 mil, the CTR is a stretch purchase, let alone the other cars.The reality is that the country is poor and getting poorer, and if you dont understand that, you are an idiot even if you have a high nw.
>>28694650Keep yapping civic faggot. I don't care about your boomer ass "yOu CaN oNlY aFfOrD a $40K cAr If YoU mAkE $300,000!!!!" copes.
>>28694655Its not just that, its your attempt to elevate yourself above other doors by disparaging them. You being poor is not the key problem here. The key problem is trying to put others down for living within their means and focusing on things that aren't rational for you. Your father needs to do better.
>>28694656yap yap yap you civic driving fuck, reading way too far into my comments. Take your meds. It's stupid to compare a $50,000 civic with $100,000 sports cars. Conversation ended.
>>28694657> got smoked by civic> b-buttt I paid 100k> madMany such cases, buy ctr track-gap insurance
>>28694291>Except no one on this board actually needs a full-size sedan.I do :)
>>28691765If you are an Amerifat:>Buy any autotragic squarebox with MUH V8 inside like every nigger around youIf you want to turn:>Buy the only good car on your list>981 or 718 btw, both GTS are great
>>28691765Go drive them and pick the one that speaks to you. Unless it actually speaks to you, then ditch it like a bitch with herpes.
