They keep reducing the cylinders. Will there be inline 2 engines in a few years?
>>28702151>inline 2Why no Inline 1?
>>28702156You can't just skip over 2.
>>28702151EUpeons already had a few cars with inline 2 engines
>>28702159fuck, inline 1 it is, then.
>>28702164We need to go back.
>>28702151Fiat 126 from 1972 had inline-2 engine
>>28702164Already been there done that.Brits did a bunch of thumper cars. Also micro cars are a thing in Europe, their version of kei cars.
>>28702151Lord please give me a turbo 1.2L single cylinder thumper whumper.Oh lord please, make it a 2 stroke too.
1 cylinder10L55hphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjCglWXU8PsWe NEED to go back.
We need to return to 2strokes too.https://youtu.be/dXVRdSbKDT8?si=8h5R84mJtIpQ5DBh
Coming soon, the two stroke sedan.
>>28702258>two stroke sedan.
>>28702258>>28702246I wonder if with modern induction and exhaust tech 2strokes are actually viable for mass market, emissions aside. Fuel injected e-turbo 2stroke inline 6 engine would go unbelievably hard, probably.
>>28702299I got you bro
>>28702309Fuck
>>28702220A Lanz Bulldog car. I thought thetbwere only tractors. Any liquid fuel too. Bunker oil to alcohol. Waste oil and I bet with a short length of hose and a rubber seal, natural gas too.
>>28702362Is that an Inline engine?
>>28702151Just drive a dirtbike
>>28702362onecylinder
>>28702151It's been done.
>>28702164I prefer boxer 1
>>28702204Impressive Inline 1
>>28702311You know that image used to be a meme and now the cucks over at the EU are genuinely trying to figure out how to make that reality.
>>28702362They'd also run on their own engine oil if you didn't spin the pump before starting.
it's weird how little car people know about engines to think there are no twins.motorcycles have had parallel and v twins for decades
>>28702731>parallel and v twinsIs that new?
>>28702151Fiat TwinAir
>>28702164
>>28702698Those old school insane displacement 1 or 2 cylinder engines make my dick so hard.700hpout of a single cylinderprobably makes enough torque to spin the earth the opposite direction
>That unburnt fuelhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ef39OYR71oY>Normal drivinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxp1SLOsdAQ
The suzuki LJ50https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6ki7Sxd_Pk
>>28702151Less is more. Inline 4s as they are is kind of ludicrous with the amount of perfomance you can get out of them with shit like the Ford RS200 Evolution getting close to 600bhp in the 80s and the newer Mercedes M139 getting close to 500bhp...at factory production baseline. As soon as you look at tuned engines you go beyond that and if your batshit crazy you can look at track made engines like Thor and Thor 2 which can go up to 3000bhp.If you can squeeze that much out of just 4 cylinders going smaller in cylinder quantity isn't really a problem bar 4 cylinders being easier to balance compared to something like 3 cylinders. Beyond performance twin or single cylinders are just based on mere principle. Nothing comes close to reving single cylinder kinetically or audibly, it just pulls like a down syndrome's tard raging while enhanced by anabolic steroids. Two stroke twins have always been a based pick for bikes for similar reasons.>inb4 muh top end speedAgain beyond perfomance, besides just make the cylinders bigger and half the time you won't get many opportunities to reach top speed in your car anyway even if it was a real concern. However you will certainly be doing more quick impromptu drag races at traffic lights when you come across a fag trying to fuck you around in another lane.
>>28702151motorcycle twins make ~100hp out of 600-800cc of displacement, so i can actually see 1 liter ptwin making around 120-130 hp in something like a small hatch, and i wouldn't be even mad at it. Alto Works with 120 hp engine would be a really fun car to drive around town or on smaller tracks.
>>28703043Try 65-85hp. There's no way a ptwin for a regular car will get 100hp/liter, not even with a turbo. They'll be gunning for just enough torque at low revs not to bog down at a green light.
>>28703043Motorcycles make power at cost of lower torque though
>>28703057And motorcycles can have low torque because they are very light compared to normal cars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHUlTVURuGYhell yeah BRVTHER
>>28702151It will all be EV's bro
>>28703053Suzuki's 1.4L k14c i4 for their cheap-ish swift sport makes ~160 with just an ECU flash and can somewhat reliably (for around 60-90k miles) push out 200+ with basic mods. 100-130hp one liter twin seems very feasible to me, especially if we consider that engineering can smuggle a solid chunk of power in the higher revs and hide them behind emission compliant tune.>>28703057Power = Torque x RPM, routinely revving to 7k at each stoplight seems like a funny thing to do.
>>28702273Quintessential East german shitbox
>>28702698That's a flat 1 not inline
>>28702742
Toyota is regretting going with an i3 and replacing it with an i4. four cylinders will probably stay the minimum for cars as long as they burn gas
>>28702713That's just an EGR
>>28703043>i can actually see 1 liter ptwin making around 120-130 hpAre you dumb?
>>28703053Fiat has some 0.9L i2 turbo engine that has like 100HP. Can actually be remapped to over 120HP. Sounds like a fucking bee hive.
>>28703443>>28703449105hp stock, almost 200Nm, 875cc of displacement. If fiat managed, anyone from big 4 can pull it off too.
>>28703538*145Nm, flash gets you to 190
>>28702159Wat?I know about 3 (like 1000cc aygos or something); never heard of 2
>>28702211>The chocolate makerThat's literally how it sounded
>>28703043There were these guys who put a 1300cc Hayabusa engine on a Smart
>>28703710Was just about to tell anon here>>28703200>routinely revving to 7k at each stoplight seems like a funny thing to dothat he wants a 'busa swapped smart car
>>28703418Best kept secret
>>28702151>Will there be inline 2 engines in a few years?You can get lancia with twinair 0.9 2 cylinder engine.
>>28703703In Poland we called it "kaszlak" - from characteristic "coughing" sound of the engine
>>28704498It's called "peglica" in ex-yu, rough translation would be "small clothes iron", idk where that came from.
>>28703538That's the one. Ex had one, I got it remapped in secret through a friend of a friend. Shit was so slow both before and after.
>>28703538The current CBR600RR (599cc) is 120hp (@1,300 rpm).Its about 72hp @ 9,000 rpm
>>28704441Nice, but was talking about these guys, from 2 decades ago:https://m.youtube.com/@arrepiadohttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oPQIizRp9ckhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAM3gswitxQ
>>28702211I hate those stupid little engines so much...
>>28704891The 600rr doesn't have a piss twin...
>>28705194post the rest of the car
>>28702299Ferrari attempted to make an emissions compliant 2 stroke engine.iirc it uses ordinary poppet valves and a supercharger to avoid burning so much oil.also liquid cooling helps allot.
>>28705709stupid wops forgot to add mount points for a transmission?
>>28702214>Also micro cars are a thing in Europe, their version of kei cars.Not these days. Even Smart got sold to the Chinese and they won't make the Fortwo again.
>>28703032In the end, engines are air pumps. People have weird fixations on their parameters.
>>28705728pastaniggers probably figured the body mounting points are good enough to align everything
>>28702164what about a v1 engine
>>28703340Lets not forget the Melkus RS1000>2 stroke i3>1.2l>90hp at 6000rpmThose are honestly impressive numbers for the late 60s and socialism
>>28705841That's like 75HP per liter. There are many late 90s krautscheiße with less than that.
>>28705841Soviets were ahead of the game with 2-strokes back then. Ernst Degner changed all that.
>>28702273Weren't Wartburg 4 cylinder?
>>28705897nope, they're 3 cyl and trabant was 2.
