The New Twingo leaked before the revealTwongi bros we are back.
Are we going back in time to the late 2000's?
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/new-%C2%A317k-renault-twingo-leaked-ahead-6-november-revealWhoops forgot the article
>actual knobs for AC thank fuck
>>28703218But a stupid square steering wheel. Why ard car makets doing that? It needs to be round so you can slide it between your fingers when straightening up.
>>28703234Bottom needs to be cut of so tallfags don't whine about their knees and top needs to be cut of to manlets and women can see the road
>>28703212>Twongi bros we are back>EV>backI don't think so, pal.
>>28703266what car is more perfect to be an ev than twingo? rwd prefferably
>>28703212Looks like plastic wheelarches, but painted in body color>>28703218Glued on tabled, disgusting
>>28703266twingo would have been an EV from the start if it made sense back then. it's mean to be cheap and practical city transportation.
>>28703212Renault literally saving the entire auto industry while VAGshit keeps dragging everything down.I hate germs so much it's unreal.
>>28703324if only they offered engines with more displacemen than 1300cc
>>28703212>Twongi bros we are back.Are you retards for real? It's just a Twingo skinwalker, it's just as fucked as any other nucar.
>>28703212looks nice, too bad it's EV slop
Reminder that Twingos dont actually exist.Its a psyop from euros to demoralize the rest of the planet.>Twingo debut- 1992>Photoshop commercial release- 1990
looks good, shame about the door handle
>>28703341Some of their hybrids come with a 1.6 or 1.8 NA engine tuned for efficiency, which sounds a lot like what Toyota is doing. I don't think they have those eCVT power splitter things though.Reviews seem a bit mixed on whether the gearbox switching sharply between gears and power sources is distracting or not.
>>28703463The fuck are those wheels? What happened to 14 and 15 Inchers?
>>28703475That's the concept model, OP is the production model
>>28703463Those donk wheels are fucking abhorrent and destroy the look of the entire car.
>>28703463oh my.
>>28703212why cant these fuckers put one normal engine why
>>28703218>mandatory tablet
imagine killing renault sport and reviving 4, 5 and twingo - just to make them ev memes
>>28703212Looks like one happy nigga/10. Twingo love, even if I hate Renault.
>>28703218As far as mandatory screenslop goes, a standalone iPad mini is at least better than a huge slab of glass that stretches from steering wheel to passenger
>>28703900>standalone iPad mini It's a cheapo Samsung SoC, IIRC.
>>28703212Those door handles are straight off the Zoe. Though I get why Renault recycle parts, it decreases costs in areas where most people don't care. Plus, Zoe door handles work just fine.
>>28703212I want it. Too bad retarded frogs won't sell it in burgerland even without it having to pass emissions testing or fuel economy standards being an EV.
>>28703234So the wheel doesn't slip as easy when people inevitably use their knees to steer.
>>28703302>ev>cheap and practical
>>28703215With ozempic I hope so.
>>28703212>we are back>EVshitEhhh. A couple people will buy it because of it's "cute" looks, but it's not going to have the same motorsport-oriented cult following as the old one since it doesn't have a gas-powered engine and manual transmission.I'm sure it'll sell since it fits the current Euro meta of EV city cars, but that doesn't exactly make this "Twingo 2.0" despite what it's name and appearance may imply.
>>28703212It looks cute. I hope its range won't be some pathetic 200km deal. Any car with real world range less than 400km is not a real car for me. But the R5 was great and can supposedly be leased for not much more than a monthly bus ticket.
>>28704240>R5 was greati keep hearing this but never see it on the road
>>28703319Twingi is excite
>>28703767Who is this retard quoting?
>>28703218This looks like shit desu they haven't even tried to mimic the original interior.
>>28703920Move to France if you like it so much. If you are black or brown, you won't even need ID to get in and get bennies!
Someone's mad.
luv twingo'ate evsimple as
>>28703234I mean it could always be worse, to this day Poogeot still insists in using this ridiculously tiny steering wheel for their entire line-up.
>>28703920>I want itMy condolences to your family
>>28704660and yet still it brushes my knees and obstructs dashboard.
>>28704534Comfy and soulful.>>28703218Cold and sterile.What happened to car interiors?
Besides the fact that it is an EV (which honestly at this point has become a literal requirement by the EU, can't blame Renault for it) I kind of love this thing. It is a small hatchback release that isn't jacked up or SUV-ified with actual control knobs and no "hurrrr angry design make grug's 3cyl econobox manly" pretenses.I wish for Renault to sell many of these to make the point known that people do still want hatchbacks and that crossovers are on the way out.
>we want the ^_^ audience
>>28704534Memphis Design pastels would likely find little acceptance with today's public.
>>28703212>>28703218Unironically looks based
>>28703280>rwd prefferablyUnfortunately it's Renault so it is likely FWD like the Renault 5 EV is. Also the previous generation of Twingo was fucking REAR ENGINED RWD because it's a Smart that looked slightly better. Before that they were their own thing and logically FWD.
>>28703341>forgets the legend 1.5 dCi
>>28703212No gas engine ?Dont care.Twingo demands a shitty twin turbo setup.
>>28703212It looks so happy!
https://insideevs.com/news/778201/renault-twingo-e-tech-ev/>With a starting price of under €20,000 ($23,000), Renault wants its new Twingo E-Tech to undercut all the budget models coming in from China. Cars like the BYD Seagull (also known as the Dolphin Surf) are excellent and offer remarkable value for the money, but Europeans would still choose something local if it were similarly priced. At least that’s what Renault hopes, and it’s making extra-sure of that by injecting some nostalgia into the mix.>Unlike the two-door original, the new Twingo has four doors for considerably more practicality. The two rear seats can individually slide 6.7 inches (17 cm) back to up more knee room for rear occupants or forward to expand the trunk capacity, which is 12.7 cubic feet (360 liters). Fold the rear seats and that expands to 35 cu-ft (1,000 liters).However, it gets a smaller 27.5-kilowatt-hour (usable) LFP battery pack, giving it a WLTP range of up to 163 miles (263 kilometers). By opting for LFP, Renault says it has reduced the cost of the battery pack by around 20%, even though it admits that it has a lower energy density than NMC. The Twingo’s battery is even smaller than the base 40 kWh pack you get in the Renault 5, and it offers considerably less range than the 5’s big 52 kWh long-range pack, which is good for a claimed 250 miles (400 km).One area where Renault has saved money is in the power of the DC fast charger, which only goes up to 50 kW. But for such a small battery, even that low charging power is still good for 10% to 80% in 30 minutes. There’s also an 11 kW AC charger, which Renault thinks will see the most use, which can charge the car from 10% to 100% in 2 hours and 35 minutes. The Twingo EV also features vehicle-to-load (V2L) bidirectional charging and can supply up to 3.7 kW.
MERCI, TWINGO!
it's officially revealed:https://www.renaultgroup.com/en/magazine/our-group-news/new-twingo-sparking-joy-in-cities-and-brimming-with-tech/it will be produced in europe (slovenia)
my first car, my first love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTnG6EYdNHgWell it's certainly cute and has nice interiors. I like the back row having a slide function so it can have multiple uses. But with that range, it's an inner city car. Probably a secondary car you buy for small errands.
>>28706300The sliding rear seats are classic Twingo, only the mk3 didn't have them because that was a Smart with a bodykit.
Looks very fucking based. Also>around €10k with EV incentives Yeah Renault is cooking lately, I want to see them do a sedan in this retro style now. Both the R5 and R4 are bangers, and the Twingo is amazing.
>>28704424I think it outsold the Tesla Model Y in Europe in october.
Is it legal to add a hidden beer compartment on a small EV city car?
>>28706345Good lord that's a tall dash.
>>28706351Yeah they mention a "letterbox" kinda view, but the bonnet is so short there isn't much to see.
>>28706331>>around €10k with EV incentivesNo fucking way, where would this be?
>>28706366In Italy it can go down to €9,900 with the best incentives.
Small EVs: this or the Dacia Spring?
>>28706373This won't be out until late 2026/early 2027 whereas the Spring already exists. And EV development is so fast that we don't even know how things will be in a year. Maybe the Twingo range will be considered unacceptable compared to other competitors that are sure to pop up.
It's so lovely.
>>28706497Lovely but lovelier than a Mini Cooper? I'm not so sure. A low mileage used Cooper EV has similar price and range but much more powerful motor. BMW i3 is also a very cheap, practical EV secondary car.
>>28706514True but you would have to buy used, and the i3 is very very old at this point. The Newingo is brand new and has more modern features, you get full coverage airbags and ADS as standard + autopark if you want.
>>28706514A few people leased an i3 near me. When the lease ended...
>>28706518That's true, as new it's really hard to beat the Twingo price. That small LFP battery is pushing costs down hard.
it's cute, i'd buy it if i wasn't a hopeless poorfag
>>28706532It's a poorfag EV.
Do you think it will be possible to trick it out?
I like the design a lot. I will see how things go, maybe I buy it in 2027-2028
>>28706559not that kind of poorfagi can literally barely afford food, and not even every day
>>28706580You have bigger problems than a car then.
>>28706584i believe most of you have way bigger problems than me, but that's another topicanyway, the car is really cute, cutest since mk1
