Now that the Maverick 300T exists, do you really have any reason not to buy one?
>>28704696My mom wont allow me
>>28704696Great, a turbo 2.0 liter with 300hp that will last 60k miles. Sign me up.
>>28704696Not being retarded is a pretty good reason. Why buy this when you can have literally anything that isn't a pickup?
>>28704696>not single cab or extended cab
>>28704696My girlfriend says they look like small penis cars not trucks.She actually laughed when I showed her pictures.She laughed harder when I showed her the engine power figures.
>>28704786what's his name?
>>28704801Aileen
>>28704696Smart people already have their hybrid one
>>28704786The power figures and 0-60 on every maverick engine option are all probably better than what she drives"Car girls" hate Mavericks because they always love Subaru, and the Maverick is basically a direct subaru competitor to their whole lineup, but cheaper more reliable and more logical.
>>28705025>Smart>CVTPick one.
>>28705033I wish I could be this confidently fucking retarded at anything in my life.
>>28704719Considering the Maverick 2.0L option just got a power reduction for 2025 because the transmission was weak on the old ones, just bolting on a bigger turbo is probably an awful idea. They do require the 4k tow kit which adds extra cooling, but wtf is the point of this truck with 300hp? It's already very fast with the hybrid and it's 247lb-ft torque combined output. Not much high end but low end is what you need in both a truck and getting around comfortably.
>>28705035I own a Maverick and it pisses off every Subaru girl. Way more people are interested in it than bashing it. The hybrid is the only one to buy, it's both more reliable and cheaper than the EcoBoost and it's also faster 0-60 for the first couple seconds - which is what matters more in daily driving. Power down low.
>>28705034eCVT with planetary gears and infinite ratios from electric motor. No belts or chains. It's more robust and simple than a regular auto slush box.
>>28705033She drives a Lexus RX350
>>28705050Small dick energy for sure
>>28704696I’m waiting for flying cars
>>28705050This is basically a Honda Element designed for retards
>>28704696What does the 300T have that makes it a better truck? Is it now body on frame? Is the engine now longitudinally mounted? Is there at least a non direct-injected engine option now? Is there now a single cab option at least? Did they at least lower the MSRP to make it a $20k truck in base trim as was promised?No to all of those things? You mean it's now just a pigfat auto-only Focus ST wearing a "pickup" costume? Damn. Neat for those that want a '''sporty''', compact, unibody CUV LARPing as a pickup truck I suppose but I'll pass.
>>28705347Whoever's running Ford nowadays should probably kill themselves for discontinuing every car that isn't the Mustang and replacing it with a truck.
>>28704696>it's just a turbo kitlmao
>>28705050>faster 0-60 for the first couple secondsSo, it's slower to 60?
>>28704696I don't need one.
>>28705386It's slower 0-60 but faster 0-30 and faster 40-60. Any more questions on how hybrids work
>>28705275Okay so it's the same as the hybrid and slower than the turbo maverick. Her horsepower figures don't matter when rx350 is 500lbs heavier than a maverick
>>28705347Don't worry, it'll handle your yearly visit to Home Depot for 3 bags of dirt just fine
>>28705059It's still a CVT. It's shit
>>28705560Well there no mild hybrid manual or geared autoYou don't seem to understand that the 0-30 is faster than every other stock truck on the road. It immediately has electric torque served to 4 wheels and spools up to the ~5600rpm max and holds it. When you floor it you experience maximum power output within 1 second without gradual acceleration, it just fuckin launchesYou faggots can keep going on about your shitty manual vehicles that haven't been made for over 20 years and/or act like there's some sort of invisible alternative in new vehicles that isn't a poverty spec NA 4 cylinder colorado or tacoma with a 12 second 0-60
>>28705566The 3.0TT i6 dodge rams are the fastest "regular" trucks currently on the road.
>>28705050>>28705539It's slower in every measurement of acceleration. Cope more retard. >hybridC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 7.4 sec1/4-Mile: 15.7 sec @ 90 mph100 mph: 20.4 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 7.3 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.7 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.9 sec>2.0TC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 5.9 sec1/4-Mile: 14.5 sec @ 95 mph100 mph: 16.4 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.7 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.2 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.2 sechttps://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a61791307/2024-ford-maverick-hybrid-reliability-maintenance/https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a38516737/2022-ford-maverick-xlt-fx4-by-the-numbers/
>>28705780Cars that take longer than 5 seconds to reach 60 mph should be illegal, its unsafe.
>>28704696They should make one with Focus RS drivetrain, complete with the meme AWD drift mode
>>28704696Bring back the 1985 Ranger. It's all we need.
>>28704696I have no need for a pick-up cuck. My SUV does everything I need on the utility front.
And to which wheels does it send this power to?
>>28704696Is it AWD?How much can it tow?What sort of MPG does it get?What does it cost?If its cheaper and gets better MPG than a Ranger; but can still tow a decent load it might be interesting. I can't see it being much fun to drive though if that's what they're going for.
>>28707315This is just a regular Maverick with a bigger turbo>>28707254All 4 upon launch
>>287047194 cyls have been making that reliably since the 90s
>>28707555Obviously the maverick we just said that
>>28704696Very cheap interior at a high price
>>28705347No one would buy the single cab pig fat truck you say you want retard. You drive a 01 corolla
>>28704696Mavs are good for hauling a few bags of potting soil, not much else.
>>28707824Anything you can put in the bed under 1,500lbs wtf are you talking about?
>>28707824That's 99% of truck buyers anon. The real competition the maverick has is used trucks
>>28708064People who want mavs do not want full size trucks
>no v8maverick is for gygacucks
