>Ferrari gets a movie about Enzo>Lamborghini gets a movie about Ferrucio>Maserati movie about the brothers coming soonIt isn't fair. When will it be our time, Porsche-sisters? Fucking Maserati is getting a movie before us. Is it the Israeli Mossad agents in Hollywood holding us back?
>>28707346Probably. They don't want to portray a Nazi SS member as a regular guy, they only allow dehumanizing and demonizing portrayals. It's all propaganda. The world is a stage.
As if THEY would make a honest portrayal.
Italians are the definition of soul, and the history of the design, production and racing of their cars goes beyond autistic engineering the Germans are known for. Classic Ferraris, Maseratis, Lamborghinis, Alfa Romeo’s, Lancias, etc all evoke emotions that one would never find in a German car. So why bother making a movie about them?
biopics will happen when we win
>>28707346I want a brutally honest Ford movie.
>>28707872Dodge brothers
Fucking never ever
>>28707873We'll get Adrian Brody and Sasha Baron Cohen to play them.
>>28707346PORSCHE DID NOT CREATED PORSCHE it was his son ferry ,ferdinand created volkswagen and tanks ,he did not gaf about racecars
I would love a movie set in the WW2 era that focused more on the rapid advancements of technology in both the military and civil fields.
>>28708073>PORSCHE DID NOT CREATED PORSCHEAbsolute retard take by any measure.> it was his son ferryWrong. Porsche AG was founded by Ferdinand, Piech, and Rosenberger.Ferry was just a nepo-baby using daddy's resources while he was in jail to hotrod VWs until ultimately making the first Porsche-brand Porsche with the 356.
>>28708708I thought like that his son created automobil porsche from volkswqgen ,from the kdf or beetle and that his father never made any other cars beside the typ 87 and its deriatives for the german military thankss for the clarification Plus i just found out he also made a concept car in 1938 , should ve done better researches hahaSo was he also the man behind the 770k at merced cuz i read he was like the ceo
>>28707346Is it sad that I knew immediately when that photo was taken?
>>28709016>this many typosPost hands