Thoughts on pic related?
>>28754836cuck mobile. Get a KIA
>>28754836Breddy good, especially if you can find a manual one.>>28754852Then you'd have one cuck-mobile and one Honda. I'd rather just have the Honda desu
>>28754862If they weren't of such questionable quality I'd rather a Genesis over an Accord simply because of RWD vs FWD.
>>28754836man the new prelude looks awful
>>28754836car
>>28754899red
>>28754942tru
>>28754836
>>28754963more like a turd
>>28754836Ehh
>>28754836only appealing if you're over 40 or brown
>>28755024I'm brown and over 40 and this doesn't appeal to me
2dr versions of a 4dr platform look weird. get something that was designed as a 2dr, or just get the 4dr version
>>28755115What's weird about it?
>>28755118Lots of front and rear overhang with a short hood and high belt line just makes it look stubby. They’re still good cars regardless especially with a V6.
>>28755158>Lots of front and rear overhang with a short hood and high belt line just makes it look stubby.every FWD coupe looks like thisand if it doesn't it's an inefficient design sacrificing aero and interior space for looks
>>28755219I guess that’s why the segment is essentially dead now. Well, except for the new Prelude.
Gay, 2004-2007 version does the same job at a fraction of the price and operating cost
>>28755251the 08-12 is the best one actually since it has the J35 and double wishbone suspension
>>28754836kia is better
>>28754836nice high res pic for opening thread
>>28754836Memes aside it's objectively a good car,not a track missile ofcourse but a good choice if you want to commute in somenthing a bit more fun than a RAV4
>>28755158>>28755247where did it all go wrong
>>28756433more like where did it go so right?
I have one. Got it in 2017 with 40k miles Now has 160k miles. The power steering is heavy, the 5 speed auto is a bit sluggish. I love the look. It's big and spacious inside unlike other cuck coupes.My ideal garage has always been a pickup and a big car. # of doors, fewer always preferred but never deal breaker.Can't go wrong with them.
>>28756448v6 ?
>>28754836If I want a cheap shit FWD front engine car I will go on a KiaCheap and easy to work on it
>>28755158>Lots of front and rear overhang90% of cars ever
>>28754836The V6 6-speeds are based but harder to find, V6 automatics are a ticking time bomb. I owned a 7th gen with the 4 cylinder auto, all around good car, extremely reliable. However it was so gutless I couldn't get the wheels to spin no matter how hard I tried to launch it
is the v6 or 2.0T better?
>>28757486why is there such a big dent in the side of your dads car?did someone back into it with a flatbed or something?
these were great carsif you find one in manual it will literally last forever
>>28757567Rear wheel drive means nothing on a daily driver. You're not drifting through the streets on your way to work. You're not doing donuts on the way home from the grocery store. You're not doing burnouts in the burger king drive through.Or hell, maybe you're a gigantic douchebag and are actually doing those things.
>>28756433I cannot WAIT long enough for all of you 80s fags to die already so that people can finally stop claiming this was actually good looking.Can the chinese government organize an actual lethal plague this time around? not the test case that covid was.
>>28757592you're obviously trolling but I'll bite. I also used to hate 80s cars because all I would see was old chrysler K cars and chevy cavaliers but you can't deny the 80s hondas (CRX, 3rd gen prelude, EF civic, DA integra) are some of the best to come out during that time. it's about proportion, balance, harmony. if you seriously think the fucking 9th gen accord looks better than any of those you need to see a doctor so that they can study your retardation.
>>28757682>if you think this normal uninteresting car looks better than these normal uninteresting cars you're clinically retardedI just don't think either of them are that interesting. Sorry.
>>28757688I'm not saying they're the sportiest sexiest cars ever but I'm sorry you can't appreciate objectively good design.
>>28757697>objectively good designliterally no such thingno accounting for taste and all that
>>28757706obviously I'm accounting only for people with good taste. people with bad taste are irrelevant other than the fact that marketing types listen to them.
>>28757486>They couldn't fully unbangle the E60 when making the F10Lmao
I drove an 8th gen coupe 4cyl all the way from 60k mi to 230k mi, never did much besides basic maintenance, until I replaced it with a Maverick, it's still in the family and my sister is now enjoying it.>VTC always rattled every start since 60k, ignore it, does nothing >oil leaks>23mpg>engine feels good, redlined it nearly everyday to 7100rpm>feels about the same as the Maverick in turns meaning mildly boaty thing and NOT sportscarMy only real regret is that I didn't get a civic instead, the accord was too big for one 6'2" guy driving around in city 90%, yet at the same time not really more useful to me than a civic. All around it was a great comfy dd, but I'm sure an 8th gen civic would have been about the same comfort, but gotten 28mpg instead of 23-24mpg, after nearly 200k mi that would have saved me $5000+ on gas. Plus civic insurance being cheaper... parts/tires all being smaller and 20% cheaper.It all adds up, if I just bought a civic instead of accord I would have saved over $10000.
>>28754836sharp looking car
>>28754836sloppy looking car
>>28757554if manual, V6 is betterif auto, the 2.0T + 10spd is better
Two-door Hondas and Acuras are for subhumans.
There are multiple reasons why it's the chariot of the lord. Coupes are nice since being based of a sedan there's plenty of room in the rear, v6 models are quick and fun, still not any faster than most npc traffic nowadays but I've trolled a couple v6 muscle cars and the odd n/a BMWs being a dick on the highway. My 7 gen v6 gets about the same mileage as the 4cyl coupe,around 26 mpg both stick. If you get have to get auto I would at least go for the acura counterpart
>>28754836Two-door Hondas and Acuras are for Aryans.
>>28754836brown car
>>28754836V6 is the best option for this. 2.4 is fine, but eats through head gaskets faster than even a WRX (I speak from experience), but I would avoid the 1.6T like the plague.Find one in manual too, unfortunately, I was put in a position where I had to buy that car and no other car as part of a sale agreement. The CVT model (which I have) is having rev issues with the odometer at 60k miles. 4 door with sport bodykit lacks the space.Treat it as an car and drive it until it cannot anymore. Simply put, consider it an oversized Mitsubishi Mirage. If you want a good car try to find one two generations before at least with low miles and check the rubber components.Not to hijack the thread, but I will be buying a motor scooter next, since this Honda is costing me more than I make. If you want, I will trade it for a Yamaha motor scooter of under 50cc. Just know, modern Hondas are not all that reliable, but they are more reliable than whatever VW is making, for example.
flipping civics is a great idea. parts are easy to find, people buy em up quickly and nearly everything you can do with the car has been documented to death both in english and your favorite minority language.
>>28757682Design wise they just look like boring plastic boxes to me,and they all look the same too
>>28754836nice mustang
>>28764104>everything needs to look like an ANGRY TRANSFORMER and have AGGRESSIVE ANGLES because I need to be OVERSTIMULATEDyou are 12
>>28765481He's not wrong doe? >>28756435looks nothing like an angry transformeryou're just assblasted technology has allowed us to do better geometric shapes than the typical shitbox of the 80s.Besides, most of us would actually prefer to survive a rollover crash instead of being crushed to death. Nothing stopping you from buying the shitboxes of the past. Safety standards and basic physics will NEVER allow shitboxes to come back.
>>28765487>doemental midget detected. you are incapable of understanding sublety. there are good designs in all decades but the 8th gen is not one. it looks too bulbous and it has too many busy unnnecessary lines. the beltline is way too high and the way it sweeps up makes it look unbalanced. just because you can do things with stamped sheet metal doesn't mean it looks good, just look at the bullshit hyundai comes out with. >safetynobody cares, I was talking about aesthetics.
>>28765523The 6th gen was where it went to shit. At least cars in the late 1990s didn't have belt lines at driver's ears like nu-Accords do now. The 8tth gen and on is everything wrong with Honda.
>>28765523you lost , stay mad. go jerk off to your wannabe aesthetic somewhere else. kick rocks incel
>>28765535>you lostwe're not even having the same conversation and you will never get it. I feel sorry for you.
>>28765534I drove my 8th Gen accord for 300000km on nothing but fluid changes and I gave it to my sister, they seem to be just fine
>>28765574that's not impressive for a honda drivetrain.
>>28754836hmm its ok
>>28754836KIA>Civic
>>28755247>the new PreludeIt looks like a 90s Mitsubishi Eclipse.
>>28765593>oil at 5k and trans at 30Any platform would go >500k when driven nicely and treated this way.
>>28754836cvt
>>287687076mt