Final nail in the /o/ coffin
>>28765093mfw: I refuse to accept it. I REFUSE I REFUSE STOP KEKING ME!
>>28765150Ooh new happa face drop. Kinda ugly but those plump DSLs, to use the parlance of our times, will be useful in jail.
>road tests, reliability, satisfaction and safetyOut of those, only reliability is relevant, and perhaps how much visibility you have while inside the vehicle.
>>28765093When the Brown Man first moves to the west buys his Brown Man's Wheels and the interior takes 6 months to fall apart rather than the one day it takes for the average car in his home country, it's a good quality car.
Put on a trip, spamming faggot.
>>28765093>final na-ACK
>>28765622>BMW being the only make that can compete with legendary Japanese reliability despite being a high end performance car Holy based
>>28765093>when you fail the test, but you're fucking the teacher so he gives you an A
>>28765622>highest is 66 and it’s Toyota famous for ‘debris in the engines’ all cars suck now
>Land Rover consistently in the bottom three on every one of these chartsEvery time.
>>28765149yeah but only the latest bmws with b series engines are reliable. none of these are reliable, as matter of fact they are probably the exact models that gave the stereotype bmw=unreliable
Consumer Reports is a fucking joke.Its based entirely on owner feedback and not actual mechanical failures or issues.>Tesla trunk seal needs to be re-glued in the corner, douche owner complains about it.>Hyundai wheel falls off, Paco bolts it back on and continues with life.
>>28765622>2026
>>28765622>only reliabilityOnly emotionless soicucks only think it is relevant for the purely soul sucking boring cuckbox/appliance. BMW won on the overall card: road test, reliability, satisfaction, and safetyBMW always wins baby.
>>28766323Reminder, BMW owners consider this regular maintenance.
tfw signing for a toyota today
>>28765093>Subaru 2ndProves the entire list worthless. This is clearly based on vibes and cherrypicked biased user claims with zero factual data factored in.
>>28766649Subarus post ~2012 are pretty bulletproof.
>>28765242i just creamed my pants
>>28765789>only gets that reliability by learning from ToyotaJAPS CAN'T STOP WINNING
>>28767615what engine is in the GR Supra again?
>>28767636The most unreliable piece of shit engine ever put into a Toyota and something that doesn't belong in there, but it's not a Toyota to begin with so whatever
>>28765622Toyota will be the most soulless ass drive of your life but hey atleast it breaks down slightly less than the cars that are way more fun and actually have some semblance of fun driving.
>>28765093>which includes road testsvalid>reliabilityunreliable polling>satisfactionunreliable>safetyreliable but according to what metric?In otherwords, its unreliable metric
>>28766323Targetted microscope on Tesla makes the whole ranking on Tesla useless. While at the other end, blurry muddy glass on for other brands makes those metrics unreliable as well.
>>28767648>reliable but according to what metric?Euro NCAP
>>28765093This is based on 2025 models. So obviously not the poorfags here with the shitty old bmws
>>28765093>We ranked .... and safety. The values and ratings of vehicles aged between 2 and 5 years were compared.
>>28766369Is it not? All it requires is removing the oil pan and loosening a few bolts every 50-100k miles. Its an easier job than changing out a clutch.
>>28767687ill literally never care about a bmw until it makes its way onto the poorfag tier list
>>28767687No it's not.
>>28767687If that's true then the chart is less than worthless because of course a car with less than one year on the clock won't have any issues, that's like bare minimum.
>>28765093>Mercedes and Amerifatshit brands
>>28767760Normal engines don't eat rod bearings. There shouldn't be any visible wear, even at 100k
>>28767795>He doesn't know how consumer reports works
>>28767795Retard
>>28768119That doesn't say it's 2025 cars only. You probably don't know but you can buy cars from older year models too.
>>28768173I guess I'm the idiot for expecting a BMW tard like you to be capable of basic comprehension. My bad
>>28768239Goyotajeet here https://www.motor1.com/news/781991/most-reliable-car-brands-2026/>The rankings are the result of an in-depth analysis covering approximately 380,000 vehicles. The data spans model years from 2000 through 2025, with a selection of newly released 2026 models already included. This wide range of vehicles allows Consumer Reports to assess both long-term ownership trends and the early reliability of newer vehicles entering the market.
>>28769759>Uses a totally different list with different metricsIt's all so tiresome dealing with you people
>>28765093D- is actually pretty solid for ford. keep up the good work boys!
>>28770377The list in OP also incorporates this list in its final judgement. BMW is king, simple as. You get what you pay for.
