[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>fall in love with picrel
>/o/ tells me its a piece of shit
>/o/ tells me to get a murican v8 of some sorts instead
assholes, all of you
>>
>>28767424
Well, did you buy one?
>>
ugly motherfucker, especially in that shitty grey
buy something pre-2000 if you want a decent car
>>
matte paint on high end cars is atrocious
>>
>>28767424
>matte paint
>black wheels
>temu universal duckbill
classy
>>
>>28767430
of course not. you killed my dream
>>
>>28767439
no its ludo. and that paint is oem
>>
>>28767465
It wasn't much of a dream then, sounds like you just got saved from a really expensive impulse purchase
>>
>>28767468
dunno i got a carrera T instead
>>
>>28767476
That's way better then, what are you complaining about?
>>
>>28767465
So you are buying a mustang instead?
>>
>>28767479
because i still cant stop thinking of the c63s
>>
>>28767534
get a rolling shell and stick an LS or RB engine in it
>>
>>28767424
there are some easy tells about a car.
for example let's take the 2008
mitsubishi pajero 3.8 iv vs land rover range rover vs bmw X vs jeep cherokee vs mercedes ML
for the bmw and the merc the version doesn't matter, all fall in the same price bracket. ie ML350 goes for 9k the ML63 AMG goes for 10k
that's for prices around here.
pajero -> 20k
lr rv -> 5k to 15k
cherokee -> 6k
bmw X -> 8k
ML -> 10k
in 2008 the 3.8 pajero was 60k new, now it's 20k
aside from the cherokee, the rest of the others were 80k to 150k depending on the options.
how come a supercharged range rover with 400+ hp cost 10k now?
well it's obvious, it's unmaintainable. the same applies for the rest of the lineup except the pajero.
the pajero is slow, it have the r/d lock, esp and tcs and a trasfer box, it isn't as good as a merc g that has 3 now and costs around 200+k, but it goes everywhere the merc g goes
it also doesn't have pneumatic or hydraulic suspension, it doesn't have excessive electronics and ridden with screens and most importantly it doesn't use hydraulic fluid to open the sunroof (looking at you merctards) so you don't have any fear of getting hydraulic fluid on your seats.
why is this piece of shit the most expensive now, whilst being the least expensive as new?
it's slow, it's simple, it's fixable.
now apply the same shit to this c63
>>
>>28767611
some people want a car thats fun and has soul. even if that means you will have to spend money on it
>>
>>28767612
you can buy reliable fun cars.
for example the sl 65 black series has all the hydraulic garbage removed and it's a coupe instead of a hardtop.
so, just by that here's a 7k-10k reduction in maintainance and replacement parts cost.
also, you will have more fun with a 1100kg 250 hp car than a 500+hp 2000kg car.
>>28767612
>fun and has soul
do you know what's the target audience of a luxury sedan with hydraulic suspension that costs 100+k?
balding 50+ year old c-suite excecutives that want comfort, not fun.
>>
>>28767612
kek no new german has any soul. bmw has a little more soul but its still all souless, especially a comfo-status box like a mb. try a pre 2013 german
>>
>>28767624
the c63s coupe is neither a sedan nor does it have hydraulic suspension
>>
>>28767624
idk but tearing up the autobahn in a glorious v8 is fun to me. a 4pot shitbox can’t compete in the slightest
>>
File: file.png (43 KB, 951x297)
43 KB
43 KB PNG
>>28767639
>4pot shitbox can’t compete in the slightest
>>
>>28767424
it's quite ugly tho, reminds me of old CLK.
>>
>>28767639
>tearing up the autobahn in a glorious v8 is fun to me
then do it in a man's car, not one designed for faggots.
imagine spending corvette, or viper, or exige money on a car to "have fun" and you go out and buy the most dumbed down experience.
>>
>>28767640
Those figures depend on the battery charge thoughbeit. It's slower than the old 4.0 C63 in all but ideal conditions
>>
>>28767476
it's actually really sad that you let a bunch of autistic retards you don't even know make your decisions for you. how have men become so feminized
>>
>>28767424
Buy it, enjoy it for a year or two. Sell it at the first sign of major trouble. Thats what everyone but does, even the original owner.
>>
>I let internet strangers influence my decision on a car that I was never going to purchase/attain regardless of being a wrenchlette/poorfag
Pottery.
>>
>>28767424
It probably looks good in any other color combination, but modern mercedes has bullshit build quality like everything else today.
>>
>>28767640
the 4pot could be twice as fast and it would still be soulless and gay in comparison
>>
Buy the thing and lose your ass on it when breaks down, who cares
>>
>>28768098
>lose your ass
>a few thousand us dollars
grow up and sort your shit out you sperg
>>
>>28767640
will benchracers ever understand that its about how the car makes you feel, not it's stats on paper
>>
File: s63 coupe.jpg (3.44 MB, 3840x2160)
3.44 MB
3.44 MB JPG
>>28767424
>2+2 Mercedes-Benz coupe
>it's not pillarless
>marketed as the C63
>looks inside - 6.2 or 6.3L V8 as the badge suggests? nah, generic downsized euro-compliant 4.0L TT
So close. I won't tell you to get something American, get something M113K or M156-powered instead. That is to say, AMGs from the early '00s to the early-mid '10s. Either that, or a newer M157-powered AMG if you can afford it (5.5L V8, yes badged as a "63" but at least it's not the generic 4.0L).
Interior quality on most MBs from the past decade or so is also abysmal. I know the V8 and performance is what one buys it for, but they've become so cheap and plastic-filled compared to older models. They've got the RGB lights and big screens consoomers like however!
>>
>>28768183
depends on how autistic they are. people with pure aspergers are devoid of all normal human feelings. i think in that case their level of satisfaction with things they use literally would actually come from their stats.
>>
File: 169761405.jpg (221 KB, 1024x767)
221 KB
221 KB JPG
>>28768310
>That is to say, AMGs from the early '00s to the early-mid '10s
Take the jagpill
>>
>>28768336
jags are cheap as fuck. Or an aston martin.
>>
>>28768692
aint that good for us on the used market (or you mean cheaply built?
>>
>>28767611
kek, 2008 is one of the very best years for Range Rover reliability
>>
>>28767467
>and that paint is oem
Doesn’t make it any better.
>>
>>28768336
Nobody wants a Jag. That’s why Jaguar stopped making cars.
>>
>>28767424
I feel like cars like this are for rich people who wish they could have a rodded up 74 Chevy Nova but everyone would think they are poor and they wouldn't have the mechanical skill to keep it running anyway.
>>
>>28768720
Also for people who want a car that can turn and stop.
>>
>>28768720
>projecting
>>
>>28767424
>listen to the petty, bitter, jealous, weeb losers on /o/.
Found your problem.


Just buy it yourself. Or just research in the MB forum or whatever.
>>
>>28767534
Salam aleikum brother
>>
>>28767424
Pssst, hey, never fall in love with a car before the depreciation curve has kicked in; you'll grow to hate it soon enough, especially if it's a non-survivable compu-car
>>
>>28767465
Good
>>
Just buy it. You can then act like hot shit by taking random pics of it in parking lots and barren fields, be sure to post food pics as well.
>>
File: 1762923504500625.png (116 KB, 400x400)
116 KB
116 KB PNG
>>28767465
If your conviction was so weak that a bunch of retards on the internet changed your mind then you don't deserve anything of value.

You sicken me
>>
>>28770621
This
I'm confident you could drive fucking anything, if you adopt an attitude that you're king shit, you can be a resident /o/ shitposter
>>
>>28767467
>ludo
Die.
>>
>>28767424
The recent c63s have been total dogshit. A v4 hybrid engine replacing a normal V8? Are you serious? There's a reason people lease these pieces of shit and don't buy them. And those saying get an American V8 are telling you that in case you want to actually own something that won't break down and cost $30,000 to repair, which you're apparently not interested in
>>
>>28767439
Really its so hideous.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.