acceptable looking still doesn't actually make it acceptable
>>28767802Soon to spawn the new Ford Fiesta.
>>28767835The only thing that I don't like about it is the abysmal interior space. It's as big as a Golf 4 but has barely more space inside than a Smart for 2
car slop for useless eaters.
Nah it looks retarded IRLThey designed it to look right on RAMZ, but every R5 I saw so far was a base model so the narrow wheels disappear in the fenders
>>28767802Outdone hard by the Inster. Way cheaper EV with more modular design after your needs. Huge space in the back row too.
>>28767802What about the new Twingo?
>>28767929But it is the ugliest car of 2025
>>28767931I don't like how smug it looks.
>>28767939Wait till the Alpine version comes out and you'll see smug.
>>28767929Bro I've gotta be honest with you, this looks like utter shit.
>>28767929It looks so ugly completely beyond comprehension
>>28767931I fear the first facelift they'll do on it will be about removing the headlight n_n bows with only the actual headlights remaining so in the end it will look like -_-
>>28767931It's based.
>>28767955>>28767948>>28767934Honestly even if I like the car, I agree. It looks like shit. They really went all in on function over form. I still would pick this over the R5 due to how great and modular a 4 seater it is. It's won a fuck ton of awards just because of how relatively cheap, small and practical it is. Also "only" weighs 1300kg in its extended range form which is for EV standards pretty light.
>>28767977>They really went all in on function over form.Absolute meme excuse. There are ways to make functional design look good and not awkward like that but apparently then it would look "too boring" for car journoids and the rest of the cattle.That car has too many horribly clashing awkward design bits going on.
>>28767984Those mismatched window lines are, to me, the worst offender.
>>28767931>4 doorit's shit,why do you goys even like it
>>28767931
>>28768297could have been WAY worse to be perfectly honest
>>28767959I highly doubt it, that would completely defeat the point of making it a mk1 throwback.
>>28767802Soon TM
>>28768541
