[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


strange how the early 2nd gen F-bodies (70-72) when they were still actually a performance car are hardly remembered but everyone remembers the malaise/mullet F-bodies from 75 onward when they were a fast-looking shopping cart.
>>
>>28770207
Late 70s Camaros just look better
>>
gm never should've did the retro model camaro because they peaked on the last 90s gen
>>
>>28770207
I think they sold more, actually a lot more post-OPEC embargo.
>>
>>28770207
Because '77-'80 Trans Am.
>>
File: 20251118_183731.jpg (1.94 MB, 4032x1908)
1.94 MB
1.94 MB JPG
GM workers were on strike for 2 1/2 out of the 4 years they made them, so they didn't sell a whole lot. '73 was the only full year of production. Probably has a lot to do with it.
>>
File: 1766076106870.png (25 KB, 284x1020)
25 KB
25 KB PNG
>>28770229
a fuckload more, though the Norwood strikes in 1972 put a huge dent in production capacity
>>
>>28770279
it's crazy how much more expensive the 1st gens are on the used market compared to the early 2nd gens when looking at those production numbers.
>>
>>28770279
the figures for 70-71 aren't bad in fact comparable to 1980-81 although they set some kind of records in 77-78
>>
Competition dried up significantly. The early 70s was the tail end of the muscle car era so performance cars were a lot more abundant. For similar reasons the Corvette also had record sales in the late 70s.
>>
>>28770207
Looks good, drives good. I don't make the rules.
>>
>>28770207
Because your young it seems that way
>>
>>28770207
god damn the split bumpers are good looking cars
>>
>>28770207
>hardly remembered
Not sure when you've last checked but prices are up bigly for '72-'75 anything because everything from '68-'71 has become true unobtanium. I bought a '73 Challenger for ~$17k a few years ago and have slowly watched '72-'74s climb to $25k for essentially no reason.
>>
>>28771054
>because everything from '68-'71 has become true unobtanium.

F-bodies with the six or small block V8s should be affordable but 396 or 427 ones ha ha yeah right
>>
>>28770207
Lol, that thing is $50K with an 8.5 to 1 mill. Check a 70 LT1 and report back.
>>
>>28770274
That is a beautiful car my man. What are you putting in there?
>>
>>28770291
Yessir, 67 and 68 are cheap also, relatively of course.
>>
File: 20250604_223417.jpg (2.38 MB, 4032x1908)
2.38 MB
2.38 MB JPG
>>28771061
Thanks bud. It's a 400 small block, my first ground-up build in a while. AFR 195 CNC heads and an Isky 280 mega cam. Got it running, broken in, and shredding tires already.
>>
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/car-show-classic/car-show-classic-1970-chevrolet-camaro-with-turbo-thrift-six-cylinder-power/

A genuine base model six. These probably can be had for $5k even though boomers will hate you if you bring it to a show.
>>
>>28771054
HAHHAHA I bought a 1970 R/T 383 4 speed for $1,100.
Man, that was a long time ago.
>>
>>28771064
ironically it's a lot more representative of what average Camaro owners had back then. the big block performance engines were actually not more than 15% of total production.
>>
>>28771063
That is going to be a boss, no doubt. Enjoy it (you will).
>>
Well my dad had a 73 Duster back in the day and it had the "little" 198 Slant Six.
>>
>>28771071
Hell yeah, brother. Thanks.
>>
>>28770207
Where'd you google that, wrenchlet? I'm not even a chevy guy and I know the early gen2s are way more sought after, nobody likes the later ones with the goofy fronts and conversion kits are sold to switch them back.
>>
As a young dude who was there before 2014, it's so strange how everybody flip flopped on this gen of Mero.

I remember every boomer and their mother loathing the split bumpers saying it was the worst camaro to ever Mero
Now fast forward and everyone applaudes them (rightfully so, while not my favorite Camero it is a good lookin car)


My buddy has one he inherited from his dead uncle, boy does he love that car man. Good stuff.
>>
File: 1979-chevrolet-camaro-z28.jpg (303 KB, 1920x1280)
303 KB
303 KB JPG
>>28773483
I like the later Camaro more but that's just one man's opinion
>>
>>28773495
>drives a Camaro
>can't even spell the name of his own car right
Checks out.
>>
>>28770207
The split bumper is one hot looking front end
>>
>>28773581
This molded nose looks a lot better than >>28770207, which looks like someone dried a towel over the rad support
>>
>>28773589
It's just the average level of mutt writing skills.
>>
>>28774095
they both look awesome.
>>
When I was in my teens, I thought anything that wasn't a modern supercar was gay.

Now, because of iPhoneization of cars, 80s and under cars are so sexy. I want a retro muscle car so bad. Is there a name for this



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.