Should I get evoke? I want your opinion on its performance, I dont care if it looks like a girls car
It's a Tata (India) with a Ford engine>performancelol? what do you mean by "performance"? it's a front-wheel drive SUV with a high center of gravity and an economy engine, you couldn't get any less performance oriented than that
>>28774170What car has similar size but better engine
>>28774162>SUVlol, fag
>>28774162no, its utter shitland rover is rock bottom in every reliability survey everthey've also gone all in on the whole screen only thing, ofc without having tesla's software engineering chops to back that shit upthey're also overpriced as fuckand they're owned by jeetsi literally cannot imagine a worse brand to choose to give your money to
um g-guys?
>>28774174for evoque money, you can get a model y performance. it will shit on anything short of 6 figure sports cars in perf. alternatively, a used model x plaid should also be in reach, if you need the extra space>inb4 tesla/EV shillsorry, i cannot recommend buying anything ICE brand new, they're unmaintainable.if you're willing to look at old enough vehicles, the standard options still apply. i guess. american suvs still came with naturally aspirated, port injected v8s until fairly recently, iirc 2020 is approx the cutoff for most of them. german stuff switched to turbo and/or direct injection earlier, ca 2015 or so. if you're willing to go used and/or old, you can easily get eg a cayenne from those days for new evoque money.
>>28774333>land rover is rock bottom in every reliability survey everbecause they're bought by stacey's who never service them until the 3 year warranty period is up, then they do a quick oil change and flog them on.At which point, the dumb cunt second owner is left with a land rover with a 100k engine with one oil change, no clutch, because woman driver, and then they go on reddit to vent.A well maintained LR is just as (un)reliable as any other marque. If they weren't, you wouldn't see literally millions of Discos still on the road here in UK, despite the horror stories.Same thing happens with Jeeps in the USA, I understand. Just buy a second hand one from an owner who take care of it and you'll be reet.
>>28774365no, they're rock bottom because they're poorly built, overcomplicated pieces of shit with absurdly expensive parts and labor costs to boot.and everyone knows that much.>literally millions of Discos still on the road here in UKafaik discos and etc land rovers are the vehicle of choice for the english upper class. and also its criminal class. and also a national icon. that doesn't mean anything about their reliability. you see a lot of bimmers and mercs and audis in germany too, they're still unreliable pieces of shit. not as much as land rovers, but still.
>>28774374>absurdly expensive parts and labor costs to boot.if you can't wrench a Disco, which is basically a C5 with more space under the bonnet, you should just go back to beta male school mate. The only thing 'complicated' that can go wrong is the air suspension, which is easy enough to fix, or the crank shaft (which is more Ford's fault, than LR). And if you can't strip an engine down, do you really deserve to drive a proper 4x4?
>>28774384>if you can't wrench a Discoim sorry, i thought we were discussing reliability?now i need to wrench on the fucking thing?>air suspensionah, nice, easy to work on in my garage right?what? no? i need a lift and a code reader to diagnose and/or reprogram the thing?and it costs 2k per corner?oh man, that land rover reliability>or the crank shaft wait, i also need to take the engine out and strip it down completely?wow, how fucking reliable
>>28774404>now i need to wrench on the fucking thing?serious beta vibes>wow, how fucking reliablebecause no american car has ever needed a new con rod. nope. not one, ever.
>>28774162I actually like the way these look, but they're dogshit mechanically.
