Show me better interiors under $40k
>>28774588$4000
>>28774588honda's ok the mazda fucking stinks
>>28774613Rented a CX-5 not too long ago, took us multiple days to realize the infotainment was controlled by that stupid ass dial down on the center console.
>>28774613>only 2 gauges
>>28774618sheeeeeeeeeit
>>28774588blud hiding the logos like anons don't have weaponized autism
>>28774588
>>28774588literally ever car that predates ipad hell beats this.
if you need it to be something new
>>28774600I like how the car has identifying nameplate on the INSIDE of the car.Truly they knew their buyers were going to need periodic reminders as they aged.>"yes maude, im out driving the...uh...what the hell is it....oh!..yea im in the grand marquis. I SAID GRAND MARQUIS!!.... now where am I going?"
kek
>>28774600love it
>>28774588Ok.'77-'79 thunderbird.Price @ trim level, about 6.5kW/ inflation, about 35k.
>>28774775what if I am not a procurer
>>28774588Not even a contest
Never ceases to amaze me how autistic some people are with having to look and feel their knobs instead of focusing on driving. No wonder there's so many accidents every year.
Best interior I've ever sat in from a build quality POV and a mint one can be had for like 8k everyday of the week
>>28774821>80s gm>Pontiac at thatliterally dogshit lol
>>28775137Cool but you're brown
>>28775137You eat dog shit straight out of the dog's ass when it squats in front of the derelict house you're squatting in
>>28774588I rly like the outgoing q3.~34k
>>28774588im new here (only 10 years lurking) what even is considered a "good interior"? no ipad and a lot of space?
>>28775493no TV in the dash, proper gauges, minimalistic but with enough buttons for everything, no bright lights.
Human civilization peaked in the 60s
>>28774588>electronic emergency brakeImmediate fail.
>>28774785Pussy
>>28775356>>28775359It's pretty ironic how these underaged retards use these terms when it applies to the dogshit interior they think is good because they've seen it in a picture onceYou're too stupid to realize how shit your taste is
>>28775583amazing.
>>28774588despite being cheap shit Citroen 10's interior looked very cool and not cheap at all.
You can actually get a great interior for less than 30k if you're willing to accept 149HP.
>>28775495Nice, but I liked it better with the analog gauges, though I love the fact that the screen is built in, not a glued-on tablet, and if you don't like it, you can just turn it off, and that section becomes piano black.
>>28775644>underaged>because they've seen it in a picture onceStop embarassing yourself Ranshid
>>28774618How long did it take you guys to figure out sex? You know, use your cock?
>>28775895Wait, what?
>>28775583More like dive bombed, 50's was better.
>>28775895When most nu-car screenslop uses touch displays, an interface straight from 2006 can be a little disorienting. There are few things I dislike more than full capacitive controls, and that's controlling a digital ui with a rotary dial. Worst of both worlds. I thought we had left that kinda thing behind with the iPod Nano
>>28775748>that huge ass tabletrevolting
>>28775077That's Mazda too
>eww screens yucky >Look at this 60 yr old shitbox.
>>28775748Sadly there is no good modern interior (last 6 years) that is also fast and reliable
A lot of you guys don't know what "better" means
>>28776673
>>28774588Nothing personnel
>>28774613Those are identical, the fuck you mean
