4 l Cayenne v8 makes over 600 hp so making a 900 hp 6+ l v8 for a truck shouldn't be a problem. It would would also need sporty suspension. Making it a bit less pigfat would also help. But the most interesting aspect would be aerodynamics since trucks are made with neither drag reduction nor downforce on mind.
>>28796249Ford's F-150 Lighting SuperTruck ran a 6:43.482 Nurburgring lap
>>28796261How is this even considered a truck at this point
>>28796249I would love to see how well a modern pickup would do. Gas or diesel should do well but diesel might have a little more overhead with how strong they are.
>>28796313Agree, it would be very retarded but I'd love to watch it go down, the same way Ford and Dodge are competing for the most capable factory Prerunner. Ford europe is selling these, but iirc it's mostly an appearance package at this point
>>28796249It would be an uphill battle.
>>28796308It's got a full tube chassis. It's an electric race car, not a truck.
>>28796249Volumetric efficiency is inversely proportional to capacity, generally speaking and omitting a lot of factors.
For what? Another excuse to make more hideous blob vehicles for "aerodynamics"?
>>28796405Starting point would probably be something like this but it's still massive>>28796405IIRC that Cayenne Turbo GT is the only track performance focused SUV at this point, or is there another one with similarly aggressive tire/brake/suspension changes?
>>28796470There's also the Lamborghini Urus and Audi RS Q8
