Car design peaked with the 1969 Corvette. Why are there no cars that look like this today?
Millennials wanted egg shaped blob shit soapbox cars instead so thats all we got in the late 1990s and 2000s.
Miata is always the answer.
I'm almost convinced the Mach 5 inspired that era of Corvette
>>28866029Emissions regulators wanted that shape the most. Reduced drag coefficient meant better gas mileage, and eventually it took over completely
>>28866028C2 is infinitely sexier though
>>28866063It's like asking who was sexier in her prime, Jennifer Lopez or Emily Ratajkowski. The proper answer is "I'd fuck both".
>>28866028Pedestrian safety
>>28866028C3 is the 3rd ugliest corvette behind early C4 and C8
>>28866203
the forbidden chop top
>>28866031That same body kit manufacturer just released a kit for the 2022-2026 Civic
>>28866217
>>28866218at least the seats are cool
>>28866217>>28866218>>28866219I'd buy it but I'd be mortified if I came across a real chally.
>>28866028The c3 is ugly as fuck. The c2 mogs it into oblivion.
>>28866203Those later C1s really got ugly
>>28866031so tempted to import one nglimagine if there was a t top version
>>28866181blurred rats is peakrobin was done dirty while pharell walks free
>>28866028liking the c3 is one of the easiest ways to tell someone has horrible tasteit's usually people that don't even own a car too
>>28866684t: blind zoomer, owner of civics
>>28866689it's literally zoomers that love this ugly piece of shit retard
>>28866203crazy how meteoric the downfall from c1 to c2 was
>>28866695Mhm mhm, sure.
>>28866908It wasn't meteoric. This was.
>>28866677You should do it man. I just love my PitCrew converted Mx-5. Wonder why Mitsuoka don't do the T-Top version?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9ZZU7u0dS0
>>28866033the Mako Shark inspired that era from 1961which also inspired the Mach 5and agreed, it is fantastic
>>28866202>>28866063C3 for me has a more angular, late 60s early 70s muscle car styling which I prefer but the C2 is also top tier
>>28866908you are crazy, the C1 looks tacky as fuck like most cars from that era, they actually toned down tackiness on all designs in the 60s>>28867120beautiful desu, the only ones I find ugly are C8 and C1
>>28866029millenials weren't buying new cars in the mid 2000s
>>28866028Peak car design is not a 2 seater that can't even fit a set of golf clubs in the trunk. You are a big dumb loser
Early C3s are one of the better looking Corvettes, while the late ones one are one of the ugliest. Same deal with 2nd gen F-bodies.
>>28867179Post tits
>>28866217>>28866250>challengerthat is a Fiat tho
>>28866218
>>28866695>it's literally zoomers that love this ugly piece of shit retardboomers were hot for it
>>28867179saw one of these conversions for sale near me not too long agoapparently pretty commoneven had shag carpet in the back
>>28867179Trunk?
>>28867229Does the back glass open or are you supposed to tear your rotator cuff pulling things in and out from the front?
>>28867493That one would have pop out rear glass at some point.
>>28866028>Car design peaked with the 1969 Corvetterespectfully disagree
>>28866028>Why are there no cars that look like this today?you might hurt a pedestrian
>>28866028>Car design peaked with the 1969 CorvetteLOL WRONGWhat we have here is the perfect automobile. Italian body design and flow wrapped around one of the best engines every made, the 351 Cleveland. De Tomaso Pantera.
>>28867568Bitch please, that looks like crap irl. Or "ok" at best, like an 80's Trans Am.
>>28867162>you are crazy, the C1 looks tacky as fuckmy favorite
>>28867493who caresit's for fuckin in
>>28866028Because nobody bought them when they make things like this
>>28867120but the c4 mogs c3 though?
>>28867568Every year I think I'm getting closer to having one, and every year the prices go up. Some day.
>>28867809Such as?
