>sit on top of a high voltage battery inside a box swimming in EMFThis is the reason colon cancer is exploding.
>>28871841>drink water and eat food contaminated with microplastics that come from tires
>>28871857Electric cars have electric tires
>>28871857>shit!
In seriousness it's probably drugs (the legal ones mostly), alcohol, processed meat, and not eating enough fiber (leafy greenss) so all that ultra processed garbage stays in the digestive system long after any nutritional value is gone.Alcohol is a known direct cause of colon cancer, who knows what all the new drugs from this century will do? We are the guinea pigs.
>>28871882You could get a graduate degree in creative math from studies like this>>28871841Or maybe it's overly processed, overly salted modern food with minimal fibre to buffer the stomach and colon against mucus dilution
>obesity still on a crisis level rise>stressful times = more comfort food and alcohol plus drugs>doom scrolling phone addicts also on the rise = less time to rest and healI don't care much for EV but I don't think it's EV's alone that's causing it I think it's just the environment and humanities generally bad impulse control
>>28871882>You could get a graduate degree in creative math from studies like thisIt's because they are lugging around a 1500 pound battery when a full gas tank weights less than 100 pounds
>>28871949It's obviously not EVs causing it. We're had lithium batteries in our pockets for decades, EMFs aren't causing cancer.
>>28871952Yes. It's that simple. And heavier cars with lots of torque and poor suspension require bigger, stickier tires that shed pollutants more quickly.
>>28871952>heavy cars go through tires quickerHas absolutely nothing to do with EV's, if the study were intellectually honest it would be saying "Truck and SUV tires create triple the pollution compared to compact vehicles" but that would go against the official narrative
>>28871961EVs of equivalent vehicle types are heavier. And yes going after SUVs, heavy "luxury" cars, and trucks for this would be fair. But they only get heavier when made into BEVs so yes it is a thing about EVs.
>>28871963Things are reaching levels of pigfat that you can't even comprehend, the BMW 5 series EV is the same weight as the regular 5 series. The suburban weighs as much as the f150 lightning
>>28871961>ahh my "official narrative" that EVs are bad for the environment from *checks notes* earth.com while all western governments were subsidizing them ahhh
>>28871974>BMW 5 series EV is the same weight as the regular 5 seriesA brand new 530i weighs 4000 lbs, i5 EV weighs 5,000 lbs or more.
>>28871978The 550e and the i5 are 4900lb>>28871976>earth.com published by LH2, an indian-owned AI slopbox-themed private equity firmI wouldn't trust anything that comes off of that site. Oil is subsidized much more heavily than EV's (up to and including invasions of countries and continual destabilization of the middle east, this makes slave labour easier to enforce), and trucks have very lax emissions requirements. I don't support EV's but the waters are muddier than most would care to register. Keep living whatever narrative you want, you're allowed to be wrong
>>28871987e60 is 3400 lbsthe reason nucars are so heavy is because communist emission regulations favor heavy carssuzuki jimny is banned in europe but a 5000 lb vagshitter is just fine
>>28871987my cars don't run on oil, they run on gasoline, which is taxed, not subsidized. if you want to go up the chain, EVs are predominantly powered by fossil fuels too and are actually less efficient at converting those fuels to energy, so oil companies really don't give a shit what you drive.
>>28871841We know the reason OP's colon is exploding
>>28871987>The 550e and the i5 are 4900lbYou (or he) said a regular 5 series. The 550e is a PHEV. The current regular 5 series weighs 4,041 lbs.
>>28872006Oh man, it almost looks like EVs are... noticeably heavier! Oh no!And don't try telling me 1,000 lbs is meaningless, my car weighs under 2,300.
>>28872000The books are extremely cooked when it comes to oil subsidies, for example the biggest subsidizer of oil production is Saudi Arabia (amongst the other middle east countries), which makes you wonder how they make such insane sums of money. Direct global oil subsidies are on the mark of about $2 trillion annually and set to increase substantially. Indirect support such as below-market rate or free loans and policy carve-outs give it another trillion in support
>>28872034Looks like we need more oil subsidies since fuel is kind of expensive
>>28871841>>28871857>>28871882>>28871952the answer to this isnt "my car better", its trains
>>28872034LOL nice job ignoring all my points. learn to read or prompt your ai better. btw the US is a net exporter of oil so saudi arabia is irrelevant.
>>28872046Yes we should put the vaccinated on trains and have them drill for oil in remote areas
>>28872047>btw the US is a net exporter of oil so saudi arabia is irrelevant.Yep. However when prices increase worldwide prices increase here. It's more speculation than supply and demand. Also, Saudi Arabia funded 9/11, fuck those guys.
>>28872047Your post had no intellectually honest content. Electricity generation in the states uses coal and natgas, not oil, also if you look at any country not part of the song and dance then you see way lower ratios of fossil fuel usage for electricity (france pictured). The goal of the US government is to keep oil prices low in order to prevent other energy sources from becoming more relevant domestically, and using taxpayer dollars to achieve that end (i.e. paying Saudi under the table). The *only* rationale for this other than rampant corruption which holds water is that Russia's economy is dependant on oil, so suppressing the price prevents Russia from having a stronger economy
Soaring oil prices really got the petrol sniffers asshurt huh?
>>28872075Your premise is correct but your image is WAY wrong.
>>28872081>(france pictured)
>>28872078More like it made evfags and /n/fags invade the board yet again.
>>28872083Oh well it should've said that. Only France is mostly-nuclear. They're the only one. Buuut, Africa is pushing back on France's use of slave towns for uranium mining in the last couple years.
>>28872084Sure anon, sure...
>>28872075lmao i never said electricity is generated in the states with oil. still ignoring my points and just rambling on about irrelevant bullshit.
>>28872102>my cars don't run on oil, they run on gasoline, which is taxed, not subsidizedI responded directly to this>EVs are predominantly powered by fossil fuels too and are actually less efficient at converting those fuels to energy, so oil companies really don't give a shit what you drive.If you can't connect what I said to this then you suffer from profound retardation
>>28872160you lack several layers of abstraction and are calling me retarded lol
