[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>3.0 Twin Turbo V6
>275 BHP
>32.5 MPG City
>56.5 MPG Highway

And this was back in 2009/10
>>
I don't think they did
>>
50mpg highway was easy until safety required twice the kerb weight.
Then women decided that all cars had to be truuks...
>>
File: X.png (199 KB, 1640x757)
199 KB
199 KB PNG
>>28888010
>I don't think they did
Here's your proof

https://autocatalogarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Jaguar-XF-2012-UK.pdf
>>
>>28887940
Those numbers are fudged, the v6 that made those mpgs was the diesel, not offered in the usa, and made less hp, something like 230. The v8 that made 270hp does like 15/25mpg (city/hwy)
>>
>>28888032
I stand corrected, they just turned up the boost for more power. Basically traded some long term disability for more power
>>
>>28888040
>disability
Durability*
>>
>>28888032
And also, it's diesel, diesel has more energy density than gasoline
>>
>>28888037
>Those numbers are fudged, the v6 that made those mpgs was the diesel, not offered in the usa, and made less hp, something like 230. The v8 that made 270hp does like 15/25mpg (city/hwy)
You're not even close to being accurate there



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.