I want this car
>>28893970so buy it
that rear...
Hatchback? More like... hunchback
it looks absurdly tiny and outdated irlthey are never ever gonna update it, its just gonna become an EV and disappear
Buy one dude
>>28893988Lmao my sister legit thought it was called hunchback, my first two cars were hatchbacks and it was a funny moment when she found out
>>28893970Looks cool, would buy / 10.
>>28893992doesn't look outdated at all
>>28894020it most certainly does, inside and out, and more so in person enjoy your decade old vehicle
>>28894022What do you recommend then
Man why can't gooks design cars for shit?
>>28894039kia sportagethey've hinted a new one is coming for 2027
>>28894044>gookmobileLol, lmao
>>28894022what does that matter? Modern over designed gook shit looks bad
>>28894047stop caring about exterior design, it doesn't matter at all, what matters is how new the platform is and how quality the features are
>>28893970I have the turbo sedan, it's comfortable, but heavy. I hate how much it looks like a red tesla because those are common as fuck now. It was special when I had one of the few 5 years ago.Still love it, going to ride it into the ground.
>>28894110>ugly ass interior>shit gearbox>rev hang>ugly front grille>3600lbs>$70,000No one wants that car.
>>28894050how does a "new" platform affect you. We're talking about economy cars here anon
>>28894126it means a new electrical architecture, generally better handling and ride due to a stiffer structure, better drive assist features, tech, and its just a sign they are putting effort in instead of giving you ancient slop that you fell for cuz of "wow muh sporty econobox" meme
>>28894120>no tablet that sticks out over the dash>front isn't Lexus-tier>only with an autotragic>Performance trim is $52,000Yeah, I want it.
>>28894134>it means a new electrical architectureirrelevant, if the system is reliable there's no need for a new onw>generally better handling and ride due to a stiffer structurenot a given at all. I don't believe that kias feel better than mazdas> better drive assist featuresI don't need assistance and even if I did they just stick the sensors and computers you need in>its just a sign they are putting effortwell you can pay a guy to dig a hole and another to fill it in and that demonstrates a ton of effort but nothing useful got done. Gooks put in "effort" because their cars suck. Mazda has been good for a long time
>>28893986Mazda has some of the best looking cars I have ever seen in my life. From the B pillar forward.
>>28894044>kia sportagewhat the fuck anon
>>28893970
>>28894203don't knock it till you try it
>>28894110Based >>28894120Ricer
>>28894120I've met a guy who had some 'special' first-edition meme release of this thing (something about it being in some rare yellow colour and you can tell it's such inside as it has the same colour stitching inside as others don't) and he was one of the biggest Jews and flogs I've ever met. He'd constantly quote people for his job at insane rip-off prices, legit' double than usual and he thought he was hot shit. But anyway yeah those cars don't look that nice IRL and I don't mean just aesthetics, but it didn't feel or 'look' quality, especially for the stupid price.
>>28893970I want a black one.
>>28894043Mazda have the best aesthetics out there, fool
>>28894221every modern suv is the sameif you've tried one you've tried them allheavy as fuck, floaty electric steering, totally isolated from the roadnot interested
>>28893970then buy it, i bought one a couple years ago>>28894022inside looks fine, still has buttons, only one screen and it isn't in your face front and center>>28894110almost bought one of these>>28894217i kek every time i look at my car in profile
>>28893970>fwd 5 door hatchback>2 litre MHEV>45.6 mpg>511 mile range>torsion beam rear suspensionMy 2004 1.2 3 door clio does better in range and economy. It's also lighter with fewer blind spots. Remind me again why anybody would willing buy a car built after 2010?
>>28893970C30 with 4 doors
>>28894800>19MPG>in a car like thatWhat is the fucking point then
>>28893970same, but the sedan version
>>28894915i had just reset itit does get shit mpg in the city though avg like 20-24mpg depending on how hard you acceleratehighway is alright thoughcloser to high 30s
Why do I like cars that look like this bros? And which one is the best one?
>>28894925That's terrible lol. What's the point of a small humiliation ritual like this when it gets the same fuel economy as a Suburban?
>>28894927the crapola is the sensible choice, but i'd go for the bmw. mazda gets an A for effort though.
>>28894929I suspect that if anon drove a suburban the same way he drives his mazda it would get much much less than 19mpg
>>28894110The refresh really fixed the front, too bad Nissan cleared them at discount before then
>>28894927Ford Focus
>>28894929>What's the point of a small humiliation ritual like this when it gets the same fuel economy as a Suburban?becuase i like driving it, and i don't like driving suburbansif you can afford gas who cares what you drive if you enjoy ityou do enjoy your car, right?>>28894927wish the civic still looked like this
>>28894915>>28894929He's got the turbo ( i do too) and he must be trying real fucking hard to win all the speeding tickets. I drive like an idiot and I still manage 23.5mpg. The advertised numbers are bullshit though, literally impossible to do in the turbo even with granny driving.
>>28894927I hope that bmw is edited
>>28894927the 130 or mk7.5 gti. the corolla is slow as shit unless it's the gr. however the gr has the same economy interior and looks like a bulbous toad. the r is more pricey but it has "awd" the gti is way cheaper usually and better overall desu.hatchbacks are superior, they're compact, they're agile and quick as fuck (talking about mk7+ gti, haven't driven newer mazda/corolla) too many retarded sedan plebs here. if i wanted something long and boat like i'd get a fucking truck.
>>28893978fpbp>>28894110Based>>28894120Pleb. Go back to your audi.
>>28895122unfortunately no, and its the shitty fwd 1 series as well
>>28894043Mazda is consistently putting out the best looking cars today, and its not even close
>>28893970P
>>28893970Watched this yesterday. Mazda rated well.
>>28895221>Porsche>ANot looking at the rest.
>>28895221I hear the cx-90s are pretty bad
>>28894099Have you found the sedan's trunk to be adequate?
>>28893970sedan looks better
>>28895192E
>>28894266That's what she said.
>>28893970I've been heavily considering a Mazda3 for my next car. I just wish they still made the Mazda6 and I wish it came in AWD. I'd get a used 6 if they were AWD. Also, I know the hatchback would be way more practical but I hate the way it looks. I'd probably get the sedan>>28893992>it looks absurdly tiny and outdated irlHow tiny is it? Would a 6'2" gentleman accustomed to driving crown victorias be able to comfortably fit in a Mazda3 for a road trip? I've seen a fat YouTuber who owns one and he seems to like it
>>28894800>listening to dungeon synth while driving
>>28895221ameribros…
>>28895221>every car brand>just the mainstream npc brands
>>28895221V6 challychud BTFO
>>28897999front seats are fine, i'm 6'3" and fit greatback seats have small amounts of head and leg room for adults, at least for the hatchjust go test drive one, or rent one for a couple days
>>28895294Smear campaign
>>28898402>front seats are fine, i'm 6'3" and fit greatThat's good to know. I rarely transport people in the backseat of my current rather large vehicle. I'm starting to think a small car like a Mazda3 might actually suit my needs quite well
>>28894927unironically
>>28893970its one of those cars that just stands out on the road. id get one even though most mazda's base demograph are vagina's.
>>28894217The king called. He wants his crown back.
>>28899572Holy fuck that's sad. Not surprising for me as I like cars with big asses and long/pointy noses of any sort. Like the wedge cars, hatchbacks etc.
I hate Americans so fucking muchFuck all our bloated pigfat SUVs and crossovers, give me fucking WAGONS
>>28894841>why anybody would willing buy a car built after 2010?This. And not just about cars, there's a lot of user products out there that peaked in that decade.
>blocks your path
>>28899716Agreed. My current cars are 2004 and 2009 (2009 I bought 2 days ago). And I seriously want to keep the 2009 for as long as I possibly can. And this isn't coming from a place of "woah this car is new [to me] wow so exciting!", either. Post-2010 cars really drop off a cliff in my opinion, across the board, not just in aesthetics, or whatever else, just overall. 2000-2010 is the best decade overall in my opinion and for what I want. Don't get me wrong, 90s are probably my favourite for aesthetics, interior and exterior.
>>28899572>>28899597>hey sung boong kim, what car design we copy today>how about porsche and nu vw beetle at same time?>can we give him supra headlight too>ha ha ha haa soooooo i bowr dowrn verry highry
>>28899662wagons are GAY as FUCKthe ultimate cope mobiles for sad dads
>>28899723only shitters need that window
>>28899754yeah, if people need a little bit more storage space they just need to get disgusting bloated pigfat SUVs and truggs
>>28895221Cool source, bro.
>>28898085Peak sovl
