there is no replacement for displacement
True but small displacment takes more skill to tune and a cracked out small engine is more enjoyable, in my honest opinion.
>>28904816>displaces you
>>28904844whos driving
>>28904846the holy spirit
>>28904816Forced induction literally is.
>>28904816>there is no replacement for displacem-ACK
For the bellow average iq american anything turns into a political issue and a matter of religious belief. Thankfully some of them dont have these shackles and advance technology.
>>28904839Yeah but making 500 rwhp with sub 3 grand via a ford big block, a DIY porting job, and various other bits and bobs etc is funny
>>28904854based alternator fan
>>28904854Sick turbo tat my dude
>>28904846A child
>>28904816>doesn't consider displacement per minute>revving intensifies
>>28904816True, but on the other hand:funny smol brum brum cars
>>28904816BASED
>>28904816>there is no replacement for displacing the tears of i(n)ce(l)s.
>>28904816tractormaxx
>>28904839I used to be like this, and it's true that keeping smol high output engines requires more skill, but ever since junk car brands picked up on the trend and ruined its legacy, the bigger displacement NA and turbo engines are looking better and better
Gallo 12? Gallo 24? Nah bro I need that Gallo 48.
>>28905072>more power than torque torquelet bitch
>>28905267>t. revlet
>>28905267Power and torque always cross over at a specific RPM. Do you know why anon?
>>28905270>revving to 7k>calling others revlets lollmao
this terrifies the 4bangercel
>>28905311you make more hp than tq retard lol post your dyno sheet (you won't)
>>28905329>giving money to the dyno kikeKWAB
>>28905365you never dyno tuned your shitbox lmao
>>28905381>xhe needs a dyno to tell xim if xher shitbox is fast
>>28905270Imagine having to rev your shit to make power. Couldn't be me.
>>28905418imagine thinking you can make more hp than torque if you're a revlet>>28905398extremely low iq post
>>28905455Where did I say that, little torquelet?
>>28905471quote which posts were yours and i'll tell you
>>28905475>>28905267>>28905418>>28905471
>>28905485ok post your engine or dyno please i want to see what kind of torque you're talking about
>>28905495>deflecting Answer the question before we move on
>>28904816Correct. There is no replacement, only cope. Forced induction is cope. All else being equal, the larger engine performs better. For a given power level, a larger engine is less stressed and will generally last longer. Midwits confuse and conflate racing regulations, government regulations, comparing turbo to NA, and other such variables when forming their cope arguments. The enlightened enthusiast either enjoys his smaller displacement vehicle for what it is, or seeks out something more.God I love big engines.
>>28905502it seems to me like you either don't understand the relationship between hp and tq or you're just pretending not to however i am willing to consneed if you're able to shut me up be posting a pic of a big boy engine hanging out in one of your cars.
>>28905519>posts the slowest piece of shit imaginable
>>28905543Pic was just for attention. My suzuki from the Ford administration was faster. I enjoy the schporty. What do you ride? Also ad hominem is not a counterargument.
>>28904816TurbochargerSuperchargerMore cylindersVtec
>>28905538It seems to me you're a torquelet bitch so I ain't reading all that
>>28907969>More cylindersThat's more displacement
>>28908963you drive some 200hp jap trap don't you lol
>>28909117What's bigger, four quarts, or one gallon?
>>28905418Based displacement haver
>>28904816technically yeah.even with loads of boost you will hit the wall eventually and the only way to make more power will be more displacement.>>28909117well iirc more cylinders does/did result in more power and thats the one of the reasons why ferrari liked using v12 engines.i dont really get exact science behind that but my guess is that with more cylinders you get more power strokes for the same displacement, resulting in more power.Thats the reason why rotaries make so much power from such small displacements, they have like three times the power stroke compared to regular 4stroke.
>>28911528More cylinders allow for smaller pistons which can be used to make more rpm and more rpm = more horsepower. More power stroke pulses do contribute to more power but simply because more cylinder = smoother spin = higher rpm ceiling = mo powa. The only real limit is volumetric efficiency in rpm range optimization, increasing area of torque in the power curve, and last boost for 100%+ volumetric efficiency (boost has the flaw of lag, sure you can use boost to build more power but big dick displacement can just out punch boost, by the time the turbos spool, the big NA motor is already gone, lag sucks and boost is overrated, big dickplacement NA motor is the way to go, only reason for turdbo is to have power while fitting into gay emissions regulations)
>>28904816I feel this more with towing, a more powerful smaller engine shouldn't tow more rather tow the same amount quicker.
>>28904846your father
>>28904852>>28904903>>28907969Cope Turbo 3.0L=500 hpTurbo 6.0L=700 hpNo replacement for displacement.
>>28912252>engineers when rotational velocidensity enters the chat
>>28912252>Turbo 8 litre 1200 hp
>>28912252The 6L will make that on single digit boost while the 3L will need upwards of 20psi. The 6L will be much more "drivable". Displacement is king. >>28912510It would be pretty hard to make that little if you're talking aftermarket. People street drive Vipers that make over 3000hp. Twin turbo big block V8's in promods are making over 6000hp these days. Where are the 6000+hp RB's, 2J's or B58's?
>>289092411 lb of feathers
>>28912608But 1lb of bricks is faster
>>28912616I dun get it
>>28904868It's also pretty funny to slap a turbo onto a tired old motor and see what it can handle before popping.
>>28905162>2 cars>2 liters of displacement between them both How bleak
